<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This paper reflects on the interaction that language and economy have in society versus an ethnocentric approach that sees other languages as challenges instead of an opportunity. The paper analyses the role that bilingualism has in the economy and how economy can impact the promotion of flexible language policies in order to open new markets. Throughout the discourse a strong focus is placed on the dilemma: can language impact and make economy beneficial? The study aims to explore how multicultural societies which often have one dominant language can benefit by opening language diversity to the business habitat with a specific focus on particular linguistic and economic developments in the Balkans after the fall of Yugoslavia. In the second part this global issues are analyzed in the local context. The study brings examples from Macedonia on how the private sector is much more advanced and innovative compared to the state institution. During this discourse few corporations active in Macedonia are analyzed in order to size the positive impact that flexible usage of language has on the economy and how state institutions can replicate this positive model. Other factors such as culture and the neurolinguistics studies have been considered as well.</p></abstract>

This paper reflects on the interaction that language and economy have in society versus an ethnocentric approach that sees other languages as challenges instead of an opportunity. The paper analyses the role that bilingualism has in the economy and how economy can impact the promotion of flexible language policies in order to open new markets. Throughout the discourse a strong focus is placed on the dilemma: can language impact and make economy beneficial? The study aims to explore how multicultural societies which often have one dominant language can benefit by opening language diversity to the business habitat with a specific focus on particular linguistic and economic developments in the Balkans after the fall of Yugoslavia. In the second part this global issues are analyzed in the local context. The study brings examples from Macedonia on how the private sector is much more advanced and innovative compared to the state institution. During this discourse few corporations active in Macedonia are analyzed in order to size the positive impact that flexible usage of language has on the economy and how state institutions can replicate this positive model. Other factors such as culture and the neurolinguistics studies have been considered as well.

Ethno-Centric or Market-Centric Societies? Bilingualism vs Ethnocentrism in the Balkans

SEEU Review

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

This paper reflects on the interaction that language and economy have in society versus an ethnocentric approach that sees other languages as challenges...

Ethno-Centric or Market-Centric Societies? Bilingualism vs Ethnocentrism in the Balkans

Online veröffentlicht: 18. Jan. 2019

Seitenbereich: 53 - 61

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2018-0006

Schlüsselwörter
Language and economy, neurolinguistics, linguistic benefits, unequal distribution of language, Macedonia

© 2019 Agim Poshka, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Ethno-Centric or Market-Centric Societies? Bilingualism vs Ethnocentrism in the Balkans

Online veröffentlicht: 18. Jan. 2019

Seitenbereich: 53 - 61

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2018-0006

SchlüsselwörterLanguage and economy, neurolinguistics, linguistic benefits, unequal distribution of language, Macedonia

© 2019 Agim Poshka, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Schlüsselwörter
Language and economy, neurolinguistics, linguistic benefits, unequal distribution of language, Macedonia