[Barthold v. Germany [1985], ECtHR, 8734/79, § 58, Series A no. 90, 25.3.1985.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bem, M.; Horodys′kyi, I. & Levyts′ka, M. (2016), Media, konflikt ta zakhyst personal’nyhk danykh [Media, conflict, and personal data protection]. Retrieved from http://medialab.online/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/1460489993222540.pdf [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Benedek, W. & Kettemann, M. C. (2013), Freedom of Expression and the Internet, Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Civil Code of Ukraine (2003), Bulletin of the Supreme Council of Ukraine (BSC), 16.1.2003, pp. 435–IV, 40–44, 356. Retrieved from http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15 [accessed 22 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Constitutional Court of Ukraine (2018), Rishennya Konstytucijoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytucijnym podannyam 57 narodnykh deputativ Ukrayiny shhodo vidpovidnosti Konstytuciyi Ukrayiny (konstytucijnosti) Zakonu Ukrayiny ‘Pro zasady derzhavnoyi movnoyi polityky’ [The Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case initiated by 57 people deputies on compliance with the Constitution of Ukraine of Law of Ukraine ‘On principles of state language policy’], no. 2-r/2018, 28.2.2018, Bulletin of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, 2018, рp. 2, 102. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v002p710-18#n55 [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions ratified by the Law of Ukraine no. 1811-VI of 20/01/2010. Retrieved from http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/952_008 [accessed 22 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Draft Law of Ukraine ‘On the facilitation of functioning of Ukrainian as a state language’ (2018), Proekt Zakonu pro zabezpechennya funkcionuvannya ukrayins’koyi movy yak derzhavnoyino, no. 5670-d, 4.10.2018. Retrieved from http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=61994 [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Drahomyretska, N. M. (2016), ‘Suchasni tendenciy vzayemozv’yaskiv rivnya rozvytky nauky ta vyznannya derzhavy u sviti’ [Modern tendencies of how the level of scientific development is interconnected with the way the country is recognized in the world], Public Governance, no. 1, pp. 95–105. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/pubm_2016_1_11 [accessed 22 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[ECtHR (2011), Internet: case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, Research Division Report. Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Research_report_Internet_ENG.pdf [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Éditions Plon v. France [2004], ECtHR, no. 58148/00, 18.8.2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[Editorial Board of Pravoye Delo and Shtekel v. Ukraine [2011], ECtHR, no. 33014/05.]Search in Google Scholar
[EU vs Disinfo (2019), 22 March. Retrieved from https://euvsdisinfo.eu/ru/ [accessed 22 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Fuley, T. I. (2015), Application of the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights in the Administration of Justice: Instructional Guide for Judges, 2nd ed., Kyiv.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gazeta Ukraina-Tsentr v. Ukraine [2010], ECtHR, no. 16695/04, 15.7.2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grabenwarter, C. & Pabel, K. (2012), Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, 5th ed., Munchen: CH Beck.]Search in Google Scholar
[Handyside v. the United Kingdom [1976], ECtHR, 7.12.1976, § 49, Series A no. 24.]Search in Google Scholar
[High Specialized Court of Ukraine (2017), Ruling of the High Specialized Court of Ukraine dated 31 May 2017 in case 757/17511/15-ц. Retrieved from http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/66935651 [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Jersild v. Denmark [1994], ECtHR, 23.9.1994, § 37, Series A no. 298.]Search in Google Scholar
[Law of Ukraine ‘On freedom of religion and religious organizations’ (1991), Zakon Ukrayiny ‘Pro svobodu sovisti ta relihijni orhanizaciyi,’ Voice of Ukraine, 6.6.1991. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/987-12 [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Law of Ukraine ‘On information’ (1992), Zakon Ukrayiny ‘Pro informaciyu,’Voice of Ukraine, 13.11.1992. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2657-12 [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Law of Ukraine ‘On languages in Ukrainian SSR’ (1989), Zakon Ukrayiny ‘Pro movy v Ukrayins’kij RSR,’ Bulletin of the Supreme Council of Ukraine (BSC), pp. 45, 63. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/8312-11 [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Law of Ukraine ‘On principles of state language policy’ (2013), Zakon Ukrayiny ‘Pro zasady derzhavnoyi movnoyi polityky,’ Voice of Ukraine, 10.8.2012, p. 146. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5029-17 [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Law of Ukraine ‘On protection of personal data’ (2010), Zakon Ukrayiny ‘Pro zakhyst personal’nykh danykh,’ Governmental Courier, 7.7.2010, p. 122. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/2297-17 [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Law of Ukraine ‘On television and radio broadcasting’ (1993), Zakon Ukrayiny ‘Pro telebachennya i radiomovlennya,’ Voice of Ukraine, 22.2.1994. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/card/3759-12 [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Lingens v. Austria [1986], ECtHR, § 41, Series A no. 103, 8.7.1986.10.2307/2384780]Search in Google Scholar
[Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy [2009], ECtHR, no. 39128/05, § 30, 20.10.2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lyashko v. Ukraine [2006], ECtHR, no. 21040/02, 10.8.2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marchenko v. Ukraine [2009], ECtHR, no. 4063/04, 19.2.2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller and Others v. the United Kingdom [2004], nos. 45825/99 and 2 other, § 33, 26.10.2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[Myrotvorets (n.d.). Retrieved from https://myrotvorets.center [accessed 22 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Myrskyy v. Ukraine [2010], ECtHR, no. 7877/03, 20.5.2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nikolaiev, Ie. (2016), ‘Yak pidnesty yakisnyj riven’ ukrayins’kyx naukovyx zhurnaliv’ [How to improve the quality of Ukrainian scientific journals], Osvitnya polityka, 1 March. Retrieved from http://education-ua.org/ua/articles/640-yak-pidnesti-yakisnij-riven-ukrajinskikh-naukovikh-zhurnaliv [accessed 05 Sep 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Oberschlick v. Austria (no. 1) [1991], § 55, Series A no. 204, 23.5.1991.10.1016/0016-3287(91)90031-V]Search in Google Scholar
[OHCHR (2016), Civic Space and Fundamental Freedoms Ahead of the Presidential, Parliamentary and Local Elections in Ukraine in 2019–2020, Office of High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Countries/UA/CivicSpaceFundamentalFreedoms2019-2020_RU.pdf [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Olishevs’kyi, O. V. (2014), ‘Concept and classification of socially harmful information,’ in Evolution of ideas of crime and punishment in public law thought (to the 250th anniversary of Cesare Beccaria’s treatise “On Crimes and Punishments”: International research and practice conference proceedings, Kharkiv: Golden Mile, pp. 146–149.]Search in Google Scholar
[Olishevs’kyi, O. V. (2014), ‘Ponyattya social’no-shkidlyvoyi informaciyi’ [The concept of socially harmful information], Forum prave, no. 1, pp. 395–399. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/FP_index.htm_2014_1_69 [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria [1994], ECtHR, § 49, Series A no. 295-A, 20.12.1994.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ovchinnikov v. Russia [2010], ECtHR, no. 9807/02, § 51, 17.7.2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pravlife.org (2019), ‘Cerkovnyj sud vyznav provynu svyashhenyka v stvorenni spil”noty, yaka protystavyla sebe Cerkvi’ [Priest found guilty by church court of creating an entity that opposed the Church], 14 February. Retrieved from https://pravlife.org/uk/content/pozbavlenyy-svyashchennogo-sanu-protoiyerey-volodymyr-golovin [accessed 22 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Prokopenko, M. (2019), ‘Yak nauka poborola “mahiyu” – v ukrayins’komu sudi’ [How science defeated “magic” – in the Ukrainian court’], 16 January. Retrieved from https://day.kyiv.ua/uk/article/cuspilstvo/yak-nauka-poborola-magiyu-v-ukrayinskomu-sudi?fbclid=IwAR0ZqsrGacKTtlrAqXAAgEmgSmW4C7abcwvDP36R_UOfO7IL-ha8uVVPPKo [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Prymak, V. D. (2014), Compensation