1. bookVolume 10 (2020): Issue 1 (June 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2674-4619
First Published
18 Jun 2013
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Brokers in Biotechnology and Software Networks in EU Research Projects

Published Online: 17 Jun 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 10 (2020) - Issue 1 (June 2020)
Page range: 195 - 236
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2674-4619
First Published
18 Jun 2013
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Researchers have acknowledged that the flow of knowledge is influenced by the non-structural and structural features of networks. This paper aims to further develop an understanding of the institutional and structural features of knowledge networks by relating the brokerage roles of actors to the types and locations of organisations in biotechnology and software networks. The study is set within the context of the European Union (EU) research and innovation policy. It is designed as a social network analysis of EU research projects in biotechnology and software that took place between 1995 and 2016, wherein organisations from the Baltic States participated. The results of the study revealed that higher education and research organisations and public bodies acted as the main knowledge brokers and brokered more frequently across different regions in biotechnology networks. In software, it was the universities and research organisations that fulfilled this role. Thus, this study contributes to an understanding about the institutional and structural aspects of knowledge networks by focusing on brokers and their brokerage roles and relating these factors to specific organisation types and the locations of actors within the two sectors. It also adds the empirical context of the Baltic States in the areas of biotechnology and software collaborative research projects to the studies of knowledge networks, and offers practical suggestions for implementing collaborative research projects.

Keywords

Asheim, B. (2007), ‘Differentiated knowledge band varieties of regional innovation systems,’ Innovation, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351161070172284610.1080/13511610701722846 Search in Google Scholar

Asheim, B. T.; Boschma, R. & Cooke, P. (2011), ‘Constructing regional advantage: platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases,’ Regional Studies, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 893–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.54312610.1080/00343404.2010.543126 Search in Google Scholar

Asheim, B. T. & Coenen, L. (2005), ‘Knowledge base and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters,’ Research Policy, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1173-1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.01310.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013 Search in Google Scholar

Asheim, B.; Coenen, L. & Vang, J. (2007), ‘Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge base: sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy,’ Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 655-670. https://doi.org/10.1068/c064810.1068/c0648 Search in Google Scholar

Asheim, B. T. & Gertler, M. S. (2005), ‘The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems,’ in J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery & R. R. Nelson (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.001110.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0011 Search in Google Scholar

Autant-Bernard, C.; Billand, P.; Frachisse, D. & Massard, N. (2007), ‘Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in Micro and Nanotechnologies,’ Papers in Regional Science, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 495–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00132.x10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00132.x Search in Google Scholar

Balachandran, S. & Hernandez, E. (2018), ‘Networks and innovation: accounting for structural and institutional sources of recombination in brokerage triads,’ Organization Science, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.116510.1287/orsc.2017.1165 Search in Google Scholar

Balland, P. A. (2012), ‘Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks: evidence from research and development projects within the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) industry,’ Regional Studies, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 741-756. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.52912110.1080/00343404.2010.529121 Search in Google Scholar

Blažek, J. & Kadlec, V. (2019), ‘Knowledge bases, R&D structure and socio- economic and innovation performance of European regions,’ Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.149100010.1080/13511610.2018.1491000 Search in Google Scholar

Borgatti, S. P. (2002), NetDraw: Graph visualization software, Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies. Search in Google Scholar

Boschma, R. (2005), ‘Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment,’ Regional Studies, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/003434005200032088710.1080/0034340052000320887 Search in Google Scholar

Boschma, R. (2018), ‘A concise history of the knowledge base literature: challenging questions for future research,’ in A. Isaksen, R. Martin & M. Trippl (eds.) New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems - Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lesson, Cham: Springer, pp. 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71661-9_210.1007/978-3-319-71661-9_2 Search in Google Scholar

Chen, S. H., Egbetokun, A. A. & Chen, D. K. (2015), ‘Brokering knowledge in networks: institutional intermediaries in the Taiwanese biopharmaceutical innovation system,’ International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 69, no. 3/4, pp. 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2015.07297810.1504/IJTM.2015.072978 Search in Google Scholar

CIP (2015), Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme, 2007–2013. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/cip/ [accessed 11 Apr 2020] Search in Google Scholar

Coenen, L.; Moodysson, J.; Ryan, C. D.; Asheim, B. R. & Phillips, P. (2006), ‘Comparing a pharmaceutical and an agro-food bioregion: on the importance of knowledge base for socio-spatial patterns of innovation,’ Industry and Innovation, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366271060103293710.1080/13662710601032937 Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990), ‘Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation,’ Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/239355310.2307/2393553 Search in Google Scholar

Connected Health (2015) Connected Health cluster strategy 2015–2020, Tehnopol, European Connected Health Alliance. Retrieved from https://www.tehnopol.ee/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Connected-Health-klastri-strateegia.pdf [accessed 12 April 2018] Search in Google Scholar

CORDIS (2020), Community Research and Development Information Service [Home page]. Retrieved from http://cordis.europa.eu/ [accessed 11 April 2020] Search in Google Scholar

