Biomechanics Scholar Citations across Academic Ranks

1. Al-Herz W., H. Haider, M. Al-Bahhar, A. Sadeq (2014) Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: How common is it and why does it exist? J. Med. Ethics., 40: 346-348.Search in Google Scholar

2. Baird L., M. C Oppenheim (1994) Do citations matter? J. Inf. Sci., 20: 2-15.Search in Google Scholar

3. Batista P.D., M.G. Campiteli, O. Kinouchi, A.S. Martinez (2006) Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics, 68: 179-189.10.1007/s11192-006-0090-4Search in Google Scholar

4. Bornmann L., W. Marx (2014) How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations. Scientometrics, 98: 487-509.10.1007/s11192-013-1161-ySearch in Google Scholar

5. Cronin B. (2001) Hyperauthorship: a postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 52: 558-569.Search in Google Scholar

6. Delgado-Loped-Cozar E., A. Cabezas-Clavjo (2013) Ranking journals: Could google scholar metrics be an alternative to journal citation reports and Scimago journal rank? Learned Publishing, 26: 101–114.10.1087/20130206Search in Google Scholar

7. de Winter J.C.F., A.A. Zadpoor, D. Dodou (2014) The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: A longitudinal study. Scientometrics, 98: 1547-1565.10.1007/s11192-013-1089-2Search in Google Scholar

8. Galloway L.M., A.E. Rauh (2014) Using google scholar citations to profile scholars’ work. Issues Sci. Technol. Librarianship, 78. DOI:10.5062/F4319SWZSearch in Google Scholar

9. Gefen A. (2011) How high is a “high” Hirsch index in biomechanics research? J. Biomech., 44: 206-208.Search in Google Scholar

10. Ghosh J.S. (1975) Uncitedness of articles in Nature, a multi-disciplinary scientific journal. Inf. Process Manag., 11: 165-169.Search in Google Scholar

11. Guliak F., C.R. Jacobs (2011) The H-index: Use and overuse. J. Biomech., 44: 208-209.Search in Google Scholar

12. Hagen N.T. (2008) Harmonic allocation of authorship credit: Source-level correction of bibliometric bias assures accurate publication and citation analysis. PLoS ONE, 3(12): e4021. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.000402110.1371/journal.pone.0004021260331119107201Search in Google Scholar

13. Hicks D., P. Wouters, L. Waltman, S. de Rijcke, I. Rafols (2015) The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520: 429-431.10.1038/520429a25903611Search in Google Scholar

14. Knudson D. (2012) Twenty-year trends of authorship and sampling in applied biomechanics research. Perceptual Motor Skills, 114: 16-20.10.2466/11.PMS.114.1.16-2022582671Search in Google Scholar

15. Knudson D. (2014) Citation rates for highly-cited papers from different sub-disciplinary areas within kinesiology. Chron. Kinesiol. Higher Educ., 25(2): 9-17.Search in Google Scholar

16. Knudson D. (2015a.) Citation rate of highly-cited papers in 100 kinesiology-related journals. Meas. Phys. Educ. Exerc. Sci., 19: 44-50.10.1080/1091367X.2014.988336Search in Google Scholar

17. Knudson D. (2015b) Evidence of citation bias in kinesiology-related journals. Chron. Kinesiol. Higher Educ., 26(1): 5-12.Search in Google Scholar

18. Knudson D. (In press) Kinesiology faculty citations across academic rank. Quest, DOI: 10.1080/00336297.2015.108214410.1080/00336297.2015.1082144Search in Google Scholar

19. Knudson D., J. Chow (2008) North American perception of the prestige of biomechanics serials. Gait Posture, 27: 559-563.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.00517707642Search in Google Scholar

20. Knudson D., J. Ostarello (2010) Influential literature in applied sports biomechanics. In: R. Jensen, W. Ebben, E. Petushek, C. Richter, K. Roemer (Ed.). Scientific Proceedings of the 28thConference of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports; pp.765-768. Marquette, MI: Northern Michigan University.Search in Google Scholar

21. Kosmulski M. (2012) The role of references in scientific papers: Cited papers as objects of research. Res. Eval., 21: 87-88.10.1093/reseval/rvr004Search in Google Scholar

22. Liebowitz S.J. (2014) Willful blindness: The inefficient reward structure in academic research. Econ. Inquiry, 52: 1267-1283.Search in Google Scholar

23. Opthof T., R. Coronel, H.M. Piper (2004) Impact factors: No totum pro parte by skewness of citation. Cardiovasc. Res., 61: 201-203.Search in Google Scholar

24. Ortega J.L., I.F. Aguillo (2012) Science is all in the eye of the beholder: Keyword maps in Google Scholar Citations. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 63: 2370-2377.Search in Google Scholar

25. Papatheodorou S.I., T.A. Trikalinos, J.P.A. Ioannidis (2008) Inflated number of authors over time have not been just due to increasing research complexity. J. Clin. Epidemiol., 61: 546-551.Search in Google Scholar

26. Seglen P.O. (1997) Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. Br. Med. J., 314: 497-502.Search in Google Scholar

27. Stern R.E. (1990) Uncitedness in the biomedical literature. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 41: 193-196.Search in Google Scholar

28. Van Dalen H.P., K. Henkens (2004) Demographers and their journals: Who remains uncited after ten years? Pop. Dev. Rev., 30: 489-506Search in Google Scholar

29. Weeks W.B., A.E. Wallace, B.C.S. Kimberly (2004) Changes in authorship patterns in prestigious US medical journals. Soc. Sci. Med., 59: 1949-1954. Search in Google Scholar