The Cooperation of Ernő Foerk and Gyula Sándy

[1] Foerk was nominated teacher in 1898 and Sándy in 1899 by the Minister of Trade. Építő Ipar 22 (1898) No. 36. pp. 229. és Építő Ipar 23 (1899) No. 37. pp. 276.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Kolbenheyer Gyula (ed.), A Budapesti M. Kir. Állami Felső Építő Ipariskola értesítője az 1899/1900. iskolai évről, Budapest. 1900. pp. 26.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Gyula Sándy, Hogyan lettem és hogyan voltam én templom-építő, -tervező és művezető építész? Lapis Angularis VI. Források a Magyar Építészeti Múzeum gyűjteményéből, Budapest: Magyar Építészeti Múzeum. 2005. pp. 205.Search in Google Scholar

[4] János Bobula mentioned that it seemed Foerk and Sándy had made a commercial appointment because they work even in small plans together which they could have done separately. Bobula’s evoking cause for it must have been the plans of the tower of the Lutheran church in Brezno that were exhibited on the Spring Show in the Art Hall in 1904. Bobula later affirms that he regards both of them as talented artist but he thinks such cooperation deprives the artwork of individuality. János Bobula, Tavaszi tárlat a Műcsarnokban. In: Budapesti Építészeti Szemle 13 (1904), 7. szám, 94.Search in Google Scholar

[5] András Hadik: Foerk Ernőről és a Magyar Építészeti Múzeumban lévő dokumentumanyagáról. Lapis Angularis II. Források a Magyar Építészeti Múzeum gyűjteményéből, Budapest: Magyar Építészeti Múzeum. 1998. pp. 14.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Építő Ipar 27 (1903) No. 15. pp. 95.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Építő Ipar 27 (1903) No. 15. pp. 95.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Postamúzeum, In. No.: D22-401.0, D22-401.1, D22-401.2Search in Google Scholar

[9] Sándy 2005. pp. 211.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Magyar Építészeti Múzeum és Műemlékvédelmi Dokumentációs Központ (further MÉM MDK), Ernő Foerk legacy, Inv. No.: 69.024.346.Search in Google Scholar

[11] MÉM MDK, Ernő Foerk legacy, Inv. No.: 69.024.347.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Magyar Pályázatok 1 (1903) No. 11. pp. 29-30.Search in Google Scholar

[13] MÉM MDK, Ernő Foerk legacy, Inv. No.: 69.024.432.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Sándy 2005. pp. 212.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Sándy 2005. pp. 214.Search in Google Scholar

[16] MÉM MDK. Ernő Foerk legacy, Inv. No.: 69.024.380Search in Google Scholar

[17] Sándy 2005. pp. 214.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Sándy 2005. pp. 88.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Magyar Mérnök és Építész Egylet Közlönye 39 (1905). No. 12. pp. 501.Search in Google Scholar

[20] And Mrs. Tüköry knew it very well.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Sándy 2005. pp. 88-89.10.1177/019263650508964507Search in Google Scholar

[22] MÉM MDK. Gyula Sándy legacy. Inv. No.: 2002.10.10.3.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Sándy 2005. pp. 89. And MÉM MDK Ernő Foerk legacy, Inv. No.: 91.09.5.1.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Sándy 2005. pp. 89.Search in Google Scholar

[25] The first prize was not awarded to anyone because there were not any really proper plans. Magyar Pályázatok 4 (1906) No. 10. pp. 4.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Építő Ipar 28 (1904) No. 33. pp. 239.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Magyar Pályázatok 4 (1906) No. 10 .pp. 18-19. The jury remonstrated that this plan does not satisfy all the presciptions of the programme. Magyar Pályázatok 4 (1906) No. 10. pp. 26.Search in Google Scholar

[28] However the common plan of the Viennese achitects Ernst Lindner – Theodor Schreier was also awarded with second prize. Sándy 2005. pp. 207.Search in Google Scholar

[29] MÉM MDK. Ernő Foerk legacy. Inv. No.: 69.462.1; Photo Storage 70.410 fot. sz.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Magyar Mérnök- és Építész Egylet Közlönye. 39 (1905) No. 2. pp. 34.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Magyar Mérnök és Építész Egylet Közlönye 41 (1907) No. XI-XII. pp. 301.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Építő Ipar 31 (1907) No. 17. pp. 161.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Építő Ipar 31 (1907) No. 17. pp. 163.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Magyar Mérnök és Építész Egylet Közlönye 41 (1907) No. XI-XII. pp. 306.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Sándy 2005. pp. 112.Search in Google Scholar

[36] MÉM MDK. Gyula Sándy legacy, Inv. No.: 2002.10.11.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Foerk was Steindl’s assisstant for several years. András Hadik 1998. pp. 13.Search in Google Scholar

[38] The performance was held on 1st April 1935. MÉM MDK. Gyula Sándy documents, box No. 3, folder No.78.Search in Google Scholar