Risk factors associated with congenital anomalies in children

1. Covic, M., Ştefănescu, D. & Sandovici, I. (sub redacţia). (2011). Tratat de genetică medicală - Ediția II. Iaşi: Ed. PoliromSearch in Google Scholar

2. Kalter, H. et al. (1983). Congenital malformations: etiologic factors and their role in prevention (first of two parts). The New England Journal of medicine. 308, 424-31Search in Google Scholar

3. Ahmed, A.M. & Shadia, Abd el Kader et all. (2011). Assessment of Risk Factors for Fetal Congenital Anomalies among Pregnant Women at Cairo University Hospitals. Journal of American Science. 7(12) http://www.americanscience.orgSearch in Google Scholar

4. Costa, C.M., da Gama, S.G. & Leal, Mdo. C. (2006). Congenital malformations in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: prevalence and associated factors. Cad Saude Publ. 22(11), 2423-243110.1590/S0102-311X200600110001617091179Search in Google Scholar

5. Holmes, L.B. & Westgate, M.N. (2011). Inclusion and exclusion criteria for malformations in newborn infants exposed to potential teratogens. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 91(9), 807-1210.1002/bdra.2084221800414Search in Google Scholar

6. Werler, M.M., Louik, C. & Mitchell, A.A. (2011). Case-control studies for identifying novel teratogens. Am J Med Genet C: Semin Med Genet. 157C(3), 201-810.1002/ajmg.c.30307348303521766434Search in Google Scholar

7. Scott, E.W. & Uma, R. (2009). Maternal Smoking and the Risk of Congenital Birth Defects: A Cohort Study. Retrieved from: http:// www.jabfm.org/cgi/reprint/14/5/330.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

8. Bakulski, K.M. & Fallin, M.D. (2014). Epigenetic epidemiology: promises for public health research. Environ Mol Mutagen. 55(3), 171-8310.1002/em.21850401148724449392Search in Google Scholar

9. Neelu, A.D. & Avinash, D. (2006). Congenital Anomalies: A Prospective Study. Retrieved from: http://www.bhj.org/journal/2006_4803_july/html/org_res_442_445.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

10. Tootoonchi, P. (2003). Easily identifiable congenital anomalies: prevalence and risk factors. Retrieved from: http://journals.tums.ac.ir/abs.aspx?org_id=59&culture_var =en&journal_ id=2&issue_id=107&manuscript_id=1032& segment=en. SchwinglSearch in Google Scholar

11. Herdt-Losavio, M.L. et al. (2010). Maternal occupation and the risk of birth defects: an overview from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Occup Environ Med. 67(1), 58-6610.1136/oem.2009.04825620029025Search in Google Scholar

12. Gorduza, E.V. (2007). Compendiu de genetică umană şi medicală. (pp. 333-338). Iaşi: Editura TehnopressSearch in Google Scholar

13. Hassold, T. & Hunt, P. (2001). Toerr (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat Rev Genet. 2, 280-9110.1038/3506606511283700Search in Google Scholar

14. Hook, E.B. (1981). Rates of chromosome abnormalities at different maternal ages. Obstet Gynecol. 58(3), 282-5. PMID: 6455611Search in Google Scholar

15. Creon, L.A. & Shaw, G.M. (1995). Young maternal age and congenital malformations: a population based study. Am J Public Health. 85(5), 710-310.2105/AJPH.85.5.710Search in Google Scholar

16. Sipila, P., Von Wendt, L. & Hartikainen-Sorri, A.L. (1990). The grand multipara-still an obstetrical challenge? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 247(4), 187-95Search in Google Scholar

17. Perveen, F. & Tyyab, S. (2007). Frequency and pattern of distribution of congenital anomalies in the newborn and associated maternal risk factors. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 17(6), 340-3Search in Google Scholar

18. Rabah, M.S. & Doaa, I.S. (2011). Congenital malformations prevalent among Egyptian children and associated risk factors. The Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics. 12, 69-78Search in Google Scholar

19. Materna-Kiryluk, A., Wisniewska, K., Badura- Stronka, M., Majnartowicz, J., Wieckowska, B. & Balcar-Boron, A. et al. (2009). Parental age as a risk factor for isolated congenital malformations in a Polish population. Pediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 23(1), 29-4010.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00979.x19228312Search in Google Scholar

