<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

A critical reflection on the current state of research into the history of the production of geographical knowledge during the period of state socialism is presented in this report. Using the example of the Czechoslovak administrative reform from 1949, several questionable aspects of current interpretations are identified. In particular, the problematic use of three crucial concepts in the study of the history of geography: time (a politics of memory); space (spatial imaginations); and geographical knowledge. Examples of approaches to each concept are presented, which can overcome the insufficiencies and contribute to a better understanding of the mutual relations between state socialism and the production of geographical knowledge. Research into the history of geography during the period of state socialism is important both to understand the current state of ‘post-socialist’ national geographies, and to add to the production of an inclusive history of global geography. One necessary condition is, however, to leave the current descriptive and encyclopaedic styles, which are marked with ahistoricism and presentism. In contrast, it is essential that the history of geography during the period of the state socialism become a serious issue, which is analysed through critical and reflexive approaches.
</abstract>

How should we do the history of geographies during the period of state socialism? Historical period, space and expert knowledge in the post-war Czechoslovakia

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

At present the digital divide has started to be considered not so much in the context of Internet access itself or the skills of Internet users, but in terms of Internet performance. The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed that faster Internet made it easier to adapt to the new reality. But not all areas can benefit from good Internet connection. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify spatial regularities in Internet performance on a local scale. This study is based on a set of data generated by Internet users, collected using the publicly available Ookla Speedtest measurement tool. The information about Internet speed and latency obtained in this way shows the actual Internet speed experienced. The analyses have indicated significant characteristics of the spatial differentiation of Internet performance. First, in the case of the Internet, the core-periphery dimension is not universal and obvious, as regional systems are strongly marked. Second, perceiving the digital divide mainly through the prism of Internet access is an insufficient approach.
</abstract>

Spatial regularities in Internet performance at a local scale: The case of Poland

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

Most of the academic literature indicates that high administrative status positively influences the development of a city, while the loss of such status leads to marginalisation. Most of these studies, however, investigated national capitals, and relatively little research has analysed the effect of a change in status at lower levels of government. Poland is an obvious subject for such research, due to the recent extensive reforms of its system of territorial government. This article presents the recent dynamics of socio-economic development in Polish cities and their relation to whether a city maintained or lost its status as a regional capital. These results enable us to identify correlations between the dynamics of socio-economic development and the status of a city. The nature of these correlations is more ambiguous than the results presented in previous studies. The findings of this study give new insight into the effect of changes in a city’s administrative status.
</abstract>

Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences

Department of Computer Science and Systems Engineering

Wroclaw University of Science and Technology

Department of Mechanics of Structures and Urban Engineering

The influence of administrative status on the trajectory of socio-economic changes: A case study of Polish cities

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

Chaotically developed post-socialist suburbs need retrofitting by providing residents with a local central space. This research aims at developing a typology of suburban local centres, describing the most common central spaces according to adopted criteria, as well as identifying which type of local centre has the most potential to be perceived as such by suburbanites and how suburban municipalities plan central spaces. The research was conducted in six institutional Warsaw suburbs representing the most common types of local centres of a neighbourhood catchment area. The research has shown that spatial criteria differentiate local centres more than social criteria. Concentric layouts attract different non-residential functions more effectively than linear ones. When recognising some spaces as central, the legibility of the broader spatial arrangement and the presence of key objects with centre-forming functions seems to be important. Factors that distort such recognition include the excessive dispersion of buildings, shops, and service points; peripheral or random location of the main activity node; poorly designed and equipped central spaces; and the proximity to large-scale shopping centres and recreational areas/objects. When looking for a model of retrofitting post-socialist suburbs through strengthening neighbourhood centres, it is worth recalling the concept of the so-called “third places”.
</abstract>

Local centres in post-socialist suburbs: Redefined concept and retrofitting perspectives

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

The necessity of plural valuation of costs for flood risk management is widely acknowledged, but practical case studies are still scarce. We developed a GIS-based plural valuation framework to determine spatially explicit priority categories for flood risk management intervention schemes on the Drava River, Southern Hungary. A conventional economic evaluation, including land market prices and additional costs due to legal conservation restrictions, was complemented by ecological valuation of vulnerability. The inclusion of ecological vulnerability significantly changed the proposed priority areas for flood risk management interventions: in this case, softwood riparian forests face far less threat, together with other Natura 2000 habitats, in comparison to unprotected wetlands and grasslands. This valuation framework also highlights priority habitats and areas for joint conservation and water management projects, utilising the synergies between several EU Directives as the Birds Directive, Habitats Directive, Flood Directive, and Water Framework Directive. Our framework is adaptable for the other floodplains along major or medium-sized European rivers, assuming that specific local settings are considered.
</abstract>

A GIS-based framework to determine spatially explicit priority categories for flood risk management intervention schemes

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 32 (2024): Issue 1 (March 2024)

Volume 31 (2023): Issue 4 (December 2023)

Volume 31 (2023): Issue 3 (September 2023)

Volume 31 (2023): Issue 2 (June 2023)

Volume 31 (2023): Issue 1 (March 2023)

Volume 30 (2022): Issue 4 (December 2022)

Volume 30 (2022): Issue 3 (September 2022)

Volume 30 (2022): Issue 2 (June 2022)

Volume 30 (2022): Issue 1 (March 2022)

Volume 29 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)

Volume 29 (2021): Issue 3 (September 2021)

Volume 29 (2021): Issue 2 (June 2021)

Volume 29 (2021): Issue 1 (March 2021)

Volume 28 (2020): Issue 4 (December 2020)

Volume 28 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)

Volume 28 (2020): Issue 2 (June 2020)

Volume 28 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)

Volume 27 (2019): Issue 4 (December 2019)

Volume 27 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)

Volume 27 (2019): Issue 2 (June 2019)

Volume 27 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)

Volume 26 (2018): Issue 4 (December 2018)

Volume 26 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)

Volume 26 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)

Volume 26 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)

Volume 25 (2017): Issue 4 (December 2017)

Volume 25 (2017): Issue 3 (September 2017)

Volume 25 (2017): Issue 2 (June 2017)

Volume 25 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)

Volume 24 (2016): Issue 4 (December 2016)

Volume 24 (2016): Issue 3 (September 2016)

Volume 24 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)

Volume 24 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)

Volume 23 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)

Volume 23 (2015): Issue 3 (September 2015)

Volume 23 (2015): Issue 2 (June 2015)

Volume 23 (2015): Issue 1 (March 2015)

Volume 22 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)

Volume 22 (2014): Issue 3 (September 2014)

Volume 22 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)

Volume 22 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)

Volume 21 (2013): Issue 4 (December 2013)

Volume 21 (2013): Issue 3 (September 2013)

Volume 21 (2013): Issue 2 (June 2013)

Volume 21 (2013): Issue 1 (March 2013)

Moravian Geographical Reports

 The Moravian Geographical Reports [MGR] is a peer-reviewed international journal that has been published in English continuously since 1993 by The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics, through its Department of Environmental Geography. The journal followed the traditions of the Reports of the Institute of Geography of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, a journal which was published from 1963 to 1992. The title of the journal celebrates its origins in the historic lands of Moravia in the eastern half of the Czech Republic. Since 2023, the MGR is co-published by Palacký University Olomouc, Faculty of Science through its Department of Geography.  The MGR has been indexed in the SCOPUS database since 1993. In 2012, the MGR was selected for coverage in the WEB OF SCIENCE (Thomson Reuters/Clarivate Analytics) products and customs information services. Beginning with Volume 19 (2011), this publication is indexed and abstracted in the Social Science Citation Index ®, Current Contents Connect ®, and Journal Citation Reports/Social Science Edition ®.  The Moravian Geographical Reports is a non-commercial open-access journal, publishing electronic articles in the “platinum” open-access mode (i.e., no fees for readers and no article processing charges or publication fees for authors). MGR is published four times per year -- at the end of every third month of the year. Beginning with Volume 21 (2013), the electronic contents are published also on the De Gruyter/Sciendo publishing company website. Starting with Volume 28 (2020), the journal is published only in electronic form.  As a general purpose geographical journal, MGR receives and evaluates articles contributed by both human and physical geographers, as well as by other researchers who specialize in related disciplines, including the social sciences (environmental studies, regional and urban planning, etc.) and geosciences. The MGR aims to publish rigorous and impactful research on topics responding to the role of regions and localities in a globalized society, given the geographic scale at which they are evaluated.  We recognize the challenges that our society needs to cope with during the current environmental crisis and emphasize the unique role of Geography in understanding the processes of sustainability transition and climate change adaptation, by paying attention to particular geographic settings, spatial configurations, and the dynamics of networks within which the processes are contextualized. Several inter-related questions are stressed: problems of regional economies and society; society in an urban or rural context; spatial organization of geographical systems; the quality of life and spatial behaviours; regional perspectives on the impacts of human activities on landscapes and environments; energy sustainability and environmental restoration; and geographic processes in landscape evolution, including the evaluation of hazards. Theoretical questions in geography are also addressed, especially the relations between human and physical geography in their regional dimensions.  The journal has a distinct regional orientation, broadly for countries in Europe, with a special emphasis on issues that are different for Central and/or East-Central Europe. Submissions dealing with regions outside of Europe are not accepted, except for invited contributions to thematic Special Issues. For a detailed description of the types of papers accepted for publication, our review process and indications for the preparation of submissions, see the Guide for Authors.  ACCESS TO THE JOURNAL: Information on the Journal’s aims and scope, Instructions for authors, Calls for Special Issues, and full contents are available free online at: http://www.geonika.cz/mgr.html and https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/mgr/mgr-overview.xml  Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 