[1. Cárdenas, Emilio J., and Héctor M. Chayer. “Corruption, accountability and the discipline of judges in Latin America.” Global Corruption Report (2007): 44–48 // http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un-dpadm/unpan045153.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Maitrepierre, Eric J. “Ethics, Deontology, Discipline of Judges and Prosecutors in France” // http://www.unafei.or.jp/english/pdf/RS_No80/No80_29VE_Maitrepierre.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Mayne, Greg. “Judicial integrity: the accountability gap and the Bangalore Principles.” Global Corruption Report (2007): 40–44 // http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un-dpadm/unpan045153.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Schultz, Jessica. “The UNCAC and judicial corruption: Requirements and avenues for reform.” Anti-Corruption Resource Centre (2009) // http://www.u4.no/publications/the-uncac-and-judicial-corruption-requirements-and-avenues-for-reform/.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Terhechte, Jörg Philipp. “Judicial Ethics for a Global Judiciary – How Judicial Networks create their own codes of conduct.” German Law Journal 10 (2009): 501–514 // http://www.leuphana.de/fileadmin/user_upload/PERSONALPAGES/_st/terhechte_joerg-philipp/files/Judicial_Ethics_for_a_Global_Judiciary_-_How_Judicial_Networks_Create_their_own_-_PDF_Vol_10_No_04_501-514_SI_Articles_Terhechte.pdf.10.1017/S2071832200001188]Search in Google Scholar
[6. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press 1995, 1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[1. Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct (2002) // http://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/corruption/judicial_group/Bangalore_principles.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Bologna and Milan Global Code of Judicial Ethics (2015) // http://www.jiwp.org/#!global-code-of-judicial-ethics/c1dnr.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Code of Ethics for Members of the Judiciary in Malta. The Commission for the administration of Justice (2004) // www.judiciarymalta.gov.mt/code-of-ethics.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Code of Ethics of Judges of the Republic of Lithuania. The General meeting of the Lithuanian judges (2006) // http://www.judicial-ethics.umontreal.ca/en/codes%20enonces%20deonto/documents/Code_lituanie.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Code of Judicial Ethics of International Criminal Court. ICC-BD/02-01-05 // https://www.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/A62EBC0F-D534-438F-A128-D3AC4CFDD644/140141/ICCBD020105_En.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Code of Judicial Ethics of the Republic of Croatia. The Council of presidents of all councils of Judges of the Republic of Croatia (2006) // http://pak.hr/cke/propisi,%20zakoni/en/CodeofJudicalEthics/EN.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Code of Judicial Ethics. Adopted in 1995 by the Conference of Judges of the Republic of Latvia // http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:TquFvYQa1V0J:at.gov.lv/files/uploads/files/archive/department1/tiesnesu_etikas_kodekss_eng.doc+&cd=1&hl=lt&ct=clnk&gl=lt.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Commentary on the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct (September 2007) // https://www.unodc.org/documents/corruption/publications_unodc_commentary-e.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Delcourt v. Belgium. European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), January 17, 1970 // http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"appno":["2689/65"],"itemid":["001-57467"]}.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Deontological Code for Judges and Prosecutors. Superior Council of Magistracy of Romania (2005) // www.csm1909.ro/csm/linkuri/15_11_2005__2048_en.doc.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Estonian Judges’ Code of Ethics. The Court en banc (2004) // http://www.nc.ee/?id=682.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Ethical Principles for Judges. The Association of Danish Judges (2014) // http://dommerforeningen.dk/english/ethical-principles-for-judges/.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Ethical Principles for Norwegian Judges. The Norwegian Association of Judges (2010) // http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/CCJE/cooperation/Ethical%20_principles_Norwegian_judges.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Good Judicial Practice. Principles and Issues. Swedish association of judges and Courts of Sweden (2013) // http://www.domstol.se/Publikationer/Rapporter/god_domarsed-grundsatser_och_fragor_eng.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Guide for Magistrates, Principles, Values and Qualities. Published in 2012 by the Belgian High Council of Justice // http://www.csj.be/sites/default/files/press_publications/o0023f.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Guide to Judicial Conduct. The Judges’ Council of England and Wales (2013) // https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Guidance/judicial_conduct_2013.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Judges Ethics Code. Adopted in 2012 by Association of Georgian Judges // http://www.supremecourt.ge/eng/judges-self-governance/judges-ethics-code/.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Judicial Ethics Report 2009-2010. ENCJ Working Group // http://www.encj.eu/images/stories/pdf/ethics/judicialethicsdeontologiefinal.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. NVvR Guide to Judicial Conduct of the Dutch Judges Association: 87–125. In: Matters of Principle. Codes on the Independence and Impartiality of the Judiciary. The Dutch Foundation ‘Judges for Judges’ // https://www.rechtspraak.nl/SiteCollectionDocuments/Matters-of-principle.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Opinion no. 3 of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) to the attention of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the principles and rules governing judges’ professional conduct, in particular ethics, incompatible behaviour and impartiality. Strasbourg (November 19, 2002) // https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?p=&id=1046405&Site=COE&direct=true.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Organic Law of Georgia on Common Courts // https://matsne.gov.ge/en/document/download/90676/13/en/pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Resolution on Judicial ethics adopted by the European Court of Human Rights (Plenary Court) (June 23, 2008) // http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Resolution_Judicial_Ethics_ENG.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. The Code of Conduct for Judicial Personnel: 81–85. In: Matters of Principle. Codes on the Independence and Impartiality of the Judiciary. The Dutch Foundation ‘Judges for Judges’ // https://www.rechtspraak.nl/SiteCollectionDocuments/Matters-of-principle.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. The Code of Judicial Ethics in Italy. Adopted in 1994 by the National Association of Judges // http://www.judicial-ethics.umontreal.ca/en/codes%20enonces%20deonto/documents/CODE_ITALIEN.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. The Code of Judicial Ethics of Slovenia. The Association of Judges of the Republic of Slovenia (2001) // http://www.judicial-ethics.umontreal.ca/en/codes%20enonces%20deonto/documents/SLOVENIA-CODEOFJUDICIALETHICS.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. The Ethical Code of Judicial Conduct. The Judicial Council of the Slovak Republic (2010) // http://www.sudcovia.sk/sk/dokumenty/legislativa/39-english-categories/documents/archive/401-theet-codeofju-cond.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. The Statement of Principles of Judicial ethics for the Scottish Judiciary (2010) // http://www.scotland-judiciary.org.uk/Upload/Documents/StatementofPriciplesofJudicialEthicsfortheScottishJudiciary.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
