The evaluation of the reverse algorithm for syphilis screening in blood donors

1. Kaur G, Kaur P. Syphilis testing in blood donors: an update. Blood Transfusion. 2015;13(2):197. (PMID: 25545876).Search in Google Scholar

2. Organization WH. Screening donated blood for transfusion-transmissible infections: recommendations: World Health Organization; 2010.http://www.who.int/blood-safety/ScreeningTTI.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

3. Loeffelholz MJ, Binnicker MJ. Point-Counterpoint: It is time to use treponemal-specific antibody screening tests for the diagnosis of syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 2011:JCM. 06347-11. (PMID: 22090405).Search in Google Scholar

4. Sommese L, De Pascale MR, Capuano M, Napoli C. Efforts in blood safety: Integrated approach for serological diagnosis of syphilis. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2016;10(1):22. (PMID: 27011666). DOI: 10.4103/0973-6247.16426710.4103/0973-6247.164267478248827011666Search in Google Scholar

5. Binder SR, Theel ES. Syphilis testing algorithms: A review. World Journal of Immunology. 2016;6(1):1-8. DOI: 10.5411/wji.v6.i1.110.5411/wji.v6.i1.1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Karaca Y, Çöplü N, Gözalan A, Öncül Ö, Akin L, Esen B. Sifiliz Tanısında Kullanılan Serolojik Testler İçin Akış Şemasının Oluşturulması. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2010;44:35-45. (PMID: 20455397).Search in Google Scholar

7. Li L, Cai B, Tao C, Wang L. Performance evaluation of CLIA for Treponema pallidum specific antibodies detection in comparison with ELISA. J Clin Lab Anal. 2016;30(3):216-22. (PMID: 25716172). DOI: 10.1002/jcla.2183910.1002/jcla.21839680708225716172Search in Google Scholar

8. Wang X, Chen L, Yu Q, Sun A. Evaluation of specific antibodies of blood receiver sera to Treponema pall-idum by chemiluminescence immunoassay. Zhonghua shi yan he lin chuang bing du xue za zhi= Zhonghua shiyan he linchuang bingduxue zazhi= Chinese journal of experimental and clinical virology. 2013;27(1):70-2. (PMID: 23855137).Search in Google Scholar

9. Marangoni A, Moroni A, Accardo S, Cevenini R. Laboratory diagnosis of syphilis with automated immunoassays. J Clin Lab Anal. 2009;23(1):1-6. (PMID: 19140205). DOI: 10.1002/jcla.2026810.1002/jcla.20268664904919140205Search in Google Scholar

10. Ortiz DA, Loeffelholz MJ. Evaluation of the Lumi-pulse® G TP-N Chemiluminescent Immunoassay as a Syphilis Screening Test. J Clin Microbiol. 2017:JCM. 00966-17. (PMID: 28878003).Search in Google Scholar

11. Liu L, Xie Y, Dai Z, Zhuo C, Wu Y. Establishment and Evaluation of a One-Step Microplate Chemiluminescence Immunoassay to Detect IgG Antibody Against Treponema Pallidum. J Clin Lab Anal. 2015;29(6):493-7. (PMID: 25277551). DOI: 10.1002/jcla.2179910.1002/jcla.21799680718925277551Search in Google Scholar

12. Tiwari AK, Acharya DP, Dara RC, Arora D, Aggarwal G, Rawat GS. Evaluation of nonspecific treponemal test rapid plasma reagin in comparison with specific treponemal test immunochromatographic assay for screening healthy blood donors. Global J Transfusion Med. 2017;2(1):29. DOI: 10.4103/GJTM.GJTM_46_1610.4103/GJTM.GJTM_46_16Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13. Naidu NK, Bharucha Z, Sonawane V, Ahmed I. Comparative study of Treponemal and non-Treponemal test for screening of blood donated at a blood center. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2012;6(1):32. (PMID: 22623840). DOI: 10.4103/0973-6247.9504810.4103/0973-6247.95048335362722623840Search in Google Scholar

14. Wang LN, Li JM. Evaluation of immunoglobulin M and G Western blot and ELISA for screening antibodies to Treponema pallidum in blood donors. Sex Transm Dis. 2009;36(7):413-6. (PMID: 19387420). DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31819db59410.1097/OLQ.0b013e31819db59419387420Search in Google Scholar

15. Baião A, Kupek E, Petry A. Reverse algorithm for syphilis screening more than halved false positive test results in Brazilian blood donors. Transfus Med. 2014;24(1):64-6. (PMID: 24329733). DOI: 10.1111/tme.1209510.1111/tme.1209524329733Search in Google Scholar

16. Sandes V, Silva S, Motta I, Velarde L, de Castilho S. Evaluation of positive and false-positive results in syphilis screening of blood donors in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Transfus Med. 2017;27(3):200-6. (PMID: 28230309). DOI: 10.1111/tme.1239510.1111/tme.1239528230309Search in Google Scholar

17. Soreng K, Levy R, Fakile Y. Serologic Testing for Syphilis: Benefits and Challenges of a Reverse Algorithm. Clin Microbiol Newsl. 2014;36(24):195. (PMID: 28845073). DOI: 10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2014.12.00110.1016/j.clinmicnews.2014.12.001556856928845073Search in Google Scholar

18. Binnicker M. Which algorithm should be used to screen for syphilis? Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25(1):79. (PMID: 22156894). DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e-32834e9a3c10.1097/QCO.0b013e32834e9a3cSearch in Google Scholar