Iniciar sesión
Registrarse
Restablecer contraseña
Publicar y Distribuir
Soluciones de Publicación
Soluciones de Distribución
Temas
Arquitectura y diseño
Artes
Ciencias Sociales
Ciencias de la Información y Bibliotecas, Estudios del Libro
Ciencias de la vida
Ciencias de los materiales
Deporte y tiempo libre
Estudios clásicos y del Cercano Oriente antiguo
Estudios culturales
Estudios judíos
Farmacia
Filosofía
Física
Geociencias
Historia
Informática
Ingeniería
Interés general
Ley
Lingüística y semiótica
Literatura
Matemáticas
Medicina
Música
Negocios y Economía
Química
Química industrial
Teología y religión
Publicaciones
Revistas
Libros
Actas
Editoriales
Blog
Contacto
Buscar
EUR
USD
GBP
Español
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrito
Home
Revistas
Nordicom Review
Volumen 45 (2024): Edición s1 (March 2024)
Acceso abierto
American media, Scandinavian audiences: Contextual fragmentation and polarisation among Swedes and Norwegians engaging with American politics
Jessica Yarin Robinson
Jessica Yarin Robinson
| 12 mar 2024
Nordicom Review
Volumen 45 (2024): Edición s1 (March 2024)
Acerca de este artículo
Artículo anterior
Artículo siguiente
Resumen
Artículo
Figuras y tablas
Referencias
Autores
Artículos en este número
Vista previa
PDF
Cite
Compartir
Publicado en línea:
12 mar 2024
Páginas:
120 - 151
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0010
Palabras clave
media fragmentation
,
audience polarisation
,
transnationalism
,
news sharing
,
Twitter
,
X
© 2024 Jessica Yarin Robinson, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
FIGURE 1
Duplication and fragmentationSource: adapted from Webster, 2005
FIGURE 2A
Norway’s Norwegian-language media network
FIGURE 2B
Sweden’s Swedish-language media network
FIGURE 2C
Norway’s English-language media network
FIGURE 2D
Sweden’s English-language media networkComments: Figures 2a–d illustrate the way different media outlets are connected each other based on the users that share them. Each country has been separated into the national language (Nor-Nor and Swe-Swe) and English (Nor-Eng and Swe-Eng) based on the language of the tweet. Networks are visualised using the Fruchterman Reingold algorithm in Gephi. In the English language networks, the 25 most well-connected outlets are labelled to ensure readability.
FIGURE 3A
Norway’s Norwegian-language media network, with modularity classes
FIGURE 3B
Sweden’s Swedish-language media network, with modularity classes
FIGURE 3C
Norway’s English-language media network, with modularity classes
FIGURE 3D
Sweden’s English-language media network, with modularity classesComments: In Figures 3a–d, the media networks from Figures 2a–d have been restructured using the ForceAtlas 2 algorithm, which better visualises divisions in the network. Distinct communities or “modularity classes” have been colourised.
FIGURE 4A
Norway’s Norwegian-language media network, with modularity class and political orientation correlations
FIGURE 4B
Sweden’s Swedish-language media network, with modularity class and political orientation correlations
FIGURE 4C
Sweden’s English-language media network, with modularity class and political orientation correlations
FIGURE 4D
Norway’s English-language media network, with modularity class and political orientation correlationsComments: Figures 4a–d illustrate the relationship between the different modularity classes of media and the political orientation of the users who shared media outlets within these classes. The strength of correlation (V) shows the level of audience polarisation in each country–language group. The colours of the bars correspond to the colours of the modularity classes in Figures 3a–d.
Summaries of country–language media networks
Nor-Nor
Nor-Eng
Swe-Swe
Swe-Eng
Size: Outlets
21
139
20
104
Size: Ties
140
7,759
163
4,714
Duplication (density)
.67
.81
.86
.88
Modularity
.10
.24
.05
.23
Diameter
2
2
2
2
Transitivity
.81
.89
.90
.92
Centralisation
.31
.19
.16
.12
Vista previa