1. bookVolume 10 (2017): Issue 2 (December 2017)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1339-3065
First Published
10 Dec 2012
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Modelling of syngas production from municipal solid waste (MSW) for methanol synthesis

Published Online: 29 Dec 2017
Volume & Issue: Volume 10 (2017) - Issue 2 (December 2017)
Page range: 107 - 114
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1339-3065
First Published
10 Dec 2012
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Approximately 1 300 Gt of municipal solid waste (MSW) are produced worldwide every year. Most of it is disposed of in landfills, which is very hazardous for the environment. Up to 10 % of produced MSW are incinerated. However, incineration is not very effective and requires specific conditions for preventing emissions. Gasification and pyrolysis are more effective processes which can be used not only for heat and electricity generation but also for fuel and valuable chemicals production. MSW can be transformed into refuse-derived fuel (RDF) which has higher heat of combustion. Synthesis gas produced by RDF gasification can be utilised in methanol production. Methanol is a very lucrative chemical which can be used as renewable liquid fuel or as a reagent in organic syntheses. Gasifier design and process optimisation can be done using a reliable mathematical model. A good model can significantly decrease the number of experiments necessary for the gasification process design. In this work, equilibrium model for RDF gasification was designed in Aspen Plus environment and the flow of oxygen and steam as gasification agents were optimised to achieve the highest theoretical methanol yield. Impact of the recycle of unreacted steam and produced tar on the methanol yield was evaluated. The highest theoretical methanol yield (0.629 kgMEOH/kgRDF) was achieved when the steam and tar recycle were switched on, the ratio between oxygen and RDF feed was 0.423 kg/kg and that between the steam and RDF feed was 0.606 kg/kg. In this case, fresh steam represented only 12 % of the total steam fed to the reactor, the rest consisted of recycled steam. Optimal gasifier temperature was 900 °C.

Keywords

Achinas S, Kapetanios E (2013) Energy and Environment Research, Vol. 3, No. 1: 150-157.Search in Google Scholar

Devi L, Ptasinski KJ, Janssen FJ (2003) Biomass and Bioenergy 24: 125-140.10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00102-2Search in Google Scholar

E4Tech (2009) Review of Technologies for Gasification of Biomass and Wastes, final report.Search in Google Scholar

Fortunato B, Brunetti G, Campporeale SM, Torresi M, Fornaretti F (2017) Energy Conversion and Managemet 140: 281-294.10.1016/j.enconman.2017.02.061Search in Google Scholar

Haydary J (2016A) GeoScience Engineering 62: 37-44.10.1515/gse-2016-0007Search in Google Scholar

Haydary J (2016B) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste Management, Limassol, Cyprus University of Technology, Cyprus.Search in Google Scholar

Hofbauer H, Rauch R, Ripfel-Nitsche K (2007) Gas cleaning for synthesis applications, Work package 2E, Vienna, University of Technology, Austria.Search in Google Scholar

Liu DHF, Lipták BG (1999) Hazardous Waste and Solid Waste. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL.Search in Google Scholar

Materazzi M, Lettieri P, Mazzei L, Taylor R, Chapman C (2013) Fuel 108: 356-369.10.1016/j.fuel.2013.02.037Search in Google Scholar

Milene TA, Evans RJ (1998) Biomas Gasifier Tars: Their Nature, Formation, and Conversion, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado, USA.10.2172/3726Search in Google Scholar

Shahbaz M, Yusup S, Inayat A, Onoja D, Onoja P, Ammar M (2017) Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 73: 468-476.10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.153Search in Google Scholar

Yucel O, Hastaoglu MA (2016) Fuel Processing Technology 144: 145-154.10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.12.023Search in Google Scholar

Zhao L, Giannis A, Lam WY, Lin SX, Yin K, Yuan GA, Wang JY (2016) Sustainable Environment Research 26: 51-54.10.1016/j.serj.2015.09.003Search in Google Scholar

Zhou H, Meng A, Long Y, Li Q, Zhang Y (2014) Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 36: 107-122.10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.024Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo