An Inter-Laboratory Comparison for the Urinary Acrolein Biomarker 3-Hydroxypropyl-Mercapturic Acid (3-HPMA)

1. Fagerström, K.O. and K. Bridgman: Tobacco Harm Reduction: The Need for New Products That Can Compete with Cigarettes; Addict. Behav. 39 (2014) 507–511. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.11.002 Search in Google Scholar

2. Institute of Medicine (IOM): Clearing the Smoke: Assessing the Science Base for Tobacco Harm Reduction; National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA, 2001. Search in Google Scholar

3. Institute of Medicine (IOM): Scientific Standards for Studies on Modified Risk Tobacco Products; National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA, 2011. Search in Google Scholar

4. Biber, A., G. Scherer, I. Hoepfner, F. Adlkofer, W.-D. Heller, J.E. Haddow, and G.J. Knight: Determination of Nicotine and Cotinine in Human Serum and Urine: An Interlaboratory Study; Toxicol. Lett. 35 (1987) 45–52. Search in Google Scholar

5. Bernert, J.T., P. Jacob III, D.B. Holiday, N.L. Benowitz, C.S. Sosnoff, M.V. Doig, C. Feyerabend, K.M. Aldous, M. Sharifi, M.D. Kellogg, and L.J. Langman: Interlaboratory Comparability of Serum Cotinine Measurements at Smoker and Nonsmoker Concentration Levels: A Round-Robin Study; Nicotine Tob. Res. 11 (2009) 1458–1466. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntp161 Search in Google Scholar

6. Minet, E., G. Errington, G. Scherer, K. Newland, M. Sharifi, B. Bailey, M. McEwan, and F. Cheung: An Inter-Laboratory Comparison of Urinary 3-Hydroxypropylmercapturic Acid Measurement Demonstrates Good Reproducibility between Laboratories; BMC Res. Notes 4 (2011) 391. DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-391 Search in Google Scholar

7. Göen, T., K.-H. Schaller, and H. Drexler: External Quality Assessment of Human Biomonitoring in the Range of Environmental Exposure Levels; Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 215 (2012) 229–232. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2011.08.012 Search in Google Scholar

8. CORESTA Task Force Nicotine Uptake: Final Report of the Task Force Nicotine Uptake; CORESTA, Paris, France, 2009. Available at https://www.coresta.org/sites/default/files/technical_documents/main/Nicotine-Uptake-TF_Final-Report_0.pdf (accessed December, 2016). Search in Google Scholar

9. Food and Drug Administration (FDA): Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents in Tobacco Products and Tobacco Smoke. Established List; A Notice by the FDA on 04/03/2012, FDA, 2012. Available at: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2012/04/03/2012-7727/harmful-and-potentially-harmful-constituents-in-tobacco-products-and-tobacco-smoke-established-list (accessed December, 2016). Search in Google Scholar

10. Stevens, J.F. and C.S. Maier: Acrolein: Sources, Metabolism, and Biomolecular Interactions Relevant to Human Health and Disease; Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 52 (2008) 7–25. DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.200700412 Search in Google Scholar

11. Sanduja, R., G.A.S. Ansari, and P.J. Boor: 3-Hydroxypropylmercapturic Acid: A Biologic Marker of Exposure to Allylic and Related Compounds; J. Appl. Toxicol. 9 (1989) 235–238. Search in Google Scholar

12. Mascher, D.G., H.J. Mascher, G. Scherer, and E.R. Schmid: High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic-Tandem Mass Spectrometric Determination of 3-Hydroxypropylmercapturic Acid in Human Urine; J. Chromatogr. B: Biomed. Sci. Appl. 750 (2001) 163–169. Search in Google Scholar

13. Schettgen, T., A. Musiol, and T. Kraus: Simultaneous Determination of Mercapturic Acids Derived from Ethylene Oxide (HEMA), Propylene Oxide (2-HPMA), Acrolein (3-HPMA), Acrylamide (AAMA) and N,N-Dimethylformamide (AMCC) in Human Urine Using Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 22 (2008) 2629–2638. DOI: 10.1002/rcm.3659 Search in Google Scholar

14. Eckert, E., H. Drexler, and T. Göen: Determination of Six Hydroxyalkyl Mercapturic Acids in Human Urine Using Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography with Tandem Mass Spectrometry (HILIC-ESI-MS/MS); J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 878 (2010) 2506–2514. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.09.003 Search in Google Scholar

15. Carmella, S.G., M. Chen, A. Zarth, and S.S. Hecht: High Throughput Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Assay for Mercapturic Acids of Acrolein and Crotonaldehyde in Cigarette Smokers’ Urine; J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life. Sci. 935 (2013) 36–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2013.07.004 Search in Google Scholar

16. Pluym, N., G. Gilch, G. Scherer, and M. Scherer: Analysis of 18 Urinary Mercapturic Acids by Two High-Throughput Multiplex-LC-MS/MS Methods; Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 407 (2015) 5463–5476. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-015-8719-x Search in Google Scholar

17. Alwis, K.U., B.C. Blount, A.S. Britt, D. Patel, and D.L. Ashley: Simultaneous Analysis of 28 Urinary VOC Metabolites Using Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-ESI/MSMS); Anal. Chim. Acta 750 (2012) 152–160. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2012.04.009 Search in Google Scholar

18. Carmella, S.G., M. Chen, Y. Zhang, S. Zhang, D.K. Hatsukami, and S.S. Hecht: Quantitation of Acrolein-Derived (3-Hydroxypropyl)Mercapturic Acid in Human Urine by Liquid Chromatography-Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry: Effects of Cigarette Smoking; Chem. Res. Toxicol. 20 (2007) 986–990. Search in Google Scholar

19. Alwis, K.U., B.R. deCastro, J.C. Morrow, and B.C. Blount: Acrolein Exposure in U.S. Tobacco Smokers and Non-Tobacco Users: NHANES 2005–2006; Environ. Health Perspect. 123 (2015) 1302–1308. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1409251 Search in Google Scholar

20. Lindner, D., S. Smith, C.M. Leroy, and A.R. Tricker: Comparison of Exposure to Selected Cigarette Smoke Constituents in Adult Smokers and Nonsmokers in a European, Multicenter, Observational Study; Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 20 (2011) 1524–1536. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1186 Search in Google Scholar

21. Minet, E., F. Cheung, G. Errington, K. Sterz, and G. Scherer: Urinary Excretion of the Acrylonitrile Metabolite 2-Cyanoethylmercapturic Acid Is Correlated with a Variety of Biomarkers of Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Consumption; Biomarkers 16 (2011) 89–96. DOI: 10.3109/1354750X.2010.533287 Search in Google Scholar

22. Morin, A., C.J. Shepperd, A.C. Eldridge, N. Poirier, and R. Voisine: Estimation and Correlation of Cigarette Smoke Exposure in Canadian Smokers as Determined by Filter Analysis and Biomarkers of Exposure; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 61 (Suppl 3) (2011) S3–S12. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.09.020 Search in Google Scholar

23. Scherer, G., J. Engl, M. Urban, G. Gilch, D. Janket, and K. Riedel: Relationship between Machine-Derived Smoke Yields and Biomarkers in Cigarette Smokers in Germany; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 47 (2007) 171–183. Search in Google Scholar

24. Roethig, H.J., S. Munjal, S. Feng, Q. Liang, M. Sarkar, R.A. Walk, and P.E. Mendes: Population Estimates for Biomarkers of Exposure to Cigarette Smoke in Adult U.S. Cigarette Smokers; Nicotine Tob. Res. 11 (2009) 1216–1225. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntp126 Search in Google Scholar

25. Sarkar, M., S. Kapur, K. Frost-Pineda, S. Feng, J. Wang, Q. Liang, and H. Roethig: Evaluation of Biomarkers of Exposure to Selected Cigarette Smoke Constituents in Adult Smokers Switched to Carbon-Filtered Cigarettes in Short-Term and Long-Term Clinical Studies; Nicotine Tob. Res. 10 (2008) 1761–1772. DOI: 10.1080/14622200802443718 Search in Google Scholar

26. Frost-Pineda, K., B.K. Zedler, D. Oliveri, S. Feng, Q. Liang, and H.J. Roethig: Short-Term Clinical Exposure Evaluation of a Third-Generation Electrically Heated Cigarette Smoking System (EHCSS) in Adult Smokers; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 52 (2008) 104–110. Search in Google Scholar

27. Tricker, A.R., I.J. Jang, C.M. Leroy, D. Lindner, and R. Dempsey: Reduced Exposure Evaluation of an Electrically Heated Cigarette Smoking System. Part 4: Eight-Day Randomized Clinical Trial in Korea; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 64 (2 Suppl.) (2012) S45–S53. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.08.013 Search in Google Scholar

28. Carmella, S.G., M. Chen, S. Han, A. Briggs, J. Jensen, D.K. Hatsukami, and S.S. Hecht: Effects of Smoking Cessation on Eight Urinary Tobacco Carcinogen and Toxicant Biomarkers; Chem. Res. Toxicol. 22 (2009) 734–741. DOI: 10.1021/tx800479s Erratum in: Chem. Res. Toxicol. 25 (2012) 763. Search in Google Scholar

29. Theophilus, E.H., C.R. Coggins, P. Chen, E. Schmidt, and M.F. Borgerding: Magnitudes of Biomarker Reductions in Response to Controlled Reductions in Cigarettes Smoked Per Day: A One-Week Clinical Confinement Study; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 71 (2015) 225–234. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.12.023. Search in Google Scholar

30. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG): List of MAK and BAT Values 2015; Wiley, Weinheim, Germany, 2015. DOI: 10.1002/9783527695539 Search in Google Scholar

31. Feinberg, M.: Basics of Interlaboratory Studies: The Trends in the New ISO 5725 Standard Edition; TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 14 (1995) 450–457. DOI: 10.1016/0165-9936(95)93243-Z Search in Google Scholar