[Abbey, A., & Dickson, J. W. (1983). R&D work climate and innovation in semiconductors. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 362-368.10.2307/255984]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Almeida, L. S., Prieto, M. D., Ferrando, M., Oliveira, E., & Ferrándiz, C. (2008). Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: The question of its construct validity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2008.03.003]Search in Google Scholar
[*Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A Consensual Assessment Technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997-1013.10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997]Search in Google Scholar
[Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-376.10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357]Search in Google Scholar
[Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 123-167). Greenwish, CT: JAI Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Amabile, T. M. (1996). Evidence to support the componential model of creativity: Secondary analyses of three studies. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 385-389.10.1207/s15326934crj0904_9]Search in Google Scholar
[*Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. The Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154-1184.10.2307/256995]Search in Google Scholar
[*Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, N. (1989). The creative environment scales: Work Environment Inventory. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 231-253.10.1080/10400418909534321]Search in Google Scholar
[Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 5-32.10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235-258.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<235::AID-JOB837>3.0.CO;2-C]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Bachelor, P. (1989). Maximum likelihood confirmatory factor-analytic investigation of factors within Guilford's Structure of Intellect model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 797-804.10.1037/0021-9010.74.5.797]Search in Google Scholar
[*Bachelor, P., & Michael, W. B. (1991). Higher-order factors of creativity within Guilford's structure-of-intellect model: A re-analysis of a fifty-three variable data base. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 157-175.10.1080/10400419109534383]Search in Google Scholar
[*Bachelor, P., Michael, W. B., & Kim, S. (1994). First-order and higher-order semantic and figural factors in Structure-of-Intellect Divergent Production measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 608-619.10.1177/0013164494054003004]Search in Google Scholar
[*Baer, J. (1991). Generality of creativity across performance domains. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 23-39.10.1080/10400419109534371]Search in Google Scholar
[Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking: A task-specific approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ]Search in Google Scholar
[*Baer, J. (1994a). Divergent thinking is not a general trait: A multi-domain training experiment. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 35-46.10.1080/10400419409534507]Search in Google Scholar
[*Baer, J. (1994b). Generality of creativity across performance domains: A replication. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 1217-1218.10.2466/pms.1994.79.3.1217]Search in Google Scholar
[*Baer, J. (1994c). Performance assessments of creativity: Do they have long-term stability? Roeper Review, 7, 7-11.10.1080/02783199409553609]Search in Google Scholar
[Baer, J. (1994d). Why you still shouldn’t trust creativity tests. Educational Leadership, 52, 72-73. ]Search in Google Scholar
[*Baer, J. (2011). How divergent thinking tests mislead us: Are the Torrance Tests still relevant in the 21st century? The division 10 debate. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 309-313. doi: 10.1037/a0025210]Search in Google Scholar
[*Baer, J. (2012). Domain specificity and the limits of creativity theory. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 16-29. doi: 10.1002/jocb.002]Search in Google Scholar
[*Baer, J. (2015). The importance of domain-specific expertise in creativity. Roeper Review, 37, 165-178. doi: 10.1080/02783193.2015.1047480]Search in Google Scholar
[*Baer, J. (2016). Domain specificity of creativity. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Gentile, C. A. (2004). Extension of the Consensual Assessment Technique to nonparallel creative products. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 113-17.10.1207/s15326934crj1601_11]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Baer, J., & McKool, S. S. (2009). Assessing creativity using the Consensual Assessment Technique. In C. S. Schreiner (Ed.), Handbook of research on assessment technologies, methods, and applications in higher education (pp. 65-77). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Baer, J., & McKool, S. S. (2014). The gold standard for assessing creativity. International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education, 3, 81-93. doi: 10.4018/ijqaete.2014010104]Search in Google Scholar
[*Barbot, B., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. I. (2011). Assessing creativity in the classroom. The Open Education Journal, 4, 124-132. doi: 10.2174/1874920801104010058]Search in Google Scholar
[*Barbot, B., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. I. (2015). Creative potential in educational settings: Its nature, measure, and nurture. Education 3-13, 43, 371-381. doi: 10.1080/03004279.2015.1020643]Search in Google Scholar
