This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Aagaard, K. (2018). Performance-based research funding in denmark: The adoption and translation of the norwegian model. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(4), 20–30.AagaardK.2018Performance-based research funding in denmark: The adoption and translation of the norwegian modelJournal of Data and Information Science34203010.2478/jdis-2018-0018Search in Google Scholar
Aagaard, K, Bloch, C., Schneider J.W., Henriksen, D., Ryan, T.K., & Lauridsen, P.S. (2014). Evaluering af den norske publiceringsindikator. Dansk Center for Forskningsanalyse, Aarhus Universitet.AagaardKBlochC.SchneiderJ.W.HenriksenD.RyanT.K.LauridsenP.S.2014Evaluering af den norske publiceringsindikatorDansk Center for Forskningsanalyse, Aarhus UniversitetSearch in Google Scholar
Aagaard, K., & Schneider, J. (2017). Some considerations about causes and effects in studies of performance-based research funding systems. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 923–926. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.018AagaardK.SchneiderJ.2017Some considerations about causes and effects in studies of performance-based research funding systemsJournal of Informetrics11392392610.1016/j.joi.2017.05.018Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Adler, R., Ewing, J., & Taylor, P. (2008). Citation statistics. A report from the International Mathematical Union. www.mathunion.org/publications/report/citationstatistics0AdlerR.EwingJ.TaylorP.2008Citation statistics. A report from the International Mathematical Unionwww.mathunion.org/publications/report/citationstatistics0Search in Google Scholar
Ahlgren, P., Colliander, C., & Persson, O. (2012). Field normalized rates, field normalized journal impact and Norwegian weights for allocation of university research funds. Scientometrics, 92(3), 767–780. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0632-x.AhlgrenP.CollianderC.PerssonO.2012Field normalized rates, field normalized journal impact and Norwegian weights for allocation of university research fundsScientometrics92376778010.1007/s11192-012-0632-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ahlgren, P., & Waltman, L. (2014). The correlation between citation-based and expert-based assessments of publication channels: SNIP and SJR vs. Norwegian quality assessments. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 985–996.AhlgrenP.WaltmanL.2014The correlation between citation-based and expert-based assessments of publication channels: SNIP and SJR vs. Norwegian quality assessmentsJournal of Informetrics8498599610.1016/j.joi.2014.09.010Search in Google Scholar
Aksnes, D. (2017). Artikler i nivå 2-tidsskrifter blir mest sitter. Forskerforum. https://www.forskerforum.no/artikler-i-niva-2-tidsskrifter-blir-mest-sitert/AksnesD.2017Artikler i nivå 2-tidsskrifter blir mest sitterForskerforum. https://www.forskerforum.no/artikler-i-niva-2-tidsskrifter-blir-mest-sitert/Search in Google Scholar
Aksnes, D., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories. Sage Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575AksnesD.LangfeldtL.WoutersP.2019Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and TheoriesSage Openhttps://doi.org/10.1177/215824401982957510.1177/2158244019829575Search in Google Scholar
Aksnes, D.W., & Sivertsen, G. (2019). A criteria-based assessment of the coverage of Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of Data and Information Science, 4(1), 1–21.AksnesD.W.SivertsenG.2019A criteria-based assessment of the coverage of Scopus and Web of ScienceJournal of Data and Information Science4112110.2478/jdis-2019-0001Search in Google Scholar
Amin, M., & Mabe, M. (2000). Impact factor: use and abuse. Perspectives in Publishing, 1, 1–6. http://www.elsevier.com/framework_editors/pdfs/Perspectives1.pdfAminM.MabeM.2000Impact factor: use and abusePerspectives in Publishing116http://www.elsevier.com/framework_editors/pdfs/Perspectives1.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
ANVUR. (2019). Regolamento per la classificazione delle riviste nelle aree non bibliometriche. https://www.anvur.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/REGOLAMENTO-PER-LA-CLASSIFICAZIONE-DELLE-RIVISTE_20022019.pdfANVUR2019Regolamento per la classificazione delle riviste nelle aree non bibliometrichehttps://www.anvur.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/REGOLAMENTO-PER-LA-CLASSIFICAZIONE-DELLE-RIVISTE_20022019.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Archambault, É., Vignola-Gagné, É., Côté, G., Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2006). Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing data-bases. Scientometrics, 68(3), 329–342.ArchambaultÉ.Vignola-GagnéÉ.CôtéG.LarivièreV.GingrasY.2006Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing data-basesScientometrics68332934210.1007/s11192-006-0115-zSearch in Google Scholar
Auranen, O., Leino, Y., Poropudas, O., & Pölönen, J. (2013). Julkaisufoorumi-luokitus ja viittausindeksittieteellisten julkaisujen laadun mittareina: Web of Science -aineistoon perustuva vertailu. TaSTI Työraportteja 8/2013.AuranenO.LeinoY.PoropudasO.PölönenJ.2013Julkaisufoorumi-luokitus ja viittausindeksittieteellisten julkaisujen laadun mittareina: Web of Science -aineistoon perustuva vertailuTaSTI Työraportteja 8/2013.Search in Google Scholar
Auranen, O., & Pölönen, J. (2012). Classification of scientific publication channels: Final report of the Publication Forum project (2010–2012). Helsinki: Federation of Finnish Learned Societies. URL: http://www.julkaisufoorumi.fi/sites/julkaisufoorumi.fi/files/publication_forum_project_final_report_0.pdfAuranenO.PölönenJ.2012Classification of scientific publication channels: Final report of the Publication Forum project (2010–2012)HelsinkiFederation of Finnish Learned SocietiesURL: http://www.julkaisufoorumi.fi/sites/julkaisufoorumi.fi/files/publication_forum_project_final_report_0.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Bakkalbasi, N., Bauer, K., Glover, J., & Wang, L. (2006). Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3, 7. doi:10.1186/1742-5581-3-7BakkalbasiN.BauerK.GloverJ.WangL.2006Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of ScienceBiomedical Digital Libraries3710.1186/1742-5581-3-7153385416805916Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Beer, D. (2016). Metric Power. Palgrave Macmillan UK.BeerD.2016Metric PowerPalgrave MacmillanUK10.1057/978-1-137-55649-3Search in Google Scholar
Bornmann, L. (2011). Scientific peer review. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 45(1), 197–245. doi:10.1002/aris.2011.1440450112BornmannL.2011Scientific peer reviewAnnual Review of Information Science and Technology45119724510.1002/aris.2011.1440450112Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
British Academy. (2007). Peer Review: The challenges for the humanities and social sciences. London: The British Academy. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Peer-review-challenges-for-humanities-social-sciences.pdfBritish Academy2007Peer Review: The challenges for the humanities and social sciencesLondonThe British Academyhttps://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Peer-review-challenges-for-humanities-social-sciences.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Butler, L. (2003). Explaining Australia's increased share of ISI publications—The effects of a funding formula based on publication counts. Research Policy 32(1), 143–155.ButlerL.2003Explaining Australia's increased share of ISI publications—The effects of a funding formula based on publication countsResearch Policy32114315510.1016/S0048-7333(02)00007-0Search in Google Scholar
Butler, L. (2004). What Happens When Funding is Linked to Publication Counts? In H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel & U. Schmoch (eds.) Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 340–389.ButlerL.2004What Happens When Funding is Linked to Publication Counts?InMoedH.F.GlänzelW.SchmochU.(eds.)Handbook of Quantitative Science and TechnologyDordrecht, The NetherlandsKluwer Academic Publishers34038910.1007/1-4020-2755-9_18Search in Google Scholar
Cleere, L., & Ma, L. (2018). A Local Adaptation in an Output-Based Research Support Scheme (OBRSS) at University College Dublin. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(4), 74–84. doi:10.2478/jdis-2018-0022CleereL.MaL.2018A Local Adaptation in an Output-Based Research Support Scheme (OBRSS) at University College DublinJournal of Data and Information Science34748410.2478/jdis-2018-0022Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Csiszar, A. (2017). How lives became lists and scientific papers became data: Cataloguing authorship during the nineteenth century. British Journal of History of Science, 50(1), 23–60.CsiszarA.2017How lives became lists and scientific papers became data: Cataloguing authorship during the nineteenth centuryBritish Journal of History of Science501236010.1017/S000708741700001228202102Search in Google Scholar
de Boer, H.F., Jongbloed, B., Benneworth, P. et al. (2015). Performance-based funding and performance agreements in fourteen higher education systems—Report for the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, CHEPS, University of Twente: Enschede. https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/5139542/jongbloed+ea+performance-based-funding-and-performance-agreements-in-fourteen-higher-education-systems.pdf.de BoerH.F.JongbloedB.BenneworthP.2015Performance-based funding and performance agreements in fourteen higher education systems—Report for the Ministry of Education, Culture and ScienceCHEPS, University of TwenteEnschedehttps://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/5139542/jongbloed+ea+performance-based-funding-and-performance-agreements-in-fourteen-higher-education-systems.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
de Filippo, D., Aleixandre-Benavent, R., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2019). Categorization model of Spanish scientific journals in social sciences and humanities. In G. Catalano et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Vol II. Rome: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 726–737.de FilippoD.Aleixandre-BenaventR.Sanz-CasadoE.2019Categorization model of Spanish scientific journals in social sciences and humanitiesInCatalanoG.(eds),Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Vol IIRomeInternational Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics726737Search in Google Scholar
de Solla Price, D. (1963). Little science, big science- and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.de Solla PriceD.1963Little science, big science- and beyondNew YorkColumbia University Press10.7312/pric91844Search in Google Scholar
Dobson, I. (2011). Australia: troubled history of an ERA. University World News, 05 June 2011. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=201106031829474DobsonI.2011Australia: troubled history of an ERAUniversity World News05June2011https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=201106031829474Search in Google Scholar
Engels, T.C.E., & Guns, R. (2018). The Flemish performance-based research funding system: A unique variant of the Norwegian model. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(4), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2018-0020EngelsT.C.E.GunsR.2018The Flemish performance-based research funding system: A unique variant of the Norwegian modelJournal of Data and Information Science344560https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2018-002010.2478/jdis-2018-0020Search in Google Scholar
Engels, T.C.E., Starčič, A., Kulczycki, E., Pölönen, J., & Sivertsen, G. (2018). Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(6), 592–607. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-05-2018-0127EngelsT.C.E.StarčičA.KulczyckiE.PölönenJ.SivertsenG.2018Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities?Aslib Journal of Information Management706592607https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-05-2018-012710.1108/AJIM-05-2018-0127Search in Google Scholar
Erola, J. (2016). Valitaan lehdille JUFO-taso äänestämällä! https://janierola.net/2016/05/12/valitaan-lehdet-jufo-tasoille-aanestamalla/ErolaJ.2016Valitaan lehdille JUFO-taso äänestämällä!https://janierola.net/2016/05/12/valitaan-lehdet-jufo-tasoille-aanestamalla/Search in Google Scholar
Eykens, J., Guns, R., & Engels, T.C.E. (2018). Comparing VABB-SHW (version VIII) with Cabells Journal Blacklist and Directory of Open Access Journals: Report to the Authoritative Panel. ECOOM: Antwerp.EykensJ.GunsR.EngelsT.C.E.2018Comparing VABB-SHW (version VIII) with Cabells Journal Blacklist and Directory of Open Access Journals: Report to the Authoritative PanelECOOMAntwerpSearch in Google Scholar
Eykens, J., Guns, R., Rahman, J., & Engels, T.C.E. (2019). Identifying publications in questionable journals in the context of performance-based research funding. PLoSONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0224541EykensJ.GunsR.RahmanJ.EngelsT.C.E.2019Identifying publications in questionable journals in the context of performance-based research fundingPLoSONEhttps://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.022454110.1371/journal.pone.0224541683990131703069Search in Google Scholar
Dassa, M., Kosmopoulos, C., & Pumain, D. (2010) JournalBase—A Comparative International Study of Scientific Journal Databases in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (SSH). Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography, document 484. http://cybergeo.revues.org/22862DassaM.KosmopoulosC.PumainD.2010JournalBase—A Comparative International Study of Scientific Journal Databases in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (SSH)Cybergeo: European Journal of Geographydocument 484. http://cybergeo.revues.org/2286210.4000/cybergeo.22862Search in Google Scholar
