1. bookVolume 11 (2017): Issue 2 (December 2017)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1802-4866
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Childcare policy in the Czech Republic and Norway: two countries, two paths with many possibilities

Published Online: 10 Feb 2018
Volume & Issue: Volume 11 (2017) - Issue 2 (December 2017)
Page range: 43 - 60
Received: 08 Aug 2016
Accepted: 31 Oct 2017
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1802-4866
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The objective of this paper is to analyse and compare the design and governance of the contemporary childcare policy in the Czech Republic and Norway in relation to the situation of households with dependent children under school age. Following this, we review certain provisions of the childcare policies of the two countries, whose systems possessed certain similarities at the beginning of the 1990s, although they represent distinct types of welfare state. Our analysis reveals that the chief differences in childcare policy have persisted and adapted to the key features of the welfare regimes. The two countries’ central childcare policy values contrast with each other (equity and free choice in Norway vs. re-familisation and strong ‘family dependency’ among individuals in the Czech Republic) and exhibit differences in the structure and extent of policy measures, as well. Policies in both are less sensitive to the needs of children with specific needs (such as migrants in Norway or Roma children in the Czech Republic).

Keywords

Aarseth, H. (2014). Finanskapitalismens kjønnsromantikk: Næringslivselitens kjønnskomplementære familiekultur. Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning 03-04, 203-218.10.18261/ISSN1891-1781-2014-03-04-02Search in Google Scholar

Andress, H.-J. & Heien, T. (1999). Four Worlds of Welfare State Attitudes? A Comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States. European Sociological Review, 17 (4), 337-356.Search in Google Scholar

Bahle, T. (2009). Public Child Care in Europe – Historical Trajectories and New Directions. In K. Scheiwe & H. Willekens (Eds.) Child Care and Preschool Development in Europe. Institutional Perspectives. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Bartáková, H. (2009). Cesta zpátky. Návrat žen po rodičovské dovolené na trh práce v České republice. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.Search in Google Scholar

Belle, van J. (2016). Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) and its long-term effects on educational and labour market outcomes. Santa Monica, Calif., and Cambridge: RAND Corporation.Search in Google Scholar

Bjørnholt, M. & Stefansen, K. & Gashi, L. & Seeberg, M.L. (2017). Balancing Acts: Policy Frameworks and Family Care Strategies in Norway. In: Sirovátka, T. & Válková, J. Understanding Care Policies in Changing Times: Experiences and Lessons from the Czech Republic and Norway. Brno: MuniPress, 161-84.Search in Google Scholar

Bovaird, T. & Loeffler, E. (Eds.) (2009). Public Management and Governance. London and New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Brenna, L. R. (2010). Med forskertrang og lekelyst: systematisk pedagogisk tilbud til alle førskolebarn: utredning fra utvalg oppnevnt ved kongelig resolusjon 19. juni 2009: avgitt til Kunnskapsdepartementet 1. oktober 2010, Vol. NOU 2010:8. Oslo: Departementenes servicesenter, Informasjonsforvaltning.Search in Google Scholar

Cerami, A. (2006). Social Policy in Central and Eastern Europe. The Emergence of a New European Welfare Regime. Universität Erfurt Dissertation 2005. Berlin: LIT Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Cerami, A. & Vanhuysse, P. (Eds.). (2009). Post-Communist Welfare Pathways. Theorizing Social Policy Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230245808Search in Google Scholar

Crompton, R. (1999). Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment: The Decline of the Male Breadwinner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

ČSÚ (2015). Data on Structure of Families in the Czech Republic. Praha: Český statistický úřad. Available at: https://www.czso.czSearch in Google Scholar

Duvander, A.-Z. & Lappegård, T. & Andersson, G. (2010). Family Policy and Fertility: Fathers´ and Mothers´ Use of Parental Leave and Continued Childbearing in Norway and Sweden. Journal of European Social Policy, 20(1), 45-57.10.1177/0958928709352541Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ellingsæter, A. L. (2003). The Complexity of Family Policy Reform. The Case of Norway. European Societies, 5(4), 419-443.10.1080/1461669032000127679Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ellingsæter, A. L. (2012). Towards Universal Quality Childcare: the Norwegian Model. Paper prepared for the conference Equal Access to Childcare: Providing Quality Early Years Education and Care to Disadvantaged Families. London, September 28, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Ellingsæter, A. L. & Gulbrandsen, L. (2007). Closing the Childcare Gap: The Interaction of Childcare Provision and Mothers´ Agency in Norway. Journal of Social Policy, 36(4), 649-669.10.1017/S0047279407001225Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ellingsæter, A. L. & Leira, A. (Eds.). (2006). Politicising Parenthood in Scandinavia. Gender Relations in Welfare States. Bristol: Policy Press.10.46692/9781847421593Search in Google Scholar

