[1. Blum, Gabriella, and Natalie J. Lockwood. “Earthquakes and Wars: The Logic of International Reparations”: 178-216. In: Larry May and Elizabeth Edenberg, eds. Jus Post Bellum and Transitional Justice. New York: CUP, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Boon, Kristen. “Jus Post Bellum in the Age of Terrorism: Introductory Remarks.” American Society of International Law Proceedings 106 (2012): 331-332.10.5305/procannmeetasil.106.0331]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Carlyle, Margaret, ed. Documents on International Affairs 1947-1948. London: Oxford University Press, 1952.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Chetail, Vincent. “Introduction: Post-conflict Peacebuilding – Ambiguity and Identity”: 1-33. In: Vincent Chetail, ed. Post-conflict Peacebuilding: A Lexicon. New York: OUP, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Commonwealth Working Party on Japanese Peace Treaty, 1st May to 17th May, 1950, Report, FO371/83830. The United Kingdom National Archives.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. De Brabandere, Eric. “The Concept of Jus Post Bellum in International Law: A Normative Critique”: 123-141. In: Carsten Stahn, Jennifer S Easterday and Jens Iverson, eds. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations. New York: OUP, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Dennett, Raymond, and Robert K. Turner, eds. Documents on American Foreign Relations. Vol. 10. Boston: World Peace Foundation, 1950.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Documents of the Far Eastern Department, FO371/92532. The United Kingdom National Archives.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Dunn, Frederick S. Peace-Making and the Settlement with Japan. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963.10.1515/9781400878420]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Easterday, Jennifer. “Jus Post Bellum in the Age of Terrorism: Remarks by Jennifer Easterday.” American Society of International Law Proceedings 106 (2012): 335-337.10.5305/procannmeetasil.106.0335]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Easterday, Jennifer S. “Peace Agreements as a Framework for Jus Post Bellum”: 379-415. In: Carsten Stahn, Jennifer S. Easterday and Jens Iverson, eds. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations. New York: OUP, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Iverson, Jens. “Contrasting the Normative and Historical Foundations of Transitional Justice and Jus Post Bellum: Outlining the Matrix of Definitions in Comparative Perspective”: 80-101. In: Carsten Stahn, Jennifer S. Easterday and Jens Iverson, eds. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations. New York: OUP, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Iverson, Jens, Jennifer S. Easterday, and Carsten Stahn. “Epilogue: Jus Post Bellum – Strategic Analysis and Future Directions”: 542-553. In: Carsten Stahn, Jennifer S. Easterday and Jens Iverson, eds. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations. New York: OUP, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Japanese Peace Treaty: General (C.P.(50)323). The United Kingdom National Archives.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Japanese Peace Treaty: Memorandum by the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs (C.P.(51)137). The United Kingdom National Archives.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Japanese Peace Treaty. Summary Records of Meetings, FO371/92557. The United Kingdom National Archives.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Kesaris, Paul, ed. Documents of the National Security Council [microfilm]. Vol. 1, A:I:0301, A:I:0326. Washington, D.C.: University Publications of America, 1980.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. May, Larry. “Jus Post Bellum, Grotius, and Meionexia”: 15-25. In: Carsten Stahn, Jennifer S. Easterday and Jens Iverson, eds. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations. New York: OUP, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. May, Larry. “Jus Post Bellum in the Age of Terrorism: Remarks by Larry May.” American Society of International Law Proceedings 106 (2012): 332-334.10.5305/procannmeetasil.106.0332]Search in Google Scholar
[20. May, Larry. “Jus Post Bellum Proportionality and the Fog of War.” European Journal of International Law 24(1) (2013): 315-333.10.1093/ejil/chs084]Search in Google Scholar
[21. May, Larry. “Reparations, Restitution, and Transitional Justice”: 32-48. In: Larry May and Andrew T. Forcehimes, eds. Morality, Jus Post Bellum, and International Law. New York: CUP, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. May, Larry, and Elizabeth Edenberg. “Introduction”: 1-25. In: Larry May and Elizabeth Edenberg, eds. Jus Post Bellum and Transitional Justice. New York: CUP, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. May, Larry, and Andrew T. Forcehimes. “Introduction”: 1-10. In: Larry May and Andrew T. Forcehimes, eds. Morality, Jus Post Bellum, and International Law. New York: CUP, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Memorandum by the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs (C.P.(51)104). The United Kingdom National Archives.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, ed. Documents on Japanese Foreign Policy: Records Related to the Conclusion of Treaty of Peace with Japan. Vol. 2, 3, 4, 5. Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, ed. Documents on Japanese Foreign Policy: Treaty of Peace with Japan Preparatory Work. Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, ed. Documents on Japanese Foreign Policy: Treaty of Peace with Japan Negotiation with the United States. Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Provisional Verbatim Minutes of the Conference for the Conclusion and Signature of the Treaty of Peace with Japan. Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 1951.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Neff, Stephen C. “Conflict Termination and Peace-making in the Law of Nations: A Historical Perspective”: 77-91. In: Carsten Stahn and Jann K. Kleffner, eds. Jus Post Bellum – Towards a Law of Transition from Conflict to Peace. Hague: T·M·C·Asser Press, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Österdahl, Inger. “Just War, Just Peace and the Jus post Bellum.” Nordic Journal of International Law 81 (2012): 271-294.10.1163/15718107-08103003]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Österdahl, Inger, and Esther van Zadel. “What Will Jus Post Bellum Mean? Of New Wine and Old Bottles.” Journal of Conflict & Security Law 14(2) (2009): 175-207.10.1093/jcsl/krp018]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Overseas Consultants, Inc. Report on Industrial Reparations Survey of Japan to the United States of America February 1948. New York: Overseas Consultants, 1948.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Pauley, Edwin E. Report on Japanese Reparations to the President of the United States: November 1945 to April 1946. Washington, D.C.: Division of Publications Office of Public Affairs, 1946.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Records of Proceedings: Conference for the Conclusion and Signature of the Treaty of Peace with Japan. Washington, D.C.: Department of State, 1951.]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Records of the Office of the Historian. Japanese Peace and Security Treaties, 1946-1952 [microfilm] (Lot File 78 D 173). Modern Japanese Political History Materials Room, Japanese National Diet Library.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Records of the Office of Northeast Asian Affairs, Relating to the Treaty of Peace with Japan [microfilm] – Subject File, 1945-51 (Lot File 56 D 527). Modern Japanese Political History Materials Room, Japanese National Diet Library.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Ronzitti, Natalino. “Reparation and Compensation”: 638-659. In: Nigel D. White and Christian Henderson, eds. Research Handbook on International Conflict and Security Law: Jus ad Bellum, Jus in Bello, and Jus post Bellum. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Sari, Aurel. “The Status of Foreign Armed Forces Deployed in Post-Conflict Environments: A Search for Basic Principles”: 467-501. In: Carsten Stahn, Jennifer S. Easterday and Jens Iverson, eds. Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Normative Foundations. New York: OUP, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Sassòli, Marco. “Reparation”: 279-290. In: Vincent Chetail, ed. Post-conflict Peacebuilding: A Lexicon. New York: OUP, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Stahn, Carsten. “‘Jus ad bellum’, ‘jus in bello’ … ‘jus post bellum’? – Rethinking the Conception of the Law of Armed Force.” European Journal of International Law 17(5) (2007): 921-943.10.1093/ejil/chl037]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Stahn, Carsten. “Jus Post Bellum: Mapping the Discipline(s)”: 93-112. In: Carsten Stahn and Jann K. Kleffner, eds. Jus Post Bellum – Towards a Law of Transition from Conflict to Peace. Hague: T·M·C·Asser Press, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Stahn, Carsten. “The Future of Jus Post Bellum”: 231-237. In: Carsten Stahn and Jann K. Kleffner, eds. Jus Post Bellum – Towards a Law of Transition from Conflict to Peace. Hague: T·M·C·Asser Press, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. United States Department of State. [1945] Foreign Relations of the United States. Vol, 6.]Search in Google Scholar
[44. United States Department of State. [1947] Foreign Relations of the United States. Vol, 6.]Search in Google Scholar
[45. United States Department of State. [1950] Foreign Relations of the United States. Vol, 6.]Search in Google Scholar
[46. United States Department of State. [1951] Foreign Relations of the United States. Vol, 6.]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Yasamee, Heather J. and Hamilton, K. A., eds. Documents on British Policy Overseas. Series 2, Vol. 4. London: HMSO, 1991.]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Yoshida, Shigeru. Kaisō Jūnen [Ten Years Memoirs]. Vol. 3. Tokyo: Chuokoron-sha, INC, 1998.]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Yoshida, Shigeru. The Yoshida Memoirs: The Story of Japan in Crisis. Translated by Kenichi Yoshida. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1973.]Search in Google Scholar
