1. bookVolume 3 (2016): Issue 2 (December 2016)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2354-0036
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

From Big Bang to Big Gap? Potential Links Between Agency-Communion Orientation and Perception of Creativity in Computer Science

Published Online: 30 Dec 2016
Volume & Issue: Volume 3 (2016) - Issue 2 (December 2016)
Page range: 363 - 378
Received: 09 Mar 2016
Accepted: 08 Oct 2016
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2354-0036
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

This study provides preliminary data on the dynamic role of participants’ agency-communion orientation in their perception of fictional students’ agency, communion and creativity, depending on descriptions of stereotypical and unstereotypical traits and behaviours. I propose that a stereotypically masculine description (i.e. more agentic) will boost the male’s - but not the female’s - perceived creativity. Polish students majoring in computer science (N = 108) read short stories about male and female interns at an IT company. Participants assessed the interns’ agency, communion and creativity. The results demonstrated that the image of the agentic man as well as the participants’ agentic-orientation are significant predictors of a male’s perceived creativity. The findings are discussed in terms of the gender-based nature of the agency-communion concept.

Keywords

Abele, A. E. (2003). The Dynamics of Masculine-Agentic and Feminine-Communal Traits: Findings from a Prospective Study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768-776.10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.768Search in Google Scholar

Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751-763.10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751Search in Google Scholar

Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2014). Communal and agentic contents in social cognition: A Dual Perspective Model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 195-255.10.1016/B978-0-12-800284-1.00004-7Search in Google Scholar

Baer, J. & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 75-105.10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley.Search in Google Scholar

Bi, C., Ybarra, O., & Zhao, Y. (2013). Accentuating your masculine side. Agentic traits generally dominate self-evaluation, even in China. Social Psychology,44, 104-109.10.1027/1864-9335/a000144Search in Google Scholar

Bianco, M., Harris, B., Garrison-Wade, D., & Leech, N. (2011). Gifted girls: Gender bias in gifted referrals. Roeper Review, 33, 170-181.10.1080/02783193.2011.580500Search in Google Scholar

Bush, T. (1995). Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 147-158.10.2190/H7E1-XMM7-GU9B-3HWRSearch in Google Scholar

Carli, L. L., Alawa, L., Lee, Y., Zhao, B., & Kim, E. (2016). Stereotypes About Gender and Science: Women ≠ Scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40,1-17.10.1177/0361684315622645Search in Google Scholar

Cassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2002). Developing the Computer User Self-Efficacy (Cuse) Scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26, 133-153.10.2190/JGJR-0KVL-HRF7-GCNVSearch in Google Scholar

Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045-1060.10.1037/a0016239Search in Google Scholar

Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., & Hudson, L. (2013). The stereotypical computer scientist: gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex Roles, 69, 58-71.10.1007/s11199-013-0296-xSearch in Google Scholar

Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzof, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6,1-8.10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049Search in Google Scholar

Chua, S. L., Chen, D., & Wong, A. F. L. (1999). Computer anxiety and its correlates: A metaanalysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 609-623.10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00039-4Search in Google Scholar

Diekman, A. B, & Goodfriend, W. (2006). Rolling with the Changes: A Role Congruity Perspective on Gender Norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 369-383.10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00312.xSearch in Google Scholar

Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M. & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking Congruity Between Goals and Roles: A New Look at Why Women Opt Out of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Careers. Psychological Science, 2,1051-1057.10.1177/0956797610377342Search in Google Scholar

Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2008). Of men, women, and motivation: A role congruity account. In J.Y. Shah & W.L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 434-447). New York: Guilford.Search in Google Scholar

Eagly, A., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from distributions of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735-754.10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.735Search in Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H., & Diekman, A. B. (2005). What is the problem? Prejudice as an attitude-in-context. In J. F. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. A. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 19-35). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). First judge warmth, then competence: Fundamental social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77-83.10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005Search in Google Scholar

Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class, New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Gilson, L. L., & Madjar, N. (2011). Radical and incremental creativity: Antecedents and processes. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 21-28.10.1037/a0017863Search in Google Scholar

Gralewski, J., & Karwowski, M. (2013). Polite girls and creative boys? Students’ gender moderates accuracy of teachers’ ratings of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 290-304.10.1002/jocb.36Search in Google Scholar

Gralewski, J., & Karwowski, M. (2016). Are Teachers’ Implicit Theories of Creativity Related to the Recognition of Their Students’ Creativity? Journal of Creative Behavior, 0, 1-17.Search in Google Scholar

Heilman, M. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 5, pp. 269-298). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Search in Google Scholar

Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin,116, 412-428.10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.412Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Pumaccahua, T. T., & Holt, R. E. (2013). Personality and creativity in realistic, investigative, artistic, social, and enterprising g college majors. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 913-917.10.1016/j.paid.2013.01.013Search in Google Scholar

Karwowski, M. (2014). Creative mindset: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 62-70.10.1037/a0034898Search in Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., Jankowska, D.M., Gralewski, J., Wiśniewska, E., & Lebuda, I. (2016). Greater male variability in creativity: A latent variables approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 159-166.10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.005Search in Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., Gralewski, J., & Szumski, G. (2015). Teachers’ effect on students’ creative self-beliefs is moderated by students’ gender. Learning and Individual Differences, 44, 1-8.10.1016/j.lindif.2015.10.001Search in Google Scholar

Kwaśnik, M., & Karwowski, M. (2015). Please, Mind the Gap. Gender and Computer Science Education. Journal of Gender and Power, 67-90.Search in Google Scholar

Margolis J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: women in computing. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224Search in Google Scholar

Moskowitz, D. S., Suh, E. J., & Desaulniers, J. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 753-76110.1037/0022-3514.66.4.753Search in Google Scholar

Proudfoot, D., Kay, A. C., & Koval, C. Z. (2015). A Gender Bias in the Attribution of Creativity: Archival and Experimental Evidence for the Perceived Association Between Masculinity and Creative Thinking. Psychological Science, 1-11.10.1177/0956797615598739Search in Google Scholar

Rosenberg, S., & Sedlak, A. (1972). Structural representations of implicit personality theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 235-297.10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60029-5Search in Google Scholar

Saleem, H., Beaudry, A., & Croteau, A. M. (2011). Antecedents of computer self-efficacy: A study of the role of personality traits and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1922-1936.10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.017Search in Google Scholar

Saunders, D., & Thagard, P. (2005). Creativity in Computer Science. In J.C. Kaufman & J.Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domain: Faces of the muse (pp.153-167). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elbraum.Search in Google Scholar

Tang, CH., Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2015). Implicit theories of creativity in computer science in the United States and China. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 49,137-156.10.1002/jocb.61Search in Google Scholar

Tang, M., Werner, C., & Karwowski, M. (2016). Differences in creative mindset between Germany and Poland: The mediating effect of individualism and collectivism. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 31-40.10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.004Search in Google Scholar

Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in Masculine and Feminine Traits over Time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305-325.10.1007/BF02766650Search in Google Scholar

Twenge, J. M. (2001). Changes in women’s assertiveness in response to status and roles: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 133-145.10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.133Search in Google Scholar

Whitley, B. E. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 1-22.10.1016/S0747-5632(96)00026-XSearch in Google Scholar

Wojciszke, B. (2005). Morality and competence in person- and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155-188.10.1080/10463280500229619Search in Google Scholar

Wojciszke, B., & Szlendak, M. (2010). Skale do pomiaru orientacji sprawczej i wspólnotowej [Scales for measuring the agentic and communal orientation]. Psychologia Spoleczna, 5, 57-69.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo