[Amnesty International (2014), Fair Trial Manual, 2nd ed., London: Amnesty International.]Search in Google Scholar
[Assy, R. (2015), Injustice in Person: The Right to Self-representation, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687442.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687442.001.0001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bezek v. Germany [2015], ECtHR, 4211/12 and 5850/12, 21.04.2015. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-154555 [accessed 24 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Bingham, L. (2006), ‘Strategy or process? Closing the international criminal tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda,’ Berkeley Journal of International Law, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 687–717.]Search in Google Scholar
[Croissant v. Germany [1992], ECtHR, no. 13611/88, 25.9.1992. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57736 [accessed 24 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Cryer, R.; Friman, H.; Robinson, D. & Wilmshurst, E. (2010), An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051176080810.1017/CBO9780511760808]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[European Commission of Human Rights (1956), Document DH(56)11 CDH(68)3 prepared by Preparatory Work on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (1956). Information Document prepared by the Secretariat of the European Commission of Human Rights. Doc. DH(56)11 CDH(68)3, 8.10.1956. Retrieved from http://www.echr.coe.int/LibraryDocs/Travaux/ECHRTravaux-ART6-DH(56)11-EN1338886.PDf [accessed 24 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[European Convention on Human Rights (1950), 4.11.1950. Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf [accessed 24 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Fellman, D. (1977), The Defendant’s Rights Today, London & Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[General Assembly Resolution A/47/10(1993), adopted by the General Assembly (on the report of Sixth Committee (A/47/586), 9 February 1993. Retrieved from https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/47/34 [accessed 24 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Gillespie, A. & Weare S. (2017), The English Legal System, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198785439.001.000110.1093/he/9780198785439.001.0001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Grover, L. (2014), Interpreting Crimes in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978110770558610.1017/CBO9781107705586]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gutnyk, V. (2015), ‘The requirements for qualification of defence counsel in the international criminal courts and tribunals,’ Teisė, vol. 95, pp. 182–192. https://doi.org/10.15388/Teise.2015.95.748110.15388/Teise.2015.95.7481]Search in Google Scholar
[Josipovic, I. (2006), ‘Responsibility for war crimes before national courts in Croatia,’ International Review of the Red Cross, vol. 88, no. 861, pp. 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S181638310600009910.1017/S1816383106000099]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kremens, K. (2011), ‘The protection of the accused in international criminal law according to the human rights law standard,’ Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics, vol. 1, pp. 26–48. https://doi.org/10.2478/wrlae-2013-002610.2478/wrlae-2013-0026]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lagerblom v. Sweden [2003], ECtHR, 26891/95, 14.1.2003. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60884 [accessed 24 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Leaney, E. (2008), ‘Assignment of counsel of choice to indigent accused at the ICTR: an analysis of a threat to fair trial rights and what may be done about it,’ New Zealand Yearbook of International Law, vol. 6, pp. 239–272.]Search in Google Scholar
[MacDonald, G. K. & Swaak-Goldman, O. Q. (2000), Substantive and Procedural Aspects of International Criminal Law. Volume 1: Commentary, Hague: BRILL.10.1163/9789004507876]Search in Google Scholar
[Marasinghe, С. (1995), ‘The right to legal assistance in international law, with special reference to the ICCPR, the ECHR, and the ACHR,’ Asian Yearbook of International Law, vol. 5, pp. 15–44.10.1163/9789004400641_005]Search in Google Scholar
[Meisenberg, S. M. (2007), ‘The right to legal assistance at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda: a review of its jurisprudence,’ in E. Decaux, A. Dieng & M. Sow (eds.) From Human Rights to International Criminal Law: Studies in Honour of an African Jurist, the Late Judge Laïty Kama, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 125–157. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004160552.i-776.3010.1163/ej.9789004160552.i-776.30]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mugwanya, G. (2000), ‘Realizing universal human rights norms through regional human rights mechanisms: reinvigorating the African system,’ Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, vol. 10, pp. 35–50. https://doi.org/10.18060/1752710.18060/17527]Search in Google Scholar
[Prosecutor v. J. B. Barayagwiza [1999], ICTR, no. ICTR-97-19 (Appeals Chamber Decision), 3.11.1999. Retrieved from http://www.unictr.org/Portals/0/Case/English/Barayagwiza/decisions/dcs991103.pdf [accessed 27 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Prosecutor v. Ferdinand Nahimana, Hassan Ngeze and Jean Bosco Barayagwiza [2003], Decision on the motion to stay the proceedings in the trial of Ferdinand Nahimana, ICTR, no. ICTR-99-52-T, 5.6.2003. Retrieved from https://jrad.irmct.org/view.htm?r=216405&s= [accessed 25 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Prosecutor v. Ferdinand Nahimana, Jean Bosco Barayagwiza and Hassan Ngeze [2007], Judgement, ICTR, no. ICTR-99-52-Am, 28.11.2007. Retrieved from https://unictr.irmct.org/sites/unictr.org/files/case-documents/ictr-99-52/appeals-chamber-judgements/en/071128.pdf [accessed 25 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Prosecutor v. J. Prlic, B. Stojic, S. Praljak, M. Petkovic, V. Coric, B. Pusic [2006], Decision On Assignment Of Defence Counsel, para. 10, ICTY, no. IT-04-74-PT, 15.12.2006. Retrieved from http://www.icty.org/x/cases/prlic/tdec/en/060215.htm [accessed 27 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Prosecutor v. S. Milosevic [2004], Decision on Interlocutory Appeal of the Trial Chamber’s Decision on the Assignment of Defense Counsel, ICTY, no. IT-02-54-AR73.7, 1.11.2004. Retrieved from http://www.icty.org/x/cases/slobodan_milosevic/acdec/en/041101.htm [accessed 27 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Prosecutor v. Phénéas Munyarugarama [2012], Decision on the prosecutor’s request for referral of the cases to the Republic of Rwanda, ICTR, no. ICTR-02-79-R11bis, 28.6.2012. Retrieved from http://w.unictr.org/sites/unictr.org/files/case-documents/ictr-02-79-r11bis/trial-decisions/en/120628.pdf [accessed 27 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Prosecutor v. V. Seselj [2003], Decision on Prosecution’s Motion for Order Appointing Counsel to Assist Vojislav Seselj with his Defence, ICTY, no. IT-03-67-PT, 9.5.2003. Retrieved from http://www.icty.org/x/cases/seselj/tdec/en/030509.htm [accessed 27 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Prosecutor v. Z. Tolimir, R. Miletic, M. Gvero [2005], Decision on Appointment of Co–counsel for Radivoje Miletic, ICTY, no. IT-05-88-PT, 28.12.2005. Retrieved from http://www.icty.org/x/cases/popovic/tdec/en/050928.htm [accessed 27 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Sands, P. (2003), From Nuremberg to The Hague: The Future of International Criminal Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051149408610.1017/CBO9780511494086]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Schabas, W. (2011), An Introduction to the International Criminal Court, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975035]Search in Google Scholar
[The Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui [2012], Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, no. ICC-01/04-01/07, Decision on the implementation of Regulation 55 of the Regulations of the Court and severing the charges against the accused persons, 21 November. Retrieved from https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2012_10236.PDF [accessed 27 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo [2016], Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, no. ICC-01/04-01/06, Decision on the Request of the Defence for Thomas Lubanga Dyilo seeking his Appearance via Video-Link at the Hearings of 11, 13 and 14 October 2016, 6.10.2016. Retrieved from https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2017_04423.PDF [accessed 27 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[UN (1993a), Letter dated 10 February 1993 from the Permanent Representative of France to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General, S/25266. Retrieved from http://repository.un.org/bitstream/handle/11176/50551/S_25266-EN.pdf [accessed 24 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[UN (1993b), Letter dated 16 February 1993 from the Permanent Representative of Italy to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General, S/25300. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/25300 [accessed 24 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[UN (1993c), Report of the Secretary–General Pursuant to Paragraph 2 of Security Council Resolution 808 (1993), presented 3 May 1993 (S/25704). Retrieved from https://undocs.org/S/25704 [accessed 24 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[UN (1994a), Draft commentary to Parts 4 and 5 of the Draft Statute, Report of the Working Group on a draft Statute for an International Criminal Court, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.491/Rev.2/Add.2, 18 July 1994. Retrieved from http://legal.un.org/docs/?symbol=A/CN.4/L.491/Rev.2/Add.2 [accessed 24 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[UN (1994b), Preliminary report of the Independent Commission of Experts. Annex to Letter dated 1 October 1994 from the Secretary-General to the President of the Security Council, UN Doc. S/1994/11254 October. Retrieved from https://undocs.org/S/1994/1125 [accessed 23 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[UN (1995), Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court, UN Doc. A/50/22. Retrieved from https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/b50da8/pdf/ [accessed 25 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[UN (1996), Report of the Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court (1996), UN Doc. A/51/22. Retrieved from https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/e75432/pdf/ [accessed 25 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[UN (2019), International Tribunals. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/content/repertoire/international-tribunals [accessed 24 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[UN Security Council Resolution 808(1993), adopted by the Security Council on 22 February 1993. Retrieved from https://undocs.org/S/RES/808(1993) [accessed 24 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[UN Security Council Resolution 827(1993), adopted unanimously on 25 May 1993. UN Doc. S/RES/827(1993). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/827(1993) [accessed 23 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[UN Security Council Resolution 955(1994), adopted on 8 November 1994. UN Doc. S/RES/955(1994). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/955(1994) [accessed 23 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action (1993), UN. Doc. A/CONF.157/23. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/Vienna.aspx [accessed 24 Aug 2019]]Search in Google Scholar
[Whiting, A. (2009), ‘In international criminal prosecutions, justice delayed can be justice delivered,’ Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 50, pp. 323–364.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wilner, G. (1995–1996), ‘Reflection of regional human rights law,’ Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, vol. 25, pp. 407–426.]Search in Google Scholar
