<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The description and interpretation of the visual composition of a film is crucial in understanding the effects of moving images and their specific role in the contemporary context of intermediality. The phenomenological approach, based on the precise depiction of the lived perceptual experience and its integration in the process of interpretation, offers a powerful tool for critical analysis. Although this theoretical framework opens up many different approaches, in this paper I will focus on Merleau-Pontyʼs phenomenological account of perception and on the viewer experience described by Vivian Sobchack with the self-contradictory term “a filmʼs body.” After studying this concept and its role in film analysis, as used by Sobchack, based on the term double-sided and fissured experience the paper offers an alternative approach which, compared to the earlier ones, seems to be more fruitful in understanding the act of vision and the embodied viewer experience constructed by a moving picture. The last part of the paper demonstrates, through the example of Paul Thomas Andersonʼs The Master (2012), how crucial the embodied viewer experience can be in the understanding of moving images. The analysis of the visual system of this film will show how the main problem of the whole story is re-created, re-presented in the visually triggered bodily experience of the viewer.</p></abstract>

The description and interpretation of the visual composition of a film is crucial in understanding the effects of moving images and their specific role in the contemporary context of intermediality. The phenomenological approach, based on the precise depiction of the lived perceptual experience and its integration in the process of interpretation, offers a powerful tool for critical analysis. Although this theoretical framework opens up many different approaches, in this paper I will focus on Merleau-Pontyʼs phenomenological account of perception and on the viewer experience described by Vivian Sobchack with the self-contradictory term “a filmʼs body.” After studying this concept and its role in film analysis, as used by Sobchack, based on the term double-sided and fissured experience the paper offers an alternative approach which, compared to the earlier ones, seems to be more fruitful in understanding the act of vision and the embodied viewer experience constructed by a moving picture. The last part of the paper demonstrates, through the example of Paul Thomas Andersonʼs The Master (2012), how crucial the embodied viewer experience can be in the understanding of moving images. The analysis of the visual system of this film will show how the main problem of the whole story is re-created, re-presented in the visually triggered bodily experience of the viewer.

Visual Composition of Bodily Presence. A Phenomenological Approach to Paul Thomas Anderson’s The Master

Moholy-Nagy University of Art and Design Budapest (Hungary)

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Film and Media Studies

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

The description and interpretation of the visual composition of a film is crucial in understanding the effects of moving images and their specific role in the...

Visual Composition of Bodily Presence. A Phenomenological Approach to Paul Thomas Anderson’s The Master

Published Online: Apr 06, 2016

Page range: 111 - 125

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ausfm-2015-0018

Keywords
phenomenology, perception, film’s body, Paul Thomas Anderson, The Master

© 2016

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Visual Composition of Bodily Presence. A Phenomenological Approach to Paul Thomas Anderson’s The Master

Published Online: Apr 06, 2016

Page range: 111 - 125

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ausfm-2015-0018

Keywordsphenomenology, perception, film’s body, Paul Thomas Anderson, The Master

© 2016

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Keywords
phenomenology, perception, film’s body, Paul Thomas Anderson, The Master