[*Barron, F., & Harrington, D. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476.10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002255]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Batey, M. (2007). A psychometric investigation of everyday creativity. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. London: University College.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Batey, M. (2012). The measurement of creativity: From definitional consensus to the introduction of a new heuristic framework. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 55-65. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.649181]Search in Google Scholar
[*Batey, M., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). Individual differences in ideational behavior: Can the big five and psychometric intelligence predict creativity scores? Creativity Research Journal, 22, 90-97. doi: 10.1080/10400410903579627]Search in Google Scholar
[*Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 355-429.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Belcher, T. L., Rubovits, J. J., & Di Meo, P. A. (1981). Measurement of creativity: A factor analytic study. Psychological Reports, 48, 819-825.10.2466/pr0.1981.48.3.819]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. I. (2008). Differences in the development of creative competencies in children schooled in diverse learning environments. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 381-389. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.11.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Biernat, M. (2003). Toward a broader view of social stereotyping. American Psychologist, 58, 1019-1027.10.1037/0003-066X.58.12.1019]Search in Google Scholar
[Blamiresa, M., & Peterson, A. (2014). Can creativity be assessed? Towards an evidenceinformed framework for assessing and planning progress in creativity. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44, 147-162. doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2013.860081]Search in Google Scholar
[*Brinkman, D. (1999). Problem finding, creativity style and the musical compositions of high school students. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 62-68.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1999.tb01038.x]Search in Google Scholar
[*Brougher, S. J., & Rantanen, E. M. (2009). Creativity and design: Creativity’s new definition and its relationship to design. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1, 605-609. doi: 10.1177/154193120905301005]Search in Google Scholar
[*Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37-50.10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4]Search in Google Scholar
[Christiaans, H. H. C. M. (2002). Creativity as a design criterion. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 41-54.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1401_4]Search in Google Scholar
[*Clapham, M. M. (1998). Structure of the figural forms A and B of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 275-283.10.1177/0013164498058002010]Search in Google Scholar
[*Clapham, M. M. (2004). The convergent validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking and creativity interest inventories. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 828-841.10.1177/0013164404263883]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Colangelo, N., Kerr, B., Hallowell, K., Huesman, R., & Gaeth, J. (1992). The Iowa inventiveness inventory: Toward a measure of mechanical inventiveness. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 157-163.10.1080/10400419209534429]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Couger, J. D., Higgins, L. F., & McIntyre, S. C. (1993). (Un)structured creativity in information systems organizations. MIS Quarterly, 17, 375-397.10.2307/249584]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Craft, A. (2001). An analysis of research and literature on creativity in education. Report prepared for the qualifications and curriculum authority. Available at http://www.creativetallis.com/uploads/2/2/8/7/2287089/creativity_in_education_report.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[*Cramond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Bandalos, D., & Zuo, L. (2005). A report on the 40- year follow-up of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Alive and well in the new millennium. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 283-291.10.1177/001698620504900402]Search in Google Scholar
[*Cropley, A. J. (1972). A five-year longitudinal study of DT tests. Developmental Psychology, 6, 119-124.10.1037/h0032228]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Cropley, A. J. (2000). Defining and measuring creativity: Are creativity tests worth using? Roeper Review, 23, 72-79.10.1080/02783190009554069]Search in Google Scholar
[*Cropley, A. J., & Maslany, G. W. (1969). Reliability and factorial validity of the Wallach- Kogan Creativity Tests. British Journal of Psychology, 60, 395-398.10.1111/j.2044-8295.1969.tb01213.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Davidovitch, N., & Milgram, R. M. (2006). Creative thinking as a predictor of teacher effectiveness in higher education. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 385-390.10.1207/s15326934crj1803_12]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education-A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004]Search in Google Scholar
