1. bookVolume 10 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1802-4866
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

What Can We Learn About Regulatory Agencies and Regulated Parties from the Empirical Study of Judicial Review of Regulatory Agencies’ Decisions? The Case of Croatia

Published Online: 26 Jul 2016
Volume & Issue: Volume 10 (2016) - Issue 1 (June 2016)
Page range: 22 - 34
Received: 01 Apr 2016
Accepted: 19 May 2016
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1802-4866
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine regulatory agencies and regulated parties in an empirical study of administrative disputes initiated against the decisions of regulatory agencies in Croatia. We first aim to provide an overview of the status and trend estimates regarding these disputes; second, to answer the question how well does the system work from the perspectives of both the plaintiffs and the regulatory agencies; third, to identify the problem areas and to compare these with problem areas identified by the authors studying the broader area of administrative judiciary in Croatia, and finally to compare efficiency level of regulatory agencies to other public authorities in confirming the legality of their decisions and actions. Data on all administrative disputes against 12 Croatian regulatory agencies’ decisions in the 17-year period between 1995 and 2011 are used to identify the main characteristics and trends relating to these disputes. Data for 2012 to 2013 was also examined to identify initial changes and emerging trends in the new administrative judiciary system resulting from fundamental legal reform as part of Croatia’s process of accession to the European Union in 2013. The results show these administrative disputes to be often costly and timely with modest outcome for the plaintiff and impressive success rate for the most of regulatory agencies.

Keywords

Barbic, J. (2006). Foreword. In J. Barbic (ed.), The reform of the administrative judiciary and administrative procedures (pp. 7-10). Scientific Council for Public Administration, Justice and the Rule of Law, Croatian Academy of Science and Arts, Book Forth, Zagreb.Search in Google Scholar

Bernstein, M. H. (1995). Regulating Business by Independent Commission. Princeton University Press, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447-468.10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.xSearch in Google Scholar

CARDS. (2004a). Twinning Project: Strategy Paper for the Drafting of a new Law on Administrative Disputes, http://www.upravnisudrh.hr/frames.php?right=CARDS2004.html.Search in Google Scholar

CARDS. (2004). Twinning Project: Impact Assessment of the draft for a new Law on Administrative Court Procedure and recommendations for its implementation.Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, T. & Lægreid, P. (2004). Regulatory Agencies - the Challenges of Balancing Agency Autonomy and Political Control. Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies, WP 18.Search in Google Scholar

Gagro B. & Juric-Knezevic D. (2006). The quality of administrative acts and activities from the experience of the ACRC with suggestions for improvements. In J. Barbic (ed.), The reform of the administrative judiciary and administrative procedures (pp. 19-37). Scientific Council for Public Administration, Justice and the Rule of Law, Croatian Academy of Science and Arts, Book Forth, Zagreb.Search in Google Scholar

Geradin, D. (2006). The Development of European Regulatory Agencies: What the EU should learn from American Experience. http://ssrn.com/abstract=877922.Search in Google Scholar

Geradin, D. & Petit, N. (2011). Judicial Review in European Union Competition Law: A Quantitive and Qualitative Assessment. TILEC Discussion Paper, DP 2011-008, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1698342.Search in Google Scholar

Geradin, D. & Petit, N. (2004). The Development of Agencies at EU and National Levels: Conceptual Analysis and Proposals for Reform. NYU School of Law, Jean Monnet Working Paper 01/04.Search in Google Scholar

Giunio, M. (2013). Connecting the court to the citizen as an eliminatory criterion for reimbursement of administrative dispute. Croatian Law Review, 13 (3), 42-49.Search in Google Scholar

Jerovsek, T. (2006). The experience of Slovenia in the administrative judiciary and conceptual changes in the regulation of administrative disputes. In J. Barbic (ed.), The reform of the administrative judiciary and administrative procedures (pp. 64-81). Scientific Council for Public Administration, Justice and the Rule of Law, Croatian Academy of Science and Arts, Book Forth, Zagreb.Search in Google Scholar

Kopric, I. (2006). Administrative judiciary in the context of EU standards. In J. Barbic (ed.), The reform of the administrative judiciary and administrative procedures (pp. 58-64). Scientific Council for Public Administration, Justice and the Rule of Law, Croatian Academy of Science and Arts, Book Forth, Zagreb.Search in Google Scholar

Lavrijssen, S. & de Visser, M. (2006). Independent administrative authorities and the standard of judicial review. Utrecht Law Review, 2(1), 111-135.10.18352/ulr.19Search in Google Scholar

Lukanovic-Ivanisevic, D. (2014). Trial within a reasonable time in the administrative judiciary - The practice of the Supreme Court of the RoC. In I. Kopric (ed.) Europeanization of administrative judiciary in Croatia. (pp. 135-155). Institute for Public Administration, Zagreb, Croatia.Search in Google Scholar

Majone, G. (1999). The Regulatory State and its Legitimacy Problems, West European Politics, 22(1), 1-24.10.1080/01402389908425284Search in Google Scholar

Majone, G. (1994). The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe, West European Politics, 17(3), 77-101.10.1080/01402389408425031Search in Google Scholar

Marusic-Babic, G. (2014). The execution of the new Administrative Disputes Act. In I. Kopric (ed.) Europeanization of administrative judiciary in Croatia. (pp. 191-201). Institute for Public Administration, Zagreb, Croatia.Search in Google Scholar

McCraw, T.K. (1984). Propeths of Regulation. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts.Search in Google Scholar

Medvedovic, D. (2011). The complete reform of administrative judiciary. Proceedings of the 49th meeting of Jurists, Opatija, 11-13 May 2011, The Croatian Association of corporate lawyers, Zagreb, 253-291.Search in Google Scholar

Medvedovic, D. (2003). Administrative judiciary in Croatia - Contribution for the historical overview. In Kriskovic, V., Krbek, I., Ivančević, V., Borković, I. & Medvedovic, I. (ed.) Hrestomaty of administrative law. (pp. 309-356). Suvremena javna uprava, Zagreb, Croatia.Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Justice (2012). The general criteria for judges. Zagreb, Croatia.Search in Google Scholar

Musa, A. (2014). Agency model of public administration. Faculty of Law, Zagreb, Croatia.Search in Google Scholar

Musa, A. (2013). Good Governance in Croatian regulatory agencies: towards a legal framework. in Kopric, I., Musa, A. i Djulabic, V. (eds.), Agency in Croatia, (pp. 103-154). Institute for Public Administration, Zagreb.Search in Google Scholar

OECD. (2002). Regulatory Policies in OECD Countries - From Interventionism to Regulatory Governance. Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Omejec, J. (2006). The relationship of the Constitutional Court of the RoC and the Administrative Court of the RoC in the control of public administration in the RoC, In J. Barbic (ed.), The reform of the administrative judiciary and administrative procedures (pp. 81-97). Scientific Council for Public Administration, Justice and the Rule of Law, Croatian Academy of Science and Arts, Book Forth, Zagreb.Search in Google Scholar

Petrovic, S. (2008). The concept and role of independent regulators. Law in Economy, 3, 462-489.Search in Google Scholar

Pierce, R. (2010). What do the studies of judicial review of agency actions mean? Administrative Law Review, Forthcoming; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 505; http://ssrn.com/abstract=1604701.Search in Google Scholar

Pierce, R. J. & Weiss, J. A. (2011). An Empirical Study of Judicial Review of Agency Interpretations of Agency Rules, Administrative Law Review, Forthcoming; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 523; http://ssrn.com/abstract=1744990.Search in Google Scholar

Popovic, N. & Maricic, D. (2014). Proceedings before independent regulatory bodies and the new Administrative Disputes Act. In I. Kopric (ed.) Europeanization of administrative judiciary in Croatia. (pp. 201-226). Institute for Public Administration, Zagreb, Croatia.Search in Google Scholar

Sikic, M. & Turudic, M. (2013). The costs of an administrative dispute. Collected Papers of the Law Faculty of the University of Rijeka, 34(2), 841-857.Search in Google Scholar

Smerdel, B. (2012). Platypus Reconsidered: How to integrate Independent Regulators into the German Constitutional Order. In Bodiroga-Vukobrat N., Sander, G., Baric, S. (eds.), Regulatory Agencies in the Tension Between Law and Economics (pp. 11-24). Verlag Dr. Kovac, Hamburg.Search in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. R. (1987). Constitutionalism after the New Deal, Harvard Law Review, 101(2), 421-510.10.2307/1341264Search in Google Scholar

Tushnet, M. (2009). Against Judicial Review, Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 09-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1368857.10.2139/ssrn.1368857Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo