Retraction Note

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><italic>Aim:</italic> To present the inappropriate types of authorship and practice, and the most recent developments related to basic principles and criteria to a fair system for allocating authorship in scientific publications.<italic>Methods:</italic> An analysis of relevant materials and documents, sources from the internet and published literature and personal experience and observations of the author.<italic>Results:</italic> Working in multidisciplinary teams is a common feature of modern research processes. The most sensitive question is how to decide on who to acknowledge as author of a multi-authored publication. The pertinence of this question is growing with the increasing importance of individual scientists’ publication records for professional status and career. However, discussions about authorship allocation might lead to serious conflicts and disputes among coworkers which could even endanger cooperation and successful completion of a research project. It seems that discussion and education about ethical standards and practical guidelines for fairly allocating authorship are insufficient and the question of ethical practices related to authorship in multi-authored publications remains generally unresolved.<italic>Conclusion:</italic> It is necessary to work for raising awareness about the importance and need for education about principles of scientific communication and fair allocation of authorship, ethics of research and publication of results. The use of various forms of education in the scientific community, especially young researchers and students, in order to create an ethical environment, is one of the most effective ways to prevent the emergence of scientific and publication dishonesty and fraud, including pathology of authorship.</abstract>

New Developments in Publishing Related to Authorship

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 45 (2024): Issue 1 (March 2024)

Volume 44 (2023): Issue 3 (December 2023)

Volume 44 (2023): Issue 2 (July 2023)

Volume 44 (2023): Issue 1 (March 2023)

Volume 43 (2022): Issue 3 (November 2022)

Volume 43 (2022): Issue 2 (July 2022)

Volume 43 (2022): Issue 1 (March 2022)

Volume 42 (2021): Issue 3 (December 2021)

Volume 42 (2021): Issue 2 (October 2021)

Volume 42 (2021): Issue 1 (April 2021)

Volume 41 (2020): Issue 3 (November 2020)

Volume 41 (2020): Issue 2 (September 2020)

Volume 41 (2020): Issue 1 (June 2020)

Volume 40 (2019): Issue 3 (December 2019)

Volume 40 (2019): Issue 2 (October 2019)

Volume 40 (2019): Issue 1 (May 2019)

Volume 39 (2018): Issue 2-3 (December 2018)

Volume 39 (2018): Issue 1 (July 2018)

Volume 38 (2017): Issue 3 (December 2017)

Volume 38 (2017): Issue 2 (September 2017)

Volume 38 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)

Volume 37 (2016): Issue 2-3 (November 2016)

Volume 37 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)

Volume 36 (2015): Issue 3 (December 2015)

Volume 36 (2015): Issue 2 (December 2015)

Volume 36 (2015): Issue 1 (May 2015)

Volume 35 (2014): Issue 3 (December 2014)

Volume 35 (2014): Issue 2 (October 2014)

PRILOZI

Prilozi is published three times a year by the Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts and is. The journal covers all fields of the medical sciences. Prilozi welcomes the submission of manuscripts that meet the general criteria of significance and scientific excellence, and will publish original articles, case studies, reviews, surveys, opinions, commentaries and essays, editorials, original research works, research reports and reviews. The manuscripts should not represent research results which the authors have already published in other books or journals.  Peer-review process  The papers submitted for publication in Prilozi are peer-reviewed by two experts from the respective scientific field who remain anonymous to the authors (single-blind review). The communication with the reviewers is via email.   Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 

PRILOZI

AHEAD OF PRINT

Retraction Note

Retraction Note

New Developments in Publishing Related to Authorship

Wyszukiwanie

Wszystkie tomy i zeszyty w tym czasopiśmie