Ferrara, A., & Bonaccorsi, A. (2016). How Robust is Journal Ratings in Humanities and Social Sciences? Evidence from a Large-scale, Multi-method Exercise. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 279–291. doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv048FerraraA.BonaccorsiA.2016How Robust is Journal Ratings in Humanities and Social Sciences? Evidence from a Large-scale, Multi-method ExerciseResearch Evaluation253279291doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv04810.1093/reseval/rvv048Search in Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (1979). Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities. ISI Press.GarfieldE.1979Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and HumanitiesISI PressSearch in Google Scholar
Genoni, P., & Haddow, G. (2009). ERA and the ranking of Australian humanities journals. Australian Humanities Review, 46, 7–26.GenoniP.HaddowG.2009ERA and the ranking of Australian humanities journalsAustralian Humanities Review4672610.22459/AHR.46.2009.01Search in Google Scholar
Giménez-Toledo, E., Mañana-Rodríguez, J., Engels, T.C.E. et al. (2019). Taking scholarly books into account, part II: a comparison of 19 European countries in evaluation and funding. Scientometrics, 118(1), 233–251.Giménez-ToledoE.Mañana-RodríguezJ.EngelsT.C.E.2019Taking scholarly books into account, part II: a comparison of 19 European countries in evaluation and fundingScientometrics118123325110.1007/s11192-018-2956-7Search in Google Scholar
Giménez-Toledo, E., Mañana-Rodríguez, J., Engels, T.C.E. et al. (2016). Taking scholarly books into account: Current developments in five European countries. Scientometrics, 107(2), 685–699.Giménez-ToledoE.Mañana-RodríguezJ.EngelsT.C.E.2016Taking scholarly books into account: Current developments in five European countriesScientometrics107268569910.1007/s11192-016-1886-5Search in Google Scholar
Giménez-Toledo, E., Kulczycki, E., Pölönen, J., & Sivertsen, G. (2019). Bibliodiversity—What it is and why it is essential to creating situated knowledge. LSE Impact Blog 5.12.2019. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/12/05/bibliodiversity-what-it-is-and-why-it-is-essential-to-creating-situated-knowledge/Giménez-ToledoE.KulczyckiE.PölönenJ.SivertsenG.2019Bibliodiversity—What it is and why it is essential to creating situated knowledgeLSE Impact Blog 5.12.2019. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/12/05/bibliodiversity-what-it-is-and-why-it-is-essential-to-creating-situated-knowledge/Search in Google Scholar
Giménez-Toledo, E., Mañana-Rodríguez, J., & Sivertsen, G. (2017). Scholarly book publishing: Its information sources for evaluation in the social sciences and humanities. Research Evaluation, 26(2), 91–101.Giménez-ToledoE.Mañana-RodríguezJ.SivertsenG.2017Scholarly book publishing: Its information sources for evaluation in the social sciences and humanitiesResearch Evaluation2629110110.1093/reseval/rvx007Search in Google Scholar
Gimenez-Toledo, E., & Roman-Roman, A. (2009). Assessment of humanities and social sciences monographs through their publishers: A review and a study towards a model of evaluation. Research Evaluation, 18, 201–213.Gimenez-ToledoE.Roman-RomanA.2009Assessment of humanities and social sciences monographs through their publishers: A review and a study towards a model of evaluationResearch Evaluation1820121310.3152/095820209X471986Search in Google Scholar
Glänzel, W., & Wouters, P. (2013). The do's and don’ts in individual level bibliometrics. Paper presented at the 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/paulwouters1/issi2013-wg-pwGlänzelW.WoutersP.2013The do's and don’ts in individual level bibliometricsPaper presented at the 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics ConferenceVienna, AustriaRetrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/paulwouters1/issi2013-wg-pwSearch in Google Scholar
Good, B., Vermeulen, N., Tiefenthaler, B., & Arnold, E. (2015). Counting quality? The Czech performance-based research funding system. Research Evaluation, 24(2), 91–105. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvu035GoodB.VermeulenN.TiefenthalerB.ArnoldE.2015Counting quality? The Czech performance-based research funding systemResearch Evaluation2429110510.1093/reseval/rvu035Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gregorio-Chaviano, O. (2018). Evaluación y clasificación de revistas científicas: reflexiones en torno a retos y perspectivas para Latinoamérica. Revista Lasallista de Investigación, 15(1), 166–179. https://dx.doi.org/10.22507/rli.v15n1a12Gregorio-ChavianoO.2018Evaluación y clasificación de revistas científicas: reflexiones en torno a retos y perspectivas para LatinoaméricaRevista Lasallista de Investigación151166179https://dx.doi.org/10.22507/rli.v15n1a1210.22507/rli.v15n1a12Search in Google Scholar
Gross, P., & Gross, E. (1926). College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66(1713), 385–389. doi:10.1126/science.66.1713.385GrossP.GrossE.1926College libraries and chemical educationScience66171338538910.1126/science.66.1713.38517782476Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gulbrandsen, M. (2000). Between Scylla and Charybdis—and Enjoying It? Organisational Tensions and Research Work. Science Studies, 13(2), 52–76.GulbrandsenM.2000Between Scylla and Charybdis—and Enjoying It? Organisational Tensions and Research WorkScience Studies132527610.23987/sts.55127Search in Google Scholar
Haddawy, P., Hassan, S.-U., Asghar, A., & Amin, S. (2016). A comprehensive examination of the relation of three citation-based journal metrics to expert judgment of journal quality. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 162–173.HaddawyP.HassanS.-U.AsgharA.AminS.2016A comprehensive examination of the relation of three citation-based journal metrics to expert judgment of journal qualityJournal of Informetrics10116217310.1016/j.joi.2015.12.005Search in Google Scholar
Haddow, G., & Hammarfelt, B. (2018). Quality, Impact, and Quantification: Indicators and Metrics Use by Social Scientists. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24097HaddowG.HammarfeltB.2018Quality, Impact, and Quantification: Indicators and Metrics Use by Social ScientistsJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology7011626https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.2409710.1002/asi.24097Search in Google Scholar
Hammarfelt, B., Nelhans, G., Eklund, P., & Åström, F. (2016). The heterogeneous landscape of bibliometric indicators. Evaluating models for allocating resources at Swedish universities. Research Evaluation, 25, 292–305.HammarfeltB.NelhansG.EklundP.ÅströmF.2016The heterogeneous landscape of bibliometric indicatorsEvaluating models for allocating resources at Swedish universities. Research Evaluation2529230510.1093/reseval/rvv040Search in Google Scholar
Haustein, S. (2012). Multidimensional Journal Evaluation: Analysing scientific periodicals beyond the impact factor. Berlin/Boston: De Guyter Saur.HausteinS.2012Multidimensional Journal Evaluation: Analysing scientific periodicals beyond the impact factorBerlin/BostonDe Guyter Saur10.1515/9783110255553Search in Google Scholar
Hicks, D. (1999). The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences. Scientometrics, 44(2), 193–215.HicksD.1999The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequencesScientometrics44219321510.1007/BF02457380Search in Google Scholar
Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261.HicksD.2012Performance-based university research funding systemsResearch Policy41225126110.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007Search in Google Scholar
Hicks, D., & Wang, J. (2011). Coverage and overlap of the new social science and humanities journal lists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(2), 284–294.HicksD.WangJ.2011Coverage and overlap of the new social science and humanities journal listsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology62228429410.1002/asi.21458Search in Google Scholar
Hicks, D., Wouters, P.F., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics: Use these 10 principles to guide research evaluation. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431.HicksD.WoutersP.F.WaltmanL.de RijckeS.RafolsI.2015The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics: Use these 10 principles to guide research evaluationNature520754842943110.1038/520429a25903611Search in Google Scholar
Houghton, B. (1975). Scientific Periodicals: Their Historical Development, Characteristics and Control. Hamden, Conn.: Linnet Books.HoughtonB.1975Scientific Periodicals: Their Historical Development, Characteristics and ControlHamden, Conn.Linnet BooksSearch in Google Scholar
Huang, Y., Li, R., Zhang, L., & Sivertsen, G. (2020). A comprehensive analysis of the journal evaluation system in China. Quantitative Science Studies (forthcoming).HuangY.LiR.ZhangL.SivertsenG.2020A comprehensive analysis of the journal evaluation system in ChinaQuantitative Science Studies(forthcoming).10.1162/qss_a_00103Search in Google Scholar
Ingwersen, P., & Larsen, B. (2014). Influence of a performance indicator on Danish research production and citation impact 2000–12. Scientometrics, 101, 1325–1344.IngwersenP.LarsenB.2014Influence of a performance indicator on Danish research production and citation impact 2000–12Scientometrics1011325134410.1007/s11192-014-1291-xSearch in Google Scholar
Jensen, C.B. (2011). Making Lists, Enlisting Scientists: The Bibliometric Indicator, Uncertainty and Emergent Agency. Science Studies, 24(2), 64–84.JensenC.B.2011Making Lists, Enlisting Scientists: The Bibliometric Indicator, Uncertainty and Emergent AgencyScience Studies242648410.23987/sts.55264Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, R., Watkinson, A., & Mabe, M. (2018). The STM Report: an overview of scientific and scholarly publishing, 5th edition. The Hague: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers.JohnsonR.WatkinsonA.MabeM.2018The STM Report: an overview of scientific and scholarly publishing5th editionThe HagueInternational Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical PublishersSearch in Google Scholar
Jonkers, K., & Zacharewitcz, T. (2016). Research Performance Based Funding Systems: A Comparative Assessment. Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2760/70120JonkersK.ZacharewitczT.2016Research Performance Based Funding Systems: A Comparative AssessmentPublications Office of the European Union10.2760/70120Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Krog Lind, J. (2019). The missing link: How university managers mediate the impact of a performance-based research funding system. Research Evaluation, 28(1), 84–93.Krog LindJ.2019The missing link: How university managers mediate the impact of a performance-based research funding systemResearch Evaluation281849310.1093/reseval/rvy038Search in Google Scholar
Kulczycki, E. (2017). Assessing publications through a bibliometric indicator: The case of comprehensive evaluation of scientific units in Poland. Research Evaluation, 45, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvw023.KulczyckiE.2017Assessing publications through a bibliometric indicator: The case of comprehensive evaluation of scientific units in PolandResearch Evaluation454152https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvw023.10.1093/reseval/rvw023Search in Google Scholar
Kulczycki, E. (2018). The diversity of monographs: Changing landscape of book evaluation in Poland. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(6), 608–622. http://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-03-2018-0062.KulczyckiE.2018The diversity of monographs: Changing landscape of book evaluation in PolandAslib Journal of Information Management706608622http://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-03-2018-0062.10.1108/AJIM-03-2018-0062Search in Google Scholar
Kulczycki, E., Engels, T.C.E., Pölönen, J. et al. (2018). Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: The evidence from eight European countries. Scientometrics, 116(1), 463–486.KulczyckiE.EngelsT.C.E.PölönenJ.2018Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: The evidence from eight European countriesScientometrics116146348610.1007/s11192-018-2711-0Search in Google Scholar
Kulczycki, E., Guns, R., Pölönen, J. et al. (2020). Multilingual Publishing in the Social Sciences and Humanities: A Seven-Country European Study. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24336KulczyckiE.GunsR.PölönenJ.2020Multilingual Publishing in the Social Sciences and Humanities: A Seven-Country European StudyJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technologyhttps://doi.org/10.1002/asi.2433610.1002/asi.24336768715233288998Search in Google Scholar
Kulczycki, E., & Korytkowski, P. (2018). Redesigning the Model of Book Evaluation in the Polish Performance-based Research Funding System. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(4), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2018-0021KulczyckiE.KorytkowskiP.2018Redesigning the Model of Book Evaluation in the Polish Performance-based Research Funding SystemJournal of Data and Information Science346173https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2018-002110.2478/jdis-2018-0021Search in Google Scholar
Kulczycki, E., & Rozkosz, E.A. (2017). Does an expert-based evaluation allow us to go beyond the Impact Factor? Experiences from building a ranking of national journals in Poland. Scientometrics, 111(1), 417–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2261-xKulczyckiE.RozkoszE.A.2017Does an expert-based evaluation allow us to go beyond the Impact Factor? Experiences from building a ranking of national journals in PolandScientometrics1111417442https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2261-x10.1007/s11192-017-2261-x536267328386153Search in Google Scholar
