1. bookVolume 10 (2020): Issue 1 (June 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2674-4619
First Published
18 Jun 2013
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

The Origins of Supranational State Aid Legislations: What Policymakers Must Know and Adhere to. The Case of Estonia

Published Online: 17 Jun 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 10 (2020) - Issue 1 (June 2020)
Page range: 123 - 145
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2674-4619
First Published
18 Jun 2013
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

As an independent country, Estonia can decide on how to promote its economy through state intervention, at least in theory. At the same time, Estonia has been a WTO member since 1999 and an EU Member State since 2004 and must adhere to these rules. Both regimes limit a Member State’s ability to interfere in the economy, setting forth rules on when a state can interfere with consequences if the rules are not met. But these rules differ, and the same situation can have a different result depending on the rules applied. Also, both sets of rules limit the competence of a member country to interfere in economy differently, for example, the WTO applies a rather lenient ex post control while in the EU a strict ex ante control by the Commission is used. Also the consequences for failing to adhere are different. Although one of the smallest EU Member States and represented by the Commission in WTO roundtables, it is still relevant for Estonia to have a position on globally applied state interference measures, and present and protect its views, if needed. To successfully promote its economy nationally and in the EU, Estonian policymakers, like those of any other country in the same position, must know not only the applicable state interference rules but also the underlying principles thereof. The article will provide a historical overview of the framework of the supranational state aid regimes of the WTO and the EU, as well as the domestic rules of Estonia. It is aimed at reflecting the principles behind the state aid rules that the domestic policymakers must consider when designing national state interference measures. The author applies classical research methods, namely, reading and interpretation of texts, but also comparing the WTO, EU and Estonian laws on state subsidies.

Keywords

Almunia, J. (2014), ‘Statement on new state aid rules for R&D and innovation and on the extended notification exemptions of state aid,’ Speech at press conference, European Commission, Brussels, 21 May 2014. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-14-402_en.htm [accessed Mar 2020] Search in Google Scholar

Blauberger, M. (2009), ‘Of good and bad subsidies: European State aid control through soft and hard law,’ West European Politics, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140238090294530010.1080/01402380902945300 Search in Google Scholar

Boundanella, P. & Musa, M. (1979), ‘The Prince,’ in The Portable Machiavelli, New York: Penguin Book, pp. 77–166. Search in Google Scholar

Brogan, O. (1936), ‘Trade between the Roman Empire and the free German,’ The Journal of Roman Studies, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 195–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/29686610.2307/296866 Search in Google Scholar

Buendía Sierra, J. L. & Smulders, B. (2008), ‘The limited role of the “refined economic approach” in achieving the objectives of state aid control: time for some realism,’ in V. Di Bucci, J. L. Buendía Sierra & B. Smulders (eds.) EC State Aid Law – Le Droit des Aides d’Etat dans le CE, Liber Amicorum Francisco Santaolalla Gadea, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, p. 18. Search in Google Scholar

Buttigieg, E. (2009), Competition Law: Safeguarding the Consumer Interest. A Comparative Analysis of US Antitrust Law and EC Competition Law, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International. Search in Google Scholar

Commission Communication ‘Europe 2020 – A strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth’, COM(2010) 2020 final, 3.3.2010. Search in Google Scholar

Commission Notice on the notion of State aid as referred to in Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, 2016/C 262/01, OJ C 262, 19.7.2016. Search in Google Scholar

Commission Regulation (EU) no. 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty, OJ L 187/1, 7.6.2014. Search in Google Scholar

Communication from the Commission, Framework for State aid for research and development and innovation, 2014/C 198/01, OJ C 198, 27.6.2014 Search in Google Scholar

Communication from the Commission, Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014–2020, 2013/C 209/01, OJ C 209, 23.7.2013. Search in Google Scholar

Communication from the Commission, Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014–2020, 2014/C 200/01, OJ C 200, 28.6.2014. Search in Google Scholar

Communication from the Commission, Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty, 2014/C 249/01, OJ C 249, 31.7.2014. Search in Google Scholar

Competition Act, RT I 1998, 30, 410. Retrieved from https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/74948 [accessed Mar 2020] Search in Google Scholar

Competition Act, RT I 2001, 56, 332. Retrieved from https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/22479 [accessed Mar 2020] Search in Google Scholar

Didier, P. (1999), WTO Trade Instruments in the EU Law. Commercial Policy Instruments: Dumping, Subsidies, Safeguards, Public Procurement, London: Cameron May. Search in Google Scholar

EEC Seed Crushers’ and Oil Processors’ Federation (Fediol) v. Commission of the European Communities [1988], CJEU 2176/84, C-187/85, ECLI:EU:C:1988:399. Search in Google Scholar

Eesti Pagar AS v. Ettevõtluse Arendamise Sihtasutus and Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium [2019], CJEU C-349/17, ECLI:EU:C:2019:172. Search in Google Scholar

Explanatory memorandum (1998), Explanatory memorandum to the 1998 Competition Act. Retrieved from https://www.riigikogu.ee/tegevus/eelnoud/eelnou/eaae79f4-1179-36a2-a150-cb711823baf6/Konkurentsiseadus [accessed Mar 2020] Search in Google Scholar

Explanatory memorandum (2001), Explanatory memorandum to the 2001 Competition Act. Retrieved from https://www.riigikogu.ee/tegevus/eelnoud/eelnou/eeb64fc8-968c-3ca5-bd71-1cd6446a126f/Konkurentsiseadus [accessed Mar 2020] Search in Google Scholar

Explanatory memorandum (2004), Explanatory memorandum to the 2004 amendments. Retrieved from https://www.riigikogu.ee/tegevus/eelnoud/eelnou/98b06494-dec1-37ba-bfe1-036ac729f4e8/Konkurentsiseaduse%20muutmise%20seadus [accessed Mar 2020] Search in Google Scholar

Explanatory memorandum (2007), Explanatory memorandum to the 2007 amendments. Retrieved from https://www.riigikogu.ee/tegevus/eelnoud/eelnou/4f2d2f97-a9b6-ec34-d725-b4ff56fbd596/Konkurentsiseaduse%20muutmise%20seadus [accessed Mar 2020] Search in Google Scholar

Explanatory memorandum (2012), Explanatory memorandum to the 2012 amendments. Retrieved from https://www.riigikogu.ee/tegevus/eelnoud/eelnou/267e5cc1-672d-4680-b955-64521279b1c2/Konkurentsiseaduse%20muutmise%20seadus [accessed Mar 2020] Search in Google Scholar

Friederiszick, H. W.; Röller, L.-H. & Verouden, V. (2006), ‘European state aid control: an economic framework,’ in P. Buccirossi (ed.) Handbook of Antitrust Economics, Chapter: European State Aid Control: An Economic Framework, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 625–669. Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, C. D. (1949), ‘Subsidies in Roman imperial defence,’ Phoenix, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 60–69.10.2307/1086897 Search in Google Scholar

Hoekman, B. M. & Kostecki, M. M. (2006), The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Hofmann, H. C. H. & Micheau, C. (2016), State Aid Law of the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Kerikmäe, T. & Pärn-Lee, E. (2018), ‘Digitalisation and automatisation as challenges for changing the European Union,’ in N. Šišková (ed.) European Union – What is Next? A Legal Analysis and the Political Visions on the Future of the Union, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, pp. 296–313. Search in Google Scholar

Kerikmäe, T. & Pärn-Lee, E. (2020, forthcoming), Legal Dilemmas of Estonian Artificial Intelligence Strategy: In Between of e-Society and Global Race.10.1007/s00146-020-01009-8 Search in Google Scholar

Kleiner, T. (2011), ‘Modernization of State aid policy,’ in E. Szyszczak (ed.) Research Handbook on European State Aid Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 1–27.10.4337/9780857936424.00010 Search in Google Scholar

Kleiner, T. (2008), ‘The State aid Action Plan,’ in W. Mederer et al. (eds.) EU Competition Law: State Aid, vol. IV, Deventer: Claeys & Casteels. Search in Google Scholar

Krämer, R. & Krajewski, M. (2011), ‘State aid (subsidies) in international trade law,’ in E. Szyszczak (ed.) Research Handbook on European State Aid Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 404–424.10.4337/9780857936424.00027 Search in Google Scholar

López, J. J. P. (2015), The Concept of State Aid under EU Law: From Internal Market to Competition and Beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Matsushita, M.; Schoenbaum, T. J. & Mavroidis, P. C. (2006), The World Trade Organization – Law, Practice, and Policy, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Mazzucato, M. (2015), The Enterpreneurial State: Debunking Public vs Private Sector Myths, New York & London: Anthem Press. Search in Google Scholar

Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG and Flughafen Leipzig-Halle GmbH v. European Commission [2012], CJEU, C-288/11 P, ECLI:EU:C:2012:821. Search in Google Scholar

Parret, L. (2012), ‘The multiple personalities of EU competition law: time for a comprehensive debate on its objectives,’ in D. Zimmer (ed.) The Goals of Competition Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 61–84.10.4337/9780857936615.00010 Search in Google Scholar

Philip Morris Holland BV v. Commission of the European Communities [1980], CJEU, C-730/79, ECLI:EU:C:1980:209. Search in Google Scholar

Regulation no. 38 (2017), Minister of Enterprise and Information Technology in Estonia, 13.7.2017. Search in Google Scholar

Second Report on Competition Policy (1972), Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/annual_report/ar_1972_en.pdf [accessed Mar 2020] Search in Google Scholar

Sykes, A. (2003), The Economics of WTO Rules on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, U Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper no. 186. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.41578010.2139/ssrn.415780 Search in Google Scholar

Tenth Report on Competition Policy (1981), Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/annual_report/ar_1980_en.pdf [accessed Mar 2020] Search in Google Scholar

The Spaak Report (1956), Report of the Heads of Delegation to the Ministers of Foreign Affairs, of 21.4.1956. Search in Google Scholar

Vertrag über die Gründung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft für Kohle und Stahl (1951), 11951K/TXT. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:11951K/TXT&from=EN [accessed Mar 2020] Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo