À propos de cet article


1. Grudniewicz A, Moher D, Cobey KD, Bryson GL, Cukier S, Allen K, et al. Predatory magazines: no definition, no defence. Nature. 2019;576(7786):210-2. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Moher D, Shamseer L, Cobey KD, Lalu MM, Galipeau J, Avey MT, et al. Stop this waste of people, animals and money. Nature. 2017;549(7670):23-5. DOI: 10.1038/549023a. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Cukier S, Lalu M, Bryson GL, Cobey KD, Grudniewicz A, Moher D. Definition predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e035561. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035561. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Clark J, Smith R. Firm action needed on predatory journals. BMJ. 2015;350:h210. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h210. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Cobey KD, Lalu MM, Skidmore B, Ahmadzai N, Grudniewicz A, Moher D. What is a predatory magazine? A scoping review. F1000Res. 2018;7:1001. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.15256.2. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Strinzel M, Severin A, Milzow K, Egger M. Erratum for Strinzel et al., Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis. mBio. 2021;12(1):e03108-20. DOI: 10.1128/mBio.03108-20. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Arévalo JA, Saraiva R, Holguín RF. Revistas depredadoras: fraude en la ciencia. Cuad Doc Multimed. 2020; 31 :1-6. Search in Google Scholar

8. Shamseer L, Moher D, Maduekwe O, Turner L, Barbour V, Burch R, et al. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals:can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):28. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9. González de Dios J, Buñuel Álvarez JC, Aparicio Rodrigo M. Checklists of systematic reviews and meta-analysis: PRISMA statement. Evid Pediatr. 2011;7:97. Search in Google Scholar

10. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

11. Hutton B, Catalá-López F, Moher D. The PRISMA statement extension for systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analysis: PRISMANMA. Clin Med (Barc). 2016;147(6):262-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2016.02.025. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Sarfraz Z, Sarfraz A, Anwer A, Nadeem Z, Bano S, Tareen S. Predatory journals: A literature review. Pakistan Journal of Surgery & Medicine. 2020;1(1):42-51. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3595029. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13. Cukier S, Helal L, Rice DB, Pupkaite J, Ahmadzai N, Wilson M, et al. Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):104. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01566-1. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Dadkhah M, Bianciardi G. Ranking predatory journals: solve the problem instead of removing it! Adv Pharm Bull. 2016;6(1):1-4. DOI: 10.15171/apb.2016.001. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Ross-White A, Godfrey CM, Sears KA, Wilson R. Predatory publications in evidence syntheses. J Med Libr Assoc. 2019;107(1):57-61. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2016.491. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Mills D, Inouye K. Problematizing ‘predatory publishing’: A systematic review of factors shaping publishing motives, decisions, and experiences. Learned Publishing. 2021;34(2):89-104. DOI: 10.1002/leap.1325. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. Kurt S. Why do authors publish in predatory journals? Learned Publishing. 2018;31(2):141-7. DOI: 10.1002/leap.1150. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Eriksson S, Helgesson G. The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics. Med Health Care Philos. 2017;20(2):163-70. DOI: 10.1007/s11019-016-9740-3. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Kendall G. Beall’s legacy in the battle against predatory publishers. Learned Publishing. 2021;34(3):379-88. DOI: 10.1002/leap.1374. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Bealls’s List of potential predatory journals and publishers. [Internet]. Available from: https://beallslist.net/. Search in Google Scholar

21. Beall J. Criteria for determining predatory open-access publishers. 3rd edition / January 1, 2015. [Internet]. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20190405020715/ https://beallslist.weebly.com/uploads/3/0/9/5/30958339/criteria-2015.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

22. Rele S, Kennedy M, Blas N. Journal Evaluation Tool. LMU Librarian Publications & Presentations. 2017;40. Available from: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/librarian_pubs/40/. Search in Google Scholar