Lamont, M. (2010). How Professors Think: Inside Curious World of Academic Judgment. Harvard University Press: Cambridge Massachusetts.LamontM.2010How Professors Think: Inside Curious World of Academic JudgmentHarvard University PressCambridge MassachusettsSearch in Google Scholar
Lange L. (1985). Effects of disciplines and countries on citation habits. An analysis of empirical papers in behavioural sciences. Scientometrics, 8(3), 205–215.LangeL.1985Effects of disciplines and countries on citation habitsAn analysis of empirical papers in behavioural sciences. Scientometrics83205215Search in Google Scholar
Larivière, V., & Macaluso, B. (2011). Improving the coverage of social science and humanities researchers’output: The case of the érudit journal platform. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 62(12), 2437–2442.LarivièreV.MacalusoB.2011Improving the coverage of social science and humanities researchers’output: The case of the érudit journal platformJournal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology62122437244210.1002/asi.21632Search in Google Scholar
Lavik, G.A., & Sivertsen, G. (2017). ERIH PLUS—Making the SSH Visible, Searchable and Available. Procedia Computer Science, 106, 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.03.035LavikG.A.SivertsenG.2017ERIH PLUS—Making the SSH Visible, Searchable and AvailableProcedia Computer Science1066165https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.03.03510.1016/j.procs.2017.03.035Search in Google Scholar
Mañana-Rodríguez, J., & Giménez-Toledo, E. (2013). Scholarly publishing in social sciences and humanities, associated probabilities of belonging and its spectrum: A quantitative approach for the Spanish case. Scientometrics, 94(3), 893–910.Mañana-RodríguezJ.Giménez-ToledoE.2013Scholarly publishing in social sciences and humanities, associated probabilities of belonging and its spectrum: A quantitative approach for the Spanish caseScientometrics94389391010.1007/s11192-012-0838-ySearch in Google Scholar
Marchitelli, A., Galimberti, P., Bollini, A., & Mitchell, D. (2017). Improvement of editorial quality of journals indexed in DOAJ: A data analysis. JLIS.it, 8(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12052MarchitelliA.GalimbertiP.BolliniA.MitchellD.2017Improvement of editorial quality of journals indexed in DOAJ: A data analysisJLIS.it81121https://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12052Search in Google Scholar
McKiernan, E.C., Schimanski, L.A., Muñoz Nieves, C., Matthias, L., Niles, M.T., & Alperin, J.P. (2019). Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations. eLife, 8, e47338. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47338McKiernanE.C.SchimanskiL.A.Muñoz NievesC.MatthiasL.NilesM.T.AlperinJ.P.2019Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluationseLife8e47338https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.4733810.7554/eLife.47338666898531364991Search in Google Scholar
Molas-Gallart, J. (2012). Research Governance and the Role of Evaluation: A Comparative Study. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(4), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214012450938Molas-GallartJ.2012Research Governance and the Role of Evaluation: A Comparative StudyAmerican Journal of Evaluation334583598https://doi.org/10.1177/109821401245093810.1177/1098214012450938Search in Google Scholar
Nederhof, A.J. (1989). Books and chapters are not to be neglected in measuring research productivity. American Psychologist, 44(4), 734–735.NederhofA.J.1989Books and chapters are not to be neglected in measuring research productivityAmerican Psychologist44473473510.1037/0003-066X.44.4.734Search in Google Scholar
Nederhof, A.J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review. Scientometrics, 66(1), 81–100.NederhofA.J.2006Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A ReviewScientometrics6618110010.1007/s11192-006-0007-2Search in Google Scholar
Neuhaus, C., Neuhaus, E., Asher, A., & Wrede, C. (2006). The depth and breadth of Google Scholar: an empirical study. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(2), 127–141.NeuhausC.NeuhausE.AsherA.WredeC.2006The depth and breadth of Google Scholar: an empirical studyPortal: Libraries and the Academy6212714110.1353/pla.2006.0026Search in Google Scholar
Nisonger, T. (1998). Management of Serials in Libraries. Englewood: Libraries Unlimited.NisongerT.1998Management of Serials in LibrariesEnglewoodLibraries UnlimitedSearch in Google Scholar
Norwegian Association of Higher Education Institutions. (2004). A Bibliometric Model for Performance-based Budgeting of Research Institutions. https://npi.nsd.no/dok/Vekt_pa_forskning_2004_in_english.pdfNorwegian Association of Higher Education Institutions2004A Bibliometric Model for Performance-based Budgeting of Research Institutionshttps://npi.nsd.no/dok/Vekt_pa_forskning_2004_in_english.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Olijhoek, T., Mitchell, D., & Bjornshauge, L. (2016). Criteria for Open Access and Publishing. ScienceOpen Research, January. doi:10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-edu.amhuhv.v1.OlijhoekT.MitchellD.BjornshaugeL.2016Criteria for Open Access and PublishingScienceOpen ResearchJanuary10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-edu.amhuhv.v1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ossenblok, T.L.B., Engels, T.C.E., & Sivertsen, G. (2012). The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science—a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005–9). Research Evaluation, 21(4), 280–290.OssenblokT.L.B.EngelsT.C.E.SivertsenG.2012The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science—a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005–9)Research Evaluation21428029010.1093/reseval/rvs019Search in Google Scholar
Pontille, D., & Torny, D. (2010a). The controversial policies of journal ratings: Evaluating social sciences and humanities. Research Evaluation, 19(5), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820210X12809191250889PontilleD.TornyD.2010aThe controversial policies of journal ratings: Evaluating social sciences and humanitiesResearch Evaluation195347360https://doi.org/10.3152/095820210X1280919125088910.3152/095820210X12809191250889Search in Google Scholar
Pontille, D., & Torny, D. (2010b). Revues qui comptent, revues qu’on compte: produire des classements en économie et gestion. Revue de la regulation: Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, 8. doi:10.4000/regulation.8881PontilleD.TornyD.2010bRevues qui comptent, revues qu’on compte: produire des classements en économie et gestionRevue de la regulation: Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs810.4000/regulation.8881Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pontille, D., & Torny, D. (2012). Rendre publique l’évaluation des SHS: les controverses sur les listes de revues de l’AERES. Quaderni, 77, 11–24. doi:10.4000/quaderni.542PontilleD.TornyD.2012Rendre publique l’évaluation des SHS: les controverses sur les listes de revues de l’AERESQuaderni77112410.4000/quaderni.542Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Porter, T.M. (1995). Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.PorterT.M.1995Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public LifePrincetonPrinceton University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Pölönen, J. (2012). Comparison of Nordic Publication Channel Ratings with special regard to SSH, Nordforsk Workshop on Bibliometrics for the Social Sciences and Humanities, Helsinki, 10.10.2012. https://www.academia.edu/34516798/Comparison_of_Nordic_publication_channel_ratings_with_special_regard_to_SSHPölönenJ.2012Comparison of Nordic Publication Channel Ratings with special regard to SSHNordforsk Workshop on Bibliometrics for the Social Sciences and Humanities, Helsinki, 10.10.2012. https://www.academia.edu/34516798/Comparison_of_Nordic_publication_channel_ratings_with_special_regard_to_SSHSearch in Google Scholar
Pölönen, J. (2018). Applications of, and Experiences with, the Norwegian Model in Finland. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(4), 31–44.PölönenJ.2018Applications of, and Experiences with, the Norwegian Model in FinlandJournal of Data and Information Science34314410.2478/jdis-2018-0019Search in Google Scholar
Pölönen, J., Engels, T., & Guns, R. (2020). Ambiguity in identification of peer-reviewed publications in the Finnish and Flemish performance-based research funding systems. Science and Public Policy, scz041, https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz041.PölönenJ.EngelsT.GunsR.2020Ambiguity in identification of peer-reviewed publications in the Finnish and Flemish performance-based research funding systemsScience and Public Policyscz041, https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz041.10.1093/scipol/scz041Search in Google Scholar
Pölönen, J., Leino, O., & Auranen, O. (2011). Coverage and Ranking of Journals: Comparison of six data sources. European Network of Indicator Designers (ENID) Conference in Rome, 7th–9th September 2011.PölönenJ.LeinoO.AuranenO.2011Coverage and Ranking of Journals: Comparison of six data sourcesEuropean Network of Indicator Designers (ENID) Conference in Rome7th–9th September 2011Search in Google Scholar
Pölönen, J., & Ruth, A.-S. (2015). Final report on 2014 review of ratings in Publication Forum, Federation of Finnish Learned Societies 2015. http://www.julkaisufoorumi.fi/sites/julkaisufoorumi.fi/files/publication_forum_final_report_on_2014_review_of_ratings.pdf.PölönenJ.RuthA.-S.2015Final report on 2014 review of ratings in Publication Forum, Federation of Finnish Learned Societies 2015http://www.julkaisufoorumi.fi/sites/julkaisufoorumi.fi/files/publication_forum_final_report_on_2014_review_of_ratings.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Pölönen, J., & Sivertsen, G. (2017). Experiences with the rating of publication channels for the Norwegian Model: With a response to a proposal for automated ratings from Saarela et al. (2016). 22nd Nordic Workshop on Bibliometrics And Research Policy, 9.–10.11.2017 Helsinki. https://figshare.com/articles/Experiences_with_the_rating_of_publication_channels_for_the_Nordic_Model_With_a_response_to_a_proposal_for_automated_ratings_from_Saarela_et_al_2016_/5624731PölönenJ.SivertsenG.2017Experiences with the rating of publication channels for the Norwegian Model: With a response to a proposal for automated ratings from Saarela et al. (2016)22nd Nordic Workshop on Bibliometrics And Research Policy, 9.–10.11.2017 Helsinki. https://figshare.com/articles/Experiences_with_the_rating_of_publication_channels_for_the_Nordic_Model_With_a_response_to_a_proposal_for_automated_ratings_from_Saarela_et_al_2016_/5624731Search in Google Scholar
Pölönen, J., & Wahlfors, L. (2016). Local use of a national rating of publication channels in Finnish universities (poster presentation). 21st Nordic Workshop on Bibliometrics and Research Policy, Copenhagen, 3.–4.11.2016. https://figshare.com/articles/Local_Use_of_a_National_Rating_of_Publication_Channels_in_Finnish_Universities_NWB_2016_poster_/4246541PölönenJ.WahlforsL.2016Local use of a national rating of publication channels in Finnish universities (poster presentation)21st Nordic Workshop on Bibliometrics and Research Policy, Copenhagen, 3.–4.11.2016. https://figshare.com/articles/Local_Use_of_a_National_Rating_of_Publication_Channels_in_Finnish_Universities_NWB_2016_poster_/4246541Search in Google Scholar
Publication Forum. (2020). User guide for the Publication Forum classification 2019. The Committee for Public Information (TJNK) and Federation of Finnish Learned Societies (TSV): Helsinki. doi: https://doi.org/10.23847/isbn.9789525995312Publication Forum2020User guide for the Publication Forum classification 2019The Committee for Public Information (TJNK) and Federation of Finnish Learned Societies (TSV)Helsinkidoi: https://doi.org/10.23847/isbn.978952599531210.23847/isbn.9789525995312Search in Google Scholar
Rey, O. (2009). Productivité et qualité scientifique: avec quelles publications compter? Dossier d’actualité de la VST, 46. http://www.inrp.fr/vst/LettreVST/46-juin-2009.php.ReyO.2009Productivité et qualité scientifique: avec quelles publications compter?Dossier d’actualité de la VST, 46. http://www.inrp.fr/vst/LettreVST/46-juin-2009.php.Search in Google Scholar
Román Román, A. (2010). Cómo valorar la internacionalidad de las revistas de Ciencias Humanas y su categorización en ERIH. Revista española de Documentación Científica, 33(3), 341–377. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2010.3.735.Román RománA.2010Cómo valorar la internacionalidad de las revistas de Ciencias Humanas y su categorización en ERIHRevista española de Documentación Científica333341377http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2010.3.735.10.3989/redc.2010.3.735Search in Google Scholar
Saarela, M., Kärkkäinen, T., Lahtonen, T., & Rossi, T. (2016). Expert-based versus citation-based ranking of scholarly and scientific publication channels. Journal of Informetrics, 10(3), 693–718.SaarelaM.KärkkäinenT.LahtonenT.RossiT.2016Expert-based versus citation-based ranking of scholarly and scientific publication channelsJournal of Informetrics10369371810.1016/j.joi.2016.03.004Search in Google Scholar
Saarela, M., & Kärkkäinen, T. (2020). Can we automate expert-based journal rankings? Analysis of the Finnish publication indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 14(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101008SaarelaM.KärkkäinenT.2020Can we automate expert-based journal rankings? Analysis of the Finnish publication indicatorJournal of Informetrics142doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.10100810.1016/j.joi.2020.101008Search in Google Scholar
Saenen, B., Morais, R., Gaillard, V., & Borrell-Damián, L. (2019). Research Assessment in the Transition to Open Science: 2019 EUA Open Science and Access Survey Results. https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/research%20assessment%20in%20the%20transition%20to%20open%20science.pdfSaenenB.MoraisR.GaillardV.Borrell-DamiánL.2019Research Assessment in the Transition to Open Science: 2019 EUA Open Science and Access Survey Resultshttps://eua.eu/downloads/publications/research%20assessment%20in%20the%20transition%20to%20open%20science.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Sandström, U., & Sandström, E. (2009). The field factor: towards a metric for academic institutions. Research Evaluation, 18(3), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820209X466892.SandströmU.SandströmE.2009The field factor: towards a metric for academic institutionsResearch Evaluation183243250https://doi.org/10.3152/095820209X466892.10.3152/095820209X466892Search in Google Scholar
Schneider, J.W. (2009). An outline of the bibliometric indicator used for performance-based funding of research institutions in Norway. European Political Science, 8(3), 364–378. doi:10.1057/eps.2009.19.SchneiderJ.W.2009An outline of the bibliometric indicator used for performance-based funding of research institutions in NorwayEuropean Political Science8336437810.1057/eps.2009.19Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Schneider, J.W., Aagaard, K., & Bloch, C.W. (2015). What happens when national research funding is linked to differentiated publication counts? A comparison of the Australian and Norwegian publication-based funding models. Research Evaluation, 25(2), 1–13.SchneiderJ.W.AagaardK.BlochC.W.2015What happens when national research funding is linked to differentiated publication counts? A comparison of the Australian and Norwegian publication-based funding modelsResearch Evaluation25211310.1093/reseval/rvv036Search in Google Scholar
Seglen, P.O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ, 314(7079), 498–502.SeglenP.O.1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating researchBMJ314707949850210.1136/bmj.314.7079.49721260109056804Search in Google Scholar
Serenko, A., & Dohan, M. (2011). Comparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: Example from the field of artificial intelligence. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 629–648.SerenkoA.DohanM.2011Comparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: Example from the field of artificial intelligenceJournal of Informetrics5462964810.1016/j.joi.2011.06.002Search in Google Scholar
Sīle, L., & Vanderstraeten, R. (2018). Measuring changes in publication patterns in a context of performance-based research funding systems: the case of educational research in the University of Gothenburg (2005–2014). Scientometrics, 118, 71–91.SīleL.VanderstraetenR.2018Measuring changes in publication patterns in a context of performance-based research funding systems: the case of educational research in the University of Gothenburg (2005–2014)Scientometrics118719110.1007/s11192-018-2963-8Search in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2010). A performance indicator based on complete data for the scientific publication output at research institutions. ISSI Newsletter, 6(1), 22–28.SivertsenG.2010A performance indicator based on complete data for the scientific publication output at research institutionsISSI Newsletter612228Search in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2016). Patterns of internationalization and criteria for research assessment in the social sciences and humanities. Scientometrics, 107(2), 357–368.SivertsenG.2016Patterns of internationalization and criteria for research assessment in the social sciences and humanitiesScientometrics107235736810.1007/s11192-016-1845-1483382227122643Search in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2016a). Publication-Based Funding: The Norwegian Model. In: M. Ochsner et al. (eds.), Research Assessment in the Humanities: Towards Criteria and Procedures, Springer International Publishing, 71–90.SivertsenG.2016aPublication-Based Funding: The Norwegian ModelIn:OchsnerM.(eds.),Research Assessment in the Humanities: Towards Criteria and ProceduresSpringer International Publishing719010.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_7Search in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2016b). Data integration in Scandinavia. Scientometrics, 106, 849–855. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1817-xSivertsenG.2016bData integration in ScandinaviaScientometrics10684985510.1007/s11192-015-1817-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2017). Unique, but still best practice? The Research Excellence Framework (REF) from an international perspective, Palgrave Communications, 3, 17078.SivertsenG.2017Unique, but still best practice? The Research Excellence Framework (REF) from an international perspectivePalgrave Communications31707810.1057/palcomms.2017.78Search in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2018a). Balanced multilingualism in science. BiD: textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació, 40.SivertsenG.2018aBalanced multilingualism in scienceBiD: textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació, 40.Search in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2018b). The Norwegian Model in Norway. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(4), 2–18.SivertsenG.2018bThe Norwegian Model in NorwayJournal of Data and Information Science3421810.2478/jdis-2018-0017Search in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G. (2019). Developing Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) as data sources for studies of research. In Glänzel, W., Moed, H.F., Schmoch, U., Thelwall, M. (Eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Cham: Springer, 667–683.SivertsenG.2019Developing Current Research Information Systems (CRIS) as data sources for studies of researchInGlänzelW.MoedH.F.SchmochU.ThelwallM.(Eds.),Springer Handbook of Science and Technology IndicatorsChamSpringer66768310.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_25Search in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G., Rousseau, R., & Zhang, L. (2019). Measuring Scientific Production with Modified Fractional Counting. Journal of Informetrics, 13(2), 679–694.SivertsenG.RousseauR.ZhangL.2019Measuring Scientific Production with Modified Fractional CountingJournal of Informetrics13267969410.1016/j.joi.2019.03.010Search in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G., & Larsen, B. (2012). Comprehensive bibliographic coverage of the social science s and humanities in a citation index: an empirical analysis of the potential. Scientometrics, 91(2), 567–575.SivertsenG.LarsenB.2012Comprehensive bibliographic coverage of the social science s and humanities in a citation index: an empirical analysis of the potentialScientometrics91256757510.1007/s11192-011-0615-3Search in Google Scholar
Sivertsen, G., & Schneider, J. (2012). Evaluering av den bibliometriske forskningsindikator, N ordisk institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanning. Rapport 17/2012. URL: http://ufm.dk/forskning-og-innovation/statistik-og-analyser/den-bibliometriske-forskningsindikator/endelig-rapport-august-2012.pdf.SivertsenG.SchneiderJ.2012Evaluering av den bibliometriske forskningsindikator, N ordisk institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanningRapport 17/2012. URL: http://ufm.dk/forskning-og-innovation/statistik-og-analyser/den-bibliometriske-forskningsindikator/endelig-rapport-august-2012.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Torres-Salinas, D., Bordons, M., Giménez-Toledo, E., Delgado-Lopez-Cozar, E., Jiménez-Contreras, E., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2010). Clasificación integrada de revistas científicas (CIRC): Propuesta de categorización de las revistas en ciencias sociales y humanas. El profesional de la información, 19(6), 675–683.Torres-SalinasD.BordonsM.Giménez-ToledoE.Delgado-Lopez-CozarE.Jiménez-ContrerasE.Sanz-CasadoE.2010Clasificación integrada de revistas científicas (CIRC): Propuesta de categorización de las revistas en ciencias sociales y humanasEl profesional de la información19667568310.3145/epi.2010.nov.15Search in Google Scholar
Verleysen, F.T., Ghesquière, P., & Engels, T.C.E. (2014). The objectives, design and selection process of the Flemish Academic Bibliographic Database for the Social Sciences and Humanities (VABB-SHW). In W. Blockmans et al. (eds.) The use and abuse of bibliometrics. Academiae Europaea; Portland Press, 115–125.VerleysenF.T.GhesquièreP.EngelsT.C.E.2014The objectives, design and selection process of the Flemish Academic Bibliographic Database for the Social Sciences and Humanities (VABB-SHW)InBlockmansW.(eds.)The use and abuse of bibliometricsAcademiae Europaea; Portland Press115125Search in Google Scholar
van den Besselaar, P., Heyman, U., & Sandström, U. (2017). Perverse effects of output-based research funding? Butler's Australian case revisited. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 905–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.016.van den BesselaarP.HeymanU.SandströmU.2017Perverse effects of output-based research funding? Butler's Australian case revisitedJournal of Informetrics113905918https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.016.10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.016Search in Google Scholar
van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L., van Raan, A.F.J., Klautz, R.J.M., & Peul, W.C. (2013). Citation Analysis May Severely Underestimate the Impact of Clinical Research as Compared to Basic Research. PLoSONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062395van EckN.J.WaltmanL.van RaanA.F.J.KlautzR.J.M.PeulW.C.2013Citation Analysis May Severely Underestimate the Impact of Clinical Research as Compared to Basic ResearchPLoSONEhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.006239510.1371/journal.pone.0062395363477623638064Search in Google Scholar
Verleysen, F., & Rousseau, R. (2017). How the Existence of a Regional Bibliographic Information System can Help Evaluators to Conform to the Principles of the Leiden Manifesto. Journal of Educational Media and Library Science, 54(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.2017.541/0011.BC.ACVerleysenF.RousseauR.2017How the Existence of a Regional Bibliographic Information System can Help Evaluators to Conform to the Principles of the Leiden ManifestoJournal of Educational Media and Library Science54197109https://doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.2017.541/0011.BC.ACSearch in Google Scholar
Wahlfors, L., & Pölönen, J. (2018). Julkaisufoorumi-luokituksen käyttö yliopistoissa. Hallinnon Tutkimus, 37(1), 7–21.WahlforsL.PölönenJ.2018Julkaisufoorumi-luokituksen käyttö yliopistoissaHallinnon Tutkimus371721Search in Google Scholar
Walters, W. (2017). Do subjective journal ratings represent whole journals or typical articles? Unweighted or weighted citation impact?. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 730–744.WaltersW.2017Do subjective journal ratings represent whole journals or typical articles? Unweighted or weighted citation impact?Journal of Informetrics11373074410.1016/j.joi.2017.05.001Search in Google Scholar
Wilsdon, J., Allen, L., Belfiore, E. et al. (2015). The Metric Tide. Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management, HEFCE. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363WilsdonJ.AllenL.BelfioreE.2015The Metric TideReport of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management, HEFCEhttps://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363Search in Google Scholar
Wouters, P., Sugimoto, C., Larivière, V. et al. (2019). Rethinking impact factors: Better ways to judge a journal. Nature, 569(7758), 621–623. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-01643-3WoutersP.SugimotoC.LarivièreV.2019Rethinking impact factors: Better ways to judge a journalNature569775862162310.1038/d41586-019-01643-331138924Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zacharewicz, T., Lepori, B., Reale, E., & Jonkers, K. (2018). Performance-based research funding in EU Member States—A comparative assessment. Science and Public Policy, 46(1), 1–11.ZacharewiczT.LeporiB.RealeE.JonkersK.2018Performance-based research funding in EU Member States—A comparative assessmentScience and Public Policy46111110.1093/scipol/scy041Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Rousseau, R., & Sivertsen, G. (2017). Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluation. PLoS ONE, 12(3), e0174205. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174205ZhangL.RousseauR.SivertsenG.2017Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluationPLoS ONE123e017420510.1371/journal.pone.0174205536977928350849Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zhang, L., & Sivertsen, G., 2020. The new research assessment reform in China and its implementation. Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2(1), 3. doi:10.29024/sar.15ZhangL.SivertsenG.2020The new research assessment reform in China and its implementationScholarly Assessment Reports21310.29024/sar.15Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zitt, M., Ramanana-Rahary, S., & Bassecoulard, E. (2005). Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: From cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisation. Scientometrics, 63(2), 373–401.ZittM.Ramanana-RaharyS.BassecoulardE.2005Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: From cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisationScientometrics63237340110.1007/s11192-005-0218-ySearch in Google Scholar