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. ([1983] 1991), ‘The Iron Cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields,’ in W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 63–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/209510110.2307/2095101 Search in Google Scholar

Eder, J. (2019), ‘Innovation in the periphery: a critical survey and research agenda,’ International Regional Science Review, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/016001761876427910.1177/0160017618764279 Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2016), Strategic Plan 2016–2020, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Ares(2016)1051529, 1.3.2016. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/strategic-plan-2016-2020-research-and-innovation_en [accessed 10 January 2020] Search in Google Scholar

European Innovation Scoreboard (2019), ‘Main Report.’ Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/38781 [accessed 10 April 2020] Search in Google Scholar

Fontes, M. (2005), ‘Distant networking: the knowledge acquisition strategies of ‘out-cluster’ biotechnology firms,’ European Planning Studies, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 899-920. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431050018849810.1080/09654310500188498 Search in Google Scholar

Fransman, M. (2008), ‘Disaggregating firms in analysing the costs and benefits of the university–industry relationship: based on an analytical and empirical study from Scotland,’ Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 17, nos. 1–2, pp. 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859070127949010.1080/10438590701279490 Search in Google Scholar

Fritsch, M. & Kauffeld-Monz, M. (2010), ‘The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: an application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks,’ The Annals of Regional Science, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0245-810.1007/s00168-008-0245-8 Search in Google Scholar

Gould, R. V. & Fernandez, R. M. (1989), ‘Structures of mediation: a formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks,’ Sociological Methodology, vol. 19, pp. 89–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/27094910.2307/270949 Search in Google Scholar

Granovetter, M. S. (1973), ‘The strength of weak ties,’ American Journal of Sociology, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/22546910.1086/225469 Search in Google Scholar

Hanneman, R. A. & Riddle, M. (2005), Introduction to Social Network Methods, Riverside: University of California. Search in Google Scholar

Hargadon, A. & Sutton, R. I. (1997), ‘Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm,’ Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 716–749. https://doi.org/10.2307/239365510.2307/2393655 Search in Google Scholar

Helfen, M. (2015), ‘Institutionalizing precariousness? The politics of boundary work in legalizing agency work in Germany, 1949–2004’, Organization Studies, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1387–1422. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084061558533810.1177/0170840615585338 Search in Google Scholar

Herstad, S. J.; Aslesen, H. W. & Ebersberger, B. (2014), ‘On industrial knowledge base, commercial opportunities and global innovation network linkages,’ Research Policy, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.00310.1016/j.respol.2013.08.003 Search in Google Scholar

IC-INTAS (2014), International Association for the promotion of cooperation with scientists from the independent states of the former Soviet Union, 1993– [Home page]. Retrieved from http://cordis.europa.eu/programme/rcn/493_en.html [accessed 11 April 2020] Search in Google Scholar

IS-ECONTENT (2001), eContent Programme, 2001–2004, [Home page]. Retrieved from https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/16411-econtent-details-available [accessed 11 April 2020] Search in Google Scholar

Kalantaridis, C.; Küttim, M.; Govind, M. & Sousa, C. (2017), ‘How to commercialise university-generated knowledge internationally? A comparative analysis of contingent institutional conditions,’ Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 123, pp. 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.01310.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.013 Search in Google Scholar

Kauffeld-Monz, M. & Fritsch, M. (2013), ‘Who are the brokers of knowledge in regional systems of innovation? A multi-actor network analysis,’ Regional Studies, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 669–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340100371336510.1080/00343401003713365 Search in Google Scholar

Kenney, M. & Patton, D. (2009), ‘Reconsidering the Bayh–Dole Act and the current university invention ownership model,’ Research Policy, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1407–1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.07.00710.1016/j.respol.2009.07.007 Search in Google Scholar

Kim, C.; Park, S. H. & Seol, B. M. (2018), ‘The role of universities for the change of a network structure in the regional business ecosystem,’ Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-04-2018-04410.1108/APJIE-04-2018-044 Search in Google Scholar

Krackhardt, D. (1992), ‘The strength of strong ties: the importance of philos in organizations,’ in N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (eds.) Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 216–239. Search in Google Scholar

Kunegis, J. (2017), Handbook of Network Analysis KONECT – the Koblenz Network Collection, University of Namur, Belgium naXys, Namur Center for Complex Systems. Search in Google Scholar

Laerd Statistics (2018), ‘Kruskal-Wallis H Test using SPSS Statistics.’ Retrieved from https://statistics.laerd.com/spss-tutorials/kruskal-wallis-h-test-using-spss-statistics.php [accessed 10 January 2019] Search in Google Scholar

Langley, A.; Lindberg, K.; Mørk, B. E.; Nicolini, D.; Raviola, E. & Walter, L. (2019), ‘Boundary work among groups, occupations, and organizations: from cartography to process,’ Academy of Management Annals, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 704–736. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.008910.5465/annals.2017.0089 Search in Google Scholar

Lauk, K. & Allik, J. (2018), ‘A puzzle of Estonian science: how to explain unexpected rise of the scientific impact’, Trames, vol. 22(72/67), no. 4, pp. 329–344. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2018.4.0110.3176/tr.2018.4.01 Search in Google Scholar

