Preservation Scenarios for Post-War Concrete Architecture: The Case of Lithuania

1 Budovaitė, K. Kitoks ir kitaip – Ryšių ministerijos kompleksas. Statyba ir archtektūra, 2019, pp. 30–33. Search in Google Scholar

2 Croft, C., Macdonald, S. (ed.). Concrete: Case studies in Conservation Practice. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute, 2019. 208 p. Search in Google Scholar

3 Černauskienė, A. Meninių formų ir gelžbetonio technologijų sąveika Lietuvos architektūroje/ Interaction of artistic forms and reinforced concrete technologies in Lithuanian architecture. Doctoral dissertation. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 2021. Search in Google Scholar

4 Demage atlas. Concrete [online]. MDCS – the Monument Diagnosis and Conservation System [cited 28.09.2023]. https://mdcs.monumentenkennis.nl/ Search in Google Scholar

5 Drėmaitė, M. Baltic Modernism. Architecture and Housing in Soviet Lithuania. Berlin: DOM Publishers, 2017. 320 p. Search in Google Scholar

6 Drėmaitė, M. Heritage of Modern Architecture in Lithuania: A Theoretical Aspect. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, vol. 36, no. 3, 2012, pp. 149–160. https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2012.732481 Search in Google Scholar

7 Forty, A. Concrete and Culture : A Material History. London: Reaktion Books LTD, 2016. 304 p. Search in Google Scholar

8 Harboe, G., Espinosa de los Monteros, F., Landi, S., Normandin, K. C. The Cádiz Document: InnovaConcrete Guidelines for Conservation of Concrete Heritage, 2021 [online]. ICOMOS [cited 26.09.2023]. https://openarchive.icomos.org/id/eprint/2578/1/CadizDocument-ICOMOS-InnovaConcrete-2021.pdf Search in Google Scholar

9 Approaches to the Conservation of Twentieth-Century Cultural Heritage. Madrid – New Delhi Document, 2017 [online]. ICOMOS ISC20C [cited 05.10.2023]. http://www.icomos-isc20c.org/pdf/madrid-new-delhi-document-2017.pdf Search in Google Scholar

10 Janušauskaitė, V. Masinės statybos perlai – paveldas ar palikimas? In: Masinės statybos gyvenamųjų rajonų architektūra Lietuvoje (Architektūra: objektai ir kontekstai Nr. 2), sud. L.Nekrošius, V. Petrušonis, E. Riaubienė, Vilnius: Technika, 2017, pp. 8–26. https://doi.org/10.3846/2017-055-M Search in Google Scholar

11 Jokilehto, J. Continuing and change in recent heritage. In: R. van Oers and S. Haraguchi’s (eds.). Identification and Documentation of Modern Heritage, UNESCO World Heritage Centre, 2003, pp. 101–112. Search in Google Scholar

12 Macdonald, S., Goncalves A. P. A. Conservation Principals for Concrete of Cultural Significance. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute, 2020. 27 p. Search in Google Scholar

13 Macdonald, S. Conserving Concrete. GCI Newsletter, vol. 34, no. 2, 2019, pp. 4–9. Search in Google Scholar

14 Macdonald, S. 20th-Century Heritage: Recognition, Protection, and Practical Challenges. Heritage at Risk, 2002/2003, pp. 223–229 [online, cited 05.10.2023]. https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/heritage/article/view/21220 Search in Google Scholar

15 Macdonald, S. Modern Matters. Breaking the Barriers to Conserving Modern Heritage. Conservation Perspectives: The Getty Conservation Institute Newsletter, vol. 28, no. 1, 2013, pp. 4–9. Search in Google Scholar

16 Marsden, S., Spearritt, P. The Twentieth-Century Historic Thematic Framework: A Tool for Assessing Heritage Places. With contributions from Leo Schmidt, Sheridan Burke, Gail Ostergren, Jeff Cody, and Chandler McCoy, 2021 [online]. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute [cited 05.10.2023]. https://hdl.handle.net/10020/gci_pubs_historic_thematic_framework_tool Search in Google Scholar

17 Nekrošius, L. Sovietinių metų architektūra kaip kultūros vertybė. Vilniaus atvejis. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, vol. 36, no. 1, 2012, pp. 38–53. https://doi.org/10.3846/20297955.2012.679786 Search in Google Scholar

18 Normandin, K., Macdonald, S. A. Colloquium to Advance the Practice of Conserving Modern Heritage, Meeting Report. The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, California, March 6–7, 2013 [online, cited 05.10.2023]. https://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/pdf_publications/pdf/colloquium_report.pdf Search in Google Scholar

19 Lietuvos TSR istorijos ir kultūros paminklų sąvadas, Vilnius, 1988 [online]. Epaveldas [cited 28.09.2023]. https://www.epaveldas.lt/preview?id=C1B0004445256 Search in Google Scholar

20 Petrulis, V. Paveldas kaip konfliktas: metodologinės Lietuvos XX a. architektūrinio palikimo vertinimo prielaidos. Kaunas: KTU, 2019. 216 p. Search in Google Scholar

21 Prudon, T. H. M. Preservation of Modern Architecture. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, 2008. 960 p. Search in Google Scholar

22 Kuipers, M., de Jonge, W. Designing from Heritage: Strategies for Conservation and Conversion. TU Delft: Heritage & Architecture, 2017. 140 p. Search in Google Scholar

23 Kuncevičiūtė, A. Architekto Dano Rusecko kūryba / the Creation of the Architect Danas Ruseckas. Master thesis, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

24 Landi, S. Grain Silos from the Thirties in Italy. Analyses, conservation, and adaptive reuse. Pisa: Pisa University Press, 2019. 292 p. Search in Google Scholar

25 The Law on the Protection of Immovable Cultural Heritage [online, cited 05.09.2023]. https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/30b3a4e0e38011ea869e86e74cfea363?­jfwid=bkaxlfhf Search in Google Scholar

26 The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance, 2013 [online]. Australia ICOMOS [cited 05.09.2023]. https://openarchive.icomos.org/id/eprint/2145/ Search in Google Scholar

27 Tostoes, A., Ferreira, Z. (ed.) Adaptive Reuse. The Modern Movement towards the Future. 14th International Docomomo Conference Proceedings. Lisbon, Porto: Docomomo International/Casa da Arquitectura, 2016. 1023 p. Search in Google Scholar