Eriksen, J. (2001). Unmarried Cohabitation and Family Policy in Norway. International Review of Sociology, 11(1), 60-74.10.1080/03906700020031009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198742002.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2009). The Provision of Childcare Services a Comparative Review of 30 European Countries. Brussels: European Commission.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2010a). Second Biennal Report on Social Services of General Interest. Commission Staff Working Document. SEC (2010) 1284 final. Brussels: European Commission.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2010b). Europe 2020. A European Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Communication from the Commission. Brussels, 3.3.2010. COM(2010) 2020. Brussels: European Commission.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2013). Barcelona Objectives. The Development of Childcare Facilities for Young Children in Europe With a View to Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Brussels: European Commission.Search in Google Scholar

European Commission/EACEA/EURYDICE (2015). Early Childhood Education and Care Systems in Europe. National Information Sheets – 2014/15. Eurydice Facts and Figures. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Search in Google Scholar

EUROSTAT (2014). Key Data on Early Childhood Education and Care in Europe. 2014 Edition. Eurydice and Eurostat Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office.Search in Google Scholar

EUROSTAT (2015). Early Childhood and Primary Education Statistics. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/Search in Google Scholar

EUROSTAT (2017a). Gender Pay Gap statistics. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostatSearch in Google Scholar

EUROSTAT (2017b). Full-Time and Part-Time Employment of Women Statistics. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/Search in Google Scholar

EUROSTAT (2017c). Gender Gap in Part-Time Employment in 2016. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/Search in Google Scholar

Hašková, H. & Saxonberg, S. & Mudrák, J. (Eds.) (2012). Péče o nejmenší: boření mýtů. Praha: Slon a Sociologický ústav AV ČR.Search in Google Scholar

Hašková, H. (2007). Doma, v jeslích, nebo ve školce? Rodinná a institucionání péče o předškolní děti v české společnosti mezi lety 1945-2006. Gender, společnost, kritika, 8(2), 15-26.Search in Google Scholar

Hendl, J. (2005). Kvalitativní výzkum. Praha: Portál.Search in Google Scholar

Horák, P. & Horáková, M. & Sirovátka, T. (2013). The Recent Trends and Changes in Czech Social Services in The European Context: The Case of Childcare and Elderly Care. Czech and Slovak Social Work Journal, 12(5), 5-19.Search in Google Scholar

Horák, P. (2005). Odlišné přístupy k implementaci individuálního akčního plánu zaměstnanosti na vybraných českých úřadech práce. In Winkler, J. & Klimplová, L. & Žižlavský, M. Účelové programy na lokálních trzích práce. Jejich význam, potřebnost a realizace (s.30-58). Brno: FSS MU.Search in Google Scholar

Horák, P. (2012). Měření governance jako způsobu řízení, koordinace, kontroly a realizace veřejných politik a programů na regionální a lokální úrovni. Fórum sociální politiky, 6(4), 2-10.Search in Google Scholar

Horáková, M. & Horák, P. (2010). Návrh mezinárodní komparace systému výcvikových a vzdělávacích programů. Fórum sociální politiky, 4(5), 2-10.Search in Google Scholar

Horáková, M. (2010). Důvody a možnosti hodnocení výcvikových a vzdělávacích programů a jejich účinků pro nízkokvalifikované osoby: návrh komplexního hodnotícího postupu. Fórum sociální politiky, 4(1), 8-16.Search in Google Scholar

Howlett, M.H. & Ramesh, M. (1995). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Javornik, J. (2014). Measuring State De-Familialism: Contesting Post-Socialist Exceptionalism. Journal of European Social Policy, 24(3), 240–257.10.1177/0958928714525815Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Jeroslow, P. (2014). Social Investment in Early Childhood across OECD Countries: Human Capital-Building or Development as Freedom? Paper prepared for the Twelfth Annual ESPAnet Conference. Oslo, August 4, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Jordan, J. (2013). Policy Feedback and Support for the Welfare State. Journal of European Social Policy, 23(2), 134-148.10.1177/0958928712471224Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kickert, W.J.M. & Klijn, E-H. & Koppenjan, J.F.M. (1997). Managing Complex Networks. Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Korpi, W. (2000). Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States. Social Politics, 7(2), 127-191.10.1093/sp/7.2.127Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kuchařová, V. (Ed.) (2009). Péče o děti předškolního a raného školního věku. Praha: VÚPSV.Search in Google Scholar

Kuitto, K. (2016). Post-Communist Welfare States in European Context. Patterns of Welfare Policies in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham (UK), Northampton (USA): Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.10.4337/9781784711986Search in Google Scholar