Lissoni, F. (2010), ‘Academic inventors as brokers,’ Research Policy, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 843–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.04.00510.1016/j.respol.2010.04.005 Search in Google Scholar

Liu, J.; Chaminade, C. & Asheim, B. (2013), ‘The geography and structure of global innovation networks: a knowledge base perspective,’ European Planning Studies, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1456–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.75584210.1080/09654313.2012.755842 Search in Google Scholar

Martin, R. (2013), ‘Differentiated knowledge bases and the nature of innovation networks,’ European Planning Studies, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1418–1436. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.75583610.1080/09654313.2012.755836 Search in Google Scholar

Mattes, J. (2012), ‘Dimensions of proximity and knowledge base: innovation between spatial and non-spatial factors,’ Regional Studies, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1085-1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.55249310.1080/00343404.2011.552493 Search in Google Scholar

Moedas, C. & Smits, R.-J. (2015), ‘30 years, European research programmes 1984–2014,’ Horizon Magazine, Special issue, March 2015. Search in Google Scholar

Morgan, G. A.; Leech, N. L.; Gloeckner, G. W. & Barrett, K. C. (2012), IBM SPSS for Introductory Statistics: Use and Interpretation,’ New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203127315 Search in Google Scholar

Murashova, E. & Loginova, V. (2017), ‘University–industry interaction trends in the Baltic Sea Region: a bibliometric analysis,’ Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 28–58. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2017-000910.1515/bjes-2017-0009 Search in Google Scholar

Nooteboom, B. (2003), ‘Problems and solutions in knowledge transfer,’ in D. Fornahl & T. Brenner (eds.) Cooperation, Networks and Institutions: Regional Innovation Systems, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 105–127. Search in Google Scholar

Owen-Smith, J. M. & Powell, W. W. (2004), ‘Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community,’ Organization Science, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.005410.1287/orsc.1030.0054 Search in Google Scholar

Ponds, R.; Van Oort, F. & Frenken, K. (2007), ‘The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration,’ Papers in Regional Science, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 423-443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00126.x10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00126.x Search in Google Scholar

Prell, C. (2012), Social Network Analysis: History, Theory and Methodology, Los Angeles: SAGE. Search in Google Scholar

Reillon, V. (2017), EU Framework Programmes for Research and Innovation: Evolution and Key Data from FP1 to Horizon 2020 in View of FP9, European Parliamentary Research Service. Search in Google Scholar

Salavisa, I.; Sousa, C. & Fontes, M. (2012), ‘Topologies of innovation networks in knowledge-intensive sectors: sectoral differences in the access to knowledge and complementary assets through formal and informal ties,’ Technovation, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 380–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.02.00310.1016/j.technovation.2012.02.003 Search in Google Scholar

Scott, J. (2013), Social Network Analysis, Los Angeles: SAGE. Search in Google Scholar

Scott, W. R. (2008), Institutions and Organizations, 3rd ed., Los Angeles: SAGE. Search in Google Scholar

Shingala, M. C. & Rajyaguru, A. (2015), ‘Comparison of post hoc tests for unequal variance,’ International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 22–33. Search in Google Scholar

Smart Specialisation (2017a), Strengthening Innovation in Estonia, Regional Policy Factsheet. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/factsheets/2017/smart-specialisation-strengthening-innovation-in-estonia [accessed 11 April 2020] Search in Google Scholar

Smart Specialisation (2017b), Strengthening Innovation in Latvia, Regional Policy Factsheet. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/factsheets/2017/smart-specialisation-strengthening-innovation-in-latvia [accessed 11 April 2020] Search in Google Scholar

Smart Specialisation (2017c), Strengthening Innovation in Lithuania, Regional Policy Factsheet. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/factsheets/2017/smart-specialisation-strengthening-innovation-in-lithuania [accessed 11 April 2020] Search in Google Scholar

Steinmo, M. & Rasmussen, E. (2016),’ How firms collaborate with public research organizations: the evolution of proximity dimensions in successful innovation projects,’ Journal of Business Research, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 1250-1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.09.00610.1016/j.jbusres.2015.09.006 Search in Google Scholar

Ter Wal, A. L. J. & Boschma, R. A. (2009), ‘Applying social network analysis in economic geography: framing some key analytic issues,’ The Annals of Regional Science, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 739–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0258-310.1007/s00168-008-0258-3 Search in Google Scholar

UN (2020), ‘Geographic regions,’ United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/ [accessed 11 April 2020] Search in Google Scholar

Weterings, A. & Ponds, R. (2009), ‘Do regional and non-regional knowledge flows differ? An empirical study on clustered firms in the Dutch life sciences and computing services industry,’ Industry and Innovation, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366271090272803510.1080/13662710902728035 Search in Google Scholar

Zietsma, C.; Groenewegen, P.; Logue, D. M. & Hinings, C. R. (2017), ‘Field or fields? Building the scaffolding for cumulation of research on institutional fields,’ Academy of Management Annals, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 391–450. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.005210.5465/annals.2014.0052 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo