Vulnerability Assessment of Participants in Lithuanian Criminal Proceedings in the Context of EU Regulations

1. Ažubalytė, Rima, Jolanta Zajančkauskienė. “Credibility of testimonies of vulnerable participants in a legal process: the Lithuanian case”: 34-51. In: 10 Years in the European Union - achievements, problems and expectations: XV international scientific conference (Riga: Turiba University, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

2. Ažubalytė, Rima, Ramūnas Jurgaitis, and Jolanta Zajančkauskienė. Specifinės baudžiamojo proceso rūšys [Specific types of criminal proceedings]. Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio universitetas, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

3. Belevičius, Linas. “Unification of Standards of Protection of the Rights of Suspected and Accused Persons in the European Union.” Administratīvā un Kriminālā Justīcija: Latvijas Policijas akadēmijas teorētiski praktisks žurnāls (Riga, Latvijas Policijas akadēmijas izdevums) 1(66) (2014): 9-20.Search in Google Scholar

4. Buczma, Sławomir R. “An Overview of the Law Concerning Protection of Victims of Crime in the View of the Adoption of the Directive 2012/29/EU Establishing Minimum Standards on the Rights, Support and Protection of Victims of Crime in the European Union.” ERA Forum 14 (2013): 235-250.10.1007/s12027-013-0305-0Search in Google Scholar

5. Flynn, Eilionor, and Anna Lawson. “Disability and Access to Justice in European Union”: 7-44. In: Lisa Waddington, Gerard Quinn, and Eilionor Flynn, eds. European Yearbook of Disability Law. Volume 4. Cambridge- Antwerp-Portland: Intersentia, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

6. Hirschel, David J., and Karen B. Rubin. “Special Problems Faced by the Elderly Victims of Crime.” Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 9 (1982): 357-374.Search in Google Scholar

7. Jimeno-Bulnes, Mar. “Towards Common Standards on Rights of Suspected and Accused Persons in Criminal Proceedings in the EU?” CEPS Liberty and Security in Europe (February 2010): 1-20 // http://aei.pitt.edu/15104/1/Jimeno-Bulnes_on_rights_of_suspects.pdf (accessed November 8, 2014).10.2139/ssrn.1926258Search in Google Scholar

8. Kanapeckaitė, Jolanta. Baudžiamasis procesas dėl nusikalstamų veikų, kuriomis įtariami (kaltinami) asmenys su fiziniais ar psichikos trūkumais (sutrikimais) [Criminal proceedings concerning offenses that a person with physical or mental deficiencies (disabilities) is suspected (charged) to have committed]. Daktaro disertacija. Vilnius: Lietuvos teisės universitetas, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

9. Letschert, Rianne, and Conny Rijken. “Rights of Victims of Crime: Tensions between an Integrated Approach and a Limited Legal Basis for Harmonisation.” New Journal of European Criminal Law Vol. 4, No. 3 (2013): 226-255.10.1177/203228441300400306Search in Google Scholar

10. Levon, Justyna, and Paulius Veršekys. “Įtariamųjų ir kaltinamųjų teisių Lietuvos baudžiamajame procese stiprinimas: perspektyvinė analizė Europos Sąjungos teisėkūros kontekste” [The strengthening of the rights of the suspects and the accused persons in Lithuania: a prospective analysis in the context of the EU legislation]: 160-185. In: Lietuvos Respublikos baudžiamojo proceso kodeksui - 10 metų [Criminal Code of Republic of Lithuania - 10 years]. Vilnius, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

11. Matuizienė, Eglė. Privataus kaltinimo bylų procesas kaip dispozityvumo realizavimo forma [Private prosecution procedure as a form of implementation of dispositivenes]. Daktaro disertacija. Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio universitetas, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

12. McEwan, Jenny. “The Testimony of Vulnerable Victims and Witnesses in Criminal Proceedings.” Era Forum 10 (2009): 369-386.10.1007/s12027-009-0126-3Search in Google Scholar

13. McQuigg, Ronagh J.A. “Domestic Violence and the ECJ: Joined Cases C-483/09 and C-1/10 Magatte Gueye and Valentin Salmeron Sanchez.” European Public Law Vol. 8, No. 4 (2012): 645-654.10.54648/EURO2012037Search in Google Scholar

14. Nusikaltimų aukų teisių direktyva: naujas požiūris į artimųjų smurto aukas [The Victim‘s Rights Directive: a New Approach to Victims of Domestic Violence]. Žmogaus teisių stebėjimo institutas, Lietuvos Teisės institutas, Lygių galimybių plėtros centras [Human Rights Monitoring Institute, Law Institute of Lithuania, Centre of Equality Advancement]. Vilnius, 2014 // https://www.hrmi.lt/uploaded/Apzvalgos/Tyrimas_auku-teisiu-direkt.pdf (accessed January 3, 2015).Search in Google Scholar

15. Sagatys, Gediminas. Vaiko teisė į šeimos ryšius. Europos žmogaus teisių ir pagrindinių laisvių apsaugos konvencijos įgyvendinimas Lietuvoje [The right of the child to family relations in the European convention on human rights and in the law of the Republic of Lithuania]. Vilnius, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

