[ASEM (1996), Chairman’s Statement of the First Asia–Europe Meeting, Bangkok, 1–2 March. Retrieved from http://www.aseminfoboard.org/sites/default/files/documents/1996%20-%20ASEM1%20-%20Chair%20Statement.pdf [accessed 8 Jun 2015]]Search in Google Scholar
[ASEM (1998), Chairman’s Statement of the Second Asia–Europe Meeting, London, 3–4 April. Retrieved from http://www.aseminfoboard.org/sites/default/files/documents/1998%20-%20ASEM2%20-%20Chair%20Statement.pdf [accessed 8 Jun 2015]]Search in Google Scholar
[CAEC (1997), The Rationale and Common Agenda for Asia–Europe Cooperation, CAEC Task Force Reports, London: Council for Asia–Europe Cooperation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cammack, P. (1999), ‘Interpreting ASEM: Interregionalism and new materialism,’ Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354786990872466810.1080/13547869908724668]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Camroux, D. & Lechervy, C. (1996), ‘‘Close Encounter of a Third Kind?’ The Inaugural Asia-Europe meeting of March 1996,’ The Pacific Review, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 442–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951274960871919610.1080/09512749608719196]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Communication from the Commission (COM (1994) 314 final) to the Council Towards a New Asia Strategy, Brussels, 13.07.1994. Retrieved from http://aei.pitt.edu/2949/1/2949.pdf [accessed 8 Jun 2015]]Search in Google Scholar
[Crawford, J. A. & Fiorentino, R. V. (2005), The Changing Landscape of Regional Trade Agreements, Discussion Paper, no. 8, Geneva: WTO Secretariat.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dent, C. M. (1999), ‘The EU–East Asia economic relationship: the persisting weak triadic link?’ European Foreign Affairs Review, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 371–394.10.54648/EERR1999037]Search in Google Scholar
[Doidge, M. (2011), The European Union and Interregionalism: Patterns of Engagement, Farnham: Ashgate.]Search in Google Scholar
[Doidge, M. (2013), ‘New Zealand and the Asia-Europe Meeting,’ Asia Europe Journal, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-013-0347-510.1007/s10308-013-0347-5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[European Council (1995), ‘Madrid European Council: Conclusions of the Presidency,’ Bulletin of the European Union, no. 12, pp. 9–51.]Search in Google Scholar
[EUROSTAT (2001), ‘Intra-EU investment increased by 50% in 2000,’ News Release, no. 74/2001, 6 July.]Search in Google Scholar
[Forster, A. (1999), ‘The European Union in South-East Asia: continuity and change in turbulent times,’ International Affairs, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 743–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.0010610.1111/1468-2346.00106]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hänggi, H. (1999), ‘ASEM and the construction of the new triad,’ Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354786990872467010.1080/13547869908724670]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hänggi, H. (2003), ‘Regionalism through interregionalism: East Asia and ASEM,’ in L. Fu-Kuo & P. Régnier (eds.) Regionalism in East Asia: Paradigm Shifting? London: Routledge, pp. 197–219.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hänggi, H. (2006), ‘Interregionalism as a multifaceted phenomenon: in search of a typology,’ in H. Hänggi, R. Roloff & J. Rüland (eds.) Interregionalism and International Relations, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 31–62.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maitland, D. & Hu, Y. S. (1998), Europe and Emerging Asia, London: Federal Trust.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pou Serradell, V. (1996), ‘The Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM): a historical turning point in relations between the two regions,’ European Foreign Affairs Review, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 185–210.10.54648/EERR1996013]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruigrok, W. & van Tulder, R. (1995), The Logic of International Restructuring, London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rüland, J. (1999), Transregional Relations: The Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) – A Functional Analysis, Paper presented to the International Conference on Asia and Europe on the Eve of the 21st Century, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 19–20 August.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stubbs, R. (2002), ‘ASEAN Plus Three: emerging East Asian regionalism?’ Asian Survey, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 440–455. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2002.42.3.44010.1525/as.2002.42.3.440]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[The World Bank (2005), Global Economic Prospects: Trade, Regionalism, and Development, Washington, DC: The World Bank.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wendt, A. (1994), ‘Collective identity formation and the international state,’ American Political Science Review, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 384–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/294471110.2307/2944711]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Yeo, L. H. (2003), Asia and Europe: The Development and Different Dimensions of ASEM, London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020360999610.4324/9780203609996]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Yeung, M. T.; Perdikis, N. & Kerr, W. A. (1999), Regional Trading Blocs in the Global Economy: The EU and ASEAN, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.]Search in Google Scholar