[
Affron, Charles; Affron, Mirella, J. 1995. Sets in Motion: Art Direction and Film Narrative. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arnheim, Rudolf. [1954] 1974. Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arnheim, Rudolf. 1988. “Visual Dynamics.” – American Scientist 6, 585–91.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Astruc, Alexandre. [1959] 1985. “What Is Mise-enscène?” – Jim Hillier (ed.), Cahiers du Cinéma: The 1950s: Neo-Realism, Hollywood, New Wave. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 266–8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barnwell, Jane. 2017a: “Spies at Home: How the design of the Domestic Interior in ‘Tinker Tailor Soldier, Spy’ Conveys Character and Narrative.” – Kosmorama, 16 June.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barnwell, Jane. 2017b. Production Design for Screen: Visual Storytelling in Film and Television. London: Bloomsbury.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barnwell, Jane. 2018. The Designer’s Story: Filmmaking from the Perspective of the Production Designer. PhD dissertation, University of Brighton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bazin, André. 1947. “Le Décor est un Acteur.” – Cineclub 1, 4–5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bazin, André. [1957] 1972. “De la politique des auteurs.” – André Bazin et al. (eds.), La Politique des auteurs. Paris: Editions Champ Libre, 99–117.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bazin, André. [1967] 2005. What Is Cinema? Vol. 1. Ed. Hugh Gray. Berkeley: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bergman, Ingmar. (dir.) 1983. Fanny and Alexander. Cinematograph AB; Svenska Filminstitutet; Gaumont. 188 minutes (film); 312 minutes (TV series). Blu Ray.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bezerra, Julio. 2017. “Bazin and Merleau-Ponty: Film and Its Ontological Bet.” – Journal of Literature and Art Studies 7, 7, 899–908. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5836/2017.07.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bordwell, David. 1985. “Widescreen Aesthetics and Mise en Scene Criticism.” – Velvet Light Trap 21, 18–25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bordwell, David. 1997. On the History of Film Style. London: Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bordwell, David; Thompson, Kristin. [1979] 2001. Film Art: An Introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cian, Luca. 2017. “Verticality and Conceptual Metaphors: A Systematic Review.” – Journal of the Association for Consumer Research 4, 2, 444–59.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coëgnarts, Maarten. 2017. “Cinema and the Embodied Mind: Metaphor and Simulation in Understanding Meaning in Films.” – Palgrave Communications 3, n.pag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coëgnarts, Maarten. 2019. Film as Embodied Art: Bodily Meaning in the Cinema of Stanley Kubrick. Academic Studies Press. https://www.perlego.com/book/1320621/film-as-embodied-art-bodily-meaning-in-the-cinema-of-stanley-kubrick-pdf (15 May 2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coëgnarts, Maarten; Kravanja, Peter. 2012a. “From Thought to Modality: A Theoretical Framework for Analysing Structural-Conceptual Metaphor and Image Metaphor in Film.” – Image [&] Narrative 13, 1, 96–113.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coëgnarts, Maarten; Kravanja, Peter. 2012b. “Embodied Visual Meaning: Image Schemas in Film.” – Projections 6, 2, 84–101.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coëgnarts, Maarten; Kravanja, Peter. 2014: “A Study in Cinematic Subjectivity: Metaphors of Perception in Film.” – Metaphor and the Social World, 4, 2, 149–73.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coëgnarts, Maarten; Kravanja, Peter. 2016a. “The Eyes for Mind in Cinema: A Metaphorical Study of the Viewer’s Experience.” – Kathrin Fahlenbrach (ed.), Embodied Metaphors in Film, Television, and Video Games. London: Routledge, 129–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coëgnarts, Maarten; Kravanja, Peter. 2016b. “From Language to Film Style: Reassessing the Role of Conceptual Metaphor in Cognitive Film Studies.” – Lars C. Grabbe, Patrick Rupert-Kruse, Norbert M. Schmitz (eds.), Image Embodiment: New Perspectives of the Sensory Turn. Darmstadt: Büchner, 108–34.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Comolli, Jean-Louis; Fieschi, Jean-Andre; Guegan, Gerard; Mardore, Michel; Ollier, Claude; Techine, Andre. [1965] 1986. “Twenty Years On: A Discussion about American Cinema and the Politique des Auteurs.” – Jim Hillier (ed.), Cahiers du Cinema 1960–1968: New Wave, New Cinema, Reevaluating Hollywood. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 187–96.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Counts, Kyle B.; Rubin, Steve. 1980. “The Making of Alfred Hitchcock’s The Birds.” – Cinemafantastique 10, 2, 15–35.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Curtis, James. 2015. William Cameron Menzies. New York: Pantheon Books. Kindle Edition.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Damasio, Antonio. 2000. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. Boston, MA: Mariner Books. Kindle Edition.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
D’Arcy, Geraint. 2018. Critical Approaches to TV and Film Set Design. New York: Taylor & Francis. https://www.perlego.com/book/1513523/critical-approaches-to-tv-and-film-set-design-pdf (9 November 2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duffer, Matt; Duffer Ross. (dirs.) 2016. Stranger Things. Season 1. 21 Laps Entertainment, Monkey Massacre Productions. Netflix.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ettedgui, Peter. 1999. Production Design and Art Direction. Hong Kong: Focal Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental Spaces. New York: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fauconnier, Gilles; Turner, Mark. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fahlenbrach, Kathrin. 2016. “Audiovisual Metaphors as Embodied Narratives in Moving Images.” – Kathrin Fahlenbrach (ed.), Embodied Metaphors in Film, Television, and Video Games. London: Routledge, 33–50.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fahlenbrach, Kathrin. 2017. “Audiovisual Metaphors and Metonymies of Emotions and Depression in Moving Images.” – Francesca Ervas, Elisabetta Gola, Maria Grazia Rossi (eds.), Metaphor in Communication, Science and Education. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 95–117.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fleming, Victor. (dir.) 1939. Gone With the Wind. Selznick International Pictures; Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. 221 minutes. Blu-Ray.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Forceville, Charles. 2016. “Pictorial and Multimodal Metaphor.” – Nina-Maria Klug, Hartmund Stöckl (eds.), Handbuch Sprache im Multimodalen Kontext. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 241–60.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Forceville, Charles. 2017. “Visual and Multimodal Metaphor in Advertising: Cultural Perspectives.” – Styles of Communication 9, 2, 26–41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Forceville, Charles; Paling, Sissy. 2021. “The Metaphorical Representation of DEPRESSION in Short, Wordless Animation Films.” – Visual Communication Journal 20, 1, 100–120.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Forceville, Charles; Renckens, Thijs. 2013. “The GOOD IS LIGHT and BAD IS DARKNESS Metaphors in Feature Films.” – Metaphor and the Social World 3, 2, 160–79.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallese, Vittorio. 2007. “Before and Below ‘Theory of Mind’: Embodied Simulation and the Neural Correlates of Social Cognition.” – Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 362, 1480: 659-69.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallese, Vittorio; Guerra Michele. 2012. “Embodying Movies: Embodied Simulation and Film Studies.” – Journal of Philosophy and the Moving Image 3, 183–210.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gallese, Vittorio; Guerra Michele. [2015] 2020. The Empathic Screen: Cinema and Neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibbs, Raymond W.; Colston, Herbert L. 1995. “The Cognitive Psychological Reality of Image Schemas and Their Transformations.” – Cognitive Linguistics 6, 347−78.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibson, James J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Godard, Jean-Luc. [1952] 1972. “Strangers on a Train.” – Jean Narboni, Tom Milne (eds.), Godard on Godard. New York: Viking Press, 22–6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodman, Ezra. 1945. “Production Designing.” – American Cinematographer, March, 81–2, 100.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grady, Joseph. 1997. Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grady, Joseph. 2005. “Primary Metaphors as Inputs to Conceptual Integration.” – Journal of Pragmatics 37, 10, 1595–614.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grady, Joseph; Oakley, Todd; Coulson, Seana. 1999. “Blending and Metaphor.” – Raymond W. Gibbs, Gerard J. Steen (eds.), Metaphors in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 101–24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halligan, Fionnuala. 2012. FilmCraft: Production Design. East Essex: Ilex. Kindle.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harry Ransom Center, University of Texas. HRCUOT 184 11. David. O Selznick Collection Production files 1939–1942, Gone With the Wind Fire Sequence.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heath, Stephen. 1976. “Narrative Space.” – Screen 17, 4, 68–112.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hitchcock, Alfred. (dir.) 1963. The Birds. Universal International Studios. 119 minutes. Blu-Ray.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hurtienne, Jörn; Klöckner, Kerstin; Diefenbach, Sarah; Nass, Claudia; Maier, Andreas. 2015. “Designing with Image Schemas: Resolving the Tension Between Innovation, Inclusion and Intuitive Use.” – Interacting with Computers 27, 3, 235–55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kachka, Boris. 2017. “The Visionaries Behind the Memorable Worlds of Film.” – New York Times, 30 September.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kövecses, Zoltán. [2000] 2003. Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2015. “Levels of Metaphor.” – Cognitive Linguistics 28, 2, 321–47.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ihde, Don. 2009. Postphenomenology and Technoscience. Albany: State of University of New York Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Israel, Robert. 1992. Advanced Problems Theatre Design. Lecture 243C, School of Theater Film and Television, UCLA, Los Angeles, 10 March.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, Mark. [1987] 2013. The Body in the Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jonauskaite, Domicele; Abdel-Khalek, Ahmed M.; Abu-Akel, Ahmad; Al-Rasheed, Abdulrahman Saud; Antonietti, Jean-Philippe; Ásgeirsson, Árni Gunnar; Atitsogbe, Kokou Amenyona; Barma, Marodégueba; Barratt, Daniel; Bogushevskaya, Victoria; Meziane, Maliha Khadidja Bouayed; Chamseddine, Amer, Charernboom, Thammanard; Chkonia, Eka; Ciobanu, Teofil; Corona, Violeta; Creed, Allison; Dael, Nele; Daouk, Hassan; Dimitrova, Nevena; Doorenbos, Cornelis B.; Fomins, Sergejs; Fonseca-Pedrero, Eduardo; Gaspar, Augusta; Gizdic, Alena; Griber, Yulia A.; Grimshaw, Gina M.; Hasan. Aya Ahmed; Havelka, Jelena; Hirnstein, Marco; Karlsson, Bodil S.A.; Katembu, Stephen; Kim, Jejoong; Konstantinou, Nikos; Laurent, Eric; Lindeman, Marjaana; Manav, Banu; Marquardt, Lynn; Mefoh, Philip; Mroczko-Wąsowicz, Aleksandra; Mutandwa, Phillip; Ngabolo, Georgette; Oberfeld, Daniel; Papadatou-Pastou, Marietta; Perchtold, Corinna M.; Pérez-Albéniz, Alicia; Pouyan, Niloufar; Soron, Tanjir Rashid; Roinishvili, Maya; Romanyuk, Lyudmyla; Montejo, Alejandro Salgado; Sultanova, Aygun; Tau, Ramiro; Uusküla, Mari; Vainio, Suvi; Vargas-Soto, Veronica; Volkan, Eliz; Wąsowicz, Grażyna; Zdravković, Sunčica; Zhang, Meng; Mohr, Christine. 2019. “The Sun is No Fun Without Rain: Physical Environments Affect How We Feel About Yellow Across 55 Countries.” – Journal of Environmental Psychology, 66, 101350.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, George. [1987] 2008. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://www.perlego.com/book/1842619/women-fire-and-dangerous-things-what-categories-reveal-about-the-mind-pdf (7 May 2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, George. 1993. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” – Ortony, Andrew (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press, 202–51.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, George; Johnson, Mark. [1980] 2008. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://www.perlego.com/book/1852464/metaphors-we-live-by-pdf (5 May 2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lakoff, George; Johnson, Mark. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LoBrutto, Vincent. 1992. By Design: Interviews with Film Production Designers. Westport, CT: Praeger.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Löffler, Diana. 2017. Color, Metaphor and Culture: Empirical Foundations for User Interface Design. PhD dissertation. Julis Maximilians-Universität Würzburg.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mandler, Jean M.; Cánovas, Cristóbal P. 2014. “On Defining Image Schemas.” – Language and Cognition 6, 4, 510–32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Margaret Herrick Library, Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. MHL AMPAS 345. Robert Boyle Papers 1933–1979, Production drawings The Birds. Martin, Adrian. 2014. Mise en Scène and Film Style: From Classical Hollywood to New Media Art. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCann, Ben. 2002. Set Design, Spatial Configurations and the Architectonics of 1930s French Poetic Realist Cinema. PhD dissertation, University of Bristol.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCann, Ben. 2004. “A Discreet Character? Action Spaces and Architectural Specificity in French poetic Realist Cinema.” – Screen, 45, 4, 375–82.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. [1945] 2003. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ortiz, María J. 2011. “Primary Metaphors and Monomodal Visual Metaphors.” – Journal of Pragmatics 43, 6, 1568–80.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ortiz, María J. 2015. “Films and Embodied Metaphors of Emotion.” – Maarten Coëgnarts, Peter Kravanja (eds.), Embodied Cognition and Cinema. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 203–20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raim, Daniel. 2015. Harold and Lillian: A Hollywood Love Story. Adama Films. 93 minutes. https://vimeo.com/ondemand/haroldandlillian (13 November 2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raim, Daniel. 2020. The Man on Lincoln’s Nose. Adama Films. 40 minutes. https://vimeo.com/ondemand/themanonlincolnsnose (5 May 2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rastimo, Kaisa. (dir.) 2002. Hayflower and Quiltshoe. Kinotaurus. 75 minutes. DVD.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rivette, Jacques. [1954] 1985. “Essential.” – Jim Hillier (ed.), Cahiers du Cinéma: The 1950s: Neo-Realism, Hollywood, New Wave, 132–5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sarris, Andrew. 1962, “Notes on the Auteur Theory.” – Film Culture 27, 1–8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schubert, Thomas W.; Waldzus, Sven; Giessner, Steffen R. 2009. “Control over the Association of Power and Size.” – Social Cognition 27, 1, 1–19.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sobchack, Vivian. 1992. The Address of the Eye: A Phenomenology of Film Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sobchack, Vivian. 2016. “The Active Eye.” – Studia Phaenomenologica 16, 63–90.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tang, Peipei; Ye Haosheng; Du Jianzheng. 2015. “The Spatial Size Metaphor of Power Concepts: A Perspective from Embodied Cognition.” – Acta Psychologica Sinica 47, 4, 514–21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tashiro, Charles. 1998. Pretty Pictures: Production Design and the History Film. Austin: University of Texas Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tikka, Pia. 2008. Enactive Cinema: Simulatorium Eisensteinense. Helsinki: Publication Series of the University of Art and Design.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tikka, Pia. 2022. “Enactive Authorship: Second-Order Simulation of the Viewer Experience – A Neurocinematic Approach.” – Projections 16, 47–66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ylänen, Helena. 2002. “Heinähattu ja Vilttitossu.” – Helsingin Sanomat, 18 October.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yu, Ning; Yu, Lu; Lee Yue C. 2017. “Primary Metaphors: Importance as Size and Weight in a Comparative Perspective.” – Metaphor and Symbol 32, 4, 231–49.
]Search in Google Scholar
