This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Bahdanau D, Cho K, Bengio Y. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. arXiv 2014: 1409.0473.BahdanauDChoKBengioYNeural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate20141409.0473Search in Google Scholar
Hutter F, Hoos HH, Leyton-Brown K. Learning and intelligent optimization. (Berlin: Springer: 2011).HutterFHoosHHLeyton-BrownKBerlinSpringer2011Search in Google Scholar
Friedman N. Inferring cellular networks using probabilistic graphical models. Science 2004; 303: 799–805.10.1126/science.109406814764868FriedmanNInferring cellular networks using probabilistic graphical models200430379980514764868Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference and Prediction (Berlin: Springer: 2001).HastieTTibshiraniRFriedmanJBerlinSpringer200110.1007/978-0-387-21606-5Search in Google Scholar
Hamelryck T. Probabilistic models and machine learning in structural bioinformatics. Stat Methods Med Res 2009; 18: 505–526.1915316810.1177/0962280208099492HamelryckTProbabilistic models and machine learning in structural bioinformatics20091850552619153168Search in Google Scholar
Zien A. Engineering support vector machine kernels that recognize translation initiation sites. Bioinformatics 2000; 16: 799–807.1110870210.1093/bioinformatics/16.9.799ZienAEngineering support vector machine kernels that recognize translation initiation sites20001679980711108702Search in Google Scholar
Ioffe S, Szegedy C (2015) Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv 2015; 1502.03167.IoffeSSzegedyC2015arXiv 2015; 1502.03167Search in Google Scholar
Bengio Y, Courville A, Vincent P. Representation learning: a review and new perspectives. Pattern Anal Mach Intell IEEE Trans 2013; 35: 1798–1828.10.1109/TPAMI.2013.50BengioYCourvilleAVincentPRepresentation learning: a review and new perspectives2013351798182823787338Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jain V, Murray JF, Roth F, Turaga S, Zhigulin V, Briggman KL, Helmstaedter MN, Denk W, Seung HS. Supervised learning of image restoration with convolutional networks. Int Conf Computer Vision. 2007; 1–8.JainVMurrayJFRothFTuragaSZhigulinVBriggmanKLHelmstaedterMNDenkWSeungHSSupervised learning of image restoration with convolutional networks20071–810.1109/ICCV.2007.4408909Search in Google Scholar
Day N, Hemmaplardh A, Thurman RE, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Noble WS. Unsupervised segmentation of continuous genomic data. Bioinformatics 2007; 23: 1424–1426.10.1093/bioinformatics/btm09617384021DayNHemmaplardhAThurmanREStamatoyannopoulosJANobleWSUnsupervised segmentation of continuous genomic data2007231424142617384021Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hoffman MM. Unsupervised pattern discovery in human chromatin structure through genomic segmentation. Nat Methods 2012; 9: 473–476.2242649210.1038/nmeth.1937HoffmanMMUnsupervised pattern discovery in human chromatin structure through genomic segmentation20129473476334053322426492Search in Google Scholar
Chapelle O, Schölkopf B, Zien A. Semi-supervised Learning (Cambridge Ma: MIT Press: 2006).ChapelleOSchölkopfBZienACambridge MaMIT Press200610.7551/mitpress/9780262033589.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Ernst J, Kellis M. ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization. Nat Methods. 2012; 9: 215–216.2237390710.1038/nmeth.1906ErnstJKellisMChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization20129215216357793222373907Search in Google Scholar
Chapelle O, Schölkopf B, Zien A. Semi-supervised Learning. (Cambridge MA: MIT Press: 2006).ChapelleOSchölkopfBZienACambridge MAMIT Press200610.7551/mitpress/9780262033589.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Urbanowicz RJ, Granizo-Mackenzie A, Moore JH. An analysis pipeline with statistical and visualization-guided knowledge discovery for Michigan-style learning classifier systems. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 2012; 7: 35–45.2543154410.1109/MCI.2012.2215124UrbanowiczRJGranizo-MackenzieAMooreJHAn analysis pipeline with statistical and visualization-guided knowledge discovery for Michigan-style learning classifier systems201273545424400625431544Search in Google Scholar
Abadi M, Agarwal A, Barham P, Brevdo E, Chen Z, Citro C, Corrado GS, Davis A, Dean J, Devin M, Ghemawat S, Goodfellow I, Harp A, Irving G, Isard M, Jia Y, Josofowicz R, Kaiser L, Kudlur M, Levenberg J. TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. arXiv 2016; 1603.04467AbadiMAgarwalABarhamPBrevdoEChenZCitroCCorradoGSDavisADeanJDevinMGhemawatSGoodfellowIHarpAIrvingGIsardMJiaYJosofowiczRKaiserLKudlurMLevenbergJTensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems20161603.04467Search in Google Scholar
Xiong C, Merity S, Socher R. Dynamic memory networks for visual and textual question answering. arXiv 2016; 1603.01417.XiongCMeritySSocherRDynamic memory networks for visual and textual question answering20161603.01417Search in Google Scholar
Xu R, Wunsch D II., Frank R. Inference of genetic regulatory networks with recurrent neural network models using particle swarm optimization. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinformatics 2007; 4: 681–692.10.1109/TCBB.2007.1057XuRWunschD II.FrankRInference of genetic regulatory networks with recurrent neural network models using particle swarm optimization2007468169217975278Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Xu Y, Mo T, Feng Q, Zhong P, Lai M, Chang EI. Deep learning of feature representation with multiple instance learning for medical image analysis. IEEE Int Conf Acoustics, Speech, Signal Processing. 2014; 1626–1630.XuYMoTFengQZhongPLaiMChangEIDeep learning of feature representation with multiple instance learning for medical image analysis20141626–163010.1109/ICASSP.2014.6853873Search in Google Scholar
Zeiler MD, Fergus R. Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks. (Berlin: Springer: 2014).ZeilerMDFergusRBerlinSpringer201410.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53Search in Google Scholar
Ng AY, Jordan MI. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. (Cabridge MA: MIT Press: 2002).NgAYJordanMICabridge MAMIT Press2002Search in Google Scholar
Wolpert DH, Macready WG. No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 1997; 1: 67–82.10.1109/4235.585893WolpertDHMacreadyWGNo free lunch theorems for optimization199716782Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Boser BE, Guyon IM, Vapnik VN. A Training Algorithm for Optimal Margin Classifiers. (NY: ACM Press: 1992).BoserBEGuyonIMVapnikVNNYACM Press199210.1145/130385.130401Search in Google Scholar
Noble WS. What is a support vector machine? Nature Biotech 2006; 24: 1565–1567.10.1038/nbt1206-1565NobleWSWhat is a support vector machine?2006241565156717160063Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Glorot X, Bengio Y. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 2010; 249–256.GlorotXBengioYUnderstanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks2010249–256Search in Google Scholar
Troyanskaya OG, Dolinski K, Owen AB, Altman RB, Botstein DA. Bayesian framework for combining heterogeneous data sources for gene function prediction (in Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 8348–8353.10.1073/pnas.0832373100TroyanskayaOGDolinskiKOwenABAltmanRBBotsteinDABayesian framework for combining heterogeneous data sources for gene function prediction (in Saccharomyces cerevisiae)20031008348835316623212826619Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Friedman N, Linial M, Nachman I, Peer D. Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data. J Comput Biol 2000; 7: 601–620.1110848110.1089/106652700750050961FriedmanNLinialMNachmanIPeerDUsing Bayesian networks to analyze expression data2000760162011108481Search in Google Scholar
Koski TJ, Noble J. A review of Bayesian networks and structure learning. Math Applicanda 2012; 40: 51–103.KoskiTJNobleJA review of Bayesian networks and structure learning20124051103Search in Google Scholar
Friedman N, Linial M, Nachman I, Pe’er D. Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data. J Comput Biol 2000; 7: 601–620.1110848110.1089/106652700750050961FriedmanNLinialMNachmanIPe’erDUsing Bayesian networks to analyze expression data2000760162011108481Search in Google Scholar
Koski TJ, Noble J. A review of bayesian networks and structure learning. Math Applicanda 2012; 40: 51–103.KoskiTJNobleJA review of bayesian networks and structure learning2012405110310.14708/ma.v40i1.278Search in Google Scholar
Brown M. Using Dirichlet mixture priors to derive hidden Markov models for protein families. Int Conf Intelligent Systems Mol Biol 1993; 47-55.BrownMUsing Dirichlet mixture priors to derive hidden Markov models for protein families19934755Search in Google Scholar
Keogh E, Mueen A. Encyclopedia of Machine Learning (Berlin: Springer: 2011).KeoghEMueenABerlinSpringer2011Search in Google Scholar
Manning CD, Schütze H. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing (Cambridge MA: MIT Press: 1999).ManningCDSchützeHCambridge MAMIT Press1999Search in Google Scholar
Friedman N. Inferring cellular networks using probabilistic graphical models. Science. 2004; 303: 799–805.10.1126/science.109406814764868FriedmanNInferring cellular networks using probabilistic graphical models200430379980514764868Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hastie T, Tibshirani R.; Friedman, J. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data mining, Inference and Prediction. (New York NY: Springer: 2001).HastieTTibshiraniRFriedmanJNew York NYSpringer200110.1007/978-0-387-21606-5Search in Google Scholar
Yip KY, Cheng C, Gerstein M. Machine learning and genome annotation: a match meant to be? Genome biol 2013; 14:205.10.1186/gb-2013-14-5-20523731483YipKYChengCGersteinMMachine learning and genome annotation: a match meant to be?201314205405378923731483Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Day N, Hemmaplardh A, Thurman RE, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Noble WS. Unsupervised segmentation of continuous genomic data. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23: 1424–1426.10.1093/bioinformatics/btm09617384021DayNHemmaplardhAThurmanREStamatoyannopoulosJANobleWSUnsupervised segmentation of continuous genomic data2007231424142617384021Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Boser BE, Guyon IM, Vapnik VN. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. (Pittsburgh, PA: ACM Press: 1992).BoserBEGuyonIMVapnikVNPittsburgh, PAACM Press199210.1145/130385.130401Search in Google Scholar
Noble WS. What is a support vector machine? Nature Biotech 2006; 24: 1565–1567.10.1038/nbt1206-1565NobleWSWhat is a support vector machine?2006241565156717160063Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J, Franklin J. The elements of statistic learning: data mining, inference and prediction. Math Intell 2005; 27: 83–85.10.1007/BF02985802HastieTTibshiraniRFriedmanJFranklinJThe elements of statistic learning: data mining, inference and prediction2005278385Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2015) Deep residual learning for image recognition. arXiv 2015; 1512.03385.HeKZhangXRenSSunJ2015arXiv 2015; 1512.03385Search in Google Scholar
Hinton GE, Salakhutdinov RR. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 2006; 313: 504–507.10.1126/science.112764716873662HintonGESalakhutdinovRRReducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks200631350450716873662Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hinton GE, Osindero S, Teh Y-W. A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput 2006; 18: 1527–1554.1676451310.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527HintonGEOsinderoSTehY-WA fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets2006181527155416764513Search in Google Scholar
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature 2015; 521: 436-444.2601744210.1038/nature14539LeCunYBengioYHintonGDeep learning201552143644426017442Search in Google Scholar
Schmidhuber J. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Networks 2015; 61: 85-117.10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003SchmidhuberJDeep learning in neural networks: An overview2015618511725462637Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mamoshina P, Vieira A, Putin E, Zhavoronkov A (2016) Applications of deep learning in biomedicine. Mol Pharm 2016; 13: 1445–1454.10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b0098227007977MamoshinaPVieiraAPutinEZhavoronkovA2016Applications of deep learning in biomedicine2016131445145427007977Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Murphy KP (2012) Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective. (Cambridge MA: MIT Press: 2012).MurphyKP2012Cambridge MAMIT Press2012Search in Google Scholar
Rampasek L, Goldenberg A (2016) TensorFlow: biology’s gateway to deep learning? Cell Syst 2016; 2: 12–14.10.1016/j.cels.2016.01.00927136685RampasekLGoldenbergA2016TensorFlow: biology’s gateway to deep learning?20162121427136685Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Salakhutdinov R, Hinton G (2012) An efficient learning procedure for deep Boltzmann machines. Neural Comput 2012; 24: 1967–2006.2250996310.1162/NECO_a_00311SalakhutdinovRHintonG2012An efficient learning procedure for deep Boltzmann machines2012241967200622509963Search in Google Scholar
Schmidhuber J (2015) Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw 2015; 61: 85–117.10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.00325462637SchmidhuberJ2015Deep learning in neural networks: an overview20156185117Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Snoek J, Larochelle H, Adams RP. Practical bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 2951–2959. (Cambridge MA: MIT Press: 2012).SnoekJLarochelleHAdamsRPPractical bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms29512959Cambridge MAMIT Press2012Search in Google Scholar
Spencer M, Eickholt J, Cheng J. A deep learning network approach to ab initio protein secondary structure prediction. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinformatics 2015; 12: 103–112.10.1109/TCBB.2014.2343960SpencerMEickholtJChengJA deep learning network approach to ab initio protein secondary structure prediction201512103112434807225750595Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Eickholt J, Cheng J. Predicting protein residue-residue contacts using deep networks and boosting. Bioinformatics 2012; 28: 3066–3072.2304756110.1093/bioinformatics/bts598EickholtJChengJPredicting protein residue-residue contacts using deep networks and boosting20122830663072350949423047561Search in Google Scholar
Eickholt J, Cheng J. DNdisorder: predicting protein disorder using boosting and deep networks. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14: 88.10.1186/1471-2105-14-8823497251EickholtJChengJDNdisorder: predicting protein disorder using boosting and deep networks20131488359962823497251Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gawehn E, Hiss JA, Schneider G. Deep learning in drug discovery. Mol Informatics 2016; 35: 3–14.10.1002/minf.201501008GawehnEHissJASchneiderGDeep learning in drug discovery20163531427491648Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Che Z, Purushotham S, Khemani R, Liu Y. Distilling knowledge from deep networks with applications to healthcare domain. arXiv 2015; 1512.03542.CheZPurushothamSKhemaniRLiuYDistilling knowledge from deep networks with applications to healthcare domain20151512.03542Search in Google Scholar
Bastien F, Lamblin P, Pascanu R, Bergstra J, Goodfellow I, Bergeron A, Bouchard N, Warde-Farley D, Bengio Y. Theano: new features and speed improvements. arXiv 2012; 1211.5590BastienFLamblinPPascanuRBergstraJGoodfellowIBergeronABouchardNWarde-FarleyDBengioYTheano: new features and speed improvements20121211.5590Search in Google Scholar
Bengio Y. Practical recommendations for gradient-based training of deep architectures. In Neural networks: tricks of the trade, Montavon G, Orr G, Müller K-R (Kelley DR, Snoek J, Rinn J. Basset: learning the regulatory code of the accessible genome with deep convolutional neural networks. Mol Syst Biol. 2016; 12(7): 878.BengioYPractical recommendations for gradient-based training of deep architectures201612787810.1007/978-3-642-35289-8_26Search in Google Scholar
Kingma DP, Welling M. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv 2013; 1312.6114.KingmaDPWellingM20131312.6114Search in Google Scholar
Kingma D, Ba J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv 2014; 1412.6980.KingmaDBaJ20141412.6980Search in Google Scholar
Leung MKK, Xiong HY, Lee LJ, Frey BJ. Deep learning of the tissue-regulated splicing code. Bioinformatics 2014; 30: 121–129.10.1093/bioinformatics/btu277LeungMKKXiongHYLeeLJFreyBJDeep learning of the tissue-regulated splicing code201430121129405893524931975Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Simonyan K, Vedaldi A, Zisserman A. Deep inside convolutional networks: visualising image classification models and saliency maps. arXiv 2013; 1312.6034.SimonyanKVedaldiAZissermanADeep inside convolutional networks: visualising image classification models and saliency maps20131312.6034Search in Google Scholar
Simonyan K, Zisserman A (2014) Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv 2014; 1409.1556.SimonyanKZissermanA2014arXiv 2014; 1409.1556Search in Google Scholar
Koh PW, Pierson E, Kundaje A. Denoising genome-wide histone ChIP-seq with convolutional neural networks. Bioinformatics 2017; 33(14): 225–233.10.1093/bioinformatics/btx243KohPWPiersonEKundajeADenoising genome-wide histone ChIP-seq with convolutional neural networks20173314225233587071328881977Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dahl GE, Jaitly N, Salakhutdinov R. Multi-task neural networks for QSAR predictions. arXiv 2014; 1406.1231.DahlGEJaitlyNSalakhutdinovRMulti-task neural networks for QSAR predictions20141406.1231Search in Google Scholar
Lipton ZC (2015) A critical review of recurrent neural networks for sequence learning. arXiv 2015; 1506.00019.LiptonZC2015arXiv 2015; 1506.00019Search in Google Scholar
Lipton ZC, Kale DC, Elkan C, Wetzell R (2015) Learning to diagnose with LSTM recurrent neural networks. arXiv 2015; 1511.03677.LiptonZCKaleDCElkanCWetzellR2015arXiv 2015; 1511.03677Search in Google Scholar
Donahue J, Jia Y, Vinyals O, Hoffman J, Zhang N, Tzeng E, Darrell T. Decaf: a deep convolutional activation feature for generic visual recognition. arXiv 2013; 1310.1531.DonahueJJiaYVinyalsOHoffmanJZhangNTzengEDarrellTarXiv 2013; 1310.1531Search in Google Scholar
Kraus OZ, Ba LJ, Frey B. Classifying and segmenting microscopy images using convolutional multiple instance learning. arXiv 2015; 1511.05286v1.KrausOZBaLJFreyBarXiv 2015; 1511.05286v1Search in Google Scholar
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature 2015; 521: 436–444.2601744210.1038/nature14539LeCunYBengioYHintonGDeep learning201552143644426017442Search in Google Scholar
Lee B, Lee T, Na B, Yoon S. DNA-level splice junction prediction using deep recurrent neural networks. arXiv 2015; 1512.05135LeeBLeeTNaBYoonS20151512.05135Search in Google Scholar
Park Y, Kellis M (2015) Deep learning for regulatory genomics. Nat Biotechnol 2015;33: 825–826.2625213910.1038/nbt.3313ParkYKellisM2015Deep learning for regulatory genomics20153382582626252139Search in Google Scholar
Libbrecht MW, Noble WS (2015) Machine learning applications in genetics and genomics. Nat Rev Genet 2015; 16: 321–332.2594824410.1038/nrg3920LibbrechtMWNobleWS2015Machine learning applications in genetics and genomics201516321332520430225948244Search in Google Scholar
Sutskever I, Vinyals O, Le QV. Advances in neural information processing systems. (Cambridge MA: MIT Press: 2014).SutskeverIVinyalsOLeQVCambridge MAMIT Press2014Search in Google Scholar
Wasson T, Hartemink AJ. An ensemble model of competitive multi-factor binding of the genome. Genome Res 2009; 19: 2102–2112.WassonTHarteminkAJAn ensemble model of competitive multi-factor binding of the genome2009192102211210.1101/gr.093450.109277558619720867Search in Google Scholar
Yip KY, Cheng C, Gerstein M. Machine learning and genome annotation: a match meant to be? Genome Biol 2013; 14: 205.10.1186/gb-2013-14-5-20523731483YipKYChengCGersteinMMachine learning and genome annotation: a match meant to be?201314205405378923731483Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zhou J, Troyanskaya OG (2015) Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning based sequence model. Nat Methods 2015; 12: 931–934.2630184310.1038/nmeth.3547ZhouJTroyanskayaOG2015Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning based sequence model201512931934476829926301843Search in Google Scholar
Swan AL, Mobasheri A, Allaway D, Liddell S, Bacardit J (2013) Application of machine learning to proteomics data: classification and biomarker identification in postgenomics biology. Omics 2013; 17: 595–610.10.1089/omi.2013.001724116388SwanALMobasheriAAllawayDLiddellSBacarditJ2013Application of machine learning to proteomics data: classification and biomarker identification in postgenomics biology201317595610383743924116388Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Alipanahi B, Delong A, Weirauch MT, Frey BJ (2015) Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning. Nat Biotechnol 2015; 33: 831–838.10.1038/nbt.330026213851AlipanahiBDelongAWeirauchMTFreyBJ2015Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning20153383183826213851Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zhang J, White NM, Schmidt HK. Integrate: gene fusion discovery using whole genome and transcriptome data. Genome Res 2016; 26(1):108–118.10.1101/gr.186114.11426556708ZhangJWhiteNMSchmidtHKIntegrate: gene fusion discovery using whole genome and transcriptome data2016261108118469174326556708Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Degroeve S, Baets BD, de Peer YV, Rouz P. Feature subset selection for splice site prediction. Bioinformatics. 2002; 18: S75–S83.10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_2.S7512385987DegroeveSBaetsBDde PeerYVRouzPFeature subset selection for splice site prediction200218S75S83Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wasson, T., Hartemink, A. J. An ensemble model of competitive multi-factor binding of the genome. Genome Res 2009;19: 2102–2112.WassonT.HarteminkA. JAn ensemble model of competitive multi-factor binding of the genome2009192102211210.1101/gr.093450.109277558619720867Search in Google Scholar
Lanckriet GRG, Bie TD, Cristianini N, Jordan MI, Noble WS. A statistical framework for genomic data fusion. Bioinformatics 2004; 20: 2626–2635.1513093310.1093/bioinformatics/bth294LanckrietGRGBieTDCristianiniNJordanMINobleWSA statistical framework for genomic data fusion2004202626263515130933Search in Google Scholar
Pavlidis P, Weston J, Cai J, Noble WS. Learning gene functional classifications from multiple data types. J Computat Biol 2002; 9: 401–411.10.1089/10665270252935539PavlidisPWestonJCaiJNobleWSLearning gene functional classifications from multiple data types2002940141112015889Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Picardi E, Pesole G. Computational methods for ab initio and comparative gene finding. Meth Mol Biol 2010; 609: 269–284.10.1007/978-1-60327-241-4_16PicardiEPesoleGComputational methods for ab initio and comparative gene finding201060926928420221925Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Degroeve S, Baets BD, de Peer YV, Rouzé P. Feature subset selection for splice site prediction. Bioinformatics 2002; 18: S75–S83.10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_2.S7512385987DegroeveSBaetsBDde PeerYVRouzéPFeature subset selection for splice site prediction200218S75S83Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ouyang Z, Zhou Q, Wong HW. ChIP-Seq of transcription factors predicts absolute and differential gene expression in embryonic stem cells. PNAS USa. 2009; 106: 21521–21526.10.1073/pnas.0904863106OuyangZZhouQWongHWChIP-Seq of transcription factors predicts absolute and differential gene expression in embryonic stem cells20091062152121526278975119995984Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chen Y, Li Y, Narayan R, Subramanian A, Xie X. Gene expression inference with deep learning Bioinformatics 2016; 32: 1832–1839.ChenYLiYNarayanRSubramanianAXieX2016321832183910.1093/bioinformatics/btw074490832026873929Search in Google Scholar
Troyanskaya OG, Dolinski K, Owen AB, Altman RB, Botstein D. A Bayesian framework for combining heterogeneous data sources for gene function prediction (in S. cerevisiae). PNAS USA 2003; 100: 8348–8353.10.1073/pnas.0832373100TroyanskayaOGDolinskiKOwenABAltmanRBBotsteinDA Bayesian framework for combining heterogeneous data sources for gene function prediction (in S. cerevisiae)200310083488353Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Upstill-Goddard R, Eccles D, Fliege J, Collins A. Machine learning approaches for the discovery of gene–gene interactions in disease data. Brief Bioinform 2013; 14: 251–260.2261111910.1093/bib/bbs024Upstill-GoddardREcclesDFliegeJCollinsAMachine learning approaches for the discovery of gene–gene interactions in disease data201314251260Search in Google Scholar
Urbanowicz R, Granizo-Mackenzie D, Moore J. An expert knowledge guided michigan-style learning classifier system for the detection and modeling of epistasis and genetic heterogeneity. Proc Parallel Problem Solving From Nature 2012; 12: 266–275.UrbanowiczRGranizo-MackenzieDMooreJAn expert knowledge guided michigan-style learning classifier system for the detection and modeling of epistasis and genetic heterogeneity20121226627510.1007/978-3-642-32937-1_27Search in Google Scholar
Angermueller C, Lee H, Reik W, Stegle O. Accurate prediction of single-cell DNA methylation states using deep learning. Genome Biol 2017; 18: 67.10.1186/s13059-017-1189-z28395661AngermuellerCLeeHReikWStegleOAccurate prediction of single-cell DNA methylation states using deep learning20171867Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ernst J, Kellis M. ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization. Nature Methods 2012;9: 215–216 (2012).2237390710.1038/nmeth.1906ErnstJKellisMChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization201292152162012Search in Google Scholar
Fraser AG, Marcotte EM. A probabilistic view of gene function. Nature Genet 2004; 36: 559–564.10.1038/ng1370FraserAGMarcotteEMA probabilistic view of gene function200436559564Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Battle A, Khan Z, Wang SH, Mitrano A, Ford MJ, Pritchard JK, Gilad Y (2015) Genomic variation. Impact of regulatory variation from RNA to protein. Science 2015; 347: 664–667.2565724910.1126/science.1260793BattleAKhanZWangSHMitranoAFordMJPritchardJKGiladY2015Genomic variation. Impact of regulatory variation from RNA to protein2015347664667Search in Google Scholar
Kelley DR, Snoek J, Rinn JL. Basset: learning the regulatory code of the accessible genome with deep convolutional neural networks. Genome Res 2016; 26: 990-99.10.1101/gr.200535.11527197224KelleyDRSnoekJRinnJLBasset: learning the regulatory code of the accessible genome with deep convolutional neural networks20162699099Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sønderby SK, Winther O. Protein secondary structure prediction with long short term memory networks. arXiv 2014; 1412.78.SønderbySKWintherO20141412.78Search in Google Scholar
Beer MA, Tavazoie S. Predicting gene expression from sequence. Cell 2004; 117: 185–198. Heintzman N. Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome. Nature Genet 2007; 39: 311–318.1508425710.1016/S0092-8674(04)00304-6BeerMATavazoieSPredicting gene expression from sequence2004117185198Heintzman N. Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome. Nature Genet 2007; 39: 311–318Search in Google Scholar
Pique-Regi R. Accurate inference of transcription factor binding from DNA sequence and chromatin accessibility data. Genome Res. 2011;21: 447–455.2110690410.1101/gr.112623.110Pique-RegiR.Accurate inference of transcription factor binding from DNA sequence and chromatin accessibility data201121447455304485821106904Search in Google Scholar
Qiu J, Noble WS. Predicting co-complexed protein pairs from heterogeneous data. PLoS Comput Biol 2008; 4: e1000054.1842137110.1371/journal.pcbi.1000054QiuJNobleWSPredicting co-complexed protein pairs from heterogeneous data20084e1000054227531418421371Search in Google Scholar
Ramaswamy S. Multiclass cancer diagnosis using tumor gene expression signatures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 15149–15154.10.1073/pnas.211566398RamaswamySMulticlass cancer diagnosis using tumor gene expression signatures20019815149151546499811742071Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Saigo H, Vert JP, Akutsu T. Optimizing amino acid substitution matrices with a local alignment kernel. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7: 246.1667738510.1186/1471-2105-7-246SaigoHVertJPAkutsuTOptimizing amino acid substitution matrices with a local alignment kernel20067246151360516677385Search in Google Scholar
Segal E. A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature 2006;44, 772–778.SegalEA genomic code for nucleosome positioning200644772–77810.1038/nature04979262324416862119Search in Google Scholar
Karlic RR, Chung H, Lasserre J, Vlahovicek K, Vingron M. Histone modification levels are predictive for gene expression. PNAS USA 2010; 107: 2926–2931.10.1073/pnas.0909344107KarlicRRChungHLasserreJVlahovicekKVingronMHistone modification levels are predictive for gene expression201010729262931281487220133639Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bell JT, Pai AA, Pickrell JK, Gaffney DJ, Pique-Regi R, Degner JF, Gilad Y, Pritchard JK (2011) DNA methylation patterns associate with genetic and gene expression variation in HapMap cell lines. Genome Biol 2011; 12: R10.10.1186/gb-2011-12-1-r1021251332BellJTPaiAAPickrellJKGaffneyDJPique-RegiRDegnerJFGiladYPritchardJK2011DNA methylation patterns associate with genetic and gene expression variation in HapMap cell lines201112R10309129921251332Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cuellar-Partida G, et al. Epigenetic priors for identifying active transcription factor binding sites. Bioinformatics 2011; 28: 56–62.22072382Cuellar-PartidaGet alEpigenetic priors for identifying active transcription factor binding sites201128566210.1093/bioinformatics/btr614324476822072382Search in Google Scholar
Kell DB (2005) Metabolomics, machine learning and modelling: towards an understanding of the language of cells. Biochem Soc Trans 2005; 33: 520–524.10.1042/BST033052015916555KellDB2005Metabolomics, machine learning and modelling: towards an understanding of the language of cells20053352052415916555Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Shen H, Zamboni N, Heinonen M, Rousu J. Metabolite identification through machine learning—Tackling CASMI challenge using fingerID. Metabolites 2013; 3: 484–505.2495800210.3390/metabo3020484ShenHZamboniNHeinonenMRousuJMetabolite identification through machine learning—Tackling CASMI challenge using fingerID20133484505390127324958002Search in Google Scholar
Glaab E, Bacardit J, Garibaldi JM, Krasnogor N. Using rule-based machine learning for candidate disease gene prioritization and sample classification of cancer gene expression data. Plos one. 2012; 7: e39932.10.1371/journal.pone.003993222808075GlaabEBacarditJGaribaldiJMKrasnogorNUsing rule-based machine learning for candidate disease gene prioritization and sample classification of cancer gene expression data20127e39932339477522808075Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Menden MP, Iorio F, Garnett M, McDermott U, Benes CH, Ballester PJ, Saez-Rodriguez J. Machine learning prediction of cancer cell sensitivity to drugs based on genomic and chemical properties. PLos one 2013; 8: e61318.2364610510.1371/journal.pone.0061318MendenMPIorioFGarnettMMcDermottUBenesCHBallesterPJSaez-RodriguezJMachine learning prediction of cancer cell sensitivity to drugs based on genomic and chemical properties20138e61318364001923646105Search in Google Scholar
Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Lake Tahoe, Nevada 2012: 1097-1105.KrizhevskyASutskeverIHintonGEImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networksNevada201210971105Search in Google Scholar
Lanchantin J, Lin Z, Qi Y. Deep motif: Visualizing genomic sequence classifications. arXiv 2016: 1605.01133.LanchantinJLinZQiY20161605.01133Search in Google Scholar
Zeng H, Edwards MD, Liu G, Gifford DK. Convolutional neural network architectures for predicting DNA–protein binding. Bioinformatics 2016; 32(12): 121–127.10.1093/bioinformatics/btw255ZengHEdwardsMDLiuGGiffordDKConvolutional neural network architectures for predicting DNA–protein binding20163212121127490833927307608Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chen J, Guo M, Wang X, Liu B. A comprehensive review and comparison of different computational methods for protein remote homology detection. Briefings in bioinformatics 2016; 108:256.surname>ChenJGuoMWangXLiuBA comprehensive review and comparison of different computational methods for protein remote homology detection2016108256Search in Google Scholar
Torracinta R, Campagne F. Training genotype callers with neural networks. bioRxiv 2016; 097469.TorracintaRCampagneFTraining genotype callers with neural networks201609746910.1101/097469Search in Google Scholar
Poplin R, Newburger D, Dijamco J, Nguyen N, Loy D, Gross SS, McLean CY, DePristo MA. Creating a universal SNP and small indel variant caller with deep neural networks. 2018; bioRxiv: doi.org/10.1101/092890.PoplinRNewburgerDDijamcoJNguyenNLoyDGrossSSMcLeanCYDePristoMA2018doi.org/10.1101/092890Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Schreiber J, Libbrecht M, Bilmes J, Noble W. Nucleotide sequence and dnasei sensitivity are predictive of 3d chromatin architecture. bioRxiv; 2017: 103614.SchreiberJLibbrechtMBilmesJNobleWNucleotide sequence and dnasei sensitivity are predictive of 3d chromatin architecture201710361410.1101/103614Search in Google Scholar
Boza V, Brejova B, Vinar T. Deepnano: Deep recurrent neural networks for base calling in minion nanopore reads. Plos one 2017;12(6): e0178751.2858240110.1371/journal.pone.0178751BozaVBrejovaBVinarTDeepnano: Deep recurrent neural networks for base calling in minion nanopore reads2017126e0178751545943628582401Search in Google Scholar
Quang D, Xie X. Danq: a hybrid convolutional and recurrent deep neural network for quantifying the function of DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44(11): e107–e107. X.2708494610.1093/nar/gkw226QuangDXieXDanq: a hybrid convolutional and recurrent deep neural network for quantifying the function of DNA sequences20164411e107e107491410427084946Search in Google Scholar
Lee T, Yoon S. Boosted categorical restricted boltzmann machine for computational prediction of splice junctions. Int Conf Machine Learning; 2015: 2483–2492.LeeTYoonSBoosted categorical restricted boltzmann machine for computational prediction of splice junctions20152483–2492Search in Google Scholar
Baumgartner C, Böhm C, Baumgartner D. Modelling of classification rules on metabolic patterns including machine learning and expert knowledge. J Biomed Inform 2005; 38: 89–98.10.1016/j.jbi.2004.08.00915796999BaumgartnerCBöhmCBaumgartnerDModelling of classification rules on metabolic patterns including machine learning and expert knowledge200538899815796999Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Alakwaa FM, Chaudhary K, Garmire LX. Deep learning accurately predicts estrogen receptor status in breast cancer metabolomics data. J Proteom Res 2018; 17: 337–347.10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00595AlakwaaFMChaudharyKGarmireLXDeep learning accurately predicts estrogen receptor status in breast cancer metabolomics data201817337347575903129110491Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hao J, Astle W, De Iorio M, Ebbels T. BATMAN—An R package for the automated quantification ofmetabolites from NMR spectra using a Bayesian model. Bioinformatics 2012; 28: 2088–2090.2263560510.1093/bioinformatics/bts308HaoJAstleWDe IorioMEbbelsTBATMAN—An R package for the automated quantification ofmetabolites from NMR spectra using a Bayesian model2012282088209022635605Search in Google Scholar
Ravanbakhsh S, Liu P, Bjorndahl TC, Mandal R, Grant JR, Wilson M, Eisner R, Sinelnikov I, Hu X, Luchinat C. Accurate, fully-automated NMR spectral profiling for metabolomics. PLos one 2015; 10: e0124219.10.1371/journal.pone.0124219RavanbakhshSLiuPBjorndahlTCMandalRGrantJRWilsonMEisnerRSinelnikovIHuXLuchinatCAccurate, fully-automated NMR spectral profiling for metabolomics201510e0124219444636826017271Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F. Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering. Cell 2014; 157: 1262.10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.01024906146HsuPDLanderESZhangFDevelopment and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering20141571262434319824906146Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sternberg S, Doudna J. Expanding the Biologist’s Toolkit with CRISPR-Cas9.Molecular Cell. 2015; 58: 568.10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.03226000842SternbergSDoudnaJExpanding the Biologist’s Toolkit with CRISPR-Cas920155856826000842Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tsai SQ, Zheng Z, Nguyen NT, Liebers M, Topkar VV, Thapar V, Wyvekens N, Khayter C, Iafrate AJ, Le LP, Aryee MJ, Joung JK. GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 2015; 33(2): 187.2551378210.1038/nbt.3117TsaiSQZhengZNguyenNTLiebersMTopkarVVThaparVWyvekensNKhayterCIafrateAJLeLPAryeeMJJoungJKGUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases2015332187432068525513782Search in Google Scholar
Slaymaker IM et al. Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity. Science 2016; 351: 84–88.10.1126/science.aad522726628643SlaymakerIMet alRationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity20163518488471494626628643Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kim S, Kim D, Cho SW, Kim J, Kim JS. Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Genome Res 2014; 24 :1012–1019.10.1101/gr.171322.11324696461KimSKimDChoSWKimJKimJSHighly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins20142410121019403284724696461Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Casini A, Olivieri M, Petris G, Montagna C, Reginato G, Maule G, Lorenzin F, Prandi D, Romanel A, Demichelis F, Inga A, Cereseto A. A highly specific SpCas9 variant is identified by in vivo screening in yeast. Nature Biotech 2018; 36: 265–271.10.1038/nbt.4066CasiniAOlivieriMPetrisGMontagnaCReginatoGMauleGLorenzinFPrandiDRomanelADemichelisFIngaACeresetoAA highly specific SpCas9 variant is identified by in vivo screening in yeast201836265271606610829431739Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wilson H, Elizabeth D, McDonald M. (2002). Factors for success in customer relationship management (CRM) systems. J Marketing Manage 2002; 18(1): 193–219.10.1362/0267257022775918WilsonHElizabethDMcDonaldM.2002Factors for success in customer relationship management (CRM) systems2002181193219Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Costa FF. Big data in genomics: challenges and solutions. GIT Lab J 2012; 11: 1-4.CostaFFBig data in genomics: challenges and solutions20121114Search in Google Scholar
Ward RM, Schmieder R, Highnam G, Mittelman D. Big data challenges andopportunities in high-throughput sequencing. Syst Biomed 2013; 1: 29-34.10.4161/sysb.24470WardRMSchmiederRHighnamGMittelmanDBig data challenges andopportunities in high-throughput sequencing201312934Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Eisenstein M. Big data: The power of petabytes. Nature 2015; 527: S2-S4.10.1038/527S2a26536222EisensteinMBig data: The power of petabytes2015527S2S426536222Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Woodco Bacardit J, Llorà X. Large-scale data mining using genetics-based machine learning. Wiley Interdiscip Rev 2013; 3: 37–61.WoodcoBacardit JLloràXLarge-scale data mining using genetics-based machine learning20133376110.1145/2464576.2480807Search in Google Scholar