[
Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement), 14.6.2000.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part (2014), OJ L 261/1, 30.8.2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Becks’che Kurz. (2016), Kommentare Zivilprozessordnung mit Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz und anderen Nebengesetzen, Begründet von. 75 Aufl., Vorb. 704, 2046.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bobek, M. (2017), ‘The effects of EU law in the national legal systems,’ in C. Barnard & S. Peers (eds.) European Union Law, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 143–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198789130.003.000610.1093/he/9780198789130.003.0006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boodman, M. (1991), ‘The myth of harmonization of laws,’ The American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 699–724. https://doi.org/10.2307/84073810.2307/840738
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bradley, C. A. (1997), ‘Territorial intellectual property rights in an age of globalism,’ Virginia International Journal of Law, vol. 37, pp. 505–586.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Civil Procedure Code of Georgia, Parliamentary Gazette, no. 47–48, 31.12.1997.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Conclusion by consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE), no. 13, Strasbourg, 19.11.2010. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/-ccje-13-2010-/168074824c [accessed 27 Aug 2019]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Constitution of Georgia, Departments of the Parliament of Georgia, no. 31–33, 24.8.1995.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cook, T. (2015), ‘Enforcement Directive and harmonisation of remedies for intellectual property infringement in the EU,’ Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, vol. 20, pp. 264–269.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision 2 March 2018 of Tbilisi City Court (Available only in Court Archive).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision 7 March 2018 of Tbilisi City Court (Available only in Court Archive).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision 30 March 2018 of Tbilisi City Court (Available only in Court Archive).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision 30 May 2018 of Tbilisi City Court (Available only in Court Archive).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision 31 May 2018 of Tbilisi City Court (Available only in Court Archive).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision 4 June 2018 of Tbilisi City Court (Available only in Court Archive).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision 17 October 2018 of Tbilisi City Court (Available only in Court Archive).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision 21 December 2018 of Tbilisi City Court (Available only in Court Archive).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision 14 March 2019 of Tbilisi City Court (Available only in Court Archive).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision 25 March 2019 of Tbilisi City Court (Available only in Court Archive).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision 29 March 2019 of Tbilisi City Court (Available only in Court Archive).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision 8 April 2019 of Tbilisi City Court (Available only in Court Archive).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision 26 February 2020 of Tbilisi City Court (Available only in Court Archive).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision of Tbilisi City Court no. 2/7126-19, 4.4.2019 (Available only in Court Archive).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision of the Court of Appeal of Tbilisi no. 2-4883-14, 5.9.2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision of the Court of Appeal of Tbilisi no. 2b/4597-14, 29.9.2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision of the Court of Appeal of Tbilisi no. 2b/5617-14, 29.9.2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia no. AS-827-1190-06, 29.5.2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia no. AS-538-511-2013, 3.7.2013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Decree adopted by the Parliament of Georgia on ‘Harmonisation of Georgian Legislation with the EU Law’, 2.9.1997.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights, OJ L 195/17, 2.6.2004.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dzlierishvili, Z. (2018), ‘Cross-undertaking as to damages resulting from a provisional remedy,’ TSU Journal of Law, no. 1, pp. 5–18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fox, E. M. (1992), ‘Harmonization on law and procedures in a globalized world: why, what and how?’ Antitrust Law Journal, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 593–598.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gagua, I. (2012), The Burden of Proof in the Civil Procedure Law, PhD thesis, Tbilisi State University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Günther, H.; Zekoll, J. & Zumbansen P., eds. (2012), Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in an Age of Globalization, Queen Mary Studies in International Law, Leiden & Boston: Brill Academic Publishing, pp. 189–228.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harms, L. T. C. (2018), A Casebook on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights, 4th ed., Geneva: WIPO.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hilty, R. M. & Moscon, V. (2017), Modernisation of the EU Copyright Rules, Position Statement of the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Research Paper no. 17–12, Munich: Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive. Retrieved from https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Intellectual_Property_Rights_Enforcement_Directive#Criticisms [accessed 12 Sep 2019]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
IPEC (2020), Annual Intellectual Property Report To Congress, United States Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator. Retrieved from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/IPEC-2019-Annual-Intellectual-Property-Report.pdf [accessed 18 Jul 2020]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JGK Statyba Ltd. and Guselnikovas v. Lithuania [2013], ECHR 3330/12. Retrieved from: http://en.efhr.eu/2010/02/11/case-jgk-statyba-ltd-guselnikovas-v-lithuania-application-no-333012-2013/ [accessed 9 Aug 2019]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jorbenadze, S. (1984), Life and Work of Ivane Javakhishvili [in Georgian], Tbilisi: Tbilisi State University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaikatsishvili & Lawyers (2018), ‘Changes made to the Code of Civil Procedure to protect intellectual property’ [in Georgian], 16 February. Retrieved from http://kbarristers.ge/ge/news/index/74 [accessed 12 Aug 2019]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kapanadze, N. & Kvachadze, M. (2008), Latin-Georgian Legal Dictionary, ed. by L. Chanturia & M. Tabidze, Tbilisi: UNDP Raoul Wallenberg Institute of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kazhashvili, G. (2016), ‘Role of the perpetuation of evidences and claim security in litigation,’ TSU Journal of Law, no. 1, pp. 65–74.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kharitonashvili, N. (2017), ‘Third parties as the subjects of civil justice,’ TSU Journal of Law, no. 1, pp. 215–227.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kur, A. & Dreier, T. (2017), EU Intellectual Property Law, Texts, Cases and Materials, transl. into Georgian by G. Giguashvili, Tbilisi.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kurdadze, Sh. & Khunashvili, N. (2015), Procedure Code of Georgia [in Georgian], 2nd ed., Tbilisi.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kurdadze, Sh.; Kurdadze, G.; Khunashvili, N. & Chkonia, Z. (2018), Comments on the Law of Georgia on Enforcement Proceedings [in Georgian], Part 1 (Arts. 1–48), Tbilisi: SDASU.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liluashvili, T. (2005), Civil Procedure Law [in Georgian], 2nd ed.,Tbilisi.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Loewenheim, U. (1996), ‘Harmonization and intellectual property in Europe,’ Columbia Journal of European Law, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 481–489.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ltd. “Georgian Manganese” v. the Parliament of Georgia [2017], Decision no. 2/6/746 of the Constitutional Court of Georgia, 1.12.2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lundstedt, L. (2016), Territoriality in Intellectual Property Law, Stockholm: Stockholm University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nachkebia, A. (2014), Definitions of Civil Legal norms in the practice of Supreme Court (2000–2013) [in Georgian], Tbilisi.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nadareishvili, G. (2009), Civil Law of Rome [in Georgian], 3rd ed., Tbilisi.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
On amendments in the Civil Procedure Code of Georgia. Retrieved from https://info.parliament.ge/file/1/BillReviewContent/151540? [accessed 31 Jul 2019]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ostermiller, S. M. & Svenson, D. R. (2014), Alternative Dispute Resolution Means in Georgia [in Georgian], Tbilisi.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peukert, A. (2010), ‘Territoriality and extraterritoriality in intellectual property law,’ in G. Handl, J. Zekoll & P. Zumbansen (eds.) Beyond Territoriality: Transnational Legal Authority in the Age of Globalization, Queen Mary Studies in International Law, Leiden & Boston: Brill Academic Publishing, pp. 189–228.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sajaia, L. (2014), The Author’s Personal Non-Property Rights, PhD thesis, Tbilisi State University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Samkharadze, I. (2015), ‘Harmonization of legal systems: EU and Georgia,’ TSU Journal of Law, no. 1, pp. 253–264.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Surmava, L. (2012), Compatibility of Georgian Legislation with EU Legislation with regard to the State Assistance, PhD thesis, Tbilisi State University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taliashvili, T. (1998), ‘Some aspects of patent law,’ Journal of Law, nos. 5–6, pp. 37–43.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taliashvili, T. (2003a), ‘Der Schutz geografischer Bezeichnungen in Georgien am Maßstab des internationalen und europäischen Rechts,’ GRUR Int., pp. 324–333.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taliashvili, T. (2003b), Foundations of Legal Protection of Geographic Indication of the Goods, PhD thesis, Tbilisi State University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taliashvili, T. (2004), ‘Aspects of protection of names of Georgian origin and geographic indications abroad and protection of names of foreign origin and geographic indications in Georgia,’ in R. Shengelia (ed.) Collection of Articles in honor of Prof. Z. Akhvlediani, Tbilisi, pp. 179–187.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taliashvili, T. (2006), ‘Auslegung der Verfassungsnormen in den Postsowjetischen Gesellschaften’, Internationale Konferenz: Ostrecht, N52, Berlin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taliashvili, T. (2012), ‘Reinvention of the concept of intellectual property to post-Soviet society—Georgian experience,’ Public Lecture, Conference on ‘Intellectual Property in Modern Europe’, GWZO, Universität Leipzig.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thomas, T. A. (2004), Ubi Jus, Ibi Remedium: The Fundamental Right to a Remedy, The University of Akron, Symposium: Remedies Discussion Forum, 41 U.S.D.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uitdehaag, J. & Kurtauli, S. (2013), Review of the Georgian within the National and International Context, Enforcement System [in Georgian], Tbilisi.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yu, P. K. (2009), The Objectives and Principles of the TRIPS Agreement. Retrieved from http://www.peteryu.com/correa.pdf [accessed 26 Jul 2019]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zoidze, B. (2005), Reception of European Private Law in Georgia [in Georgian], Tbilisi: Educational Center for Publishing Works.
]Search in Google Scholar
