<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Selection is a key element of the cartographic generalisation process, often being its first stage. On the other hand it is a component of other generalisation operators, such as simplification. One of the approaches used in generalization is the condition-action approach. The author uses a condition-action approach based on three types of rough logics (Rough Set Theory (RST), Dominance-Based Rough Set Theory (DRST) and Fuzzy-Rough Set Theory (FRST)), checking the possibility of their use in the process of selecting topographic objects (buildings, roads, rivers) and comparing the obtained results. The complexity of the decision system (the number of rules and their conditions) and its effectiveness are assessed, both in terms of quantity and quality – through visual assessment. The conducted research indicates the advantage of the DRST and RST approaches (with the CN2 algorithm) due to the quality of the obtained selection, the greater simplicity of the decision system, and better refined IT tools enabling the use of these systems. At this stage, the FRST approach, which is characterised by the highest complexity of created rules and the worst selection results, is not recommended. Particular approaches have limitations resulting from the need to select appropriate measurement scales for the attributes used in them. Special attention should be paid to the selection of network objects, in which the use of only a condition-action approach, without maintaining consistency of the network, may not produce the desired results. Unlike approaches based on classical logic, rough approaches allow the use of incomplete or contradictory information. The proposed tools can (in their current form) find an auxiliary use in the selection of topographic objects, and potentially also in other generalisation operators.</abstract>

The use of rough rules in the selection of topographic objects for generalizing geographical information

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The authors analyses the issues inherent in implementation of a multi-sensory mobile application which uses a map as an interface for an edutainment-style city guide for tourists. Two models – the triad of tourist experiences (3E), i.e. education, entertainment, and excitement, and the hierarchy of needs of Abraham Maslow – were used as the basis for identifying what conditions should be met by such an application to encourage its use by both local residents and tourists, in equal measure. It was decided that only open source software would be used to achieve the goal of the application.</abstract>

City guide as a multi-sensory mobile phone application

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The author’s aim is to reflect on the cartographic modelling of historical borders based on the example of the series “Historical Atlas of Poland. Detailed maps of the 16th century” (HAP). HAP presents secular (state, palatinate, district) and religious borders (dioceses, archdeaconry, deanery, parish). The belonging of historic settlements to administrative units is determined on the basis of written sources. During work on the current volumes of HAP, the borders were reconstructed through their manual interpolation (the so-called linear model). Digital tools enable the automatic generation of administrative units based on settlements in point geometry (Thiessen polygons) or the use of modern divisions (precincts [obręby ewidencyjne]) as a reference to them (semi-automatic method). The article compares and assesses the three mentioned methods of determining historical borders and the possibilities of harmonizing them in relation to contemporary administrative divisions. The source material consisted of 18,357 settlements from the volumes of HAP published so far and 235 parishes for detailed analyses. Precincts were adopted as reference areas due to the possibilities of data harmonization.</abstract>

Cartographic modelling of administrative divisions in the “Historical Atlas of Poland”

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The author of this paper sets out to identify and date the individual editions of <italic>Atlas selectus</italic> that were published in Leipzig by Johann George Schreiber and his heirs. The paper is based on the analysis of maps and printed registers from 27 unique editions of the atlas. After a brief summary of Schreiber’s non-cartographic activity, the atlas is presented and dating of its eight editions is proposed, from 1741 to the end of the 18th century. Some special editions of the atlas are also identified and briefly described. The estimated production rate of maps in Schreiber’s workshop is compared with earlier research. Finally, a few misconceptions concerning Schreiber and his cartography are clarified.</abstract>

Johann George Schreiber’s <italic>Atlas selectus</italic>: editions and dating

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 55 (2023): Issue 1 (January 2023)

Volume 54 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)

Volume 53 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)

Volume 52 (2020): Issue 4 (December 2020)

Volume 52 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)

Volume 52 (2020): Issue 2 (July 2020)

Volume 52 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)

Volume 51 (2019): Issue 4 (December 2019)

Volume 51 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)

Volume 51 (2019): Issue 2 (July 2019)

Volume 51 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)

Volume 50 (2018): Issue 4 (December 2018)

Volume 50 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)

Volume 50 (2018): Issue 2 (July 2018)

Volume 50 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)

Volume 49 (2017): Issue 4 (December 2017)

Volume 49 (2017): Issue 3 (September 2017)

Volume 49 (2017): Issue 2 (July 2017)

Volume 49 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)

Volume 48 (2016): Issue 4 (December 2016)

Volume 48 (2016): Issue 3 (September 2016)

Volume 48 (2016): Issue 2 (July 2016)

Volume 48 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)

Volume 47 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)

Volume 47 (2015): Issue 3 (September 2015)

Volume 47 (2015): Issue 2 (July 2015)

Volume 47 (2015): Issue 1 (March 2015)

Polish Cartographical Review

Journal's original version: electronic version  70 points in the evaluation of Ministry of Education and Science   The Polish Cartographical Review (Pol. Cartogr. Rev, PCR) is one of the oldest cartographic journals in the world. It has been distributed since 1969 as the continuation of the periodical that had been published in Lvov for 11 years (during the years 1923 to 1934) under the title The Polish Cartographical Review. The quarterly plays an essential role in connection with the increasing importance of spatial information in the contemporary world as well as due to the expanding of use of maps in many areas of social and economic life. As a result, cartography as a field of knowledge, dealing with the methodology of information transmission via maps, is becoming increasingly important; especially facing the new challenges posed by the technological changes, and in the natural consequence - cultural ones.  The thematic scope of the articles that are published in The Polish Cartographical Review is very diverse. It reflects the main development directions of the contemporary cartography that is worked up by the cartographers and another specialists from the other fields of science for whom the map is the subject of research or the visual presentation of the results. In the area of interest of the magazine are the problems of theory of cartography, editing and perception processes of maps, the use of cartography in the studies of social and economic phenomena, including the use of the remote sensing and GIS tools, as well as the cultural role of the map and the history of cartography.  Today, like before the World War II, The Polish Cartographical Review is an important forum for exchange of ideas between the cartographers - workers of science, and the contractors or users of space information in the field of research related to utilitarian aspects of the cartographic activity.  The magazine is a quarterly that is edited by Polish scientists connected with Polish Geographical Society. The reviewers are foreign and Polish scientists. The consultative body is the international Advisory Editorial Board. Social media  Twitter  Facebook   Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 

Polish Cartographical Review

Volume 52 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)

The use of rough rules in the selection of topographic objects for generalizing geographical information

City guide as a multi-sensory mobile phone application

Cartographic modelling of administrative divisions in the “Historical Atlas of Poland”

Johann George Schreiber’s Atlas selectus: editions and dating

Wyszukiwanie

Wszystkie tomy i zeszyty w tym czasopiśmie