1. bookVolume 9 (2016): Issue 1 (April 2016)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1339-3065
First Published
10 Dec 2012
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Water liquid-vapor equilibrium by molecular dynamics: Alternative equilibrium pressure estimation

Published Online: 08 Jun 2016
Volume & Issue: Volume 9 (2016) - Issue 1 (April 2016)
Page range: 36 - 43
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1339-3065
First Published
10 Dec 2012
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The molecular dynamics simulations of the liquid-vapor equilibrium of water including both water phases — liquid and vapor — in one simulation are presented. Such approach is preferred if equilibrium curve data are to be collected instead of the two distinct simulations for each phase separately. Then the liquid phase is not restricted, e.g. by insufficient volume resulting in too high pressures, and can spread into its natural volume ruled by chosen force field and by the contact with vapor phase as vaporized molecules are colliding with phase interface. Averaged strongly fluctuating virial pressure values gave untrustworthy or even unreal results, so need for an alternative method arisen. The idea was inspired with the presence of vapor phase and by previous experiences in gaseous phase simulations with small fluctuations of pressure, almost matching the ideal gas value. In presented simulations, the first idea how to calculate pressure only from the vapor phase part of simulation box were applied. This resulted into very simple method based only on averaging molecules count in the vapor phase subspace of known volume. Such simple approach provided more reliable pressure estimation than statistical output of the simulation program. Contrary, also drawbacks are present in longer initial thermostatization time or more laborious estimation of the vaporization heat. What more, such heat of vaporization suffers with border effect inaccuracy slowly decreasing with the thickness of liquid phase. For more efficient and more accurate vaporization heat estimation the two distinct simulations for each phase separately should be preferred.

Keywords

Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, DiNola A, Haak JR (1984) J. Chem. Phys. 81: 3684.Search in Google Scholar

Dean JA (1999) Lange’s Handbook of Chemistry, 15th edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen J-P, McDonald IR (1986) Theory of Simple Liquids, Academic Press, London.10.1016/B978-0-08-057101-0.50015-9Search in Google Scholar

Hirschfelder JO, Curtiss CF, Bird RB (1954) Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids, Wiley: New York.Search in Google Scholar

Hodsdon ME, Ponder JW, Cistola DP (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 264: 585.Search in Google Scholar

Hoover WG (1985) Phys. Rev. A 31: 1695.Search in Google Scholar

Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J (1996) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117: 11225.Search in Google Scholar

Jorgensen WL, McDonald NA (1998) J. Mol. Struct. — THEOCHEM 424: 145.Search in Google Scholar

Jorgensen WL, Rizzo RC (1999) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121: 4827.Search in Google Scholar

Kundrot CE, Ponder JW, Richards FM (1991) J. Comput. Chem. 12: 402.Search in Google Scholar

Maitland GC, Rigby M, Smith EB, Wakeham WA (1981) Intermolecular Forces, Clarendon Press: Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Martinez JM, Martinez L (2003) J. Comput. Chem. 24: 819.Search in Google Scholar

Martinez L, Andrade R, Birgin EG, Martinez JM (2009) J. Comput. Chem. 30: 2157.Search in Google Scholar

Matsumoto M (1998) Fluid Phase Equilibria 114: 307.10.1016/S0378-3812(97)00274-4Search in Google Scholar

Nose S (2001) J. Phys. Soc. Japan 77: 70.Search in Google Scholar

Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J, Jorgensen WL (1995) J. Comput. Chem. 16: 984.Search in Google Scholar

McDonald NA, Jorgensen WL (1998) J. Phys. Chem. B 102: 8049.Search in Google Scholar

Pappu RV, Hart RK, Ponder JW (1998) J. Phys. Chem. B 102: 9725.Search in Google Scholar

Ponder JW, Richards FM (1987) J. Comput. Chem. 8: 1016.Search in Google Scholar

Price MLP, Ostrovsky D, Jorgensen WL (2001) J. Comput. Chem. 22 1340.Search in Google Scholar

Ren P, Ponder JW (2002) J. Comput. Chem. 23: 1497.Search in Google Scholar

Ren P, Ponder JW (2003) J. Phys. Chem. B 107: 5933.Search in Google Scholar

Ren P, Ponder JW (2003) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125: 15671.Search in Google Scholar

Ren P, Ponder JW (2004) J. Phys. Chem. B 108: 13427.Search in Google Scholar

Sakamaki R, Sum AK, Narumi T, Yasuoka K (2011) J. Chem. Phys. 134: 124708.Search in Google Scholar

Sládek V, Bučinský L, Matuška J, Ilčin M, Lukeš V, Laurinc V (2014) Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16: 18519.Search in Google Scholar

van der Spoel D, van Maaren PJ, Berendsen HJC (1998) J. Chem. Phys. 108: 10220.Search in Google Scholar

Xie J-F, Sazhin SS, Cao B-Y (2012) J. Therm. Sc. Tech. 7: 1.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo