The research process expects ethical behaviour and good practice. As plagiarism and self-plagiarism are on the increase, scientific publishers are using software to detect these instances of scientific misconduct.
Dedicated software scans articles, books and conference proceedings to detect plagiarism. The material is compared against a database containing published papers in academic journals and books.
Universities and research bodies have also expressed concerns regarding plagiarism (standard and self) and developed policies and detailed guidelines for academic researchers.
What is plagiarism?
The University of Cambridge has a dedicated website to plagiarism and academic misconduct. It identifies plagiarism as “using someone else’s ideas, words, data, or other material produced by them without acknowledgement” and self-plagiarism as “using the Registered Student’s own ideas, words, data or other material produced by them and submitted for formal assessment at this University or another institution, or for publication elsewhere, without acknowledgement, unless expressly permitted by the assessment”.
Scientific publishers offer guidelines to authors. In scholarly publishing, self-plagiarism occurs when an author uses his/her own material published elsewhere without acknowledging its reuse. If this happens in a minor way, the paper is sent back to the author for revision, if it’s considerable, the paper is rejected.
Plagiarism has dire consequences as it could severely limit academic job prospects and potentially end a professional career. There is also a serious legal consequence: copyright infringement.
Type of self-plagiarism
Scientific publishers consider it as serious as standard plagiarism. This occurs when:
How to avoid plagiarism
Although most people understand what plagiarism is, there are still many cases of researchers having their papers rejected or retracted due to plagiarising their sources unintentionally. It is not simply a question of copying and pasting text but also of subtler issues such as improper paraphrasing, invalid citation formats or even work done by a co-author, which can be detected by increasingly sophisticated plagiarism software.
Summing up, authors should avoid:
Global organisations tackling scientific misconduct
The World Conferences on Research Integrity Foundation (WCRIF), established in 2017 is a non-profit organisation based in The Netherlands that organises conferences on research integrity. It also publishes policies and guidance for authors and scientific publishers on the responsible conduct of research.
COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) is celebrating its 25th birthday. This organisation aims to educate and support academic editors, scientific publishers and those involved in publication ethics across the world. It offers resources and support of members and encourages professional debate in the wider community. Its database includes cases of misconduct, including plagiarism.
Sciendo offers all customers a Similarity Check system, provided by Crossref. This is part of all publishing packages (Standard, Classic and Premier) for journals, books and conference proceedings. This system prevents scholarly and professional plagiarism. Scientific publishers are expected to provide a high standard of service and a quality peer-review process, which are crucial to achieve a high impact factor for journals and a reputation of excellence for books and conference proceedings.
If you are an early career scholar who is thinking of writing academic books to advance your career, this article will help you navigate book publishing with more confidence and less stress.
read moreIn a previous article entitled Publishing your first academic book, we advised early-career researchers to start publishing articles in reputable journals as a way to get experience and build up a career as academic authors. Open-access journals are particularly helpful because they are not behind a paywall and can reach a wider audience.
read moreOpen access publishing is gaining popularity worldwide. Diffusing research findings in an open access journal offers many benefits to academic authors and institutions, which we will discuss in this article.
read moreThe presented study is the result of the research project ‘Open Online Learning for Digital and Networked Society (3.3-LMT-K-712-01-0189)’, funded by the European Social Fund according to the activity ‘Improvement of researchers’ qualification by implementing world-class R&D projects’ of Measure No. 09.3.3-LMT-K-712 under the grant agreement with the Research Council of Lithuania (LMTLT).
read moreIn early 2020 when the pandemic struck, many scholarly societies began to look for ways to hold their scientific conference online.
read more