The Development of Rural Peripheral Areas in Lithuania: The Challenges of Socio-Spatial Transition

[1] Berzins, A. & Zvidrins, P. (2011). Depopulation in the Baltic states. Lithuanian Journal of Statistics 50(1), 39–48.10.15388/LJS.2011.13931Search in Google Scholar

[2] Blowers, A. & Leroy, P. (1994). Power, politics and environmental inequality: A theoretical and empirical analysis of the process of “peripheralisation”. Environmental Politics 3, 197–228. DOI: 10.1080/09644019408414139.10.1080/09644019408414139Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[3] Burbulytė-Tsiskarishvili, G. (2012). Measuring Peripherality and Accessibility for Lithuanian Regional Policy. Regional Formation and Development Studies 8(3), 25–35.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bürk, T. (2013). Voices from the Margin: The Stigmatization Process as an Effect of Socio-Spatial Peripheralization in Small-Town Germany. In Fischer-Tahir, A. & Naumann, M., eds., Peripheralization. The Making of Spatial Dependencies and Social Injustice (pp. 168–185). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Burneika, D. (2006). Peculiarities of economic relations between former Soviet countries – influence of different heritage. Geopolitical Studies 14, 409–420.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Burneika, D. (2012). Transformations in Lithuania – factors of change and regional patterns. In Gorzelak, G., Goh, C. C. & Fazekas, K., eds., Adaptability and Change: The Regional Dimensions in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 267–283). Drelow: Poligraf.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Chevalier, P., Mačiulyté, L., Razafimaheva, L. & Dedeire, M. (2017). The Leader Programme as a Model of Institutional Transfer: Learning From its Local Implementation in France and Lithuania. European Countryside 9(2), 317–341. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2017-0020.10.1515/euco-2017-0020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] Copus, A. K. (2001). From Core-periphery to Polycentric Development: Concepts of Spatial and Aspatial Peripherality. European Planning Studies 9(4), 539–552. DOI: 10.1080/713666491.10.1080/713666491Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[9] Daugirdas, V., Burneika, D., Kriaučiūnas, E., Ribokas, G., Stanaitis, S. & Uberevičiuné, R. (2013). Lietuvos retai apgyventos teritorijos. Vilnius: Lietuvos socialinių tyrimų centras.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Daugirdas, V. & Burneika, D. (2008). Peripherality and peripheral regions in Lithuania – borderland of EU. In Baubinas, R., ed., Problem regions in Lithuania (sociogeographical aspect) (pp. 6–12). Vilnius: Geografijos ir geologijos institutas.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Deleuze, G. (2004). Desert islands and other texts. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Dringelis, L. (2013). Lietuvos miestai, miesteliai ir kaimai: jų urbanistinių ir demografinių pokyčių įtaka šalies kraštovaizdžio erdvinės struktūros savitumui Juornal of architecture and urbanism 37(4), 310–323. DOI: 10.3846/20297955.2013.869884.10.3846/20297955.2013.869884Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[13] Elcock, H. (2014). Multi-level governance and peripheral places: The North-East of England. Local Economy 29(4–5), 323–333. DOI: 10.1177/0269094214541524.10.1177/0269094214541524Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[14] Eriksson, M. (2008). (Re)Producing a “peripheral” region – Northern Sweden in the news. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 90, 369–388. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2008.00299.x.10.1111/j.1468-0467.2008.00299.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[15] Gutiérrez, J. & Urbano, P. (1996). Accessibility in the European Union: the impact of the Trans European road network. Journal of Transport Geography 4(1), 15–25. DOI: 10.1068/a301337.10.1068/a301337Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[16] Janc, K. (2006). Human and social capital in Poland – spatial diversity and relations. Europa XXI 14, 39–55.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Jeřábek, M. (2006). Research into peripheral areas in the Czech Republic – changes in the landscape and land use in the model regions. Europa XXI 15, 171–183.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Juska, A., Poviliunas A. & Pozzuto, R. (2005). Resisting Marginalisation: The Rise of the Rural Community Movement in Lithuania. Sociologia Ruralis 45(1–2), 3–21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2005.00287.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2005.00287.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[19] Juškevičius, P. (2015). Lietuvos miestų sistemos raida ir jos ateities perspektyvos. Acta Academiae Artium Vilensis 76, 11–34.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Kavoliutė, F. (2014). Gyvenamųjų vietovių vardai – nematerialusis šalies kultūros paveldas [Place names – intangible cultural heritage]. Geografijos metraštis 47, 88–102.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Keeble, D. E. (1989). Core-periphery disparities, recession and new regional dynamisms in the European Community. Geography 74(1), 1–11.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Kinsey, B. S. (2006). Cleavage formation in Norway: The Contextual Dimension. Scandinavian Political Studies 29(3), 261–283. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00152.x.10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00152.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[23] Kondrotaitė, G. (2006). Socialinės rizikos šeimos Lietuvoje: atvejo studija. Filosofija.Sociologija 4, 55–60.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Kriaučiūnas, E., Krupickaité, D., Pociūté-Sereikiné, G. & Ubarevičiuné, R. (2014). Lietuvos kaimo gyvenviečių funkcijų kaitos regioninės ypatybės. Geografijos metraštis 47, 70–87.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Kriaučiūnas, E. (2010). Some development patterns of Lithuanian rural territories in 1990– 2010. Geopolitical Studies 16, 199–212.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Kriaučiūnas, E. & Daugirdas, V. (2013). Rečiausiai gyvenamų Lietuvos teritorijų gyvenviečių tinklo ypatumai Geografijos metraštis 46, 32–45.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Krugman, P. R. (2010). The New Economic Geography, Now Middle-aged. Regional Studies 45(1), 1–7. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2011.537127.10.1080/00343404.2011.537127Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[28] Kühn, M. (2015). Peripheralization: Theoretical Concepts Explaining Socio-Spatial Inequalities. European Planning Studies 23(2), 367–378. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2013.862518.10.1080/09654313.2013.862518Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[29] Kühn, M. & Bernt, M. (2013). Peripheralization and power – Theoretical debates. In Fischer-Tahir, A. & Naumann, M., eds., Peripheralization – The making of spatial dependencies and social injustice (pp. 302–317). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Lang, T. (2012). Shrinkage, Metropolisation and Peripheralisation in East Germany. European Planning Studies 20(10), 1747–1754. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2012.713336.10.1080/09654313.2012.713336Search in Google Scholar

[31] Lang, T. (2015). Socio-economic and political responses to regional polarisation and socio-spatial peripheralisation in Central and Eastern Europe: a research agenda. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 64(3), 171–185. DOI: 10.15201/hungeobull.64.3.2.10.15201/hungeobull.64.3.2Search in Google Scholar

[32] Mačiulytė, J. & Bagočiūtė, A. (2008). Regional Developement Disparities and Regional Policy in Lithuania after Accession to the European Union. In Gaidoš, P., ed., Regional Disparities in Central Europe (pp. 87–97). Bratislava: Interlingua.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Maldžiūnas, V. (1970). Teritorinių mikrorajonų centrų tinklas Lietuvos TSR [PhD thesis]. Kaunas: Kauno politechnikos institutas.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Marada, M., Chromý, P., Jančák, V. & Havlíček, T. (2006). Space polarization and peripheral regions in Czechia. Europa XXI 15, 29–34.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Miggelbrink, J. & Meyer, F. (2015). Lost in Complexity? Researching the Role of Socio-Spatial Ascriptions in the Process of Peripheralization. In Lang, T., Henn, S., Ehrlich., K. & Sgibnev, W., eds., Understanding Geographies of Polarization and Peripheralization (pp. 62–79). Basingstoke: Palgrave.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Nagy, G. (2006). Economic potential of regions – modelling the spatial structure of Hungary in the period of transition. Europa XXI 14, 7–26.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Pocius, A. (2007). Changes in internal territorial Lithuanian resident mobility and influence of migration of labour market. Survey of Lithuanian economy 2, 24–32.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Pociūtė, G. (2014). Trends of imbalances of demographic and socioeconomic development in post-reform period in Lithuania. In Churski, P., ed., The social and economic growth vs. the emergence of economic growth and stagnation areas (pp. 129–150). Poznan: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Pociūtė-Sereikienė, G., Kriaučiūnas, E. & Ubarevičienė, R. (2014). Peripheralisation trends in rural territories: the case of Lithuania. Studies in Agricultural Economics 116, 122–130. DOI: 10.7896/j.1421.10.7896/j.1421Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[40] Rokkan, S. & Urwin, D. W. (1982). Introduction: Centres and peripheries in Western Europe. In Rokkan, S. & Urwin, D. W., ed., The Politics of territorial identity: Studies in European regionalism (pp. 1–17). London: SAGE Publications.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Rupas, V. & Vaitekūnas, S. (1980). Lietuvos kaimo gyventojai ir gyvenvietės [Lithuanian rural population and settlements]. Vilnius: Mintis.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Šešelgis, K. (1975). Rajoninio planavimo ir urbanistikos pagrindai. Vilnius: Mintis.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Šešelgis, K. (1996). Teritoriju planavimo raida Lietuvoje. Urbanistika ir Architektūra 21(1), 4– 19.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Spiekermann, K. & Wegener, M. (1996). Trans-European Networks and Unequal Accessibility in Europe. European Journal of Regional Development 4, 35–42.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Spoor, M. (2013). Multidimensional Social Exclusion and the ‘Rural-Urban Divide’ in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Sociologia Ruralis 53(2), 139–157. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12008.10.1111/soru.12008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[46] Swain, N. (2016). Eastern European Rurality in Neo-Liberal, European Union World. Sociologia Ruralis 56 (4), 574–596. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12131.10.1111/soru.12131Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[47] Ubarevičienė, R. & van Ham, M. (2017). Population decline in Lithuania: who lives in declining regions and who leaves? Regional Studies, Regional Science, 4(1), 57–79. 10.1080/21681376.2017.131312.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Vaishar, A. (2006). Regional periphery: What does it mean? Europa XXI 15, 7–12.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Vaitekūnas, S. (1989). Gyvenviečių geografija. Vilnius: Vilniaus Universitetas.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Vaitekūnas, S. (2006). Lietuvos gyventojai: Per du tūkstantmečius. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos institutas.Search in Google Scholar

[51] Van Berkel, D. B. & Verburg, P. H. (2011). Sensitising rural policy: Assessing spatial variation in rural development options for Europe. Land Use Policy 28(3), 447–459. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.09.002.10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.09.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[52] Vanagas, J., Kriśjane, Z., Noorkoiv, R. & Staniunas, E. (2002). Planning urban systems in Soviet times and in the era of transition: the case of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Geographia Polonica 75(2), 75–100.Search in Google Scholar

[53] Willett, J. (2010). Why is Cornwall So Poor? Narrative, Perception and Identity [PhD thesis]. Exeter: University of Exeter.Search in Google Scholar

[54] Census 1989 (1991). Lithuanian 1989 population census data. Vilnius: Statistics Lithuania.Search in Google Scholar

[55] European Commission (2017). Commission Staff Working Document. Country Report Lithuania 2017. SWD (2017) 80 final. Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/2017-european-semester-country-reports_en Accessed 22 February 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[56] LR Vyriausybės nutarimas (2003). Dėl probleminių teritorijų išskyrimo kriterijų [LR Government decision “Due to the criterion to distinguish problem territories”]. Act. No. 35–1483.Search in Google Scholar

[57] LR Vyriausybės nutarimas (2007). Dėl probleminių teritorijų [LR Government decision “Due to problem territories”]. Act. No. 15–555.Search in Google Scholar

[58] Lyman, R. (2016). Like Trump, Europe‘s Populist Win Big With Rural Voters. The New York Times December 6. Available online at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/06/world/europe/europe-poland-populism-rural-voters.html?_r=2 Accessed 7 December 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[59] Raagmaa, G. (2003). Centre-periphery model explaning the regional development of informational and transitional society. Conference abstract. 43^rd Congress of the European regional science association (ERSA) in Jyväskylä, Finland, 27–30 August 2003. Available online at: http://www.jyu.fi/ersa2003/cdrom/abstracts/a503.html Accessed 15 January 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[60] Statistics Lithuania (2017). Database of indicators. Available online at: http://osp.stat.gov.lt/en/statistiniu-rodikliu-analize1?epoch=ML Accessed 12 December 2016.Search in Google Scholar