1. bookVolume 24 (2020): Issue 1 (July 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2719-535X
First Published
01 Jan 2020
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Gross Motor Function Disorders in Patients with Alternating Hemiplegia of Childhood

Published Online: 29 Jul 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 24 (2020) - Issue 1 (July 2020)
Page range: 24 - 32
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2719-535X
First Published
01 Jan 2020
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Introduction

Alternating hemiplegia of childhood (AHC) is a rare neurological disease characterised by recurrent hemiplegic attacks and other paroxysmal symptoms, abolished with sleep. The incidence is estimated at 1 per 1,000,000 births (1). AHC was first described by Verret and Steele in 1971 (2). Most cases of AHC are attributed to de novo mutations in the ATP1A3 gene coding for alpha-3 catalytic subunit of the Na+/K(+)-ATPase (3,4,5).

Paroxysmal symptoms include episodes of hemiplegia, bilateral hemiplegia, quadriplegia, dystonia, tonic spells, seizures and abnormal eye movements (5,6,7,8). Also observed are respiratory difficulty, dysarthria, dysphagia, facial dyskinesia or athetosis, as well as autonomic disturbances such as bradycardia, stridor, bronchospasm, changes in skin color, excessive constriction or dilation of the pupils, vomiting, diarrhoea, sweating, hyperthermia, hypothermia or excessive salivation (5,6,7,8,9,10,11). The hemiplegic episodes vary in frequency and duration (6). The clinical status of AHC sufferers varies during and between attacks (5). Intellectual and motor development is impaired in most patients with AHC (10,12). Tone abnormalities, choreoathetosis, ataxia and motor clumsiness are observed (8). Fine motor skills, cognitive development and behaviour are also affected (5).

Aim of the Study

The aim of the study was to assess gross motor function between attacks in a group of Polish patients with diagnosed AHC and to describe the disease-specific motor deficits between attacks. The results of the study may allow the design of a dedicated physiotherapy programme for patients with AHC.

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted from November 2014 until the end of May 2015. Contact with the patients was facilitated by the Polish Association for Persons with AHC (AHC-PL), which is a nongovernmental, not-for-profit and support organisation promoting the interests of and acting on behalf of patients with AHC.

The subjects were included in the study when AHC was diagnosed by a neurologist or geneticist based on the Aicardi criteria (13). To qualify for a detailed assessment of gross motor capabilities, the subject had to be >2 years of age. The exclusion criteria included a hemiplegic attack during the study or feeling unwell, which made administration of the tests impossible.

A control group was established for comparison with gross motor function assessments in AHC patients. For each study subject, three age (+ 6 months)- and gender-matched controls were randomly selected, i.e. a total of 30 controls. The exclusion criteria for controls included the following: participation in competitive sports; post-injury status or surgical operation within the past 12 months; or feeling unwell, which made completing the study impossible.

The parents of the children and the adults participating in the study were informed about its aims, and they signed the consent to participate in the study and publish data form. The study was approved by the Senate Research Ethics Committee at the Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Poland (SKE 01–07/2015).

Fourteen patients with AHC, aged 1.2–30.1 years, and/or their carers expressed their wish to participate in the study. All of the subjects were members of the Polish Association for persons with AHC (AHC-PL). Two children below 2 years of age were not included in the detailed assessment of gross motor function because of their young age, and two patients were excluded from the study due to an ongoing hemiplegic attack. Ultimately, the study was completed by 10 subjects (four females and six males) >2 years of age. Mutations of ATP1A3 were identified in seven subjects. The information on age, height and weight of the study patients, as well as that of the age- and gender-matched controls, is presented in Table 1.

Characteristics of the study (AHC) and control groups

Study group (AHC)Control group

No.GenderHeight (cm)Weight (kg)Age (years)Mutation of ATP1A3No.GenderMean height (cm)Mean weight (kg)Mean age (years)
1F8311.52.5+1.1; 1.2; 1.3F89.813.62.5
2M104143.5+2.1; 2.2; 2.3M100.3153.5
3M104193.5 3.1; 3.2; 3.3M103193.5
4F124236.2+4.1; 4.2; 4.3F121.3226.6
5F128229.1 5.1; 5.2. 5.3F141318.9
6M132269.1+6.1;6.2; 6.3M142.7379.2
7M1646012.8 7.1; 7.2;7.3M159.75312.9
8M1885020.3+8.1; 8.2; 8.3M1817420.5
9F1545224.3+9.1; 9.2; 9.3F16962.324.3
10M1847030.1+10.1;10.2;10.3M182.582.530.3

The study consisted of two parts. The subjects with diagnosed AHC and/or their carers first completed a questionnaire providing personal details and history of the disease, and next, the gross motor function was assessed.

AHC patients and/or their carers reported typical signs, such as plegic attacks, tonic/dystonic attacks, nystagmus, deviation of the eyes, episodic respiratory difficulties and episodic autonomic disturbances. The plegic attacks occurred from a few to 20–30 times a month and lasted from a few minutes to several days. A detailed list of signs and symptoms, frequency and duration of the attacks in individual study subjects is presented in Table 2.

Characteristics of the study (AHC) group – signs

No.Unilateral AttacksBilateral attacksSignsFrequency (number of attacks per month)Average duration of episodeMedicines
1++Plegic attacksTonic/dystonic attacksNystagmusDeviation of the eyesEpisodic respiratory difficultiesEpisodic autonomic disturbances1–230 min–2 hYes
2++Plegic attacksTonic/dystonic attacksNystagmusDeviation of the eyesEpisodic respiratory difficultiesEpisodic autonomic disturbances4–87 days–several daysNo
3++Plegic attacksTonic/dystonic attacksAtaxiaA fewA few minutes to few hoursYes
4++Plegic attacksTonic/dystonic attacksNystagmusDeviation of the eyes1–30A few minutes to 12 hNo
5+ Tonic/dystonic attacksNystagmusEpisodic autonomic disturbances5–3030 s–1 minYes
6++Plegic attacksTonic/dystonic attacksDeviation of the eyesEpisodic respiratory difficulties10A few hours–2 daysYes
7++Plegic attacksTonic/dystonic attacksNystagmus1–20A few minutes to a few hoursYes
8++Plegic attacksTonic/dystonic attacksDeviation of the eyesEpisodic respiratory difficultiesEpisodic autonomic disturbancesOne to a fewA few hours to a few daysNo
9++Plegic attacksTonic/dystonic attacksNystagmusEpisodic respiratory difficultiesPlegic attacks17–20A few minutes to a few daysNo
10++Tonic/dystonic attacksDeviation of the eyesEpisodic respiratory difficultiesFew – 20Several minutes to a few hoursYes

Gross motor function was assessed using the Gross Motor Function AHC (GMF AHC) scale proposed by the authors, comprising 41 motor tasks ranked by order of appearance of motor skills in human motor development (Table S1). The GMF AHC scale was based on various published motor function scales, mainly on the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale – Expanded (HFMSE) and the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM), and it included other motor tasks proposed by the authors of the study and which were selected after appropriate pilot studies. The GMF AHC scale used 23 items from the HFMSE and 2 items from the GMFM. Because of the differences in age and motor function status among the patients, after an initial assessment of some of them, 16 new motor tasks were added.

The HFMS was originally developed to assess function in non-ambulant children with spinal muscular atrophy. The scale was later modified, extended (HFMSE) and validated (14,15,16). Authors used the following sub-tests from HFMSE: 1. Lifts head from supine position; 2. Moves from lying to sitting position; 3. Duration of sitting; 4. Duration of long sitting; 5. Places right hand on head while sitting, hand touching the head above the level of ears; 6. Places left hand on head while sitting, hand touching the head above the level of ears; 7. Places two hands on head while sitting, hands touching the head above the level of ears; 8. Moves from sitting to lying position; 9. Moves from supine position to lying on side; 10. Rolls over from supine position to prone position on the right; 11. Rolls over from prone position to supine position on the right; 12. Rolls over from supine position to prone position on the left; 13. Rolls over from prone position to supine position on the left; 14. Lifts head from the prone position; 15. Props on forearms; 16. Props on extended arms; 17. Performs four-point kneeling; 18. Performs crawling; 20. Executes supported standing; 21. Stands unsupported; 22. Squats; 33. Ascends stairs without rail; 34. Descends stairs without rail.

The GMFM was originally designed to assess gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy (17). It has also been used and validated in children with other diseases associated with significant motor impairment (18,19,20). The authors used the following sub-tests from GMFM: 24. Walks forward; 28. Runs.

The new motor tasks added by the authors were as follows: 19. Gets to standing position from a supine position; 23. Gets off a chair without using arms; 25. Stands on toes; 26. Walks on toes; 27. Walks on heels; 29. Hops on both legs; 30. Hops on right foot; 31. Hops on left foot; 32. Hops on alternate legs; 35. Catches a ball with both hands, stands – ball 25 cm, five attempts; 36. Throws a tennis ball – dominant hand, stands, five attempts; 37. Kicks ball – dominant leg, stands, ball 20 cm, 3 m, five attempts; 38. Stands on right leg with eyes open, hands crossed on chest; 39. Stands on left leg with eyes open, hands crossed on chest; 40. Stands on right leg with eyes closed, hands crossed on chest; 41. Stands on left leg with eyes closed, hands crossed on chest.

The validation of the GMF AHC prior to the study was impossible to perform due to the extremely small number of patients. The patients and controls were tested by four qualified physiotherapists. The tests were carried out on patients in the lying, sitting and standing positions. Tasks 1–37 could score 0, 1 or 2 points (0= task not performed; 1= task partially performed; 2= task normally performed), while in tasks 38–41, the time it took the subject to perform the task was measured. Tasks 38–41 had to be performed in triplicate up to 15 seconds in duration, and the best result was recorded. Instructions for each motor task were given to the subject verbally, followed by a demonstration by the investigator.

The results for the study subjects were analysed using the SPSS software. The results achieved in each of the 41 tasks by the study subjects were compared to the results for controls using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U-test. In tasks 38–41, the mean times were compared between the study subjects and controls. The results were considered statistically significant at p<0.05.

Results

Tests for gross motor function in subjects aged 2–30 years found statistically significant differences between the study group and controls in 22 tasks (Table 3). The study subjects achieved significantly worse results in the following sub-tests: 19. Gets to standing from a supine position; 21. Stands unsupported; 22. Squats; 23. Gets off a chair without using arms; 24. Walks forward; 25. Stands on toes; 26. Walks on toes; 27. Walks on heels; 28. Runs; 29. Hops on both legs; 30. Hops on right leg; 31. Hops on left leg; 32. Hops on alternate legs; 33. Ascends stairs without rail; 34. Descends stairs without rail; 35. Catches a ball with both hands; 36. Throws a tennis ball; 37. Kicks ball – dominant leg; 38. Stands on right leg with eyes open; 39. Stands on left leg with eyes open; 40. Stands on right leg with eyes closed; 41. Stands on left leg with eyes closed.

Gross Motor Function AHC scale – differences between study (AHC) and control groups

ItemGross Motor Function AHC Study (AHC) groupGross Motor Function AHC Control groupp

Mean ± SDSEMean ± SDSE
1. Lifts head from supine position1.90 ± 0.320.101.93 ± 0.250.050.73
2. Lying to sitting position1.90 ± 0.320.102.00 ± 0.000.000.08
3. Sitting position2.00 ± 0.000.002.00 ± 0.000.001.00
4. Long sitting position2.00 ± 0.000.002.00 ± 0.000.001.00
5. Right hand to head in sitting position1.90 ± 0.320.102.00 ± 0.000.000.08
6. Left hand to head in sitting position1.90 ± 0.320.102.00 ± 0.000.000.08
7. Two hands to head in sitting position1.90 ± 0.320.102.00 ± 0.000.000.08
8. Sitting to lying position2.00 ± 0.000.002.00 ± 0.000.001.00
9. Supine position to lying on side2.00 ± 0.000.002.00 ± 0.000.001.00
10. Rolls from supine position to prone position over right1.90 ± 0.320.102.00 ± 0.000.000.08
11. Rolls from prone position to supine position over right1.90 ± 0.320.102.00 ± 0.000.000.08
12. Rolls from supine position to prone position over left1.90 ± 0.320.102.00 ± 0.000.000.08
13. Rolls from prone position to supine position over left1.90 ± 0.320.102.00 ± 0.000.000.08
14. Lifts head from prone position2.00 ± 0.000.002.00 ± 0.000.001.00
15. Props on forearms2.00 ± 0.000.002.00 ± 0.000.001.00
16. Props on extended arms2.00 ± 0.000.002.00 ± 0.000.001.00
17. Achieves four-point kneeling1.90 ± 0.320.102.00 ± 0.000.000.08
18. Crawls2.00 ± 0.000.002.00 ± 0.000.001.00
19. Gets to standing from a supine position1.60 ± 0.840.272.00 ± 0.000.000.01*
20. Executes supported standing1.80 ± 0.630.202.00 ± 0.000.000.08
21. Stands unsupported1.60 ± 0.840.272.00 ± 0.000.000.01*
22. Squats0.96 ± 0.610.191.79 ± 0.460.080.00*
23. Gets off a chair without using arms1.60 ± 0.840.272.00 ± 0.000.000.01*
24. Walks forward1.60 ± 0.840.272.00 ± 0.000.000.01*
25. Stands on toes0.50 ± 0.530.171.90 ± 0.310.060.00*
26. Walks on toes1.18 ± 0.900.282.00 ± 0.000.000.00*
27. Walks on heels0.70 ± 0.820.262.00 ± 0.000.000.00*
28. Runs0.94 ± 0.880.281.94 ± 0.130.020.00*
29. Hops on both legs1.30 ± 0.820.262.00 ± 0.000.000.00*
30. Hops on right foot0.40 ± 0.840.271.90 ± 0.310.060.00*
31. Hops on left foot0.40 ± 0.840.271.83 ± 0.380.070.00*
32. Hops on alternate legs0.43 ± 0.560.181.56 ± 0.480.090.00*
33. Ascends stairs without rail1.25 ± 0.780.251.92 ± 0.200.040.00*
34. Descends stairs without rail1.25 ± 0.780.251.92 ± 0.200.040.00*
35. Catches a ball with both hands1.20 ± 0.790.251.93 ± 0.250.050.00*
36. Throws a tennis ball1.60 ± 0.840.272.00 ± 0.000.000.01*
37. Kicks ball – dominant leg1.60 ± 0.840.272.00 ± 0.000.000.01*
38. Stands on right leg with eyes open3.58 ± 5.011.5911.92 ± 4.590.840.00*
39. Stands on left leg with eyes open3.78 ± 5.071.6011.81 ± 4.430.810.00*
40. Stands on right leg with eyes closed2.22 ± 3.521.118.82 ± 5.971.090.00*
41. Stands on left leg with eyes closed1.93 ± 2.480.799.03 ± 6.031.100.00*

SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error.

p calculated using the Mann–Whitney U–test;

p<0.05.

Discussion

Studies of AHC are relatively recent and, to date, cases of patients from a number of countries have been reported (10, 12, 21,22,23,24,25,26). The aim of the present study was to provide detailed characteristics of gross motor dysfunction in AHC patients. To the best of our knowledge, to date, no other such study has been performed.

There are no available tools to assess gross motor function in AHC or to compare gross motor function in subjects who vary greatly in age. The motor tasks included in the Gross Motor Function AHC scale developed for the purpose of the present study allow the assessment of motor function in particular body parts and, as a result, a detailed description of the motor dysfunction in each subject. The Gross Motor Function AHC is based on items of the HFMSE and the GMFM, to which new sub-tests have been added. The advantage of the GMF AHC is its ability to assess the subject's performance in different positions, from lying prone and supine to standing, during both static and dynamic activities. However, the scoring system does not assess the quality and precision of the movements, which should be addressed in further studies.

We found gross motor impairment in AHC subjects, in agreement with the reports from other authors, who observed delayed development in most individuals with AHC (5,10).

In our study, AHC subjects achieved the worst results in the following tasks: standing and walking on toes, walking on heels, running, hopping on one leg and hopping on alternate legs. Walking abnormalities in AHC were also noted in other published studies (5). Kirshenbaum et al. (27) studied mice with mutations in the gene responsible for AHC. The animals had less-stable gait, walked with shorter steps and had poorer postural stability than wild-type mice (27).

In the present study, two subjects aged 2.5 and 3.5 years were not able to walk independently.

The results of the present study mostly indicate impaired control of the muscles producing plantar and dorsal flexion of the foot, stabilising muscles of the foot, as well as muscles straightening the knee and hip joints, which are active during hopping, walking and running. Additionally, the test results suggest impaired coordination and fluidity of movement, with a narrow base of support. Tests performed in a lying position did not reveal any dysfunction of trunk muscles. However, significantly impaired function of the upper limbs was observed during catching and throwing. Such a pattern of muscle function abnormalities is consistent with disturbances in consecutive phases of development and indicates generally delayed development. Interestingly, inability to perform alternate movements of the trunk and extremities was observed in all study patients. Our findings allow the development of AHC-specific physiotherapy management. They cannot be compared to other studies because, to our knowledge, there have been no published studies of this kind. It would be worthwhile to conduct similar studies involving a larger group of patients from different countries.

Undoubtedly, the limitation of this research is the large discrepancy in age of the study subjects. Taking it into consideration, the authors randomly selected three age- and gender-matched controls for each AHC subject. This method of qualification was intended to reduce the effect of age on the results.

The results of our research expand our knowledge about major motor disorders in AHC patients. It can be assumed that a dedicated physiotherapy management might improve the condition of AHC patients, but this requires confirmation in further studies.

Conclusion

Gross motor impairment is observed in patients with AHC between attacks. The present study mostly indicates impaired control of the muscles responsible for the functioning of the lower extremities. The study findings may indicate the need to introduce individualised physiotherapy management of patients with AHC, tailored to their motor development, but this requires further research.

Gross Motor Function AHC

Item No. Item Points: 0 Points: 1 Points: 2
1 Lifts head from supine position Unable Head is lifted, but through side flexion or with no neck flexion. Held for a count of 3 In supine position, head must be lifted in midline. Chin moves towards chest. Held for a count of 3
2 Lying to sitting position Unable Turns into prone position or towards floor Able to do by lying on side
3 Sitting 2 hands for support 1 hand for support, for a count of 3 No hand support, for a count of 3
4 Long sitting 2 hands for support 1 hand for support, for a count of 3 No hand support, for a count of 3
5 Right hand to head in sitting position Hand touches head above level of ears Unable Can only bring right hand to head by flexing head Able to bring right hand to head. Head and trunk remain stable
6 Left hand to head in sitting position Hand touches head above level of ears Unable Can only bring left hand to head by flexing head Able to bring right hand to head. Head and trunk remain stable
7 Two hands to head in sitting position Hands touch head above level of ears Unable Able to place hands on head but only using head flexion or side tilt Able to place both hands on head, arms free from side. Head and trunk remain stable
8 Sitting to lying position Unable or falls over Able to lie down by flopping forwards and rolling sideways Able to lie down in a controlled fashion through lying on side or using clothes
9 Supine position to side-lying position Unable Can ½ roll only one way: either right or left Able to ½ roll from supine position both ways
10 Rolls from supine position to prone position over right Unable Turns to prone position by pulling/pushing on arms Turns to prone position with free arms to the right
11 Rolls from prone position to supine position over right Unable Turns to supine position using arms to push/pull with Turns to supine position with free arms to the right
12 Rolls from supine position to prone position over left Unable Turns to prone position by pulling/pushing on arms Turns to prone position with free arms to the left
13 Rolls from prone position to supine position over left Unable Turns to supine position using arms to push/pull with Turns to supine position with free arms to the left
14 Lifts head from prone position Unable Lifts head with arms in a forward position for a count of 3 Able to lift head up in prone position, arms by side for a count of 3
15 Props on forearms Unable Holds position when placed for a count of 3 Able to achieve prop on elbows with head up for a count of 3
16 Props on extended arms Unable Holds position when placed Achieves hands support in prone position
17 Four-point kneeling Unable Holds position when placed for a count of 3 Achieves four-point kneeling – head up for a count of 3
18 Crawling Unable Moves all four points only once Able to crawl forwards – moves all four points twice or more
19 Gets to standing position from a supine position§ Unable Uses furniture Achieves standing without furniture
20 Supported standing Can stand with hand support but needs knee/hip support in addition for a count of 3, unable Able to stand with minimal trunk support (not hip) for a count of 3 Can stand using one hand support for a count of 3
21 Stands unsupported Stands only momentarily, unable Stands independently for a count of 3 Can stand independently for more than a count of 3
22 Squats Unable Initiates squat (>10%), uses arm support, or static <3 seconds Squats with arms free (at least 90° of hip and knee flexion), static > 3 seconds
23 Gets off a chair without using arms§ Unable Uses arms Gets off independently without using arms
24 Walks forward Unable Walks <10 steps Walks >10 steps
25 Stands on toes§ Unable Stands <5 seconds Stands >5 seconds
26 Walks on toes§ Unable Walks with assistance, <3 m Walks independently, >3 m
27 Walks on heels§ Unable Walks with assistance, <3 m Walks independently, >3 m
28 Runs Unable Runs <4.5 m Runs >4.5 m, stops and returns
29 Hops on both legs§ Unable <5 consecutive hops >5 consecutive hops
30 Hops on right foot§ Unable <5 consecutive hops >5 consecutive hops
31 Hops on left foot§ Unable <5 consecutive hops >5 consecutive hops
32 Hops on alternate legs§ Unable Does not hop on alternate legs and arms, <10 consecutive hops Hops on alternate legs and arms, >10 consecutive hops
33 Ascends stairs without rail Unable Ascends <4 stairs, arms free, any pattern or with arm support Ascends 4 stairs, arms free, alternating feet
34 Descends stairs without rail Unable Descends <4 stairs, arms free, any pattern or with arm support Descends 4 stairs, arms free, alternating feet
35 Catches a ball with both hands, stands, ball 25 cm, 5 attempts§ Unable Catches a ball with both hands, throws to a distance >1.5 m Catches a ball with both hands >4 times
36 Throws a tennis ball, stands, dominant hand, 5 attempts§ Unable Throws distance <1.5 m or throws to a distance >1.5 m < 4 times Throws to a distance > 1.5 m, 4 or 5 times
37 Kicks ball – dominant leg, stands, ball 20 cm, 3 m, 5 attempts § Unable Kicks 3 m< 4 times Kicks 3 m> 4 times
38 Stands on right leg with eyes open, hands crossed on chest § Timer
39 Stands on left leg with eyes open, hands crossed on chest § Timer
40 Stands on right leg with eyes closed, hands crossed on chest § Timer
41 Stands on left leg with eyes closed, hands crossed on chest § Timer

Characteristics of the study (AHC) group – signs

No. Unilateral Attacks Bilateral attacks Signs Frequency (number of attacks per month) Average duration of episode Medicines
1 + + Plegic attacksTonic/dystonic attacksNystagmusDeviation of the eyesEpisodic respiratory difficultiesEpisodic autonomic disturbances 1–2 30 min–2 h Yes
2 + + Plegic attacksTonic/dystonic attacksNystagmusDeviation of the eyesEpisodic respiratory difficultiesEpisodic autonomic disturbances 4–8 7 days–several days No
3 + + Plegic attacksTonic/dystonic attacksAtaxia A few A few minutes to few hours Yes
4 + + Plegic attacksTonic/dystonic attacksNystagmusDeviation of the eyes 1–30 A few minutes to 12 h No
5 + Tonic/dystonic attacksNystagmusEpisodic autonomic disturbances 5–30 30 s–1 min Yes
6 + + Plegic attacksTonic/dystonic attacksDeviation of the eyesEpisodic respiratory difficulties 10 A few hours–2 days Yes
7 + + Plegic attacksTonic/dystonic attacksNystagmus 1–20 A few minutes to a few hours Yes
8 + + Plegic attacksTonic/dystonic attacksDeviation of the eyesEpisodic respiratory difficultiesEpisodic autonomic disturbances One to a few A few hours to a few days No
9 + + Plegic attacksTonic/dystonic attacksNystagmusEpisodic respiratory difficultiesPlegic attacks 17–20 A few minutes to a few days No
10 + + Tonic/dystonic attacksDeviation of the eyesEpisodic respiratory difficulties Few – 20 Several minutes to a few hours Yes

Characteristics of the study (AHC) and control groups

Study group (AHC) Control group

No. Gender Height (cm) Weight (kg) Age (years) Mutation of ATP1A3 No. Gender Mean height (cm) Mean weight (kg) Mean age (years)
1 F 83 11.5 2.5 + 1.1; 1.2; 1.3 F 89.8 13.6 2.5
2 M 104 14 3.5 + 2.1; 2.2; 2.3 M 100.3 15 3.5
3 M 104 19 3.5 3.1; 3.2; 3.3 M 103 19 3.5
4 F 124 23 6.2 + 4.1; 4.2; 4.3 F 121.3 22 6.6
5 F 128 22 9.1 5.1; 5.2. 5.3 F 141 31 8.9
6 M 132 26 9.1 + 6.1;6.2; 6.3 M 142.7 37 9.2
7 M 164 60 12.8 7.1; 7.2;7.3 M 159.7 53 12.9
8 M 188 50 20.3 + 8.1; 8.2; 8.3 M 181 74 20.5
9 F 154 52 24.3 + 9.1; 9.2; 9.3 F 169 62.3 24.3
10 M 184 70 30.1 + 10.1;10.2;10.3 M 182.5 82.5 30.3

Gross Motor Function AHC scale – differences between study (AHC) and control groups

Item Gross Motor Function AHC Study (AHC) group Gross Motor Function AHC Control group p

Mean ± SD SE Mean ± SD SE
1. Lifts head from supine position 1.90 ± 0.32 0.10 1.93 ± 0.25 0.05 0.73
2. Lying to sitting position 1.90 ± 0.32 0.10 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 0.08
3. Sitting position 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 1.00
4. Long sitting position 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 1.00
5. Right hand to head in sitting position 1.90 ± 0.32 0.10 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 0.08
6. Left hand to head in sitting position 1.90 ± 0.32 0.10 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 0.08
7. Two hands to head in sitting position 1.90 ± 0.32 0.10 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 0.08
8. Sitting to lying position 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 1.00
9. Supine position to lying on side 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 1.00
10. Rolls from supine position to prone position over right 1.90 ± 0.32 0.10 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 0.08
11. Rolls from prone position to supine position over right 1.90 ± 0.32 0.10 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 0.08
12. Rolls from supine position to prone position over left 1.90 ± 0.32 0.10 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 0.08
13. Rolls from prone position to supine position over left 1.90 ± 0.32 0.10 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 0.08
14. Lifts head from prone position 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 1.00
15. Props on forearms 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 1.00
16. Props on extended arms 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 1.00
17. Achieves four-point kneeling 1.90 ± 0.32 0.10 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 0.08
18. Crawls 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 1.00
19. Gets to standing from a supine position 1.60 ± 0.84 0.27 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 0.01*
20. Executes supported standing 1.80 ± 0.63 0.20 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 0.08
21. Stands unsupported 1.60 ± 0.84 0.27 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 0.01*
22. Squats 0.96 ± 0.61 0.19 1.79 ± 0.46 0.08 0.00*
23. Gets off a chair without using arms 1.60 ± 0.84 0.27 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 0.01*
24. Walks forward 1.60 ± 0.84 0.27 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 0.01*
25. Stands on toes 0.50 ± 0.53 0.17 1.90 ± 0.31 0.06 0.00*
26. Walks on toes 1.18 ± 0.90 0.28 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 0.00*
27. Walks on heels 0.70 ± 0.82 0.26 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 0.00*
28. Runs 0.94 ± 0.88 0.28 1.94 ± 0.13 0.02 0.00*
29. Hops on both legs 1.30 ± 0.82 0.26 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 0.00*
30. Hops on right foot 0.40 ± 0.84 0.27 1.90 ± 0.31 0.06 0.00*
31. Hops on left foot 0.40 ± 0.84 0.27 1.83 ± 0.38 0.07 0.00*
32. Hops on alternate legs 0.43 ± 0.56 0.18 1.56 ± 0.48 0.09 0.00*
33. Ascends stairs without rail 1.25 ± 0.78 0.25 1.92 ± 0.20 0.04 0.00*
34. Descends stairs without rail 1.25 ± 0.78 0.25 1.92 ± 0.20 0.04 0.00*
35. Catches a ball with both hands 1.20 ± 0.79 0.25 1.93 ± 0.25 0.05 0.00*
36. Throws a tennis ball 1.60 ± 0.84 0.27 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 0.01*
37. Kicks ball – dominant leg 1.60 ± 0.84 0.27 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 0.01*
38. Stands on right leg with eyes open 3.58 ± 5.01 1.59 11.92 ± 4.59 0.84 0.00*
39. Stands on left leg with eyes open 3.78 ± 5.07 1.60 11.81 ± 4.43 0.81 0.00*
40. Stands on right leg with eyes closed 2.22 ± 3.52 1.11 8.82 ± 5.97 1.09 0.00*
41. Stands on left leg with eyes closed 1.93 ± 2.48 0.79 9.03 ± 6.03 1.10 0.00*

Neville BG, Ninan M. The treatment and management of alternating hemiplegia of childhood. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(10):777–80. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00777.x. NevilleBG NinanM The treatment and management of alternating hemiplegia of childhood Dev Med Child Neurol 2007 49 10 777 80 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00777.x Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Verret S, Steele JC. Alternating hemiplegia in childhood: a report of eight patients with complicated migraine beginning in infancy. Pediatrics. 1971;47(4):675–80. VerretS SteeleJC Alternating hemiplegia in childhood: a report of eight patients with complicated migraine beginning in infancy Pediatrics 1971 47 4 675 80 10.1542/peds.47.4.675 Search in Google Scholar

Rosewich H, Thiele H, Ohlenbusch A, Maschke U, Altmüller J, Frommolt P, et al. Heterozygous de-novo mutations in ATP1A3 in patients with alternating hemiplegia of childhood: a whole-exome sequencing gene-identification study. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(9):764–73. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70182-5. RosewichH ThieleH OhlenbuschA MaschkeU AltmüllerJ FrommoltP Heterozygous de-novo mutations in ATP1A3 in patients with alternating hemiplegia of childhood: a whole-exome sequencing gene-identification study Lancet Neurol 2012 11 9 764 73 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70182-5 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Heinzen EL, Swoboda KJ, Hitomi Y, Gurrieri F, Nicole S, de Vries B, et al. De novo mutations in ATP1A3 cause alternating hemiplegia of childhood. Nat Genet. 2012;44(9):1030–4. doi:10.1038/ng.2358. HeinzenEL SwobodaKJ HitomiY GurrieriF NicoleS de VriesB De novo mutations in ATP1A3 cause alternating hemiplegia of childhood Nat Genet 2012 44 9 1030 4 10.1038/ng.2358 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mikati MA, Kramer U, Zupanc ML, Shanahan RJ. Alternating hemiplegia of childhood: clinical manifestations and long-term outcome. Pediatr Neurol. 2000;23(2):134–141. doi:10.1016/s0887-8994(00)00157-0. MikatiMA KramerU ZupancML ShanahanRJ Alternating hemiplegia of childhood: clinical manifestations and long-term outcome Pediatr Neurol 2000 23 2 134 141 10.1016/s0887-8994(00)00157-0 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Sweney MT, Silver K, Gerard-Blanluet M, Pedespan JM, Renault F, Arzimanoglou A, et al. Alternating hemiplegia of childhood: early characteristics and evolution of a neurodevelopmental syndrome. Pediatrics. 2009;123(3):e534–41. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-2027. SweneyMT SilverK Gerard-BlanluetM PedespanJM RenaultF ArzimanoglouA Alternating hemiplegia of childhood: early characteristics and evolution of a neurodevelopmental syndrome Pediatrics 2009 123 3 e534 41 10.1542/peds.2008-2027 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Samanta D. Management of alternating hemiplegia of childhood: a review. Pediatr Neurol. 2019 Nov 1;S0887–8994(19)30900-2. doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2019.10.003. [Epub ahead of print]. SamantaD Management of alternating hemiplegia of childhood: a review Pediatr Neurol 2019 Nov 1 S0887 8994 (19)30900-2 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2019.10.003 [Epub ahead of print] Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Heinzen EL, Arzimanoglou A, Brashear A, Clapcote SJ, Gurrieri F, Goldstein DB, et al. Distinct neurological disorders with ATP1A3 mutations. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(5):503–14. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70011-0. HeinzenEL ArzimanoglouA BrashearA ClapcoteSJ GurrieriF GoldsteinDB Distinct neurological disorders with ATP1A3 mutations Lancet Neurol 2014 13 5 503 14 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70011-0 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fons C, Campistol J, Panagiotakaki E, Giannotta M, Arzimanoglou A, Gobbi G, et al. Alternating hemiplegia of childhood: metabolic studies in the largest European series of patients. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2012;16(1):10–14. doi:10.1016/j.ejpn.2011.08.006. FonsC CampistolJ PanagiotakakiE GiannottaM ArzimanoglouA GobbiG Alternating hemiplegia of childhood: metabolic studies in the largest European series of patients Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2012 16 1 10 14 10.1016/j.ejpn.2011.08.006 21945173 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Panagiotakaki E, Gobbi G, Neville B, Ebinger F, Campistol J, Nevsímalová S, et al. Evidence of a non-progressive course of alternating hemiplegia of childhood: study of a large cohort of children and adults. Brain. 2010;133(Pt 12):3598–610. doi:10.1093/brain/awq295. PanagiotakakiE GobbiG NevilleB EbingerF CampistolJ NevsímalováS Evidence of a non-progressive course of alternating hemiplegia of childhood: study of a large cohort of children and adults Brain 2010 133 Pt 12 3598 610 10.1093/brain/awq295 20974617 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gergont A, Kaciński M. Alternating hemiplegia of childhood: new diagnostic options. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2014;48(2):130–5. doi:10.1016/j.pjnns.2013.05.003. GergontA KacińskiM Alternating hemiplegia of childhood: new diagnostic options Neurol Neurochir Pol 2014 48 2 130 5 10.1016/j.pjnns.2013.05.003 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Vila-Pueyo M, Pons R, Raspall-Chaure M, Marcé-Grau A, Carreño O, Sintas C, et al. Clinical and genetic analysis in alternating hemiplegia of childhood: ten new patients from Southern Europe. J Neurol Sci. 2014;344(1–2):37–42. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2014.06.014. Vila-PueyoM PonsR Raspall-ChaureM Marcé-GrauA CarreñoO SintasC Clinical and genetic analysis in alternating hemiplegia of childhood: ten new patients from Southern Europe J Neurol Sci 2014 344 1–2 37 42 10.1016/j.jns.2014.06.014 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bourgeois M, Aicardi J, Goutières F. Alternating hemiplegia of childhood. J Pediatr. 1993;122(5 Pt 1):673–679. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(06)80003-x. BourgeoisM AicardiJ GoutièresF Alternating hemiplegia of childhood J Pediatr 1993 122 5 Pt 1 673 679 10.1016/s0022-3476(06)80003-x Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

O’Hagen JM, Glanzman AM, McDermott MP, Ryan PA, Flickinger J, Quigley J, et al. An expanded version of the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale for SMA II and III patients. Neuromuscul Disord. 2007;17(9–10):693–697. doi:10.1016/j.nmd.2007.05.009. O’HagenJM GlanzmanAM McDermottMP RyanPA FlickingerJ QuigleyJ An expanded version of the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale for SMA II and III patients Neuromuscul Disord 2007 17 9–10 693 697 10.1016/j.nmd.2007.05.009 17658255 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Glanzman AM, O’Hagen JM, McDermott MP, Martens WB, Flickinger J, Riley S, et al. Validation of the Expanded Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale in spinal muscular atrophy type II and III. J Child Neurol. 2011;26(12):1499–507. doi:10.1177/0883073811420294. GlanzmanAM O’HagenJM McDermottMP MartensWB FlickingerJ RileyS Validation of the Expanded Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale in spinal muscular atrophy type II and III J Child Neurol 2011 26 12 1499 507 10.1177/0883073811420294 21940700 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Krosschell KJ, Scott CB, Maczulski JA, Lewelt AJ, Reyna SP, Swoboda KJ, et al. Reliability of the Modified Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale in young children with spinal muscular atrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2011;44(2):246–51. doi:10.1002/mus.22040. KrosschellKJ ScottCB MaczulskiJA LeweltAJ ReynaSP SwobodaKJ Reliability of the Modified Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale in young children with spinal muscular atrophy Muscle Nerve 2011 44 2 246 51 10.1002/mus.22040 313658721698647 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rosenbaum PL, Walter SD, Hanna SE, Palisano RJ, Russell DJ, Raina P, et al. Prognosis for gross motor function in cerebral palsy: creation of motor development curves. JAMA. 2002;288(11):1357–63. doi:10.1001/jama.288.11.1357. RosenbaumPL WalterSD HannaSE PalisanoRJ RussellDJ RainaP Prognosis for gross motor function in cerebral palsy: creation of motor development curves JAMA 2002 288 11 1357 63 10.1001/jama.288.11.1357 12234229 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gémus M, Palisano R, Russell D, Rosenbaum P, Walter SD, Galuppi B, et al. Using the gross motor function measure to evaluate motor development in children with Down syndrome. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2001;21(2–3):69–79. doi:10.1080/J006v21n02_06. GémusM PalisanoR RussellD RosenbaumP WalterSD GaluppiB Using the gross motor function measure to evaluate motor development in children with Down syndrome Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2001 21 2–3 69 79 10.1080/J006v21n02_06 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Nelson L, Owens H, Hynan LS, Iannaccone ST; AmSMART Group. The gross motor function measure™ is a valid and sensitive outcome measure for spinal muscular atrophy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2006;16(6):374–80. doi:10.1016/j.nmd.2006.03.005. NelsonL OwensH HynanLS IannacconeST AmSMART Group The gross motor function measure™ is a valid and sensitive outcome measure for spinal muscular atrophy Neuromuscul Disord 2006 16 6 374 80 10.1016/j.nmd.2006.03.005 16632361 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Linder-Lucht M, Othmer V, Walther M, Vry J, Michaelis U, Stein S, et al. Validation of the gross motor function measure for use in children and adolescents with traumatic brain injuries. Pediatrics. 2007;120(4):e880–6. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-2258. Linder-LuchtM OthmerV WaltherM VryJ MichaelisU SteinS Validation of the gross motor function measure for use in children and adolescents with traumatic brain injuries Pediatrics 2007 120 4 e880 6 10.1542/peds.2006-2258 17908744 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Chi LY, Zhao XH, Liu XW, Jiang WJ, Chi ZF, Wang SJ. Alternating hemiplegia of childhood in Chinese following long-term treatment with flunarizine or topiramate. Int J Neurosci. 2012;122(9):506–10. doi:10.3109/00207454.2012.683216. ChiLY ZhaoXH LiuXW JiangWJ ChiZF WangSJ Alternating hemiplegia of childhood in Chinese following long-term treatment with flunarizine or topiramate Int J Neurosci 2012 122 9 506 10 10.3109/00207454.2012.683216 22494152 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Yang X, Gao H, Zhang J, Xu X, Liu X, Wu X, et al. ATP1A3 mutations and genotype-phenotype correlation of alternating hemiplegia of childhood in Chinese patients. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e97274. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0097274. YangX GaoH ZhangJ XuX LiuX WuX ATP1A3 mutations and genotype-phenotype correlation of alternating hemiplegia of childhood in Chinese patients PLoS One 2014 9 5 e97274 10.1371/journal.pone.0097274 402657624842602 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ishii A, Saito Y, Mitsui J, Ishiura H, Yoshimura J, Arai H, et al. Identification of ATP1A3 mutations by exome sequencing as the cause of alternating hemiplegia of childhood in Japanese patients. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56120. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056120. IshiiA SaitoY MitsuiJ IshiuraH YoshimuraJ AraiH Identification of ATP1A3 mutations by exome sequencing as the cause of alternating hemiplegia of childhood in Japanese patients PLoS One 2013 8 2 e56120 10.1371/journal.pone.0056120 356803123409136 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Tatlı B, Aydınlı N, Calışkan M, Ozmen M, Kara B, Yaramış A, et al. Clinical features of nine patients with alternating hemiplegia of childhood. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011;47(10):734–6. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02042.x. TatlıB AydınlıN CalışkanM OzmenM KaraB YaramışA Clinical features of nine patients with alternating hemiplegia of childhood J Paediatr Child Health 2011 47 10 734 6 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02042.x 21449903 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hoei-Hansen CE, Dali CÍ, Lyngbye TJ, Duno M, Uldall P. Alternating hemiplegia of childhood in Denmark: clinical manifestations and ATP1A3 mutation status. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2014;18(1):50–4. doi:10.1016/j.ejpn.2013.08.007. Hoei-HansenCE Dali LyngbyeTJ DunoM UldallP Alternating hemiplegia of childhood in Denmark: clinical manifestations and ATP1A3 mutation status Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2014 18 1 50 4 10.1016/j.ejpn.2013.08.007 24100174 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Viollet L, Glusman G, Murphy KJ, Newcomb TM, Reyna SP, Sweney M, et al. Alternating hemiplegia of childhood: retrospective genetic study and genotype-phenotype correlations in 187 subjects from the US AHCF registry. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0127045. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127045. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0137370. ViolletL GlusmanG MurphyKJ NewcombTM ReynaSP SweneyM Alternating hemiplegia of childhood: retrospective genetic study and genotype-phenotype correlations in 187 subjects from the US AHCF registry PLoS One 2015 10 5 e0127045 10.1371/journal.pone.0127045 Erratum in: PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0137370 444074225996915 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kirshenbaum GS, Dawson N, Mullins JG, Johnston TH, Drinkhill MJ, Edwards IJ, et al. Alternating hemiplegia of childhood-related neural and behavioural phenotypes in Na+,K+-ATPase α3 missense mutant mice. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e60141. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060141. KirshenbaumGS DawsonN MullinsJG JohnstonTH DrinkhillMJ EdwardsIJ Alternating hemiplegia of childhood-related neural and behavioural phenotypes in Na+,K+-ATPase α3 missense mutant mice PLoS One 2013 8 3 e60141 10.1371/journal.pone.0060141 360392223527305 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo