[Al-Faki, Ibrahim Mohamed. 2014. Political Speeches of Some African Leaders from a Linguistic Perspective. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 4(3): 180-198.]Search in Google Scholar
[Armasu, Veronica-Diana. 2013. The Concept of Politeness in Everyday and Professional Discourse. PhD dissertation, Babeş-Bolyai University. <http://193.231.20.119/doctorat/teza/fisier/1427> (January 15, 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Becker, Annette. 2007. Are you saying...? A cross-cultural analysis of interviewing practices in TV election night coverages. In Fetzer, Anita & Lauerbach, Gerda Eva (eds.), Political discourse in the media, 139-162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.160.08bec]Search in Google Scholar
[Billig, Michael. 2008. The language of critical discourse analysis: the case of nominalization. Discourse & Society 19(6): 783-800.10.1177/0957926508095894]Search in Google Scholar
[Bramley, Nicolette Ruth. 2001. Pronouns of politics: the use of pronouns in the construction of ‘self’ and ‘other’ in political interviews. PhD dissertation, Australian National University. <https://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/ bitstream/1885/46225/5/01front.pdf> (August 10, 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Deignan, Alice. 2008. Corpus Linguistics and Metaphor. In Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, 280-294. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.018]Search in Google Scholar
[Fetzer, Anita. 2007. Challenges in political interviews: An intercultural analysis. In Fetzer, Anita & Lauerbach, Gerda Eva (eds.), Political discourse in the media, 163-192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.160.10fet]Search in Google Scholar
[Fez-Barringten, Barie. 2012. Architecture: The Making of Metaphors. Ed. Edward Hart. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gibbs, Raymond. W. Jr. 1998. Metaphor: Psychological Aspects. In Jacob L. Mey (ed.), The Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fowler, Roger, Hodge, Bob, Kress, Gunther & Trew, Tony. 1979. Language and Social Control. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Furkó, Bálint Péter. 2008. General extenders in English and Hungarian. In József Andor, Béla Hollósy, Tibor Laczkó, Péter Pelyvás (eds.), When Grammar Minds Language and Literature - Festschrift for Prof. Béla Korponay on the occasion of his 80th birthday, 147-157. Debrecen: Angol-Amerikai Intézet.]Search in Google Scholar
[Furkó, Bálint Péter. 2013. The Functional Spectrum of Pragmatic Markers in Political News Interviews and Celebrity Interviews. Topics in Linguistics 11: 13-21.]Search in Google Scholar
[Greatbatch, David. 1986. Aspects of topical organisation in news interviews: The use of agenda-shifting procedures by interviewees. Media, Culture and Society 8(4): 441-55.10.1177/0163443786008004005]Search in Google Scholar
[Hill, Jane. 1999. Read my article: ideological complexity and the overdetermination of promising in American presidential politics. In Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.), Regimes of language: ideologies, polities, and identities, 262-263. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ho, Victor. 2013. Strategic use of nouns and pronouns in public discourse: the case of the fine-tuning of the medium of instruction policy in Hong Kong. Pragmatics 23(1): 51-67.10.1075/prag.23.1.03ho]Search in Google Scholar
[Hurford, James R., Heasley, Brendan and Smith, Michael, B. (eds.). 2008. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Irimiea, Silvia. 2010. Rhetorical and Comparative Study of the Victory Speeches of Barack Obama and Mircea Geoana. JoLIE 3: 41-53.10.29302/jolie.2010.3.3]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, Mark. 2008. Philosophy’s Debt to Metaphor. In Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, 39-52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Lauerbach, Gerda. 2007. Argumentation in Political Talk Show Interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1388-1419.10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Németh T., Enikő. 2014. Implicit arguments at the grammar-pragmatics interface: Some methodological considerations. Argumentum 10: 679-694.]Search in Google Scholar
[Storjohann, Petra. 2005. Corpus-driven vs. corpus-based approach to the study of relational patterns. <http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/research/activity/corpus/ publications/conference-archives/2005-conf-e-journal.aspx> (November 25, 2015)]Search in Google Scholar
[Stubbs, Michael. 1996. Text and Corpus Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tognini-Bonelli, Elena. 2001. Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.6]Search in Google Scholar
[Tranchese, Alessia & Zollo, Sole Alba. 2013. The Construction of Gender-based Violence in the British Printed and Broadcast Media. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 7(1): 141-163.]Search in Google Scholar
[Uhlman, J. Todd. 2012. Gas-Light Journeys: Bayard Taylor and the Cultural Work of the American Travel Lecturer in the Nineteenth Century. American Nineteenth Century History 13(3): 371-401.10.1080/14664658.2012.736146]Search in Google Scholar
[van Dijk, Teun A. 1993. Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society 4(2): 249-283.10.1177/0957926593004002006]Search in Google Scholar
[van Leeuwen, Theo. 1996. The representation of social actors. In C. R. Caldas- Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds.), Texts and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, 32-69. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wodak, Ruth. 1989. Language, Power and Ideology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ct.7]Search in Google Scholar