of Non-economic Damages Based on the Principles of Fairness, Reasonableness, and Good Faith, Kyiv: Iurinkom Inter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Renaud v. France [2010], ECtHR, no. 13290/07, § 36–42, 25.2.2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[Supreme Court of Ukraine (2010), Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine no. 5 of 4 June 2010 on application of statutory regulations by the courts in the cases for the protection of copyright and neighboring rights. Retrieved from http://search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/VSS00004.html [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Supreme Court of Ukraine (2018a), Resolution of the Supreme Court of 7 March 2018 in the case no. 522/14388/15 proceedings no. 61-4147 sv 18. Retrieved from http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/72756753 [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Supreme Court of Ukraine (2018b), Resolution of the Supreme Court of 21 March 2018 in case no. 752/21313/15-ц proceedings no. 61-9080 sv 18. Retrieved from http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/73189660 [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine (2012), Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine on certain matters of practice of resolution of disputes related to protection of intellectual property rights no. 12 of 17/10/2012. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0012600-12 [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Salov v. Ukraine [2005], ECtHR, ECHR 2005-VIII, no. 65518/01.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shvadchak, N. (2018), ‘Plahiat b’ye po nauci – chy ye komu vidpovisty?’ [Plagiarism wreaks havoc on science – anyone to make a stand?], LB.ua, 17 October. Retrieved from https://lb.ua/society/2018/10/17/410178_plagiat_bie_nautsi-chi_ie.html?fbclid=IwAR2r5PEQm-x7JUBM6Ss7QKDkXn_eamuMmzvlzQQFFfaCIuUtIs5gmIZNyzY [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Spasibo-Fateeva, I. V.et al. (2018), Corporate Disputes: Comments on Case-Law, Kharkiv: Pravo.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stefanchuk, R. O. (2007), Personal Immaterial Rights of Natural Persons in Civil Law (the Notion, Content, System, Implementation and Defense), Khmelnytskyi: Khmelnytskyi University Publishing House.]Search in Google Scholar
[Strana (2019), ‘Sud na 100% udovletvoril isk Portnova k BPP. Iurist rasskazal ob audiozapisi “apotheoza protsessa”‘ [The court fully satisfied the Portnov’s lawsuit. The lawyer told about the apotheosis of the trial], 26 March. Retrieved from https://strana.ua/news/192835-sud-polnostju-udovletvoril-isk-andreja-portnovak-bpp.html [accessed 22 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom [1979], ECtHR, (no. 1), § 65, Series A no. 30, 26.4.1979.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tserkovna, A. O.et al. (2014), ‘Problems of compensation of non-economic losses under Ukrainian civil law,’ Actual Legal Problems: Theory and Practice, no. 29, pp. 145–153.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ukrainian Media Group v. Ukraine [2005], no. 72713/01, 29.3.2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[UNESCO (1997), ‘UNESCO recommendation concerning the Status of Higher-Education Teaching Personnel,’ 11 November. Retrieved from http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13144&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[UOC (2018), ‘UPC: politychni pohlyady ta heorhiyivs’ka strichka – pryvatna sprava svyashhenyka’ [UOC: political views and St. George’s ribbon are private matters of a priest], Union of Orthodox Journalists, 14 February. Retrieved from https://spzh.news/ua/news/51477-upts-politychni-poglyady-ta-georgiyivs%60ka-strichka-pryvatna-sprava-svyashchenyka [accessed 22 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Vogt v. Germany [1996], (Article 50), § 52, ECtHR Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV, 2.9.1996.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC][1999], ECtHR, no. 28396/95, § 8, 36, ECHR 1999-VII.]Search in Google Scholar
[World Summit on the Information Society (2003), Declaration of Principles: Building the Information Society: A Global Challenge in the New Millennium, WSIS-03/GENEVA/DOC/4-E, 12.12.2003. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/wsis/docs/geneva/official/dop.html [accessed 20 Apr 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
