This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Andersson, U. (2017). Lågt förtroende för rapporteringen om invandring [Low trust in the media coverage of immigration]. In L. Truedson (Ed.), Misstron mot medier [Media distrust] (pp. 17–50). Institutet för mediestudier.AnderssonU.2017Lågt förtroende för rapporteringen om invandring [Low trust in the media coverage of immigration]InTruedsonL.(Ed.)1750Institutet för mediestudierSearch in Google Scholar
Andersson, U. (2021). Mediers samhällsvärde och oberoende spelar stor roll för förtroendet [The perceived societal value and independence of the news media greatly influences media trust]. In U. Andersson, A. Carlander, M. Grusell, & P. Öhberg (Eds.), Ingen anledning till oro (?) [No reason for worries (?)] (pp. 57–73). SOM Institute, University of Gothenburg.AnderssonU.2021Mediers samhällsvärde och oberoende spelar stor roll för förtroendet [The perceived societal value and independence of the news media greatly influences media trust]InAnderssonU.CarlanderA.GrusellM.ÖhbergP.(Eds.),5773SOM Institute, University of GothenburgSearch in Google Scholar
Baker, C. E. (2002). Media, markets, and democracy. Cambridge University Press.BakerC. E.2002Cambridge University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Bengtsson, J. (2021). Högerfront mot public service: Vad vill de tre högerpartierna med SVT, SR och UR? [Right-wing front against public service: How do the three right-wing parties want to change SVT, SR, and UR?]. Tankesmedjan Tiden. https://tankesmedjantiden.se/rapport/hogerfront-mot-public-service/BengtssonJ.2021Tankesmedjan Tidenhttps://tankesmedjantiden.se/rapport/hogerfront-mot-public-service/Search in Google Scholar
Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press.BenklerY.FarisR.RobertsH.2018Oxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Brüggemann, M., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Humprecht, E., & Castro, L. (2014). Hallin and Mancini revisited: Four empirical types of Western media systems. Journal of Communication, 64(6), 1037–1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12127BrüggemannM.EngesserS.BüchelF.HumprechtE.CastroL.2014Hallin and Mancini revisited: Four empirical types of Western media systems64610371065https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12127Search in Google Scholar
Carlson, M. (2009). Media criticism as competitive discourse: Defining reportage of the Abu Ghraib scandal. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 33(3), 258–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859909333693CarlsonM.2009Media criticism as competitive discourse: Defining reportage of the Abu Ghraib scandal333258277https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859909333693Search in Google Scholar
Carlson, M., Robinson, S., & Lewis, S. C. (2021). News after Trump: Journalism's crisis of relevance in a changed media culture. Oxford University Press.CarlsonM.RobinsonS.LewisS. C.2021Oxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Cheruiyot, D. (2018). Popular criticism that matters: Journalists’ perspectives of “quality” media critique. Journalism Practice, 12(8), 1008–1018. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1494511CheruiyotD.2018Popular criticism that matters: Journalists’ perspectives of “quality” media critique12810081018https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1494511Search in Google Scholar
Cook, T. E. (2005). Governing with the news: The news media as a political institution (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.CookT. E.20052nd ed.University of Chicago PressSearch in Google Scholar
D’Alessio, D. (2012). Media bias in presidential election coverage, 1948–2008. Evaluation via formal measurement. Lexington Books.D’AlessioD.2012Lexington BooksSearch in Google Scholar
Domke, D., Watts, M. D., Shah, D. V., & Fan, D. P. (1999). The politics of conservative elites and the “liberal media” argument. Journal of Communication, 49(4), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02816.xDomkeD.WattsM. D.ShahD. V.FanD. P.1999The politics of conservative elites and the “liberal media” argument4943558https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02816.xSearch in Google Scholar
Eberl, J.-M. (2019). Lying press: Three levels of perceived media bias and their relationship with political preferences. Communications, 44(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2018-0002EberlJ.-M.2019Lying press: Three levels of perceived media bias and their relationship with political preferences441532https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2018-0002Search in Google Scholar
Egelhofer, J. L., Aaldering, L., & Lecheler, S. (2021). Delegitimizing the media? Analyzing politicians’ media criticism on social media. Journal of Language and Politics, 20(5), 653–675. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20081.egeEgelhoferJ. L.AalderingL.LechelerS.2021Delegitimizing the media? Analyzing politicians’ media criticism on social media205653675https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20081.egeSearch in Google Scholar
Egelhofer, J. L., & Lecheler, S. (2019). Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: A framework and research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782EgelhoferJ. L.LechelerS.2019Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: A framework and research agenda43297116https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782Search in Google Scholar
Ekman, M., & Widholm, A. (2022). Parasitic news: Adoption and adaption of journalistic conventions in hybrid political communication. Journalism. OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221136940EkmanM.WidholmA.2022Parasitic news: Adoption and adaption of journalistic conventions in hybrid political communicationOnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221136940Search in Google Scholar
Ekström, M. (2002). Epistemologies of TV journalism: A theoretical framework. Journalism, 3(3), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490200300301EkströmM.2002Epistemologies of TV journalism: A theoretical framework33259282https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490200300301Search in Google Scholar
Ekström, M., & Westlund, O. (2019). The dislocation of news journalism: A conceptual framework for the study of epistemologies of digital journalism. Media and Communication, 7(1), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1763EkströmM.WestlundO.2019The dislocation of news journalism: A conceptual framework for the study of epistemologies of digital journalism71259270https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1763Search in Google Scholar
Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697EngesserS.ErnstN.EsserF.BüchelF.2017Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology20811091126https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697Search in Google Scholar
Esser, F., Stepinska, A., & Hopmann, D. N. (2017). Populism and the media: Cross-national findings and perspectives. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinmann, J. Strömbäck, & . De Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 365–380). Routledge.EsserF.StepinskaA.HopmannD. N.2017Populism and the media: Cross-national findings and perspectivesInAalbergT.EsserF.ReinmannC.StrömbäckJ.De Vreese(Eds.),365380RoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar
Farhall, K., Carson, A., Wright, S., Gibbons, A., & Lukamto, W. (2019). Political elites’ use of fake news discourse across communications platforms. International Journal of Communication, 13, 4353–4375.FarhallK.CarsonA.WrightS.GibbonsA.LukamtoW.2019Political elites’ use of fake news discourse across communications platforms1343534375Search in Google Scholar
Fawzi, N. (2019). Untrustworthy news and the media as “enemy of the people?” How a populist worldview shapes recipients’ attitudes toward the media. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218811981FawziN.2019Untrustworthy news and the media as “enemy of the people?” How a populist worldview shapes recipients’ attitudes toward the media242146164https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218811981Search in Google Scholar
Fawzi, N., & Krämer, B. (2021). The media as part of a detached elite? Exploring antimedia populism among citizens and its relation to political populism. International Journal of Communication, 15, 3292–3314.FawziN.KrämerB.2021The media as part of a detached elite? Exploring antimedia populism among citizens and its relation to political populism1532923314Search in Google Scholar
Fawzi, N., Steindl, N., Obermaier, M., Prochazka, F., Arlt, D., Blöbaum, B., Dohle, M., Engelke, K. M., Hanitzsch, T., Jackob, N., Jakobs, I., Klawier, T., Post, S., Reinemann, C., Schweiger, W., & Ziegele, M. (2021). Concepts, causes and consequences of trust in news media – a literature review and framework. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(2), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1960181FawziN.SteindlN.ObermaierM.ProchazkaF.ArltD.BlöbaumB.DohleM.EngelkeK. M.HanitzschT.JackobN.JakobsI.KlawierT.PostS.ReinemannC.SchweigerW.ZiegeleM.2021Concepts, causes and consequences of trust in news media – a literature review and framework452154174https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1960181Search in Google Scholar
Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W. A., Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (2002). Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies. Theory and Society, 31(3), 289–324. https://www.jstor.org/stable/658129FerreeM. M.GamsonW. A.GerhardsJ.RuchtD.2002Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies313289324https://www.jstor.org/stable/658129Search in Google Scholar
Figenschou, T. U., & Ihlebæk, K. A. (2019). Challenging journalistic authority: Media criticism in far-right alternative media. Journalism Studies, 20(9), 1221–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1500868FigenschouT. U.IhlebækK. A.2019Challenging journalistic authority: Media criticism in far-right alternative media20912211237https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1500868Search in Google Scholar
Figenschou, T. U., & Ihlebaek, K. A. (2021). Media criticism from the far-right: Attacking from many angles. Journalism Practice, 13(8), 901–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1647112FigenschouT. U.IhlebaekK. A.2021Media criticism from the far-right: Attacking from many angles138901905https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1647112Search in Google Scholar
Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. University of Chicago Press.GierynT. F.1999University of Chicago PressSearch in Google Scholar
Hameleers, M. (2020). My reality is more truthful than yours: Radical right-wing politicians’ and citizens’ construction of “fake” and “truthfulness” on social media – Evidence from the United States and the Netherlands. International Journal of Communication, 14, 1135–1152. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/12463HameleersM.2020My reality is more truthful than yours: Radical right-wing politicians’ and citizens’ construction of “fake” and “truthfulness” on social media – Evidence from the United States and the Netherlands1411351152https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/12463Search in Google Scholar
Hameleers, M. (2021). Populist disinformation in fragmented information settings: Understanding the nature and persuasiveness of populist and post-factual communication. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003194668HameleersM.2021Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781003194668Search in Google Scholar
Hanitzsch, T., Van Dalen, A., & Steindl, N. (2018). Caught in the nexus: A comparative and longitudinal analysis of public trust in the press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217740695HanitzschT.Van DalenA.SteindlN.2018Caught in the nexus: A comparative and longitudinal analysis of public trust in the press231323https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217740695Search in Google Scholar
Hansen, G. J., & Kim, H. (2011). Is the media biased against me? A meta-analysis of the hostile media effect research. Communication Research Reports, 28(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2011.565280HansenG. J.KimH.2011Is the media biased against me? A meta-analysis of the hostile media effect research282169179https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2011.565280Search in Google Scholar
Hassell, H. J. G., Holbein, J. B., & Miles, M. R. (2020). There is no liberal bias in which news stories political journalists choose to cover. Science Advances, 6(14), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay9344HassellH. J. G.HolbeinJ. B.MilesM. R.2020There is no liberal bias in which news stories political journalists choose to cover61418https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay9344Search in Google Scholar
Holbert, R. L. (2005). Back to basics: Revisiting, resolving, and expanding some of the fundamental issues of political communication research. Political Communication, 22(4), 511–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600500311436HolbertR. L.2005Back to basics: Revisiting, resolving, and expanding some of the fundamental issues of political communication research224511514https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600500311436Search in Google Scholar
Holt, K. (2020). Right-wing alternative media. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429454691HoltK.2020Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9780429454691Search in Google Scholar
Holt, K., Ustad Figenschou, T., & Frischlich, L. (2019). Key dimensions of alternative news media. Digital Journalism, 7(7), 860–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715HoltK.Ustad FigenschouT.FrischlichL.2019Key dimensions of alternative news media77860869https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715Search in Google Scholar
Humprecht, E., Castro Herrero, L., Blassnig, S., Brüggemann, M., & Engesser, S. (2022). Media systems in the digital age: An empirical comparison of 30 countries. Journal of Communication, 72(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab054HumprechtE.Castro HerreroL.BlassnigS.BrüggemannM.EngesserS.2022Media systems in the digital age: An empirical comparison of 30 countries722145164https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab054Search in Google Scholar
Jungherr, A. (2016). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401JungherrA.2016Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review1317291https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401Search in Google Scholar
Koliska, M., & Assmann, K. (2021). Lügenpresse: The lying press and German journalists’ responses to a stigma. Journalism, 22(11), 2729–2746. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919894088KoliskaM.AssmannK.2021Lügenpresse: The lying press and German journalists’ responses to a stigma221127292746https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919894088Search in Google Scholar
Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2021). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect (4th ed.). Crown.KovachB.RosenstielT.20214th ed.CrownSearch in Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Sage.KrippendorffK.20133rd ed.SageSearch in Google Scholar
Ladd, J. M. (2012). Why Americans hate the media and how it matters. Princeton University Press.LaddJ. M.2012Princeton University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Martinsson, J., & Andersson, U. (2022). Svenska trender 1986–2021 [Swedish trends 1986–2021]. SOM Institute, University of Gothenburg.MartinssonJ.AnderssonU.2022SOM Institute, University of GothenburgSearch in Google Scholar
Meeks, L. (2020). Defining the enemy: How Donald Trump frames the news media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(1), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019857676MeeksL.2020Defining the enemy: How Donald Trump frames the news media971211234https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019857676Search in Google Scholar
Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., Barthel, M., & Shearer, E. (2016). The modern news consumer: News attitudes and practices in the digital era. Pew Research Center. https://apo.org.au/node/65498MitchellA.GottfriedJ.BarthelM.ShearerE.2016Pew Research Centerhttps://apo.org.au/node/65498Search in Google Scholar
Molyneux, L., & McGregor, S. C. (2022). Legitimating a platform: Evidence of journalists’ role in transferring authority to Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 25(11), 1577–1595. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.18764037MolyneuxL.McGregorS. C.2022Legitimating a platform: Evidence of journalists’ role in transferring authority to Twitter251115771595https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.18764037Search in Google Scholar
Mutz, D. C. (1998). Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. Cambridge University Press.MutzD. C.1998Cambridge University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Müller, P., & Schulz, A. (2021). Alternative media for a populist audience? Exploring political and media use predictors of exposure to Breitbart, Sputnik, and Co. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1646778MüllerP.SchulzA.2021Alternative media for a populist audience? Exploring political and media use predictors of exposure to Breitbart, Sputnik, and Co242277293https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1646778Search in Google Scholar
Neo, R. (2022). Fighting fire with fire? Relegitimizing strategies for media institutions faced with unwarranted “fake news” accusations. Social Media + Society, 8(1), 20563051221077016. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221077014NeoR.2022Fighting fire with fire? Relegitimizing strategies for media institutions faced with unwarranted “fake news” accusations8120563051221077016. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221077014Search in Google Scholar
Nichols, T. (2017). The death of expertise: The campaign against established knowledge and why it matters. Oxford University Press.NicholsT.2017Oxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Nord, L. (2021). Public service som politisk stridsfråga [Public service as politically contentious issue]. In Mediestudiers årsbok – tillståndet för journalistiken 2021 [Annual report from the Institute for Media Studies] (pp. 133–142). Institutet för mediestudier.NordL.2021Public service som politisk stridsfråga [Public service as politically contentious issue]In133142Institutet för mediestudierSearch in Google Scholar
Nord, L., & Grusell, M. (2021). Media and politics in Sweden. In E. Skogerbø, Ø. Ihlen, N. Nørgaard Kristensen, & L. Nord (Eds.), Power, communication, and politics in the Nordic countries (pp. 113–132). Nordicom. https://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855299-6NordL.GrusellM.2021Media and politics in SwedenInSkogerbøE.IhlenØ.Nørgaard KristensenN.NordL.(Eds.),113132Nordicomhttps://doi.org/10.48335/9789188855299-6Search in Google Scholar
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.NorrisP.InglehartR.2019Cambridge University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Oleskog Tryggvason, P., & Andersson, U. (2022). Svenska folkets uppfattningar om nyhetsmediernas vänster-högerplacering [Perceptions of the news media's left-right placement among the Swedish population]. In U. Andersson, H. Oscarsson, B. Rönnerstrand, & N. Theorin (Eds.), Du sköra nya värld [Our fragile, new world] (pp. 319–337). SOM Institute, University of Gothenburg.Oleskog TryggvasonP.AnderssonU.2022Svenska folkets uppfattningar om nyhetsmediernas vänster-högerplacering [Perceptions of the news media's left-right placement among the Swedish population]InAnderssonU.OscarssonH.RönnerstrandB.TheorinN.(Eds.),319337SOM Institute, University of GothenburgSearch in Google Scholar
Perloff, R. M. (2015). A three-decade retrospective on the hostile media effect. Mass Communication and Society, 18(6), 701–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1051234PerloffR. M.2015A three-decade retrospective on the hostile media effect186701729https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1051234Search in Google Scholar
Ross, A. S., & Rivers, D. J. (2018). Discursive deflection: Accusation of “fake news” and the spread of mis- and disinformation in the tweets of President Trump. Social Media + Society, 4(2), 2056305118776010. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118776010RossA. S.RiversD. J.2018Discursive deflection: Accusation of “fake news” and the spread of mis- and disinformation in the tweets of President Trump422056305118776010. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118776010Search in Google Scholar
Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2014). Mediation of political realities: Media as crucial sources of information. In F. Esser, & J. Strömbäck (Eds.), Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western democracies (pp. 93–113). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137275844ShehataA.StrömbäckJ.2014Mediation of political realities: Media as crucial sources of informationInEsserF.StrömbäckJ.(Eds.),93113Palgrave Macmillanhttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137275844Search in Google Scholar
Silva, B. C., & Proksch, S.-O. (2022). Politicians unleashed? Political communication on Twitter and in parliament in Western Europe. Political Science Research and Methods, 10(4), 776–792. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.36SilvaB. C.ProkschS.-O.2022Politicians unleashed? Political communication on Twitter and in parliament in Western Europe104776792https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.36Search in Google Scholar
Sloman, S., & Fernbach, P. M. (2017). The knowledge illusion: Why we never think alone. Riverheads Books.SlomanS.FernbachP. M.2017Riverheads BooksSearch in Google Scholar
Sobieraj, S., & Berry, J. M. (2011). From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news. Political Communication, 28(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.542360SobierajS.BerryJ. M.2011From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news2811941https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2010.542360Search in Google Scholar
Solis, J. A., & Sagarzazu, I. (2020). The media smells like sulfur!!! Leaders and verbal attacks against the fourth estate in unconsolidated democracies. Political Communication, 37(1), 20–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1660440SolisJ. A.SagarzazuI.2020The media smells like sulfur!!! Leaders and verbal attacks against the fourth estate in unconsolidated democracies3712045https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1660440Search in Google Scholar
Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500131950StrömbäckJ.2005In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism63331345https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500131950Search in Google Scholar
Strömbäck, J. (2022). Three major threats to Swedish public broadcasting – increasingly politically contested. In N. Dickson (Ed.), The power of words: Future challenges for freedom of expression (pp. 28–35). Svenska PEN.StrömbäckJ.2022Three major threats to Swedish public broadcasting – increasingly politically contestedInDicksonN.(Ed.)2835Svenska PENSearch in Google Scholar
Strömbäck, J., Andersson, F., & Nedlund, E. (2017a). Invandring i medierna: Hur rapporterade svenska tidningar åren 2010–2015 [Immigration in the media: How Swedish media covered immigration in the years 2010–2015]. Delegationen för migrationsstudier.StrömbäckJ.AnderssonF.NedlundE.2017aDelegationen för migrationsstudierSearch in Google Scholar
Strömbäck, J., Boomgaarden, H., Broda, E., Damstra, A., Lindgren, E., Tsfati, Y., & Vliegenthart, R. (2022). From low-choice to high-choice media environments: Implications for knowledge resistance. In J. Strömbäck, Å Wikforss, K. Glüer, T. Lindholm, & H. Oscarsson Knowledge resistance in high-choice information environments (pp. 49–68). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003111474StrömbäckJ.BoomgaardenH.BrodaE.DamstraA.LindgrenE.TsfatiY.VliegenthartR.2022From low-choice to high-choice media environments: Implications for knowledge resistanceInStrömbäckJ.WikforssÅGlüerK.LindholmT.OscarssonH.4968Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781003111474Search in Google Scholar
Strömbäck, J., & Johansson, B. (2017). När bjälken sitter i betraktarens ögon: Om fientliga medierfenomenet [When the beam is in the eye of the beholder: About the hostile media phenomenon]. In L. Truedson (Ed.), Misstron mot medier [Media distrust] (pp. 100–116). Institutet för mediestudier.StrömbäckJ.JohanssonB.2017När bjälken sitter i betraktarens ögon: Om fientliga medierfenomenet [When the beam is in the eye of the beholder: About the hostile media phenomenon]InTruedsonL.(Ed.)100116Institutet för mediestudierSearch in Google Scholar
Strömbäck, J., Jungar, A.-C., & Dahlberg, S. (2017b). Sweden: No longer a European exception. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, & C. de Vreese (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 68–81). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623016StrömbäckJ.JungarA.-C.DahlbergS.2017bSweden: No longer a European exceptionInAalbergT.EsserF.ReinemannC.StrömbäckJ.de VreeseC.(Eds.),6881Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623016Search in Google Scholar
Strömbäck, J., & Karlsson, M. (2017). Sjunkande förtroende för svenska medier? En analys av hur medborgarnas medieförtroende och betydelsen av partisympati har förändrats mellan 2014 och 2016 [Declining trust in the Swedish media? An analysis of how people's grust in the media and the importance of party affiliation changed between 2014 and 2016]. In L. Truedson (Ed.), Misstron mot medier [Media distrust] (pp. 84–99). Institutet för mediestudier.StrömbäckJ.KarlssonM.2017Sjunkande förtroende för svenska medier? En analys av hur medborgarnas medieförtroende och betydelsen av partisympati har förändrats mellan 2014 och 2016 [Declining trust in the Swedish media? An analysis of how people's grust in the media and the importance of party affiliation changed between 2014 and 2016]InTruedsonL.(Ed.)8499Institutet för mediestudierSearch in Google Scholar
Strömbäck, J., Tsfati, Y., Boomgaarden, H., Damstra, A., Lindgren, E., Vliegenthart, R., & Lindholm, T. (2020). News media trust and its impact on media use: Toward a framework for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1755338StrömbäckJ.TsfatiY.BoomgaardenH.DamstraA.LindgrenE.VliegenthartR.LindholmT.2020News media trust and its impact on media use: Toward a framework for future research442139156https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1755338Search in Google Scholar
Syvertsen, T., Mjøs, O. J., Moe, H., & Enli, G. S. (2014). The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital era. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/nmw.12367206.0001.001SyvertsenT.MjøsO. J.MoeH.EnliG. S.2014University of Michigan Presshttps://doi.org/10.3998/nmw.12367206.0001.001Search in Google Scholar
Tandoc, E. C. (2019). The facts of fake news: A research review. Sociology Compass, 13(9), e12724. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12724TandocE. C.2019The facts of fake news: A research review139e12724https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12724Search in Google Scholar
Truedson, L. (Ed.). (2016). Migrationen i medierna – men det får en väl inte prata om? [Migration in the media – something one should not talk about?]. Institutet för mediestudier.TruedsonL.(Ed.).2016Institutet för mediestudierSearch in Google Scholar
Tsfati, Y., Strömbäck, J., Lindgren, E., Damstra, A., Boomgaarden, H. G., & Vliegenthart, R. (2022). Going beyond general media trust: An analysis of topical media trust, its antecedents and effects on issue (mis)perceptions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 34(2), edac010. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edac010TsfatiY.StrömbäckJ.LindgrenE.DamstraA.BoomgaardenH. G.VliegenthartR.2022Going beyond general media trust: An analysis of topical media trust, its antecedents and effects on issue (mis)perceptions342edac010https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edac010Search in Google Scholar
Vergara, D. (2016). Borgerlig debattör tar över SD:s mediesatsning [Right-wing debater takes over SD's media investment]. Expo. https://expo.se/2016/05/borgerlig-debatt%C3%B6r-tar-%C3%B6ver-sds-mediesatsningVergaraD.2016Expohttps://expo.se/2016/05/borgerlig-debatt%C3%B6r-tar-%C3%B6ver-sds-mediesatsningSearch in Google Scholar
Vergara, D. (2021). SD-politiker leder mediesatsning [SD politician is leading media investment]. https://expo.se/2021/04/sd-politiker-leder-mediesatsningVergaraD.2021https://expo.se/2021/04/sd-politiker-leder-mediesatsningSearch in Google Scholar
von Krogh, T. (2012). Understanding media accountability: Media accountability in relation to media criticism and media governance in Sweden 1940–2010 [Doctoral dissertation, Mid Sweden University]. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-16679von KroghT.2012https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-16679Search in Google Scholar
Waisbord, S., & Amado, A. (2017). Populist communication by digital means: Presidential Twitter in Latin America. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1330–1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328521WaisbordS.AmadoA.2017Populist communication by digital means: Presidential Twitter in Latin America20913301346https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328521Search in Google Scholar
Watts, M. D., Domke, D., Shah, D. V., & Fan, D. P. (1999). Elite cues and media bias in presidential campaigns: Explaining public perceptions of a liberal press. Communication Research, 26(2), 144–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026002003WattsM. D.DomkeD.ShahD. V.FanD. P.1999Elite cues and media bias in presidential campaigns: Explaining public perceptions of a liberal press262144175https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026002003Search in Google Scholar
Widholm, A., & Mårtenson, F. (2018). Mediekritik driver Twitteraktivitet: Om journalistik som resurs för politisk kommunikation i sociala medier [Media criticism fuels Twitter activity: On journalism as a resource for political communication in social media]. In L. Truedson (Ed.), Fejk, filter och faktaresistens – hotar sociala medier demokratin? [Fake, filters, and fact resistance – do social media threaten democracy?] (pp. 104–135). Institutet för mediestudier.WidholmA.MårtensonF.2018Mediekritik driver Twitteraktivitet: Om journalistik som resurs för politisk kommunikation i sociala medier [Media criticism fuels Twitter activity: On journalism as a resource for political communication in social media]InTruedsonL.(Ed.)104135Institutet för mediestudierSearch in Google Scholar
Wikforss, Å. (2021). Därför demokrati: Om kunskapen och folkstyret [Hence democracy: On knowledge and popular government]. Fri Tanke.WikforssÅ.2021Fri TankeSearch in Google Scholar
Wright, S. (2021). Beyond ‘fake news’? A longitudinal analysis of how Australian politicians attack and criticize the media on Twitter. Journal of Language and Politics, 20(5), 719–740. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21027.wriWrightS.2021Beyond ‘fake news’? A longitudinal analysis of how Australian politicians attack and criticize the media on Twitter205719740https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21027.wriSearch in Google Scholar
Åkerlund, M. (2020). The importance of influential users in (re)producing Swedish far-right discourse on Twitter. European Journal of Communication, 35(6), 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323190940909ÅkerlundM.2020The importance of influential users in (re)producing Swedish far-right discourse on Twitter356613629https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323190940909Search in Google Scholar