1. bookVolume 9 (2016): Issue 1 (October 2016)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2068-7583
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Linguistic Justice, van Parijs, and Esperanto

Published Online: 26 Oct 2016
Volume & Issue: Volume 9 (2016) - Issue 1 (October 2016)
Page range: 55 - 61
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2068-7583
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

In the European and world-wide scenario of linguistic justice offered by van Parijs (2011), it is argued that we need one lingua franca only and that the only suitable candidate is English. In order to sustain his argument, the author has to reject three known alternatives against the English-only scenario. The second alternative is Esperanto. Van Parijs argues that there are some inner defects in the Esperanto language, and therefore Esperanto is not suitable for the role of world-wide lingua franca. This paper offers counterarguments based on the evidence of facts, showing that if nowadays Esperanto is only a lesser-used language the reason is not in the inner traits of the language, rather in geopolitical decisions. I argue that in the most probable global scenario English still plays the actual major role, but along with other cultural languages being regional lingua francas.

Keywords

ECKERT, Penelope. 2006. Communities of Practice. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01276-1Search in Google Scholar

GLEDHILL, Christopher. 2000. The Grammar of Esperanto. A Corpus-Based Description. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

GOBBO, Federico. 2005. The European Union’s Need for an International Auxiliary Language. Journal of Universal Language 6: 1–28.10.22425/jul.2005.6.1.1Search in Google Scholar

GOBBO, Federico. 2015. Interlinguïstiek, een vak voor meertaligheid. Interlingvistiko, fako por multlingveco. Interlinguistics, a Discipline for Multilingualism. Oratie 532, verschenen in de oratiereeks van de Universiteit van Amsterdam op vrijdag 13 maart 2015. Amsterdam University Press.Search in Google Scholar

LINDSTEDT, Jouko. 2009. Esperanto: an Eastern European Contact Language? In: VOSS, Christian–NAGÓRKO, Alicja (eds), Die Europäizität der Slawia oder dies Slawizität Europas. Ein Beitrag der kultur- und sprachrelativistischen Linguistik (Studies on Language and Culture in Central and Eastern Europe, 2). Munich–Berlin: Otto Sagner.Search in Google Scholar

LINDSTEDT, Jouko. 2010. Esperanto as a Family Language. In: DERVIN, F. (ed.), Lingua francas. La véhicularité linguistique pour vivre, travailler et étudier. L’Harmattan, 69–80.Search in Google Scholar

LINS, Ulrich. 2000. The Work of the Universal Esperanto Association for a More Peaceful World. Esperanto Documents 45 A. Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.Search in Google Scholar

OKRENT, Arika. 2010. In the Land of Invented Languages. Spiegel & Grau.Search in Google Scholar

SIKOSEK, Marcus. 2006. Die neutrale Sprache: Eine politische Geschichte des Esperanto-Weltbundes. Bydgoszcz: Skonpres.Search in Google Scholar

VAN PARIJS, Philippe. 2011. Linguistic Justice for Europe and for the World. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199208876.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

WELLS, John. 1989. Lingvistikaj aspektoj de Esperanto. Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.Search in Google Scholar

ZAMENHOF, Ludwik Lejzer. 1915. Alvoko al la diplomatoj. Appeal to the diplomats. The British Esperantist 123: 51–55.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo