Accès libre

Are Model Organisms Theoretical Models?

À propos de cet article

Citez

Anitschkow, Nikolai. 1913. Über die Veränderungen der Kanichnenaorta bei experimenteller Cholesterinsteatose. Beitrage zur pathologischen Anatomie und zur allgemeinen Pathologi 56: 379–404.Search in Google Scholar

Anitschkow, Nikolai. 1933. Experimental arteriosclerosis in animals. In Arteriosclerosis, ed. by Edmund. V. Cowdry. New York: The MacMillan Company, 271–322.Search in Google Scholar

Ankeny, Rachel. 2009. Model organisms as fictions. In Fictions in Science. Philosophical Essays on Modelling and Idealisation, ed. by Mauricio Suárez. London: Routledge, 194–204.Search in Google Scholar

Ankeny, Rachel; and Leonelli, Sabina. 2011. What’s so special about model organisms? Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 41: 313–23.10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.039Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ankeny, Rachel; Leonelli, Sabina; Nelson, Nicol C.; and Ramsden, Edmund. 2014. Making organisms model human behavior: situated models in North-American alcohol research, since 1950. Science in Context 27(3): 485–509.10.1017/S0269889714000155Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Aschoff, Ludwig. 1933. Introduction. In Arteriosclerosis, ed. by Edmun.V. Cowdry. New York: The MacMillan Company, 1–19.Search in Google Scholar

Bolker, Jessica A. 2009. Exemplary and surrogate models: two modes of representation in biology. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 52(4): 485–99.10.1353/pbm.0.0125Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bruger, Maurice; and Oppenheim, Elliot. 1951. Experimental and human atherosclerosis: possible relationship and present status. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 27(9): 539.Search in Google Scholar

Duff, G. Lyman;d McMillan, Gardner C. 1951. Pathology of atherosclerosis. The American Journal of Medicine 11(1): 92–108.10.1016/0002-9343(51)90011-3Search in Google Scholar

Frigg, Roman. 2006. Scientific representation and the semantic view of theories. Theoria 55: 37–53.Search in Google Scholar

Giere, Ronald. 2004. How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science 71: S742–52.10.1086/425063Search in Google Scholar

Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2009. Models and fictions in science. Philosophical Studies 143: 101–16.10.1007/s11098-008-9313-2Search in Google Scholar

Hirsch, Edwin F.; and Weinhouse, Sidney. 1943. The role of the lipids in atherosclerosis. Physiological Reviews 23(3): 185–202.10.1152/physrev.1943.23.3.185Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Katz, Louis N. 1952. Experimental atherosclerosis. Circulation 5(1): 101–14.10.1161/01.CIR.5.1.101Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kuorikoski, Jaakko; and Ylikoski, Petri. 2015. External representations and scientific understanding. Synthese 192(12): 3817–37.10.1007/s11229-014-0591-2Search in Google Scholar

Kuorikoski, Jaakko; and Lehtinen, Aki. 2009. Incredible worlds, credible results. Erkenntnis 70(1): 119–31.10.1007/s10670-008-9140-zSearch in Google Scholar

Leary, Timothy. 1944. The role of lipids in atherosclerosis. The Journal of American Medical Association 124(6): 358–86.10.1001/jama.1944.02850060055025Search in Google Scholar

Levy, Arnon; and Currie, Adrian. 2015. Model organisms are not (theoretical) models. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66(2): 327–48.10.1093/bjps/axt055Search in Google Scholar

Maugeri, Paol B.; and Blasimme, Alessandro. 2011. Humanised models of cancer in molecular medicine: the experimental control of disanalogy. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 33: 603–22.Search in Google Scholar

Morrison, Margaret. 2009. Fictions, representations and reality. In Fictions in Science. Philosophical Essays on Modelling and Idealisation, ed. by Mauricio Suárez. London: Routledge, 110–35.Search in Google Scholar

Morgan, Mary S.; and Morrison, Margaret. 1999. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511660108Search in Google Scholar

Mäki, Uskali. 2005. Model are experiments, experiments are models. Journal of Economic Methodology 12(2): 303–15.10.1080/13501780500086255Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, Nicole C. 2013. Modeling mouse, human, and discipline: epistemic scaffolds in animal behavior genetics. Social Studies of Science 43(1): 3–29.10.1177/0306312712463815Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Peters, John P.; and VanSlyke, Donald D. 1946. Quantitative Clinical Chemistry. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Search in Google Scholar

Weber, Marcel. 2005. Philosophy of Experimental Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Weisberg, Michael. 2004. Robustness analysis. Philosophy of Science 73(5): S730–42.10.1086/518628Search in Google Scholar

Weisberg, Michael. 2013. Simulation and Similarity: Using Models to Understand the World. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199933662.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
0873-626X
Langues:
Anglais, Portuguese
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Philosophy, Selected Philosophical Movements, Analytical Philosophy