[Aberbach, Joel D., Robert D. Putnam, and Bert A. Rockman. 1981. Bureaucrats & Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674020047]Search in Google Scholar
[Algemene Bestuursdienst. 2016. “Visie op publiek leiderschap.” Available at https://www.algemenebestuursdienst.nl/documenten/publicatie/2016/06/30/visieop-publiek-leiderschap (last accessed 13 April 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Aucoin, Peter. 2012. “New Political Governance in Westminster Systems: Impartial Public Administration and Management Performance at Risk.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 25(2), 177 – 199.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bakker, Ryan, Liesbet Hooghe, Seth Jolly, Gary Marks, Jonathan Polk, Jan Rovny, Marco Steenbergen and Milada Anna Vachudova. 2019. Chapel Hill Expert Survey. Version 2019.1. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Available at chesdata.eu (last accessed 28 March 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[van den Berg, Caspar. 2017. “Dynamics in the Dutch Policy Advisory System: Externalization, Politicization and the Legacy of Pillarization.” Policy Sciences 50(1), 63 – 84.]Search in Google Scholar
[van den Berg, Caspar, Myrte Ferwerda and Esmé Cartens. 2019. “Een toekomstbestendige topmanagementgroep: Naar een groter aantal beschikbare kandidaten.” Available at https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2019/11/12/een-toekomstbestendige-topmanagementgroep (last accessed 3 November 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[van den Berg, Caspar and Myrte Ferwerda. 2020. “Rol topambtenaar moet duidelijk zijn.” De Volkskrant, 27 January.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bourdieu, Pierre and Jean-Claude Passeron. 1964. Les Héritiers: Les étudiants et la culture. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.10.1515/9783112319161]Search in Google Scholar
[Bovens, Mark A. P. 2000. “De vierde macht revisited: Over ambtelijke macht en publieke verantwoording.” Presented at inaugural lecture, 13 September, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carlyle, Th omas. 1841. On Heroes, Hero-worship and the Heroic in History. London: Chapman and Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Christiansen, Peter M., Brigitta Niklasson and Patrik Öhberg. 2016. “Does Politics Crowd out Professional Competence ? The Organisation of Ministerial Advice in Denmark and Sweden.” West European Politics 39(6), 1230 – 1250.]Search in Google Scholar
[Connaughton, Bernadette. 2015. “Navigating the Borderlines of Politics and Administration: Reflections on the Role of Ministerial Advisers.” International Journal of Public Administration 38(1), 37 – 45.]Search in Google Scholar
[van Dorp, Erik-Jan and Paul ’t Hart. 2019. “Navigating the Dichotomy: The Top Public Servant’s Craft.” Public Administration 97(4), 877 – 891.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ebinger, Falk, Sylvia Veit and Nadin Fromm. 2019. “The Partisan-Professional Dichotomy Revisited: Politicization and Decision-Making of Senior Civil Servants.” Public Administration, April, 861 – 876.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eichbaum, Chris and Richard Shaw. 2013. “The Mortal Temples of the King: Prime Ministers and their Advisers in Parliamentary Democracies.” In Paul ’t Hart and Roderick Rhodes (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 517 – 532.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fielding, Henry. 1752. “O ye Wicked Rascallions.” Covent Garden Journal 47, June, 700 – 701.]Search in Google Scholar
[Florio, John, trans. 2006 [1603]. Michel de Montaigne. London: Folio Society.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gains, Francesca and Gerry Stoker. 2011. “Special Advisers and the Transmission of Ideas from the Policy Primeval Soup.” Policy and Politics 39(4), 485 – 498.]Search in Google Scholar
[’t Hart, Paul and Wim Kuijken. 2018. Dienen en Beïnvloeden: Verhalen over Ambtelijk Vakmanschap. Den Haag: NSOB.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hood, Christopher and Martin Lodge. 2006. The Politics of Public Service Bargains: Reward, Competency, Loyalty – and Blame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019926967X.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Hooghe, Lisbet, Ryan Bakker, Anna Brigevich, Catherine de Vries, Erica Edwards, Gary Marks, Jan Rovny, Marco Steenbergen and Milada Anna Vachudova. 2010. “Reliability and Validity of Measuring Party Positions: The Chapel Hill Expert Surveys of 2002 and 2006.” European Journal of Political Research 49, 684 – 703.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hustedt, Thurid and Heidi Salomonsen. 2014. “Ensuring Political Responsiveness: Politicization Mechanisms in Ministerial Bureaucracies.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 80(4), 746 – 765.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kunst, Sander [@SanderKunst]. 5 June 2020. Inspired by @turnbulldugarte, 20 years of party position change in the Netherlands (1999 – 2019) using the Chapel Hill Expert Survey (@ches_data). Tweet. Available at https://twitter.com/sanderkunst/status/1268826022675390465 (last accessed 4 July 2020).]Search in Google Scholar
[Lijphart, Arend. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Th irty-Six Countries. London: Yale University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mayntz, Renate and Hans-Ulrich Derlien. 1989. “Party Patronage and Politicization of the West German Administrative Elite 1970 – 1987: Toward Hybridization ?” Governance 2(4), 384 – 404.10.1111/j.1468-0491.1989.tb00099.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat. 1748. De l’Esprit des Loix. Geneva: Barrillot & Fils.]Search in Google Scholar
[Overeem, Patrick. 2013. “Integriteit in ambtelijke verhoudingen.” In Marijn Zweegers and Edgar Karssing (eds). Jaarboek Integriteit. Bureau BIOS, 22 – 30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Page, Edward C. and Vincent Wright. 1999. Bureaucratic Elites in Western European States: A Comparative Analysis of Top Officials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198294468.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Painter, Martin and B. Guy Peters. 2010. “Administrative Traditions in Comparative Perspective: Families, Groups and Hybrids.” In Martin Painter and Brainard Peters (eds). Tradition and Public Administration. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 19 – 30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters, B. Guy and Jon Pierre. 2004. “Politicization of the Civil Service: Concepts, Causes, Consequences.” In Brainard Peters and Jon Pierre (eds). Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: The Quest for Control. London: Routledge, 1 – 13.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pettigrew, Andrew M. 1990. “Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice.” Organizational Science 1(3), 267 – 292.]Search in Google Scholar
[Polk, Jonathan, Jan Rovny, Ryan Bakker, Erica Edwards, Liesbet Hooghe, Seth Jolly, Jelle Koedam, Filip Kostelka, Gary Marks, Gijs Schumacher, Marco Steenbergen, Milada Anna Vachudova and Marko Zilovic. 2017. “Explaining the Salience of Anti-Elitism and Reducing Political Corruption for Political Parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey Data.” Research & Politics (January–March), 1 – 9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pollitt, Christopher and Geert Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. New Public Management, Governance and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shaw, Richard and Chris Eichbaum. 2018. “Introduction: Mininsters, Minders and Mandarins.” In Richard Shaw and Chris Eichbaum (eds). Ministers, Mind-ers and Mandarins: An International Study of Relationaships at the Executive Summit of Parliamentary Democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1 – 14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sykes, Gresham and David Matza. 1957. “Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency.” American Sociological Review 22(6), 664 – 670.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weber, Max. 1988 [1918]. “Parlament und Regierung im Neugeordneten Deutsch-land: Zur Politischen Kritik des Beamtentumus und Parteiwesens.” In Johannes Winckelmann (ed.). Gesammelte Politische Schriften. 5th edn. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 306 – 443.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wilson, Woodrow. 1887. “The Study of Administration.” Political Science Quarterly 2(2), 197 – 222.]Search in Google Scholar