20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Folate status in women of childbearing age, by race/ethnicity-united states, 1999-2000, 2001-2002, and 2003-2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 55(51), 1377-80Search in Google Scholar

21. Beil, L. (2008). Medscape Medical news. http:// www.medscape.com/viewarticle/569590?sssdmh=dm1.334737&src=nldneSearch in Google Scholar

22. Oprea, O. și colab. (2013). Raport de cercetare privind frecvenṭa şi cauzele malformaṭiilor 111 fetale ȋn judeṭul Timiş. ISBN 978-606-8427-81-2, http://prenataldiagnosis.ro/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Raport-de-cercetare-.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

23. Honein, M.A., Rasmussen, S.A., Reefhuis, J., Romitti, P., Lammer, E.J. & Sun, L. et al. (2007). Maternal smoking, environmental tobacco smoke, and the risk of oral clefts. Epidemiology. 18(2), 226-3310.1097/01.ede.0000254430.61294.c017202867Search in Google Scholar

24. Schwartz, R. & Teramo, K.A. (2000). Effects of diabetic pregnancy on the fetus and newborn. Semin Perinatol. 24(2), 120-13510.1053/sp.2000.636310805168Search in Google Scholar

25. Apeland, T.B. & Berget, M. (1992). Pregnant diabetics: a retrospective study of pregnancy and labour in women with type I diabetes in Sor- Rogaland (1982-90). Tidsskr-Nor-Laegeforen. 112(19), 2520-2523Search in Google Scholar

26. Hod, M., Merlob, P., Friedman, S., Rusecki, Y., Schoenfeld, A. & Ovadia, J. (1991). Prevalence of congenital anomalies and neonatal complications in the offspring of diabetic mothers in Israel. Isr J Med Sci. 27(8-10), 498-502Search in Google Scholar

27. Schafer-Graf, U.M., Buchanan, T.A., Xiang, A., Songster, G., Montoro, M. & Kjos, S.L. (2000). Patterns of congenital anomalies and relationship to initial maternal fasting glucose levels in pregnancies complicated by type 2 and gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 182(2), 313-2010.1016/S0002-9378(00)70217-1Search in Google Scholar

28. Waller, D.K., Shaw, G.M., Rasmussen, S.A., Hobbs, C.A., Canfield, M.A., Siega-Riz, A.M., Gallaway, M.S. & Correa, A. (2007). Prepregnancy obesity as a risk factor for structural birth defects. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 161(8), 745-5010.1001/archpedi.161.8.74517679655Search in Google Scholar

29. Devi, R., Tilak, P. & Rajangam, S. (2007). Multiple congenital anomalies - an aetiological evaluation. Bombay Hosp J [Review articles]. http://www.bhj.org/journal/2007Search in Google Scholar

30. Stoll, C.G., Dott, B., Alembik, Y., Roth, M.P. (1990). An epidemiology study of oligohydramnios associated with congenital malformations. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 19(8), 947-53Search in Google Scholar

31. Mostello, D., Chang J.J., Bai, F., Wang, J., Guild, C., Stamps, K. & Leet, T.L. (2014). Breech presentation at delivery: a marker for congenital anomaly? Journal of Perinatology. 34, 11-15; DOI:10.1038/jp.2013.132; published online 24 October 2013, http://www.nature.com/jp/journal/v34/n1/full/jp2013132a.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

32. Zhou, H., Chen, X.S., Hong, F.C., Pan, P., Yang, F., Cai, Y.M., Yin, Y.P., Peeling, R.W. & Mabey, D. (2007). Risk factors for syphilis infection among pregnant women: results of a case-control study in Shenzhen, China. Sex Transm Infect. 83(6), 476-80. Epub 2007 Aug 3.10.1136/sti.2007.026187259872517675391Search in Google Scholar

33. Wagner, L.K. (2004). Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia. Am Fam PhysSearch in Google Scholar

34. Rizk, F., Salameh, P. & Hamadé, A. (2014). Congenital Anomalies: Prevalence and Risk Factors. Universal Journal of Public Health. 2(2), 58-63. http://www.hrpub.org10.13189/ujph.2014.020204Search in Google Scholar

35. Zhu, J.L., Madsen, K.M., Vestergaard, M., Olesen, A.V., Basso, O., Olsen, J. (2005). Paternal age and congenital malformations. Hum Reprod. 20(11), 3173-710.1093/humrep/dei18616006461Search in Google Scholar