16. Schünemman, Bernd. “Protection of Children and Other Vulnerable Victims against Secondary Victimisation: Making It Easier to Testify in Court.” Era Forum 10 (2009): 387-396.10.1007/s12027-009-0130-7Search in Google Scholar

17. Štarienė, Lijana. “Teisės į teisingą teismą, įtvirtintos Europos žmogaus teisių konvencijos 6 str., pobūdis, vieta ir apsaugos lygis kitų konvencijos teisių požiūriu” [The character, place and the level of protection of the right to a fair court established in Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights in the light of other rights]. Jurisprudence-Jurisprudencija 10(88) (2006): 40-48.Search in Google Scholar

18. Trechsel, Stefan. Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings. Oxford University Press, 2005.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271207.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

19. Vaikų, nukentėjusiųjų nuo nusikaltimų, apsauga Lietuvoje. Nacionalinė ataskaita. [The protection of child victims in Lithuania. National report]. Vilnius: Paramos vaikams centras. 2013.Search in Google Scholar

20. Vidal Feernandez, Begona. “The Standing of the Victim in Criminal Proceeding throughout the European Union”: 202-223. In: Montserrat de Hoyos Sancho, ed. Criminal Proceedings in European Union: Essential Safeguards. Lex Nova, S.A.U., 2008.Search in Google Scholar

21. Walklate, Sandra. Handbook of Victims and Victimology. Portland: Willan Publishing, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

22. Zajančkauskienė, Jolanta. “Asmens, turinčio negalią, teisė gintis padedant gynėjui” [The right to defence of a disabled person with the help of a defence lawyer”]. Societal Innovations for Global Growth: Research Papers 1(1) (2012): 105-122.Search in Google Scholar

23. Zajančkauskienė, Jolanta. “Fiziniai ar psichikos trūkumai (sutrikimai): procesinė teisinė samprata ir reikšmė, realizuojant asmens teisę į gynybą” [Physical or mental deficiencies (disorders): procedural legal concept and importance in realising the individual’s right to the defence]: 289-326. In: Petras Ancelis, et al. Sąžiningas baudžiamasis procesas: probleminiai aspektai [Fair criminal proceedings: problem aspects]. Vilnius: Industrus, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

24. Zajančkauskienė, Jolanta. “Prozessualle Handlungsfähigkeit eines Verdächtigen (Beschuldigten)” [Procedural Capacity of a Suspected (Accused) Person]. Jurisprudence-Jurisprudencija 4(122) (2010): 245-259.Search in Google Scholar

25. Zajančkauskienė, Jolanta. “Speciali pažeidžiamųjų įtariamųjų ar kaltinamųjų apsauga” [Special protection of the vulnerable suspects or of the accused persons]: 325-338. In: Jonas Prapiestis, et.al. Globalizacijos iššūkiai baudžiamajai justicijai [Challenges of globalization to criminal justice]. Vilnius: Registrų centras, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

1. A. S. v. Finland. ECHR (September 28, 2010).Search in Google Scholar

2. Bocos-Cuesto v. the Netherlands. ECHR (November 10, 2005).Search in Google Scholar

3. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. OL C 326, 2012 10 26: 391-407.Search in Google Scholar

4. Code of the Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2002, no. 37-1341.Search in Google Scholar

5. Commission Recommendation 2013/C 378/02 of 27 November 2013 on procedural safeguards for vulnerable persons suspected or accused in criminal proceedings. OJ C 378, 24.12.2013: 8-10.Search in Google Scholar

6. Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment Accompanying the document Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Proposal for a on procedural safeguards for children suspected or accused in criminal proceedings. SWD/2013/0480 final // http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?qid=1415469073671&uri=CELEX:52013SC0480 (accessed November 10, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

7. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Strengthening Victim’s Rights in the EU. COM (2011)274 Final // http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/criminal/victims/docs/com_2011_274_en.pdf (accessed November 6, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

8. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. An open and secure Europe: making it happen. SWD(2014) 63 final // http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/e-library/documents/basicdocuments/docs/an_open_and_secure_europe_-_making_it_happen_en.pdf (accessed November 8, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

9. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Making progress on the European Union Agenda on Procedural Safeguards for Suspects or Accused Persons - Strengthening the Foundation of the European Area of Criminal Justice. COM/2013/0820 final // http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013DC0820&qid=1415465203454&from=EN (accessed November 8, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

10. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol // http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf (accessed November 9, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

11. Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism. Official Journal L 164, 22/06/2002: 0003-0007.Search in Google Scholar

12. Criminal Proceedings against Maria Pupino. ECR I-5285 (2005).Search in Google Scholar

13. Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings. OJ L 280, 2010 10 26.Search in Google Scholar

14. Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA. OJ L 101, 15.4.2011.Search in Google Scholar

15. Directive 2011/93/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA. OJ L 335/1, 17.12.2011.Search in Google Scholar

16. Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings. OL L 142, 2012 61.Search in Google Scholar

17. Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA. OL L 315, 2012 11 14.Search in Google Scholar

18. Directive 2013/48/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, and on the right to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty. OJ L 294, 2013 11 6. Search in Google Scholar

19. European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Official Gazette, 1995, no. 40-987.Search in Google Scholar

20. F. and M. v. Finland. ECHR (July 17, 2007).Search in Google Scholar

21. Green Paper from Commission “Procedural Safeguards for Suspects and Defendants in Criminal Proceedings throughout the European Union”. Brussels, 19.2.2003 COM(2003) 75 final // http://www.statewatch.org/semdoc/assets/files/commission/COM-2003-75.pdf (accessed November 9, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

22. Lietuvos Respublikos apsaugos nuo smurto artimoje aplinkoje įstatymas [Law on protection against domestic violence]. Official Gazette, 2011, no. 72-3475.Search in Google Scholar

23. Lietuvos Respublikos baudžiamojo proceso kodekso 9, 154, 186, 280, 283 straipsnių ir priedo pakeitimo įstatymas [Law on the amendment of Articles 9, 154, 186, 280, 283 and the annex of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania]. Register of Legal Acts, no. 2014-03403.Search in Google Scholar

24. Lietuvos Respublikos baudžiamojo proceso kodekso 9, 185, 186, 275, 276, 283 straipsnių ir priedo pakeitimo įstatymas [Law on the amendment of Articles 9, 185, 186, 275, 276 and 283 and the annex of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania]. Register of Legal Acts, no. 2014-10422.Search in Google Scholar

25. Lietuvos Respublikos prokuratūros veiklos 2013 metais ataskaita [2013 Report of the Activities of the Prosecution Service of the Republic of Lithuania] // http://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter3/dokpaieska.showdoc_l?p_id=466645&p_tr2=2 (accessed November 6, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

26. Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės nutarimas dėl valstybės smurto artimoje aplinkoje prevencijos ir pagalbos teikimo nukentėjusiesiems asmenims 2014-2020 metų programos patvirtinimo [Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania regarding approval of the 2014-2020 national programme for prevention of domestic violence and support for victims]. Register of Legal Acts, no. 2014-05986.Search in Google Scholar

27. Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Proposal for a on procedural safeguards for children suspected or accused in criminal proceedings. Brussels, 27.11.2013, SWD(2013) 480 final (COM (2013) 8 22) // http://ec.europa.eu/justice/criminal/files/swd_2013_480_en.pdf (accessed November 8, 2014). Search in Google Scholar

28. Recommendation No. R (97) 13 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States Concerning intimidation of witnesses and the rights of the defence. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on September 10, 1997, at the 600th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies // http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/victims/recR_97_13e.pdf (accessed November 6, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

29. Resolution of the Council of 10 June 2011 on a Roadmap for strengthening the rights and protection of victims, in particular in criminal proceedings. 2011/C 187/01 // http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.C_.2011.187.01.0001.01.ENG#ntr5-C_2011187EN.01000101-E0005 (accessed November 8, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

30. Resolution of the Council of 30 November 2009 on a Roadmap for strengthening procedural rights of suspected or accused persons in criminal proceedings. 2009/C 295/01. OJ C 295, 4.12.2009.10.1002/elps.200990011Search in Google Scholar

31. Ruling of Supreme Court of Lithuania of November 11, 2014. Criminal case no. 2K-432/2014.Search in Google Scholar

32. Ruling of Vilnius District Court of November 26, 2008. Criminal case no. 1S-945-628/2008.Search in Google Scholar

33. Ruling of Vilnius District Court of November 7, 2013. Criminal case no.1S-923-628/2013.Search in Google Scholar

34. S.C. v.The United Kingdom. ECtHR, no. 60958/00 (2004).Search in Google Scholar

35. The Carloway Review. Report and Recommendations (November 17, 2011) // http://www.scotland.gov.uk/About/Review/CarlowayReview (accessed November 9, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

36. The Conclusions of the European Council (June 26/27, 2014) // http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/143478.pdf (accessed November 8, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

37. The ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of 16 January 2006 on the compliance of Paragraph 4 (wording of 11 September 2001) of Article 131 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania with the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania, on the compliance of Paragraph 5 (wordings of 10 April 2003 and 16 September 2003) of Article 234, Paragraph 2 (wordings of 10 April 2003 and 16 September 2003) of Article 244, Article 407 (wording of 19 June 2003), Paragraph 1 (wording of 14 march 2002) of Article 408, Paragraphs 2 and 3 (wording of 14 March 2002) of Article 412, Paragraph 5 (wording of 14 March 2002) of Article 413 and Paragraph 2 (wording of 14 March 2002) of Article 414 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania with the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania and on the petitions of the Šiauliai District Court, the petitioner requesting to investigate whether Article 410 (wording of 14 March 2002) of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania is not in conflict with the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2006, no. 7-254.Search in Google Scholar

38. The Stockholm Programme - an Open and Secure Europe Serving and Protecting Citizens. 2010/C 115/01. OJ C 115, 2010 5 4. Search in Google Scholar