Lappegård, T. (2010). Family Policies and Fertility in Norway. European Journal of Population, 26(1), 99-116.10.1007/s10680-009-9190-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Leitner, S. (2003). Varieties of Familialism. Caring Function of the Family in Comparative Perspective. European Societies, 5(4), 353–75.10.1080/1461669032000127642Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lurie, J. & Tjelflaat, T. (2012). Children’s Rights and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: Monitoring and Implementation in Norway. Dialogue in Praxis, 1 (14), 1-56.Search in Google Scholar

Maříková, H. (2008). Caring Fathers and Gender (In)Equality? Polish Sociological Review, 48(162), 135-152.Search in Google Scholar

Meuleman, L. (2008). Public Management and the Metagovernance of Hierarchies, Networks and Markets. The Feasibility of Designing and Managing Governance Style Combinations.Search in Google Scholar

MPSV (2016a). Rodičovský příspěvek. Integrovaný portal MPSV. Available at: https://portal.mpsv.cz/soc/ssp/obcane/rodicovsky_prispSearch in Google Scholar

MPSV (2016b). Co se mění v roce 2017? Novinky Ministerstva práce a sociálních věcí.Search in Google Scholar

MPSV (2016c). Koncepce rodinné politiky. Praha: MPSV/Odborná komise pro rodinnou politiku. Available at: http://hnutiprozivot.cz/download/zpravy/2634-koncepce_rodinne_politiky.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

MŠMT (2014). Výkonová data o školách a školských zařízeních – 2003/04–2013/14. Oficiální stránky ministerstva školství.Search in Google Scholar

MŠMT (2015). Statistická ročenka školství - výkonové ukazatele předškolního vzdělávání. Oficiální stránky ministerstva školství. Available at: http://toiler.uiv.cz/rocenka/rocenka.aspSearch in Google Scholar

Natali, D. & Bonoli, G. (2012). The Politics of the New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

NAV (2013). Family Related Benefits. Official website of Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration. Available at: https://www.nav.no/en/Home/Benefits+and+services/Family+related+benefitsSearch in Google Scholar

NAV (2015). Family related benefits. Available at: https://www.nav.no/en/Home/Benefits+and+services/Family+related+benefitsSearch in Google Scholar

NMER 2011. Framework Plan for the Content and Tasks of Kindergartens. Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research. Available at: http://www.udir.no/Upload/barnehage/Rammeplan/Framework_Plan_for_the_Content_and_Tasks_of_Kindergartens_2011_rammeplan_engelsk.pdf?epslanguage=noSearch in Google Scholar

OECD (2011a). Starting Strong III - A Quality Toolbox for Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: OECD.Search in Google Scholar

OECD (2011b). OECD Economic Outlook. Volume 1. Paris: OECD.Search in Google Scholar

OECD (2012). OECD family database. [Online]. http://www.oecd.org/els/family/oecdfamilydatabase.htm [accessed: 18 January 2013].Search in Google Scholar

OECD (2015). Starting Strong IV Monitoring Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: OECD.10.1787/9789264233515-enSearch in Google Scholar

OECD (2017). Family Benefits Public Spending (Indicator). Available at: https://data.oecd.org/Search in Google Scholar

OKRP (2017). Odborná komise pro rodinou politiku – zpráva o činnosti 2016. Available at: http://www.mpsv.cz/files/clanky/30178/Zprava_o_cinnosti_2016.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Osborne, S.P. (Ed.) (2010). The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203861684Search in Google Scholar

Paloncyová, E. (Ed.) (2013). Rodinné chování a rodinná politika jako kontext systému denní péče o děti ve Francii a v České republice. Praha: Výzkumný ústav práce a sociálních věcí.Search in Google Scholar

Plasová, B. & Godarová, J. (2015). Analýza možností nastavení systému služeb péče o děti a návrh legislativních změn. Praha: Ministerstvo práce a sociálních věcí.Search in Google Scholar

Plasová, B. & Kubalčíková, K. (2017). Balancing Acts: Family Care Strategies and Policy Frameworks in The Czech Republic. In Sirovátka, T. & Válková, J. Understanding Care Policies in Changing Times: Experiences and Lessons from the Czech Republic and Norway (pp. 135-59). Brno: MuniPress,Search in Google Scholar

Plasová, B. (2011). The Czech Childcare Policy Model. The Principles, Goals and Functions of Early Childcare Services (0 to 6 years) in the Czech Republic within the Context of European Childcare Policy Goals. Social Work Journal, 11(5), 60-79.Search in Google Scholar

Plasová, B. (2012). Zaměstnavatelé a nerovnováha mezi prací a rodinou. Brno: FSS MU.Search in Google Scholar

Pullmann, M. & Kolář, P. (2017). Co byla normalizace? Studie o pozdním socialismu. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.Search in Google Scholar

Rønsen, M. (2004). Fertility and Family Policy in Norway – A Reflection on Trends and Possible Connections. Demographic Research, 10(10), 265-286.10.4054/DemRes.2004.10.10Search in Google Scholar

Rønsen, M. & Skrede, K. (2006). Nordic Fertility Patterns: Compatible with Gender Equality? In A. Ellingsæter & A. Leira (Eds.) Politicising Parenthood in Scandinavia. Gender Relations in Welfare States (pp. 53-76). Bristol: Policy Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rossi, P.H. & Lipsey, M.W. & Freeman, H.E. (2009). Evaluation: A systematic Approach. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Rostgaard, T. 2014. Family Policies in Scandinavia. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Search in Google Scholar

Saraceno, Ch. & Keck, W. (2011). Towards an Integrated Approach for the Analysis of Gender Equity in Policies Supporting Paid Work and Care Responsibilities. Demographic Research, 25(11), 371-406.10.4054/DemRes.2011.25.11Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Saxonberg, S. & Sirovátka, T. (2009). Neo-liberalism by Decay? The Evolution of the Czech Welfare State. Social Policy and Administration, 43(2), 186–203.10.1111/j.1467-9515.2009.00655.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Šebestová, M. (2013). 60 000 nepřijatých dětí do mateřských školek, to je síla! Britské listy, 26.9.2013.Search in Google Scholar

Seeberg, M. L. (2010). Siste skanse: en undersøkelse om 3-5 åringer som ikke går i barnehage, NOVA-rapport 7, 1-111. Oslo: Norsk institutt for forskning om oppvekst, velferd og aldring.10.7577/nova/rapporter/2010/7Search in Google Scholar

Sirovátka, T. & Greve, B. (2014). Innovation in Social Services. The Public-Private Mix in Social Provision, Fiscal Policy and Employment. Farnham: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

Sirovátka, T. & Válková, J. (2016). Attitudes Towards Childcare Policies, Policy Feedback and Path Dependency: Czech Republic Contrasted to Norway. Manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Sirovátka, T. (2004). Family Policy in The Czech Republic after 1989: From Gendered and Enforced De-familialism to Gendered and Implicit Familialism. In Mareš, P. et al. Society, Reproduction and Contemporary Challenges (pp. 97-117). Brno: Barrister and Principal publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Skevik, A. & Hatland, A. (2008). Family Policies in Norway. In Ostner, I. & Ch. Schmitt (Eds.) Family Policies in the Context of Family Change (pp. 89-107). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Search in Google Scholar

Školský zákon (2016). Zákon č. 561/2004 Sb. o předškolním, základním, středním, vyšším odborném a jiném vzdělávání (školský zákon). Availaable at: http://www.msmt.cz/uploads/skolsky_zakon.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. (Eds.) 2007. Theories of Democratic Network Governance. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9780230625006Search in Google Scholar

Statistics Norway (2015). Indicators for Gender Equality, 2013. Data available at: https://www.ssb.no/en/befolkning/nokkeltall/key-figures-on-gender-equalitySearch in Google Scholar

Szelewa, D. & Polakowski, M.P. (2008). Who Cares? Changing Patterns of Childcare in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(2), 115-31.10.1177/0958928707087589Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Szikra, D. & Tomka, B. (2009). Social Policy in East Central Europe: Major Trends in the Twentieth Century. In A. Cerami & P. Vanhuysse (Eds.) Post-Communist Welfare Pathways. Theorizing Social Policy Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 17-34). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Thorkildsen, L.H. & Kavli, H. (2009). Improving Norway’s Reputation. Synovate. Available at: https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/ud/vedlegg/kultur-og-profilering/omdoemme/synovate---improving-norways-reputation-final-printed.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Válková, J. (2010). What is The Direction of the Czech Childcare Policy? In Manka Goes to Work. Public Childcare in The Visegrad Countries 1989–2009 (pp.41-56). Budapest: Budapest Institute for Policy Analysis.Search in Google Scholar

Van Berkel, R. & de Graaf, W. & Sirovátka, T. (Eds.). (2011). Work and Welfare in Europe. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Wagener, H. J. (2002). The Welfare State in Transition Economies and Accession to the EU. West European Politics, 25(2), 152-174.10.1080/713601579Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

WEF (2016). The Global Gender Gap Report 2016. World Economic Forum. Available at: http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2016/the-global-gender-gap-report-2016/Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo