Effect of Different Plant Arrangements on Maize Morphology and Forage Quality

ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS. 2005. Official methods of analysis, 18^th Ed. Gaithersburg, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists. AOAC International.ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS2005Official methods of analysis18th Ed.Gaithersburg, USAAssociation of Official Analytical Chemists. AOAC InternationalSearch in Google Scholar

BAGHDADI, A. – HALIM, R.A. – MAJIDIAN, M. – DAUD, W.N.W. – AHMAD, I. 2012. Plant density and tillage effects on forage corn quality. In Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 10 no. 2, pp. 366–370.BAGHDADIA.HALIMR.A.MAJIDIANM.DAUDW.N.W.AHMADI.2012Plant density and tillage effects on forage corn qualityJournal of Food Agriculture and Environment102366370Search in Google Scholar

BALKCOM, K.S. – SATTERWHITE, J.L. – ARRIAGA, F.J. – PRICE, A.J. – VAN SANTEN, E. 2011. Conventional and glyphosate-resistant maize yields across plant densities in single- and twin-row configurations. In Field Crops Research, 120, no. 3, pp. 330‒337. 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.10.013BALKCOMK.S.SATTERWHITEJ.L.ARRIAGAF.J.PRICEA.J.VAN SANTENE.2011Conventional and glyphosate-resistant maize yields across plant densities in single- and twin-row configurationsField Crops Research120333033710.1016/j.fcr.2010.10.013Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

BARBIERI, P. – ECHARTE, L. – DELLA MAGGIORA, A. – SADRAS, V.O. – ECHEVERRIA, H. – ANDRADE, F.H. 2012. Maize evapotranspiration and water-use efficiency in response to row spacing. In Agronomy Journal, 104 no. 4, pp. 939–944. 10.2134/agronj2012.0014BARBIERIP.ECHARTEL.DELLA MAGGIORAA.SADRASV.O.ECHEVERRIAH.ANDRADEF.H.2012Maize evapotranspiration and water-use efficiency in response to row spacingAgronomy Journal104493994410.2134/agronj2012.0014Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

BARON, V.S. – NAJDA, H.G. – STEVENSON, F.C. 2006. Influence of population density, row spacing and hybrid on forage corn yield and nutritive value in a cool-season environment. In Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 86 no. 4, pp. 1131–1138. 10.4141/P05-136BARONV.S.NAJDAH.G.STEVENSONF.C.2006Influence of population density, row spacing and hybrid on forage corn yield and nutritive value in a cool-season environmentCanadian Journal of Plant Science8641131113810.4141/P05-136Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

BERES, B.L. – BREMER, E. – VAN DASSELAAR, C. 2008. Response of irrigated corn silage to seeding rate and row spacing in southern Alberta. In Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 88 no. 4, pp. 713–716. 10.4141/CJPS08012BERESB.L.BREMERE.VAN DASSELAARC.2008Response of irrigated corn silage to seeding rate and row spacing in southern AlbertaCanadian Journal of Plant Science88471371610.4141/CJPS08012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ÇARPICI, E.B. – CELIK, N. – BAYRAM, G. 2010. Yield and quality of forage maize as influenced by plant density and nitrogen rate. In Tourkish Journal of Field Crops, 15 no. 2, pp. 128–132.ÇARPICIE.B.CELIKN.BAYRAMG.2010Yield and quality of forage maize as influenced by plant density and nitrogen rateTourkish Journal of Field Crops152128132Search in Google Scholar

COX, J.C. – CHERNEY, D.J.R. 2001. Row spacing, plant density, and nitrogen effects on corn silage. In Agronomy Journal, 93 no. 3, pp. 597–602. 10.2134/agronj2001.933597xCOXJ.C.CHERNEYD.J.R.2001Row spacing, plant density, and nitrogen effects on corn silageAgronomy Journal93359760210.2134/agronj2001.933597xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

CUSICANQUI, J.A. – LAUER, J.G. 1999. Plant density and hybrid influence on corn forage yield and quality. In Agronomy Journal, 91 no. 6, pp. 911–915. 10.2134/agronj1999.916911xCUSICANQUIJ.A.LAUERJ.G.1999Plant density and hybrid influence on corn forage yield and qualityAgronomy Journal91691191510.2134/agronj1999.916911xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE. 2015. Statistical yearbook of the Czech Republic 2015. Czech Statistical Office. 799 pp. ISBN 978-80-250-2638-0.CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE2015Statistical yearbook of the Czech Republic 2015Czech Statistical Office799ISBN 978-80-250-2638-0.Search in Google Scholar

GÖZÜBENLI, H. 2010. Influence of planting patterns and plant density on the performance of maize hybrids in the eastern Mediterranean conditions. In International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 12 no. 4, pp. 556–560.GÖZÜBENLIH.2010Influence of planting patterns and plant density on the performance of maize hybrids in the eastern Mediterranean conditionsInternational Journal of Agriculture and Biology124556560Search in Google Scholar

GÖZÜBENLI, H. – KILINC, M. – SENER, O. – KONUSKAN, O. 2004. Effects of single and twin row planting on yield and yield components in maize. In Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 3 no. 2, pp. 203–206.GÖZÜBENLIH.KILINCM.SENERO.KONUSKANO.2004Effects of single and twin row planting on yield and yield components in maizeAsian Journal of Plant Sciences3220320610.3923/ajps.2004.203.206Search in Google Scholar

IPTAS, S. – ACAR, A.A. 2006. Effects of hybrid and row spacing on maize forage yield and quality. In Plant, Soil and Environment, 52 no. 11, pp. 515–552.IPTASS.ACARA.A.2006Effects of hybrid and row spacing on maize forage yield and qualityPlant, Soil and Environment521151555210.17221/3543-PSESearch in Google Scholar

IUSS Working Group WRB. 2014. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources No. 106. FAO, Rome.IUSS Working Group WRB2014World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources No. 106FAO, RomeSearch in Google Scholar

LYNCH, J.P. – O’KIELY, P. – DOYLE, E.M. 2012. Yield, quality, and ensilage characteristics of whole-crop maize and of the cob and stover components: harvest date and hybrid effects. In Grass and Forage Science, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 472–487. 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00868.xLYNCHJ.P.O’KIELYP.DOYLEE.M.2012Yield, quality, and ensilage characteristics of whole-crop maize and of the cob and stover components: harvest date and hybrid effectsGrass and Forage Science67447248710.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00868.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

MAQBOOL, M.M. – TANVEER, A. – ATA, Z. – AHMAD, R. 2006. Growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) as affected by row spacing and weed competition durations. In Pakistan Journal of Botany, 38 no. 4, pp. 1227–1236.MAQBOOLM.M.TANVEERA.ATAZ.AHMADR.2006Growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) as affected by row spacing and weed competition durationsPakistan Journal of Botany38412271236Search in Google Scholar

MARSALIS, M.A. – ANGADI, S.V. – CONTRERAS-GOVEA, F.E. 2010. Dry matter yield and nutritive value of corn, forage sorghum, and BMR forage sorghum at different plant populations and nitrogen rates. In Field Crops Research, 116 no. 1‒2, pp. 52–57. 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.11.009MARSALISM.A.ANGADIS.V.CONTRERAS-GOVEAF.E.2010Dry matter yield and nutritive value of corn, forage sorghum, and BMR forage sorghum at different plant populations and nitrogen ratesField Crops Research1161‒2525710.1016/j.fcr.2009.11.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

MILLNER, J.P. – VILLAVER, R. 2005. The yield and nutritive value of maize hybrids grown for silage. In New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 48 no. 1, pp. 101–108. 10.1080/00288233.2005.9513637MILLNERJ.P.VILLAVERR.2005The yield and nutritive value of maize hybrids grown for silageNew Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research48110110810.1080/00288233.2005.9513637Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

MODOLO, A.J. – CARNIELETTO, R. – KOLLING, E.M. – TROGELLO, E. – SGARBOSSA, M. 2010. Performance of corn hybrids at the Southwest of Parana under different row spacing. In Revista Ciencia Agronomica, 41 no. 3, pp. 435–441. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-66902010000300016MODOLOA.J.CARNIELETTOR.KOLLINGE.M.TROGELLOE.SGARBOSSAM.2010Performance of corn hybrids at the Southwest of Parana under different row spacingRevista Ciencia Agronomica413435441DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-66902010000300016Search in Google Scholar

NOVACEK, M.J. – MASON, S.C. – GALUSHA, T.D. – YASEEN, M. 2013. Twin rows minimally impact irrigated maize yield, morphology, and lodging. In Agronomy Journal, 105 no. 1, pp. 268–276. 10.2134/agronj2012.0301NOVACEKM.J.MASONS.C.GALUSHAT.D.YASEENM.2013Twin rows minimally impact irrigated maize yield, morphology, and lodgingAgronomy Journal105126827610.2134/agronj2012.0301Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

RAMEZANI, M. – ABANDANI, S.R.R. – MOBASSER, H.R. – AMIRI, E. 2011. Effects of row spacing and plant density on silage yield of corn (Zea mays L. cv. sc 704) in two plant pattern in North of Iran. In African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6 no. 5, pp. 1128–1133. 10.5897/AJAR10.898RAMEZANIM.ABANDANIS.R.R.MOBASSERH.R.AMIRIE.2011Effects of row spacing and plant density on silage yield of corn (Zea mays L. cv. sc 704) in two plant pattern in North of IranAfrican Journal of Agricultural Research651128113310.5897/AJAR10.898Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ROBLES, M. – CIAMPITTI, I.A. – VYN, T.J. 2012. Responses of maize hybrids to twin-row spatial arrangement at multiple plant densities. In Agronomy Journal, 104 no. 6, pp. 1747–1756. 10.2134/agronj2012.0231ROBLESM.CIAMPITTII.A.VYNT.J.2012Responses of maize hybrids to twin-row spatial arrangement at multiple plant densitiesAgronomy Journal10461747175610.2134/agronj2012.0231Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

SKONIESKI, F.R. – NÖRNBERG, J.L. – KESSLER, J.D. – DE DAVID, D.B. – DE AZEVEDO, E.B. – BRÜNING, G. – PIMENTEL, C.M.M. 2014. Corn plant arrangement and its effect on silage quality. In Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 43 no. 3, pp. 114–119. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982014000300002SKONIESKIF.R.NÖRNBERGJ.L.KESSLERJ.D.DE DAVIDD.B.DE AZEVEDOE.B.BRÜNINGG.PIMENTELC.M.M.2014Corn plant arrangement and its effect on silage qualityRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia433114119DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982014000300002Search in Google Scholar

STATISTICA, version 12. 2013. Data analysis software system, StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, USA.STATISTICA, version 122013Data analysis software systemStatSoft Inc.Tulsa, USASearch in Google Scholar

STONE, P. – PEARSON, A. – SORENSEN, I. – ROGERS. B. 2000. Effect of row spacing and plant population on maize yield and quality. In 30^th Joint NZIAS/NZSHS Annual Conference, Proceedings of the Agronomy Society of New Zeland, vol. 30, pp. 67‒75.STONEP.PEARSONA.SORENSENI.ROGERSB.2000Effect of row spacing and plant population on maize yield and quality30^th Joint NZIAS/NZSHS Annual Conference, Proceedings of the Agronomy Society of New Zeland306775Search in Google Scholar

STRIEDER, M.L. – da SILVA, P.R.F. – RAMBO, L. – SANGOI, L. – da SILVA, A.A. – ENDRIGO, P.C. – JANDREY, D.B. 2008. Crop management systems and maize grain yield under narrow row spacing. In Scientia Agricola, 65 no. 4, pp. 346–353. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162008000400004STRIEDERM.L.da SILVAP.R.F.RAMBOL.SANGOIL.da SILVAA.A.ENDRIGOP.C.JANDREYD.B.2008Crop management systems and maize grain yield under narrow row spacingScientia Agricola654346353DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162008000400004Search in Google Scholar

ter BRAAK, C.J.F. – ŠMILAUER, P. 2002. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, USA.ter BRAAKC.J.F.ŠMILAUERP.2002CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4.5)Microcomputer PowerIthaca, USASearch in Google Scholar

TURGUT, I. – DUMAN, A. – BILGILI, U. – ACIKGOZ, E. 2005. Alternate row spacing and plant density effects on forage and dry matter yield of corn hybrids (Zea mays L.). In Journal Agronomy and Crop Science, 191 no. 2, pp. 146–141. 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2004.00146.xTURGUTI.DUMANA.BILGILIU.ACIKGOZE.2005Alternate row spacing and plant density effects on forage and dry matter yield of corn hybrids (Zea mays L.)Journal Agronomy and Crop Science191214614110.1111/j.1439-037X.2004.00146.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

WIDDICOMBE, W.D. – THELEN, K.D. 2002. Row width and plant density effect on corn forage hybrids. In Agronomy Journal, 94 no. 2, pp. 326–330. 10.2134/agronj2002.3260WIDDICOMBEW.D.THELENK.D.2002Row width and plant density effect on corn forage hybridsAgronomy Journal94232633010.2134/agronj2002.3260Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

ZAMIR, M.S.I. – AHMAD, A.H. – JAVEED, H.M.R. – LATIF, T. 2011. Growth and yield behaviour of two maize hybrids (Zea mays L.) towards different plant spacing. In Cercetări Agronomice în Moldova, 44 no. 2, pp. 33–40.ZAMIRM.S.I.AHMADA.H.JAVEEDH.M.R.LATIFT.2011Growth and yield behaviour of two maize hybrids (Zea mays L.) towards different plant spacingCercetări Agronomice în Moldova442334010.2478/v10298-012-0030-9Search in Google Scholar