<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Nasal haemorrhage or epistaxis is the most common otolaryngologic emergency. It affects about 60% of the population and a percentage of 6% do not cease spontaneously, medical approach being needed.The management of epistaxis varies depending on its severity and etiology. The therapeutic conduct of this ENT emergency is based on three main principles: 1. local haemostasis; 2. detection and ceasing of the cause; 3. evaluation and correction of hypovolemia if necessary. Haemostasis can be done by chemical or electric cauterisation after identifying the bleeding source, by nasal packing, by endoscopic or external surgery or, in special cases, when none of the above methods returns any results, embolization. The current paper emphasizes our experience and a brief literature concerning epistaxis management in patients presented in the Emergency Room, in chronic cases of vascular intranasal tumors with recurrent bleeding, in iatrogenic haemorrhages, and none of the least we will bring into discussion the treatment applied for patients diagnosed with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.</abstract>

Centre of excellence for research of sensorial and sensitive disorders, study of inceto-inflammatory, tumoral and obstructive aero-digestive pathology (CESITO), ENT&HNS Department, “Sfanta Maria” Clinical Hospital

ENT&HNS Department, “Sfanta Maria” Clinical Hospital

“Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Epistaxis management - our point of view and literature review

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><bold>BACKGROUND.</bold> Functional connection between the stomatognathic system and the acoustic-vestibular apparatus is approached with interest in topical studies, in an attempt to elucidate in depth the cause-effect relationship between pathology and symptom. The temporomandibular joint disorder may be accompanied by a series of otological symptoms such as otalgia, tinnitus and vertigo. For this reason, for a correct diagnosis, a complex clinical examination is required both on the acousticvestibular analyzer and on neighbouring structures.<bold>MATERIAL AND METHODS.</bold> We conducted a clinical study, on a group of 97 patients diagnosed with temporomandibular joint disorder (TMJD) and treated for this pathology. All patients included in the study were evaluated by the dentist and the ENT specialist. The patients were treated at the dental clinic and then returned to the ENT clinic two months after completion of the treatment for re-examination, recording changes in otologic symptoms in order to obtain the results of the study.<bold>RESULTS.</bold> Of the 97 patients with TMJD, 58 also associated otic symptomatology (otalgia – 74.13%, tinnitus – 53.45%, vertigo – 43.10%). The evaluation done two months after treatment of the temporomandibular joint disorder revealed a significant remission of otalgia (decrease in Mean VAS from 6.05 to 2.49), followed by vertigo (from 5.08 to 2.52) and by tinnitus (from 4.84 to 3.84). Important changes also occurred in the results of the vestibular assessments.<bold>CONCLUSION.</bold> The most common otological symptom of patients with TMJD is auricular pain. Otalgia, tinnitus and vertigo can be improved by dental treatment of the temporomandibular dysfunction, auricular pain having the highest rate of remission.</abstract>

ENT&HNS Department, “Sfanta Maria” Hospital

Otologic symptomatology associated with the temporomandibular joint disorder

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><bold>OBJECTIVES.</bold> We reviewed the foreign aspects in nasal septal deformities.<bold>MATERIAL AND METHODS.</bold> Mladina classification of the nasal septal deformities was used.<bold>RESULTS.</bold> Types 5 and 6 have been dominantly inherited. The mechanism of the onset and possible connection to the trauma against the nose, as well as clinical implications of the remaining four types of the nasal septal deformities, have been explained and described in detail, giving the court expert witnesses the excellent opportunity to make a reliable and valuable finding.<bold>CONCLUSION.</bold> Type 5 and type 6 nasal septal deformities are never the consequence of the trauma against the nose. In most of the cases, this also concerns type 3. This type as well as type 7 require the latero-lateral and anterior-posterior X-rays of the nasal bones in cases when the nasal pyramid is concurrently deformed. Types 1 and 2 in most of the cases are connected to trauma against the nose.</abstract>

ENT Head and Neck Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine

Some forensic aspects of the nasal septal deformities

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Nasal meningoencephaloceles are rare findings, represented by protrusions of intracranial contents into the nasal cavity. They present as unilateral masses, and commonly determine unilateral nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea and non-characteristic headaches.We present the case of a 34-year-old patient diagnosed with a posttraumatic transethmoidal meningoencephalocele. The patient presented with unilateral nasal obstruction, mild headache and episodic watery rhinorrhea. The treatment was endoscopic endonasal surgical excision and repair of the skull base defect, in a mixt ENT-neurosurgical team. Patient follow-up showed no remaining mass or symptoms and normal closure of the skull base defect.</abstract>

“Prof. Dr. D. Hociota” Institute of Phono-Audiology and Functional ENT Surgery

Department of Morphological Sciences, Discipline of Anatomy

“Carol Davila” University for Medicine and Pharmacy

Endoscopic endonasal resection of a nasal meningoencephalocele - Case report

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><bold>BACKGROUND.</bold> Primary sinonasal mucosal melanoma is a rare tumor with a poor survival rate. There is an inherent difficulty in diagnosing these lesions, especially because their complex anatomic locations and symptoms can be frequently confused with other benign or malignant processes. The purpose of our study was to report a difficult case and review the literature and recent research on therapeutic modalities.<bold>MATERIAL AND METHODS.</bold> We herein report a 61-year-old female patient, with a history of right eye enucleation and prosthesis, who presented with obstruction of the left nostril, anterior and posterior mucopurulent rhinorrhea, anosmia, left facial numbness, left exophthalmia accompanied by ipsilateral epiphora and decreased visual acuity.<bold>RESULTS.</bold> Clinical and imagistic testing revealed a large, grayish, fleshy tumor localized in the left maxillary sinus, with extension to the left orbit (producing osteolysis of the inferior and medial orbital walls), nasopharynx, ethmoidal cells and left frontal sinus. Pathological and immunohistochemical examination confirmed the diagnosis of mucosal melanoma. Other primary sites were excluded. The patient succumbed shortly after, following only palliative treatment.<bold>CONCLUSION.</bold> Early diagnosis of primary sinonasal mucosal melanoma is essential but very difficult to detect. Any symptoms such as unilateral epistaxis or nasal obstruction in a patient over the age of 60 should be rendered suspicious. Pathological and immunohistochemical examination for diagnosis and prognostic factors are important. Although surgery is the first option for treatment, one must consider, according to tumor staging, radiotherapy and chemotherapy with immunotherapy as a viable course of treatment for advanced cases.</abstract>

CESITO Center, “Sfanta Maria” Clinical Hospital

Department of Pathology, “Sfanta Maria” Clinical Hospital

Primary sinonasal mucosal melanoma – Case report and literature review

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><bold>BACKGROUND.</bold> Signal void, or the absence of signal on MRI sequences, in the sinonasal region may be encountered in fungal rhinosinusitis cases with the aspect of a pseudo-pneumatized sinus, leading to diagnostic errors.<bold>CASE REPORT.</bold> We present the case of a 75-year-old woman referred to our clinic for complete and persistent right-sided nasal obstruction. The patient was evaluated using sinus CT and contrast-enhanced head MRI. Opacification of the right maxillary, ethmoid and frontal sinuses as well as of the right nasal fossa were seen on CT, with maxillary sinus expansion and osseous erosion. The MRI showed T2 signal void in the maxillary sinus with extension to the nasal fossa, creating the appearance of a pseudo-pneumatized sinus, and hyperintense signal in the ipsilateral anterior ethmoid and frontal sinuses. The patient underwent endoscopic sinus surgery. The dual imaging evaluation of the patient aided the preoperative differential diagnosis and choosing the surgical approach.</abstract>

Signal void and pseudo-pneumatized sinus in fungal rhinosinusitis – Case report

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Sinoliths are rarely found calculi of paranasal sinuses. The most rarely they were found in the sphenoidal sinuses. At a routine Cone Beam CT exam of a 52-year-old male patient clinically silent small sinoliths were found bilaterally in the sphenoidal sinuses and a larger posterior ethmoidal sinolith was found on the right side. To our knowledge, such multiple sinuses involvement has not been previously reported.</abstract>

“Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Division of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dental Medicine

Division of Anatomy, Faculty of Dental Medicine

Sphenoidal and ethmoidal sinoliths

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 14 (2024): Issue 54 (April 2024)

Volume 14 (2024): Issue 53 (March 2024)

Volume 13 (2023): Issue 52 (December 2023)

Volume 13 (2023): Issue 51 (July 2023)

Volume 13 (2023): Issue 50 (April 2023)

Volume 13 (2023): Issue 49 (March 2023)

Volume 12 (2022): Issue 48 (December 2022)

Volume 12 (2022): Issue 47 (July 2022)

Volume 12 (2022): Issue 46 (April 2022)

Volume 12 (2022): Issue 45 (March 2022)

Volume 11 (2021): Issue 44 (December 2021)

Volume 11 (2021): Issue 43 (September 2021)

Volume 11 (2021): Issue 42 (June 2021)

Volume 11 (2021): Issue 41 (March 2021)

Volume 10 (2020): Issue 40 (December 2020)

Volume 10 (2020): Issue 39 (September 2020)

Volume 10 (2020): Issue 38 (June 2020)

Volume 10 (2020): Issue 37 (March 2020)

Volume 9 (2019): Issue 36 (December 2019)

Volume 9 (2019): Issue 35 (September 2019)

Volume 9 (2019): Issue 34 (June 2019)

Volume 9 (2019): Issue 33 (March 2019)

Volume 8 (2018): Issue 32 (October 2018)

Volume 8 (2018): Issue 31 (September 2018)

Volume 8 (2018): Issue 30 (June 2018)

Volume 8 (2018): Issue 29 (March 2018)

Volume 7 (2017): Issue 28 (December 2017)

Volume 7 (2017): Issue 27 (September 2017)

Volume 7 (2017): Issue 26 (June 2017)

Volume 7 (2017): Issue 25 (March 2017)

Volume 6 (2016): Issue 24 (December 2016)

Volume 6 (2016): Issue 23 (September 2016)

Volume 6 (2016): Issue 22 (June 2016)

Volume 6 (2016): Issue 21 (March 2016)

Volume 5 (2015): Issue 20 (December 2015)

Volume 5 (2015): Issue 19 (September 2015)

Volume 5 (2015): Issue 18 (June 2015)

Volume 5 (2015): Issue 17 (March 2015)

Romanian Journal of Rhinology

Rhinology, as an important part of Otorhinolaryngology, addresses a very frequent and diverse pathology, with important interdisciplinary implications. In the last decades, this medical field was the beneficiary of new technical means for accurate and effective investigation, treatment and research. The needs of modern medicine - over-specialization, interdisciplinary approach and evidence-based medicine, lead to the situation that the international rhinologic societies are the most dynamic and appreciated.  The Romanian Journal of Rhinology is the official scientific publication of the Romanian Rhinologic Society, and it is trying to fill the existing gap in the Romanian ENT literature, promoting modern publishing and criteria according to the international standards. Romanian Journal of Rhinology appears quarterly with the purpose to publish original articles, original clinical reports, clinically relevant experimental studies and short communications presenting new results of general interest. Its aim is to concentrate and provide information concerning care, cure and prevention of different rhinologic disorders and borderline pathology. With a peer review by an important national and international editorial board, the journal provides clinical and clinically related information written by authors from all over the world.  Journal’s business model  Romanian Journal of Rhinology is an Open Access journal. The submission and publication of the articles are free of charge, in both print and electronic publication. The publisher covers all costs – editing, printing, copyediting, typesetting, long-term archiving, journal management.  Romanian Journal of Rhinology is the journal of the Romanian Rhinologic Society; thus, one of the financial sources for publication is represented by the Society from the manuscript fees.  Advertisements represent another important founding source. The decision regarding the type of advertisements, acceptance/rejections, the price offering is made by the Publishing/technical Editor, the Editorial Board having no decision power on this aspect. Advertorials and publicity about pharmacological devices, drugs, supplements related to rhinologic and otolaryngologic pathologies can be taken into consideration. In case of Advertorials, with an important scientific content, the medical data presented will have the approval of the Journal’s Editors.  There is also available the annual subscription for individuals and companies. The contact person is also the Publishing/technical Editor.  Publication schedule  The Romanian Journal of Rhinology is published quarterly:   January-March (publication month: February)  April-June (publication month: April)  July-September (publication month: July)  October-December (publication month: October)  Editorial process  The Romanian Journal of Rhinology uses a standard scheme for the evaluation process of the submitted articles. All manuscripts are strictly reviewed for originality, correctness, methodology, quality of the medical information, suitability for the journal’s medical field, ethical nature.  The Editors reserve the right to refuse any manuscript which does not correspond to the submission guidelines.  Peer-review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. Independent researchers in the otorhinolaryngology area assess the submitted manuscripts for originality, validity, and significance to help editors determine whether the manuscript should be published in their journal.  After submission:   All manuscript are treated as confidential documents, all being assigned with a registration number (for example, RJR010121 (day of submission)(month of submission) (the last two numbers of the year of submission)). All communications between the editors, the author(s), the reviewers are made by using this identification number.  Technical review performed by the editor-in-chief, associated editors, members of the editorial board analyses – the importance of the subject, presentation clarity, relevance, plagiarism index. Submissions that fail to fulfil all requirements are rejected. This process last for a few days after submission.  Review process. The Romanian Journal of Rhinology has a double-blind reviewing process, in which the reviewers do not know the names of the authors, and the authors do not know who reviewed their manuscript. Therefore, the authors are required to submit a blind manuscript without the authors’ names and affiliations on the title page or in the text and a separate title page with the names of the authors, affiliations, and information about the corresponding author. After the initial assessment for, submissions are sent to at least two experts in the field who are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically coherent, easy to read, useful in the field, and whether the manuscript should be accepted, rejected or revised. The review process will take approximately 2 weeks. After the review process is completed, the corresponding author will receive an e- mail about the evaluation results of the submitted manuscript: accepted, revision or rejection. If the e-mail contains suggestions and comments for revising the manuscript, the authors should make the changes and return to the editor within 2 weeks; if not, the manuscript is considered rejected. If the manuscript is accepted for publication by the reviewers, it is forwarded to the Editor-in-Chief. The final decisions are made by the Editor-in-Chief based on the recommendations of reviewers reports and the journal’s editors. Where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board. The Editor-in-Chief may advice the corresponding author to make necessary revisions in order to publish the article. The final form of the article will be sent to the main author for the last approval from his/her part (if there are minor changes these should be send in no more than 1 week).  The publication process after the article’s submission may take 45 days, average. All accepted articles are assigned with a DOI number.  The Romanian Journal of Rhinology follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals and required ICMJSE to be listed as a journal that follows these recommendations.  Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 

Romanian Journal of Rhinology

Volume 7 (2017): Issue 28 (December 2017)

Original Study