Latvian Ecolabel Green Certificate – an Example of Sustainable Rural Tourism in the Use of Ecosystem Services

1. Acampora, A., Ali, F., Lucchetti, M.C., Merli, R., & Preziosi, M. (2018). The impact of green practices in coastal tourism: An empirical investigation on an eco-labelled beach club. Roma Tre University of South Florida, USA, Italy, (pp. 471 - 482.).10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.08.011Search in Google Scholar

2. Baltic Country Holidays. Green Sertificate. Retrieved February 24, 2019, from https://www.celotajs.lv/lv/c/prof/certificates/green_certificate.Search in Google Scholar

3. Bērziņa, I. (2012). Tūrisma ekonomiskā nozīmīguma novērtēšana Latvijas nacionālo parku reģionos (Assessment of tourism economic significance in the regions of national parks of Latvia). Doctoral dissertation, Latvia University of Agriculture, Jelgava. (in Latvian)Search in Google Scholar

4. Dreija, K. (2013). Latvijas vēsturiskie dārzi un parki mūsdienu lauku ainavā. (Historical Gardens and Parks of Latvia in present rural landscape). Doctoral dissertation, Latvia University of Agriculture, Jelgava. (in Latvian)Search in Google Scholar

5. Ecolabel index. (2019). Retrieved January 4, 2019, from http://www.ecolabelindex.com/ecolabels/?st=category,tourism.Search in Google Scholar

6. Grizāne, T. (2007). Kultūrvēsturisko parku publiskā vērtība un izmantošana Ziemeļvidzemes biosfēras rezervātā (Public value and use of heritage parks in North Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve). Doctoral dissertation, Latvia University of Agriculture, Jelgava. (in Latvian)Search in Google Scholar

7. Jeroščenkova, L. (2017). Kultūras mantojuma izmantošana lauku tūrisma attīstībā (The use of cultural heritage for the development of Rural tourism). Doctoral dissertation, Latvia University of Agriculture, Jelgava. (in Latvian)Search in Google Scholar

8. Kerstetter, D., Sasidharan, V., Sirakaya, E. (2001). Developing countries and tourism ecolabels. San Diego State University un Texas A&M University, USA, (pp. 162 - 174.).10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00047-4Search in Google Scholar

9. Klepers, A. (2012). Tūrisma telpiskās struktūras Latvijā, to veidošanās, izpausmes un nozīme galamērķu virzībai tirgū (Tourism spatial structures in Latvia, their formation, expression and importance in promotion of destinations on the market). Doctoral dissertation, University of Latvia, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, Riga. (in Latvian)Search in Google Scholar

10. Križaj, D., Sasidharan, V. (2018). Tourism Ecolabels and Social Sustainability: Challenges and Innovations from a Slovene Perspective. University of Primorska and San Diego State University, Slovenia, USA, (pp. 19 - 29.).10.26493/2335-4194.11.19-29Search in Google Scholar

11. Leroux, E., Pupion, P. C. (2018). Factors of adoption of eco-labelling in hotel industry. University of Paris, University of Poitiers, France. (pp. 194 - 209.).10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.018Search in Google Scholar

12. LIFE Ecosystem services. (2019). Retrieved January 4, 2019, from http://ekosistemas.daba.gov.lv/public/lat/ekosistemu_pakalpojumi11/.Search in Google Scholar

13. Margaryan, L., & Stensland, S. (2017). Sustainable by nature? The case of (non) adoption of eco-certification among the nature-based tourism companies in Scandinavia. Mid Sweden University, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, (pp. 559 - 567.).10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.060Search in Google Scholar

14. Ministry of Nature protection and Regional development. Planning regions. Retrieved February 23, 2019, from http://www.varam.gov.lv/lat/darbibas_veidi/reg_att/pl_reg/?doc=13637.Search in Google Scholar

15. Ruskule, A., Klepers, A. & Veidemane, K. (2018). Mappping and assessment of cultural ecosystem services of Latvian coastal areas. Baltic Environmental forum, Riga, Latvia; University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia; Vidzeme University of Applied Sciences, Valmiera, Latvia.10.3897/oneeco.3.e25499Search in Google Scholar

16. Ziemele, A., 2019, personal communication on 25 February 2019.Search in Google Scholar