A nonlinear model for the characterization and optimization of athletic training and performance

1. Allen H., A. Coggan (2010) Training and Racing With a Power Meter. VeloPress.Search in Google Scholar

2. Asteroth A., A. Hagg (2015) How to successfully apply genetic algorithms in practice: Representation and parametrization. 2015 International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA). DOI: 10.1109/INISTA.2015.7276778.10.1109/INISTA.2015.7276778Search in Google Scholar

3. Banister E.W., T.W. Calvert, M.V. Savage, T.M. Bach (1975) A systems model of training for athletic performance. Aust. J. Sports Med., 7: 57-61.Search in Google Scholar

4. Busso T. (2003) Variable dose-response relationship between exercise training and performance. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 35(7): 1188-1195. DOI: 10.1249/01. MSS.0000074465.13621.37.Search in Google Scholar

5. Busso T., C. Carasso, J.-R. Lacour (1991) Adequacy of a systems structure in the modeling of training effects on performance. J. Appl. Physiol., 71(5): 2044-2049.10.1152/jappl.1991.71.5.20441761506Search in Google Scholar

6. Busso T., K. Häkkinen, A. Pakarinen, C. Carasso, J.R. Lacour, P.V. Komi, H. Kauhanen (1990) A systems model of training responses and its relationship to hormonal responses in elite weight-lifters. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol., 61: 48-54. DOI: 10.1007/BF00236693.10.1007/BF002366932289497Search in Google Scholar

7. Calvert T.W., E.W. Banister, M.V. Savage, T. Bach (1976) A systems model of the effects of training on physical performance. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., 6(2): 94-102. DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.1976.5409179.10.1109/TSMC.1976.5409179Search in Google Scholar

8. Clarke D.C., P.F. Skiba (2013) Rationale and resources for teaching the mathematical modeling of athletic training and performance. Adv. Physiol. Educ., 37(2): 134-152. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00078.2011.10.1152/advan.00078.201123728131Search in Google Scholar

9. Hellard P., M. Avalos, G. Millet, L. Lacoste, F. Barale, J.-C. Chatard (2005) Modeling the residual effects and threshold saturation of training: A case study of Olympic swimmers. J. Strength Cond. Res., 19(1): 67-75. DOI: 10.1519/14853.1.10.1519/14853.1535282815705048Search in Google Scholar

10. Hellard P., M. Avalos, L. Lacoste, F. Barale, J.-C. Chatard, G.P. Millet (2006) Assessing the limitations of the Banister model in monitoring training. J. Sports Sci., 24(5): 509-520. DOI: 10.1080/02640410500244697.10.1080/02640410500244697197489916608765Search in Google Scholar

11. Rao S.S. (2009) Engineering Optimization: Theory and Practice. 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9780470549124.10.1002/9780470549124Search in Google Scholar

12. Schaefer D., A. Asteroth, M. Ludwig (2015) Training plan evolution based on training models. 2015 International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA). DOI: 10.1109/INISTA.2015.7276739.10.1109/INISTA.2015.7276739Search in Google Scholar

13. Sih B.L., C.H. Negus (2016) Physical training outcome prediction with biomechanics, Part 1: Army physical fitness test modeling. Mil. Med., 181(5S). DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00168.10.7205/MILMED-D-15-0016827168556Search in Google Scholar

14. Skiba P.F. (2008) Analysis of power output and training stress in cyclists: The development of the BikeScoreTM algorithm. Tech. rep. PhysFarm Training Systems LLC.Search in Google Scholar

15. Taha T., S.G. Thomas (2003) Systems modeling of the relationship between training and performance. Sports Med., 33(14): 1061-1073. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200333140-00003.10.2165/00007256-200333140-0000314599233Search in Google Scholar

16. Thomas L., I. Mujika, T. Busso (2008) A model study of optimal training reduction during pre-event taper in elite swimmers. J. Sports Sci., 26(6): 643-652. DOI: 10.1080/02640410701716782.10.1080/0264041070171678218344135Search in Google Scholar

17. Thomas L., I. Mujika, T. Busso (2009) Computer simulations assessing the potential performance benefit of a final increase in training during pre-event taper. J. Strength Cond. Res., 23(6): 1729-1736. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b3dfa1.10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b3dfa119675490Search in Google Scholar