<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Scientific studies show that the efficiency of biochar can be improved by its combination with other fertilisers. For this reason, fertiliser manufacturers are working to create products that combine biochar with other soil fertility enhancers suitable for different soil-climatic conditions. In this study, two types of biochar substrates (1. biochar blended with farmyard manure, and 2. biochar blended with farmyard manure as well as with digestate) at rates of 10 and 20 t/ha were applied alone or in combination with other manure and mineral fertilisers. These were added to Arenosol (sandy soil, Dolná Streda, Slovakia) and Chernozem (loamy soil, Veľké Úľany, Slovakia) to evaluate the soil physical properties to test the potential of these amendments for soil amelioration in texturally different soils. The results showed that the application of biochar substrates alone increased soil moisture, the volume of capillary pores, and decreased aeration and volume of non-capillary pores. The application of biochar substrates with mineral fertilisers increased aeration, content of water-stable macro-aggregates (WSAma), total porosity, and decreased soil moisture and the content of water-stable micro-aggregates (WSAmi) in sandy soil. In loamy soil, when compared to unfertilised control, the biochar treatments increased content of WSAma, content of dry-sieved macro-aggregates, and decreased content of WSAmi and content of dry-sieved micro-aggregates. The combination of biochar substrates together with manure had no effect on changes in the physical properties of loamy soil.</abstract>

Physical Properties of Texturally Different Soils After Application of Biochar Substrates

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Species that have been identified as the genome donors to cultivated polyploid durum and bread wheats (<italic>Triticum durum</italic> L. and <italic>T. aestivum</italic> L., respectively) are potential gene sources for the breeding of these two crops. Therefore, their accurate identification facilitates their use in the improvement of these crops. Based on chloroplast DNA analysis (<italic>rpL2</italic> and <italic>rps16</italic> introns, <italic>psbC-trnS</italic>, <italic>trnT-L</italic>, and <italic>trnL-F</italic>) using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), an attempt was made in 2018 (Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology/AECS) to identify durum and bread wheats from each of their proposed diploid ancestral species (i.e., <italic>T. monococcum</italic>, <italic>T. urartu</italic>, <italic>Aegilops speltoides,</italic> and <italic>Ae. tauschii</italic>). The use of two PCR markers (<italic>psbC-trnS</italic> and <italic>trnL-F</italic>) and three PCR-RFLP locus-enzyme combinations (<italic>rps16</italic> intron-Tru 1I, <italic>rpL2</italic> intron-Taq I, and <italic>trnT-L-</italic>Taq I) allowed the identification of all species involved. Reliable and accurate identification of diploid ancestors of durum and bread wheats using these candidate species-specific cpDNA markers will be useful for wheat breeding programs, <italic>in situ</italic> and <italic>ex situ</italic> conservation efforts, verification of seed purity in commercial seed stocks, and ensuring identity and integrity of accessions held within a collection does not change through unwanted gene flow or by genetic drift after regeneration by seed.</abstract>

Identification of Bread and Durum Wheats from their Diploid Ancestral Species Based on Chloroplast DNA

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Precision agriculture requires a wide sampling procedure to determine the spatial variability of soil properties for adequate assessment of soil state and appropriate recommendations. Electrical geophysical methods (i.e. vertical electrical resistivity sounding) allow performing rapid measurement of soil electrical properties directly from the soil surface to any depth without any mechanical disturbance of soil cover. Soil electrical properties are linked with many soil properties and could improve the quality and spatial coverage of soil surveys. The results obtained in our study using vertical electrical resistivity sounding confirmed the hypothesis of a high correlation between electrical resistivity and such soil properties as carbon and nitrogen content and silt content. The highest correlation (<italic>r</italic> > 0.9) was found for electrical resistivity and carbon content. It was also confirmed that significant correlations between electrical resistivity and soil properties are found mainly when soil properties are highly ranged. Perspectives for the applied method lie at the relationship between electrical resistivity and soil properties, such as texture class, clay content, carbon content, and cation exchange capacity. The results obtained in this work could be useful for complex precision agriculture, creating maps of agricultural soils, adequate methods of plant growth, and other issues of precision and conventional agriculture.</abstract>

Assessment of Soil Electrical Properties in Selected Agricultural Soils of Puchuncaví, Central Chile

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The true grasses (<italic>Poaceae</italic>) comprise one of the largest plant families on earth. The group is peerless in its contribution to global agricultural production and its members dominate many of the world’s most important habitats. However, morphological diagnosis of wild grasses is notoriously problematic and it is often impossible in the absence of flowering individuals. The advent of DNA barcoding provided a useful tool to address this problem for larger-scale or longer-term studies but the need for sequencing precludes its use in a field laboratory context or in situations where either funding or time is limited. Here, a chloroplast DNA (cpDNA)-based Cleaved Amplified Polymorphic Sequence (CAPS) system of molecular species diagnosis that has the capacity to address this problem is presented using British grasses as a model. First, PCRs were performed using universal primer pairs targeting 21 regions of the chloroplast genome in authenticated representatives of the 117 grass species from the British Isles, and universal amplification for all loci targeted was demonstrated. Second, 54 restriction enzymes were applied on amplification products generated from all species. There were 10 locus-enzyme combinations (with the highest variation) that had the best diagnostic utility for the 117 grass species.CAPS analysis on 16 representatives of three genera (<italic>Calamagrostis</italic>, <italic>Phleum,</italic> and <italic>Agrostis</italic>) was then used to illustrate the potential utility of the pipeline for establishing a field-laboratory screen of species identity. CAPS DNA barcoding system developed here may have ecological, conservation, and commercial applications. However, it has limited possibilities for intraspecific differentiation due to the highly conserved nature of loci targeted within species.</abstract>

Caps DNA Barcoding for Field Laboratory Identification of Grass Species (British Grasses as a Model)

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 69 (2023): Issue 3 (October 2023)

Volume 69 (2023): Issue 2 (July 2023)

Volume 69 (2023): Issue 1 (April 2023)

Volume 68 (2022): Issue 4 (December 2022)

Volume 68 (2022): Issue 3 (October 2022)

Volume 68 (2022): Issue 2 (July 2022)

Volume 68 (2022): Issue 1 (April 2022)

Volume 67 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)

Volume 67 (2021): Issue 3 (October 2021)

Volume 67 (2021): Issue 2 (July 2021)

Volume 67 (2021): Issue 1 (April 2021)

Volume 66 (2020): Issue 4 (December 2020)

Volume 66 (2020): Issue 3 (November 2020)

Volume 66 (2020): Issue 2 (July 2020)

Volume 66 (2020): Issue 1 (April 2020)

Volume 65 (2019): Issue 4 (December 2019)

Volume 65 (2019): Issue 3 (October 2019)

Volume 65 (2019): Issue 2 (July 2019)

Volume 65 (2019): Issue 1 (April 2019)

Volume 64 (2018): Issue 4 (December 2018)

Volume 64 (2018): Issue 3 (August 2018)

Volume 64 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)

Volume 64 (2018): Issue 1 (April 2018)

Volume 63 (2017): Issue 4 (December 2017)

Volume 63 (2017): Issue 3 (October 2017)

Volume 63 (2017): Issue 2 (August 2017)

Volume 63 (2017): Issue 1 (May 2017)

Volume 62 (2016): Issue 4 (December 2016)

Volume 62 (2016): Issue 3 (October 2016)

Volume 62 (2016): Issue 2 (August 2016)

Volume 62 (2016): Issue 1 (April 2016)

Volume 61 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)

Volume 61 (2015): Issue 3 (September 2015)

Volume 61 (2015): Issue 2 (June 2015)

Volume 61 (2015): Issue 1 (March 2015)

Volume 60 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)

Volume 60 (2014): Issue 3 (September 2014)

Volume 60 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)

Volume 60 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)

Volume 59 (2013): Issue 4 (December 2013)

Volume 59 (2013): Issue 3 (September 2013)

Volume 59 (2013): Issue 2 (June 2013)

Volume 59 (2013): Issue 1 (March 2013)

Volume 58 (2012): Issue 4 (December 2012)

Volume 58 (2012): Issue 3 (October 2012)

Volume 58 (2012): Issue 2 (June 2012)

Volume 58 (2012): Issue 1 (April 2012)

Volume 57 (2011): Issue 4 (December 2011)

Volume 57 (2011): Issue 3 (September 2011)

Volume 57 (2011): Issue 2 (June 2011)

Volume 57 (2011): Issue 1 (March 2011)

Agriculture (Pol'nohospodárstvo)

 Why subscribe, read and submit The Agriculture (Poľnohospodárstvo) is a peer-reviewed international journal with open access that publishes mainly original research papers. The types of contributions are also published – review and short communication. Papers are published in British English. The journal has been continuously publishing since 1954. It is published four times a year by the National Agricultural and Food Centre - Research Institute of Plant Production Piešťany, Slovak Republic (www.agriculture.sk; www.nppc.sk; www.vurv.sk). It is indexed in 36 recognized international scientific databases (e.g. SCOPUS).  Our journal is an excellent source of research information on agricultural and biological sciences. It offers fast review, editing process, worldwide dissemination and accessibility of articles. It examines various aspects of research and is devoted to the publication of papers dealing with the aims and scopes related to:   cropland,  farming and cropping systems,  precision agriculture,  agroecosystems,  plant improvement (genetic resources and biodiversity, physiology, genetics, breeding, biotechnology),  permanent crops (growing management and technologies, nutrition, disease and pest protection, weed control, economy of production),  chemistry,  biology, and genetics applied to agronomy,  quality of plant production,  interactions with environment,  grasslands and pasture improvement,  organic farming,  soil quality and management for sustainable agriculture,  irrigation and water use, and other aspects of plant science and production.   Rejection Rate   70%   Back issues Link to previous on-line volumes of Agriculture (Poľnohospodárstvo) (full text from 2006): www.agriculture.sk  Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 