Editorial

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The core objective of this paper is to determine the main political and economic conditions and challenges related to the possible evolution of the integration process in the euro area toward fiscal federalism and fiscal union as a way to increase the capacity of the area to cope with future economic and financial crises. The issue of a separate budget for this area is of particular interest in this article. The idea of such a budget has recently become the subject of lively public debate in the European Union and has been a factor in encouraging the European Commission to propose new solutions at the end of 2017 in the field of economic governance of the euro area, including the establishment of a European Monetary Fund. The analysis carried out in this article leads to the conclusion that under the current conditions, there is little chance of introducing such regulatory and institutional changes that would significantly increase the scale of financial transfers between the euro area member states.</abstract>

Fiscal federalism and a separate budget for the euro area

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The decision of the United Kingdom (UK) to leave the European Union (EU) is unprecedented, especially considering the recent trend in the global economy toward economic integration. There is a multitude of research concerning the implications of economic integration; however, research in the field of disintegration is scarce. Brexit serves as an interesting case study to investigate the effects of economic disintegration. The implications for trade are especially fascinating as trade liberalization is one of the most important benefits of economic integration. Existing studies focus mainly on Brexit’s impact on the UK’s exports and imports, while less attention has been paid to Brexit’s effects on the trade of other countries. The main objective of our research is to estimate Brexit’s influence on Polish exports. We present several possible scenarios of future trade relations between the UK and the EU and assume that, at least in the nearest-future post-Brexit scenario, trade under the World Trade Organization rules is most likely. This will result in the imposition of tariffs on trade between the UK and the EU members, including Poland. In our research, we used the real exchange rate of the Polish zloty against the British pound as a proxy for the changes in price competitiveness of Polish exports due to the imposition of tariffs. We find that in the first year after Brexit, the dynamics of Polish exports to the UK will decrease due to the imposition of customs duties by 1.3 percentage points (pp) and by 0.1 pp when it comes to total Polish exports. This paper contributes to the discussion on the effects of disintegration on trade. We propose a new method for assessing changes in trade volume due to increase of trade barriers.</abstract>

The Impact of Hard Brexit on Polish Exports

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">In the European Union Member States, value-added tax (VAT) is undergoing a continuous process of harmonization, which was initiated in the 1960s by the introduction of the First and Second Council Directives and which resulted in the implementation of the common tax assessment base. Currently, the European Union VAT system faces multiple challenges related in particular to the negative side effects of certain design features and progressing globalization. The main aim of this article is to discuss some dilemmas of the common VAT model. Particular attention is placed on the fiscal consequences of VAT preferences, as well as on the origins, components, and implications of the VAT gap. For the purpose of this analysis, 2 neighboring countries were selected, namely, Germany and Poland. On the basis of the national and Eurostat data, the author calculates the most significant VAT performance indicators and reviews the factors decreasing VAT efficiency in these countries in comparison to other European Union Member States.</abstract>

Collection Dilemmas and Performance Measures of the Value-Added Tax in Germany and Poland

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The article sets out to explore how conflicting institutional logics of support organizations influence their value creation. Value creation undertaken by support organizations does not directly reflect their missions. Even though one can generalize that all support organizations should adjust their offer according to the idea of helping companies (especially small- and medium-sized enterprises [SMEs]) in their development, support organizations very often struggle with the conflict between mission delivery and survival needs, which affects value proposition of services. Moreover, support organizations are also shaped by institutional logics, which, embedded in social systems, govern all social agents. Therefore, the study explains the challenge of value creation from the perspective of the conflict of competing institutional logics that govern support organizations. The study also has its academic impact by contributing to existing literature on value creation by support organizations through the use of institutional logic theory. To gain this knowledge, discourse analysis is utilized in the study.</abstract>

Value Creation by Support Organizations Through the Prism of Conflicting Institutional Logics

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Introduced in 2003, net promoter score (NPS) very quickly gained popularity, as a customer loyalty measure, among companies and a part of researchers, due to its simplicity, the ease of interpretation, low costs of calculation, and, overall, its assumed impact on future growth and profitability. In due course of literature review, it was identified that not all researchers endorsed NPS, rejecting its presumed impact on growth and its superiority over other loyalty measures. This study aims therefore to verify the influence of NPS on the growth and profitability of Polish transportation companies. This objective is achieved with the use of Spearman correlation ranks and linear regression. The findings of this study reject the proclaimed relationship between NPS and growth; hence, in that matter, the results are aligned to criticism presented in literature. The study, however, confirmed a positive and statistically significant relationship between NPS and profitability. Accordingly, the study recommends Polish transportation companies to include NPS in a portfolio of metrics, however, not as a stand-alone diagnostic tool.</abstract>

Net promoter score, growth, and profitability of transportation companies

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Purpose – This study aimed to assess the impact of director-generals’ human and social capitals on the organizational performance of farmers’ cooperatives in Fujian Province. Design/Methodology/Approach – Questionnaire survey data of 303 standard cooperatives in nine cities of Fujian Province were statistically analyzed.Findings – We identified that director-generals’ human and social capitals affect all four dimensions of cooperative performance, through the mediating role of management effectiveness.Practical Implications – We offer suggestions and measures for improving cooperatives’ performance by enhancing the human and social capitals of director-generals. Based on China’s national conditions, we propose measures to improve director-generals’ human and social capitals by the Internal trust, Government policy support, and Business network (IGB) model, which emphasizes establishing a social network of cooperatives’ director-generals, accumulating social capital, and promoting cooperative development through internal members, government departments, and commercial organizations.</abstract>

College of Management & College of Tourism

Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou

Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University

Director-Generals’ Human and Social Capital, and Management Performance of Farmers’ Cooperatives: Evidence from China’s Fujian

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 60 (2024): Issue 1 (March 2024)

Volume 59 (2023): Issue 4 (December 2023)

Volume 59 (2023): Issue 3 (September 2023)

Volume 59 (2023): Issue 2 (June 2023)

Volume 59 (2023): Issue 1 (March 2023)

Volume 58 (2022): Issue 4 (December 2022)

Volume 58 (2022): Issue 3 (September 2022)

Volume 58 (2022): Issue 2 (June 2022)

Volume 58 (2022): Issue 1 (March 2022)

Volume 57 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)

Volume 57 (2021): Issue 3 (September 2021)

Volume 57 (2021): Issue 2 (June 2021)

Volume 57 (2021): Issue 1 (March 2021)

Volume 56 (2020): Issue 4 (December 2020)

Volume 56 (2020): Issue 3 (September 2020)

Volume 56 (2020): Issue 2 (June 2020)

Volume 56 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)

Volume 55 (2019): Issue 4 (December 2019)

Volume 55 (2019): Issue 3 (September 2019)

Volume 55 (2019): Issue 2 (June 2019)

Volume 55 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)

Volume 54 (2018): Issue 4 (December 2018)

Volume 54 (2018): Issue 3 (September 2018)

Volume 54 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)

Volume 54 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)

Volume 53 (2017): Issue 4 (December 2017)

Volume 53 (2017): Issue 3 (September 2017)

Volume 53 (2017): Issue 2 (June 2017)

Volume 53 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)

Volume 52 (2016): Issue 1 (December 2016)

Volume 51 (2016): Issue 1 (September 2016)

Volume 50 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)

Volume 49 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)

Volume 48 (2015): Issue 1 (December 2015)

Volume 47 (2015): Issue 1 (September 2015)

Volume 46 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)

Volume 45 (2015): Issue 1 (March 2015)

Volume 44 (2014): Issue 1 (December 2014)

Volume 43 (2014): Issue 1 (September 2014)

Volume 42 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)

Volume 41 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)

Volume 40 (2013): Issue 1 (December 2013)

Volume 39 (2013): Issue 1 (September 2013)

Volume 38 (2013): Issue 1 (June 2013)

Volume 37 (2013): Issue 1 (March 2013)

International Journal of Management and Economics

 IJME is a platform for scientific discussion and knowledge sharing open for all researchers worldwide.  IJME aims to enhance the body of knowledge in a variety of economic disciplines, such as economy, management, business administration, finance, marketing, logistics, entrepreneurship, etc. IJME is focused on international economic problems and research, however the single country perspective enabling the international comparisons is also welcome.  IJME accepts original works, substantively different from papers previously published or being under review elsewhere.  Rejection Rate   50%   The journal of the SGH WARSAW SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 

International Journal of Management and Economics

Volume 54 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)

Editorial

Editorial

Research Article

Fiscal federalism and a separate budget for the euro area

The Impact of Hard Brexit on Polish Exports

Collection Dilemmas and Performance Measures of the Value-Added Tax in Germany and Poland

Value Creation by Support Organizations Through the Prism of Conflicting Institutional Logics

Net promoter score, growth, and profitability of transportation companies

Director-Generals’ Human and Social Capital, and Management Performance of Farmers’ Cooperatives: Evidence from China’s Fujian

Cerca

Tutti i volumi ed i numeri in questa rivista