[*Davis, G. A. (1975). In frumious pursuit of the creative person. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 9, 75-87.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1975.tb00561.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Davis, G. A., & Subkoviak, M. J. (1975). Multidimensional analysis of a personalitybased test of creative potential. Journal of Educational Measurement, 12, 37-43.10.1111/j.1745-3984.1975.tb01007.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. The Academy of Management Review, 21, 619-654.10.5465/amr.1996.9702100310]Search in Google Scholar
[*Diakidoy, I. N., & Spanoudis, G. (2002). Domain specificity in creativity testing: A comparison of performance on a general divergent-thinking test and a parallel, content- specific test. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 41-61.10.1002/j.2162-6057.2002.tb01055.x]Search in Google Scholar
[*Dixon, J. (1979). Quality versus quantity: The need to control for the fluency factor in originality scores from the Torrance Tests. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2, 70-79.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ericsson, K. A. (1999). Creative expertise as superior reproducible performance: Innovative and flexible aspects of expert performance. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 329-333.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363]Search in Google Scholar
[Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 290-309.10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Finke, R. A., Ward, T. M., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Fishkin, A. S., & Johnson, A. S. (1998). Who is creative? Identifying children’s creative abilities. Roeper Review, 21(1), 40-46. doi: 10.1080/02783199809553925]Search in Google Scholar
[*Fleenor, J. W., & Taylor, S. (1994). Construct validity of three self-report measures of creativity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 464-470.10.1177/0013164494054002021]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Forrester, V., & Hui, A. (2007). Creativity in the Honk Kong classroom: What is the contextual practice? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 30-38.10.1016/j.tsc.2006.10.003]Search in Google Scholar
[*Fraser, B. J., Treagust, D. F., & Dennis, N. (1986). Development of an instrument for assessing classroom psychosocial environment at universities and colleges. Studies in Higher Education, 11, 43-54.10.1080/03075078612331378451]Search in Google Scholar
[*Furnham, A., Batey, M., Anand, K., & Manfield, J. (2008). Personality, hypomania, intelligence and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1060-1069. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01293.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2016). Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi. 10.1037/edu000013310.1037/edu0000133]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Galati, F. (2015). Complexity of judgment: What makes possible the convergence of expert and nonexpert ratings in assessing creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 27, 24-30. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2015.992667]Search in Google Scholar
[Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Geis, G.T. (1988). Making Companies Creative. In R. L. Kuhn (ed.), Handbook for creative and innovative managers (pp. 25-33). New York: McGraw-Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976) The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in Art. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Gluck, J., Ernst, R., & Unger, F. (2002). How creatives define creativity: Definitions reflect different types of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 55-67.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1401_5]Search in Google Scholar
[*Goldsmith, R. E., & Matherly, T. A. (1988). Creativity and self-esteem: A multiple operationalization validity study. The Journal of Psychology, 122, 47-56.10.1080/00223980.1988.10542942]Search in Google Scholar
[*González, M. A., Campos, A., & Pérez, M. J. (1997). Mental imagery and creative thinking. The Journal of Psychology, 131, 357-364.10.1080/00223989709603521]Search in Google Scholar
[*Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398-1405.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.10.1037/h0063487]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guilford, J. P. (1975). Creativity: A quarter century of progress. In I. A. Taylor, & J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 37-59). Chicago: Aldine.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Han, K. (2003). Domain-specificity of creativity in young children: How quantitative and qualitative data support it. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 117-142.10.1002/j.2162-6057.2003.tb00829.x]Search in Google Scholar
[*Han, K., & Marvin, C. (2002). Multiple creativities? Investigating domain-specificity of creativity in young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 98-109.10.1177/001698620204600203]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Harrington, D. (1975). Effects of explicit instructions to "be creative" on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Personality, 43, 434-454.10.1111/j.1467-6494.1975.tb00715.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Harrington, D. (1990). The ecology of human creativity: A psychological perspective. In M. Runco, & R. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 143-169). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Heausler, N. L., & Thompson, B. (1988). Structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 463-468.10.1177/0013164488482021]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hekkert, P., & Van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1996). Beauty in the eye of expert and nonexpert beholders: A study in the appraisal of art. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 389-407.10.2307/1423013]Search in Google Scholar
[*Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569-598. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416]Search in Google Scholar
[*Hennessey, B. A., Amabile, T. M., & Mueller, J. S. (2011). Consensual Assessment. In M. A. Runco, & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.) Encyclopedia of creativity, vol. 1 (2nd ed.) (pp. 253-260). San Diego: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Hickey, M. (2001). An application of Amabile’s Consensual Assessment Technique for rating the creativity of children’s musical compositions. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 234-244.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Hocevar, D. (1979a). A comparison of statistical infrequency and subjective judgment as criteria in the measurement of originality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 297-299.10.1207/s15327752jpa4303_13]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Hocevar, D. (1979b). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191-196.10.1037/0022-0663.71.2.191]Search in Google Scholar
[*Hocevar, D. (1979c). The development of the Creative Behavior Inventory (CBI). Paper presented at the 1979 conference of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association, Las Vegas, Nevada (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED170350).]Search in Google Scholar
[*Hocevar, D. (1979d). The unidimensional nature of creative thinking in fifth grade children. Child Study Journal, 9, 273-278.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Hocevar, D. (1980). Intelligence, divergent thinking, and creativity. Intelligence, 4, 25- 40.10.1016/0160-2896(80)90004-5]Search in Google Scholar
[*Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: Review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 450-464.10.1207/s15327752jpa4505_1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 53-75). New York: Plenum Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Hocevar, D., & Michael, W. B. (1979). The effects of scoring formulas on the discriminant validity of tests of divergent thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 39, 917-921.10.1177/001316447903900427]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoelcher, M., & Schubert, M. (2015). Potential and problems of existing creativity and innovation indices. Creativity Research Journal, 27, 1-15. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2015.992656]Search in Google Scholar
[Holland, J. L., & Nichols, R. (1964). Prediction of academic and extracurricular achievement in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 55-65.10.1037/h0047977]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Horn, D., & Salvendy, G. (2006). Consumer-based assessment of product creativity: A review and reappraisal. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 16, 155-175.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., & Ekvall, G. (1999). Situational Outlook Questionnaire: A measure of the climate for creativity and change. Psychological Reports, 85, 665-674.10.2466/pr0.1999.85.2.665]Search in Google Scholar
[James, K., & Asmus, C., (2000-2001). Personality, cognitive skills, and creativity in different life domains. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 149-159.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1302_3]Search in Google Scholar
[James, K., Clark, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Positive and negative creativity in groups, institutions, and organizations: A model and theoretical extension. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 211-226.10.1207/s15326934crj1203_6]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality, 28, 95-105. doi: 10.1002/per.1941]Search in Google Scholar
[*Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the Muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 298-308. doi: 10.1037/a0029751]Search in Google Scholar
[*Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004). Hawking's Haiku, Madonna's math: Why it is hard to be creative in every room of the house. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 3-19). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2012). Beyond new and appropriate: Who decides what is creative? Creativity Research Journal, 24, 83-91. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.649237]Search in Google Scholar
[*Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cole, J. C., & Sexton, J. D. (2008). A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the Consensual Assessment Technique. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 171-178. doi: 10.1080/10400410802059929]Search in Google Scholar
[*Kaufman, J. C., Evans, M. L., & Baer, J. (2010). The American Idol Effect: Are students good judges of their creativity across domains? Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28, 3-17. doi: 10.2190/EM.28.1.b]Search in Google Scholar
[*Kaufman, J. C., Lee, J., Baer, J., & Lee, S. (2007). Captions, consistency, creativity, and the Consensual Assessment Technique: New evidence of reliability. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 96-106.10.1016/j.tsc.2007.04.002]Search in Google Scholar
[*Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Russell, C. M. (2012). Identifying and assessing creativity as a component of giftedness. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 60-73. doi: 10.1177/0734282911428196]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Resource review: Creativity. Change, 39, 55-58.10.3200/CHNG.39.4.55-C4]Search in Google Scholar
[*Khatena, J., & Torrance, E. P. (1973). Thinking creatively with sounds and words: Technical Manual (Research Ed.). Lexington, MA: Personnel Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Khattab, A., Michael, W. B., & Hocevar, D. (1982). The construct validity of higher order Structure-of-Intellect abilities in a battery of tests emphasizing the product of transformations: A confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 1089-1105.10.1177/001316448204200415]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Kim, K. H. (2006a). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18, 3-14.10.1207/s15326934crj1801_2]Search in Google Scholar
[*Kim, K. H. (2006b). Is creativity unidimensional or multidimensional? Analyses of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 251-259.10.1207/s15326934crj1803_2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kim, K. H. (2008). Meta-analyses of the relationship of creative achievement to both IQ and divergent thinking test scores. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 106-130. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01290.x]Search in Google Scholar
[*Kim, K. H., Cramond, B., & Bandalos, D. L. (2006). The latent structure and measurement invariance of scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-figural. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 459-477.]Search in Google Scholar
[*King, L. A., Walker, L. M., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 189-203.10.1006/jrpe.1996.0013]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Kogan, N., & Pankove, E. (1974). Long-term predictive validity of divergent-thinking tests: Some negative evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 802-810.10.1037/h0021521]Search in Google Scholar
[*Krumm, G., Aranguren, M., Filippetti, V. A., & Lemos, V. (2014). Factor structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking verbal form B in a Spanish-speaking population. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50, 150-164. doi: 10.1002/jocb.76]Search in Google Scholar
[*Krumm, G., Filippetti, V. A., Lemos, V., Koval, J., & Balabanian, C. (2016). Construct validity and factorial invariance across sex of the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking - figural Form A in Spanish-speaking children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 180-189. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.003]Search in Google Scholar
[*Krumm, G., Lemos, V., & Filippetti, V. A. (2014). Factor structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking figural form B in Spanish-speaking children: Measurement invariance across gender. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 72-81. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2013.843908]Search in Google Scholar
[*Lee, S., Lee, J., & Youn, C.-Y. (2005). A variation of CAT for measuring creativity in business products. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 15, 143-153.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Lemons, G. (2011). Diverse perspectives of creativity testing: Controversial issues when used for inclusion into gifted programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34, 742-772. doi: 10.1177/0162353211417221]Search in Google Scholar
[Leung, A. K.-Y., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C-Y. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63, 169-181. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.169]Search in Google Scholar
[Lindauer, M. S. (1991). Comparisons between museum and mass-produced art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9, 11-22.10.2190/6CD7-HPM2-2Q14-56GJ]Search in Google Scholar
[Lindauer, M. S., & Long, D. A. (1986). The criteria used to judge art: Marketplace and academic comparisons. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 4, 163-174.10.2190/C9MW-G2XR-MG4V-WKAU]Search in Google Scholar
[Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295-308.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_07]Search in Google Scholar
[Lubart, T. I., & Guignard, J. (2004). The generality-specificity of creativity: A multivariate approach. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 43-56). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Lubart, T. I., Zenasni, F., & Barbot, B. (2013). Creative potential and its measurement. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 1, 41-51.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Mace, D. E., Michael, W. B., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Validity of higher-order ability constructs in Structure-Of-Intellect tests all involving semantic content and operations of cognition or evaluation: A confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 353-359.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Mathisen, G. E., & Einarsen, S. (2004). A review of instruments assessing creative and innovative environments within organizations. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 119-140.10.1207/s15326934crj1601_12]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of Creativity Research. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) Handbook of Creativity (pp. 449-460). New York: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[McLaren, R. B. (1993). The dark side of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 137-144.10.1080/10400419309534472]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232.10.1037/h0048850]Search in Google Scholar
[*Michael, W. B., & Bachelor, P. (1990). Higher-order structure-of-intellect creativity factors in divergent production tests: A re-analysis of a Guilford data base. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 58-74.10.1080/10400419009534333]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Milgram, R. M., & Hong, E. (1993). Creative thinking and creative performance in adolescents as predictors of creative attainments in adults: A follow-up study after 18 years. Roeper Review, 15, 135-139.10.1080/02783199309553487]Search in Google Scholar
[*Miller, A. L. (2014). A self-report measure of cognitive processes associated with creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 203-218. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2014.901088]Search in Google Scholar
[*Moos, R. (1986). Work Environment Scale: Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Mouchiroud, C., & Lubart, T. (2001). Children's original thinking: An empirical examination of alternative measures derived from divergent thinking tasks. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 162, 382-401.10.1080/00221320109597491]Search in Google Scholar
[*Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107-120.10.1080/10400419.2003.9651403]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2012). A comparison of self-ratings and non-self-report measures of employee creativity. Human Relations, 65, 1021-1047. doi: 10.1177/0018726712446015]Search in Google Scholar
[*Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Cultural influences on artistic creativity and its evaluation. International Journal of Psychology, 36, 225-241.10.1080/00207590143000036]Search in Google Scholar
[Okuda, S. M., Runco, M. A., & Berger, D. E. (1991). Creativity and the finding and solving of real-world problems. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 45-53.10.1177/073428299100900104]Search in Google Scholar
[*O'Quin, K., & Besemer, S. P. (1989). The development, reliability, and validity of the revised creative product semantic scale. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 267-278.10.1080/10400418909534323]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Palmiero, M., Nori, R., Aloisi, V., Ferrara, M., & Piccardi, L. (2015). Domain-specificity of creativity: A study on the relationship between visual creativity and visual mental imagery. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1-8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01870]Search in Google Scholar
[Paramithaa, A., & Indarti, N. (2014). Impact of the environment support on creativity: Assessing the mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 115, 102-114. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.419]Search in Google Scholar
[*Park, N. K., Chun, M. Y., & Lee, J. (2016). Revisiting individual creativity assessment: Triangulation in subjective and objective assessment methods. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 1-10. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2016.1125259]Search in Google Scholar
[*Patterson, M. G., West, M. A., Shackleton, V. J., Dawson, J. F., Lawthom, R., Maitlis, S., Robinson, D. L., & Wallace, A. M. (2005). Validating the organizational climate measure: Links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 379-408.10.1002/job.312]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Piffer, D. (2012). Can creativity be measured? An attempt to clarify the notion of creativity and general directions for future research. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 258-264. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2012.04.009]Search in Google Scholar
[*Plucker, J. A. (1999a). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance's (1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103-114.10.1207/s15326934crj1202_3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Plucker, J. A. (1999b). Reanalyses of student responses to creativity checklists: Evidence of content generality. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 126-137.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1999.tb01042.x]Search in Google Scholar
[*Plucker, J. A., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Assessment of creativity. In J. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Plucker, J. A., Qian, M., & Wang, S. (2011). Is originality in the eye of the beholder? Comparison of scoring techniques in the assessment of divergent thinking. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45, 1-22. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01081.x]Search in Google Scholar
[*Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.). Handbook of human creativity (pp. 35-60). New York: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Plucker, J. A., & Runco, M. A. (1998). The death of creativity measurement directions in creativity assessment has been greatly exaggerated: Current issues, recent advances, and future. Roeper Review, 21, 36-39.10.1080/02783199809553924]Search in Google Scholar
[Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879]Search in Google Scholar
[*Priest, T. (2006). Self-evaluation, creativity, and musical achievement. Psychology of Music, 34, 47-61.10.1177/0305735606059104]Search in Google Scholar
[Primi, R. (2014). Divergent productions of metaphors: Combining many-facet Rasch measurement and cognitive psychology in the assessment of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts (online publication). doi: 10.1037/a0038055]Search in Google Scholar
[*Raudsepp, E. (1981). How creative are you? New York: Perigee. ]Search in Google Scholar
[*Reiter-Palmon, R., Robinson-Morral, E. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Santo, J. B. (2012). Evaluation of self-perceptions of creativity: Is it a useful criterion? Creativity Research Journal, 24, 107-114. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.676980]Search in Google Scholar
[Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 109-135. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Rudowicz, E. (2003). Creativity and culture: A two way interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 273-290. 10.1080/00313830308602]Search in Google Scholar
[*Runco, M. A. (1984). Teachers' judgments of creativity and social validation of divergent thinking tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 711-717.10.2466/pms.1984.59.3.711]Search in Google Scholar
[*Runco, M. A. (1986). Divergent thinking and creative performance in gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 375-384.10.1177/001316448604600211]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Runco, M. A. (1987). The generality of creative performance in gifted and nongifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 121-125.10.1177/001698628703100306]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Runco, M. A. (1993). Divergent thinking, creativity, and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 16-22.10.1177/001698629303700103]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657-687.10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502]Search in Google Scholar
[*Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity. Theories and themes: Research, development and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Runco, M. A. (2008). Commentary: Divergent thinking is not synonymous with creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 93-96. doi: 10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.93]Search in Google Scholar
[*Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 66-75. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.652929]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. A., & Bahleda, M. D. (1986). Implicit theories of artistic, scientific, and everyday creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 93-98.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1986.tb00423.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92-96. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.650092]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. A., & Johnson, D. J. (1993). Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity. Child Study Journal, 23, 91-113.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Runco, M. A., McCarthy, K. A., & Svenson, E. (1993). Judgments of the creativity of artwork from students and professional artists. The Journal of Psychology, 128, 23-31.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Runco, M. A., Millar, G., Acar, S., & Cramond, B. (2010). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking as predictors of personal and public achievement: A fifty year follow up. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 361-368. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2010.523393]Search in Google Scholar
[*Runco, M. A., & Mraz, W. (1992). Scoring divergent thinking tests using total ideational output and a creativity index. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 213-221.10.1177/001316449205200126]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Runco, M. A., & Okuda, S. M. (1988). Problem discovery, divergent thinking, and the creative process. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17, 211-220.10.1007/BF01538162]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Runco, M. A., Okuda, S. M., & Thurston, B. J. (1987).The psychometric properties of four systems for scoring divergent thinking tests. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 5, 149-156.10.1177/073428298700500206]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Runco, M. A., & Smith, W. R. (1992). Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 295-302.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider, B., & Reichers, A. E. (1983). On the etiology of climates. Personnel Psychology, 36, 19-39.10.1111/j.1744-6570.1983.tb00500.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933-958.10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007]Search in Google Scholar
[*Siegel, S. M., & Kaemmerer, W. F. (1978). Measuring the perceived support for innovation in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 553-562.10.1037/0021-9010.63.5.553]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Silvia, P. J. (2015). Intelligence and creativity are pretty similar after all. Educational Psychological Review (online publication). doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9299-1]Search in Google Scholar
[*Silvia, P. J., Martin, C., &, Nusbaum, E. C. (2009). A snapshot of creativity: Evaluating a quick and simple method for assessing divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2009.06.005]Search in Google Scholar
[*Silvia, P. J., Wigert, B., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 19-34. doi: 10.1037/a0024071]Search in Google Scholar
[*Skager, R. W., Klein, S. P., & Schultz, C. B. (1967). The prediction of academic and artistic achievement at a school of design. Journal of Educational Measurement, 4, 105-117.10.1111/j.1745-3984.1967.tb00577.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607-627.10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.607]Search in Google Scholar
[Sternberg, R. J., Conway, B. E., Ketron, J. L., & Bernstein, M. (1981). People's conceptions of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 37-55.10.1037/0022-3514.41.1.37]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). New York: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomas, N. G., & Berk, L. E. (1981). Effects of school environments on the development of young children's creativity. Child Development, 52, 1153-1162.10.2307/1129501]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Thompson, G., & Lordan, M. (1999). A review of creativity principles applied to engineering design. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 213, 17-31.10.1243/0954408991529960]Search in Google Scholar
[*Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual. Lexington, MA: Personal Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Torrance, E. P. (1969). Prediction of adult creative achievement among high school seniors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 13, 223-229.10.1177/001698626901300401]Search in Google Scholar
[*Torrance, E. P. (1972a). Career patterns and peak creative achievements of creative high school students 12 years later. Gifted Child Quarterly, 16, 75-88.10.1177/001698627201600201]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Torrance, E. P. (1972b). Predictive validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 236-252.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00936.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Torrance, E. P. (1977). Creativity in the classroom: What research says to the teacher. Washington, DC: National Education Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Torrance, E. P. (1980). Growing up creatively gifted: The 22-year longitudinal study. The Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 5, 148-158.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Torrance, E. P. (1981a). Empirical validation of criterion referenced indicators of creative ability through a longitudinal study. The Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 6, 136-140.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Torrance, E. P. (1981b). Predicting the creativity of elementary school children (1958-80) and the teacher who made a difference. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 55-62.10.1177/001698628102500203]Search in Google Scholar
[*Torrance, E. P. (2008). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-norms-technical manual- figural (streamlined) forms A and B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Torrance, E. P., & Haensly, P. A. (2003). Assessment of creativity in children and adolescents. In C. R. Reynoolds, & R. W. Kamphaus (Eds.) Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Intelligence, aptitude and achievement (2nd ed.) (pp. 584-607). New York: The Guildford Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Treffinger, D. J. (1996). Creativity, creative thinking, and critical thinking: In search of definitions. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Treffinger, D. J., Renzulli, J., & Feldhusen, J. (1971). Problems in the assessment of creative thinking. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 5, 104-112.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1971.tb00880.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Treffinger, D. J., Young, G. C., Selby, E. C., & Shepardson, C. (2002). Assessing creativity: A guide for educators. Sarasota: Center for Creative Learning.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Ulosevich, S. N., Michael, W. B., & Bachelor, P. (1991). Higher-order factors in Structure -of-Intellect (SOI) aptitude tests hypothesized to portray constructs of military leadership: A re-analysis of an SOI data base. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 15-37.10.1177/0013164491511002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ursyn, A. (2014). Perceptions of Knowledge Visualization: Explaining Concepts through Meaningful Images. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-4666-4703-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Vaughn, V. L., Feldhusen, J. F., & Asher, J. W. (1991). Meta-analyses and review of research on pull-out programs in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 92-98.10.1177/001698629103500208]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Vincent, P. H., Decker, B. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 163-178.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1402_4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.]Search in Google Scholar
[*Wechsler, S. (2006). Validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking to the Brazilian culture. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 15-25.10.1207/s15326934crj1801_3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity: understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Westby, E. L., & Dawson, V. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom? Creativity Research Journal, 8, 1-10.10.1207/s15326934crj0801_1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[*Williams, F. (1980). Creativity assessment packet. Buffalo, NY: DOK.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2009). Fostering creativity in service development: Facilitating service innovation by the creative cognition approach. Service Science, 1, 142-153. doi: 10.1287/serv.1.3.142]Search in Google Scholar
[*Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23, 24-37. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2011.545713]Search in Google Scholar
[*Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). Research on employee creativity: A critical review and directions for future research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 22, 165-217.]Search in Google Scholar