The Impact of the Quality Assessment of Optimal Assignment for Data Association in a Multitarget Tracking Context

1. Y. Bar Shalom, Ed. Multitarget-Multisensor Tracking: Advanced Applications. Artech House, Norwood, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bar Shalom, Y., T. Fortmann. Tracking and Data Association. Academic Press, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

3. Bar Shalom, Y., P. K. Willet, X. Tian. Tracking and Data Fusion: A Handbook of Algorithms. YBS Publishing, Storrs, CT, USA, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

4. He, X., R. Tharmarasa, M. Pelletier, T. Kirubarajanar. Accurate Murty’s Algorithm for Multitarget Top Hypothesis. – In: Proc. of Int. Conference of Information Fusion, Chicago, USA, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

5. Dezert, J., F. Smarandache, A. Tchamova. On the Blackman’s Association Problem. – In: Proc. of Int. Conference of Information Fusion, Cairn, Australia, 2003.10.1109/ICIF.2003.177397Search in Google Scholar

6. Tchamova, A., J. Dezert, T. Semerddjiev, P. Konstantinova. Target Tracking with Generalized Data Association Based on the General DSm Rule of Combination. – In: Proc. of Int. Conference of Information Fusion, Stockholm, Sweden, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

7. Dezert, J., A. Tchamova, T. Semerddjiev, P. Konstantinova. Performance Evaluation of Fusion Rules for Multitarget Tracking in Clutter Based on Generalized Data Association. – In: Proc. of Int. Conference of Information Fusion, Philadelphia, USA, 2005.10.1109/ICIF.2005.1591958Search in Google Scholar

8. F. Smarandache, J. Dezert, Ed. Advances and Applications of DSmT for Information Fusion. Vol. 1, 2, 3. American Research Press, 2004, 2006, 2009. http://www.gallup.unm.edu/~smarandache/DSmT.htmSearch in Google Scholar

9. Denoeux, T., N. El Zoghby, V. Cherfaoui, A. Jouglet. Optimal Object Associaton in the Dempster-Shafer Framework. – IEEE Trans. on Cybernetics, 2014 (to appear).10.1109/TCYB.2014.2309632Search in Google Scholar

10. Dezert, J., K. Benameur. On the Quality of Optimal Assignment for Data Association. – Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8764, 2014, pp. 374-382.Search in Google Scholar

11. Dezert, J., K. Benameur, L. Ratton, J. F. Grandin. On the Quality Estimation of Optimal Multiple Criteria Data Association Solutions. – In: Proc. of Int. Conference of Information Fusion, Washington, DC, USA, 6-9 July 2015.Search in Google Scholar

12. Kuhn, H. W. The Hungarian Method for the Assignment Problem. – Naval Research Logistic Quarterly, Vol. 2, 1955, pp. 83-97.10.1002/nav.3800020109Search in Google Scholar

13. Munkres, J. Algorithms for the Assignment and Transportation Problems. – Journal of the Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 5, 1957, No 1, pp. 32-38.10.1137/0105003Search in Google Scholar

14. Bourgeois, F., J. C. Lassalle. An Extension of the Munkres Algorithm for the Assignment Problem to Rectangular Matrices. – Comm. of the ACM, Vol. 14, 1971, No 12, pp. 802-804.10.1145/362919.362945Search in Google Scholar

15. Murty, K. G. An Algorithm for Ranking All the Assignments in Order of Increasing Cost. – Operations Research Journal, Vol. 16, 1968, No 3, pp. 682-687.10.1287/opre.16.3.682Search in Google Scholar

16. Smets, P., R. Kennes. The Transferable Belief Model. – Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 66, 1994, No 2, pp. 191-234.10.1016/0004-3702(94)90026-4Search in Google Scholar