[Anderson, J. R. (2002). Spanning seven orders of magnitude: a challenge for cognitive modeling. Cognitive Science, 26, 85-112.10.1207/s15516709cog2601_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, J. R. (2007). How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe? Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195324259.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An Integrated Theory of the Mind. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1036-1060.10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.103615482072]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (2003). The Newell test for a theory of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 587-637.10.1017/S0140525X0300013X]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, J. R., & Schooler, L. J. (1991). Reflections of the environment in memory. Psychological Science, 2, 396-408.10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00174.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Ball, J. T., Myers, C. W., Heiberg, A., Cooke, N. J., Matessa, M., Freiman, M., et al. (under review). The Synthetic Teammate Project. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory.]Search in Google Scholar
[Byrne, M. D. (2003). Cognitive Architecture. In J. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications (pp. 97-117). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dimperio, E., Gunzelmann, G., & Harris, J. (2008). An initial evaluation of a cognitive model of UAV reconnaissance. In J. Hansberger (Ed.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation (pp. 165-173). Orlando, FL: Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ding, C., & He, X. (2004). K-means Clustering via Principal Component Analysis. Paper presented at the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning, Banff, CA.10.1145/1015330.1015408]Search in Google Scholar
[Gluck, K. A. (2010). Cognitive architectures for human factors in aviation. In E. Salas & D. Maurino (Eds.) Human Factors in Aviation, 2nd Edition (pp. 375-400). New York, NY: Elsevier.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gluck, K. A., Ball, J. T., & Krusmark, M. A. (2007). Cognitive control in a computational model of the Predator pilot. In W. D. Gray (Ed.), Integrated models of cognitive systems (pp. 13-28). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gluck, K. A., Ball, J. T., Krusmark, M. A., Rodgers, S. M., & Purtee, M. D. (2003). A computational process model of basic aircraft maneuvering. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, Universitats-Verlag, Bamberg.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gonzalez, C., Lerch, F. J., & Lebiere, C. (2003). Instance-based learning in real-time dynamic decision making. Cognitive Science, 27(4), 591-635.10.1207/s15516709cog2704_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Gray, W. D. (Ed.). (2007). Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195189193.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Gray, W. D., John, B. E., & Atwood, M. E. (1993). Project Ernestine: Validating GOMS for predicting and explaining real-world task performance. Human Computer Interaction., 8(3), 237-309.10.1207/s15327051hci0803_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Gray, W. D., Schoelles, M., & Myers, C. W. (2002). Computational cognitive models ISO ecologically optimal strategies. Paper presented at the 46th Annual Conference of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, Baltimore, MD.10.1177/154193120204600358]Search in Google Scholar
[Gunzelmann, G. F., Gross, J. B., Gluck, K. A., & Dinges, D. F. (2009). Sleep Deprivation and Sustained Attention Performance: Integrating Mathematical and Cognitive Modeling. Cognitive Science.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01032.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Herd, S.A. & O'Reilly, R.C. (2005). Serial visual search from a parallel model. Vision Research, 45, 2987-2992.10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.017]Search in Google Scholar
[Jones, R. M., Laird, J. E., Nielsen P. E., Coulter, K., Kenny, P., and Koss, F. Automated Intelligent Pilots for Combat Flight Simulation, AI Magazine, Spring 1999, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 27-42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kieras, D., & Meyer, D. E. (1997). An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 391-438.10.1207/s15327051hci1204_4]Search in Google Scholar
[Kowler, E., Anderson, E., Dosher, B., Blaser, E. (1995). The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vision Research, 35(13), 1897-1916.10.1016/0042-6989(94)00279-U]Search in Google Scholar
[Laird, J. E. (2008). Extending the Soar cognitive architecture. Paper presented at the 1st Artificial General Intelligence Conference, Memphis, TN.]Search in Google Scholar
[Laird, J. E., Wray, R. E., Marinier, R. P., & Langley, P. (2009). Claims and challenges in evaluating human-level intelligent systems. Paper presented at the 2nd Artificial General Intelligence Conference, Arlington, VA.10.2991/agi.2009.17]Search in Google Scholar
[Levenshtein, V. I. (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10, 707-710.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lovett, M. C. (1998). Choice. In J. R. Anderson & C. Lebiere (Eds.) The atomic components of thought, 255-296. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin, E., Lyon, D. R., & Schreiber, B. T. (1998). Designing synthetic tasks for human factors research: An application to uninhabited air vehicles. Paper presented at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.10.1177/154193129804200128]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive control processes and human multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of Psychological Refractory-Period Phenomena. Psychological Review, 104, 749-791.10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.749]Search in Google Scholar
[Myers, C. W., & Gray, W. D. (2010). Visual scan adaptation during repeated visual search. Journal of Vision, 10(8): 4, 1-14; doi:10.1167/10.8.]Search in Google Scholar
[Myers, C. W., & Schoelles, M. (2005). ProtoMatch: A tool for analyzing high-density, sequential eye gaze and cursor protocols. Behavior Research Methods, 37(2), 256-270.10.3758/BF03192693]Search in Google Scholar
[Newell, A. (1973). You can't play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers of this symposium. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 283-308). New York: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Newell, A. (1980). Physical symbol system. Cognitive Science, 4, 135-183.10.1207/s15516709cog0402_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Newell, A. (1990). Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Newell, A., & Simon, H.A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Salvucci, D. D. (2006). Modeling driver behavior in a cognitive architecture. Human Factors, 48, 362-380.10.1518/00187200677772441716884055]Search in Google Scholar
[Salvucci, D. D., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Automated Eye-Movement Protocol Analysis., Human-Computer Interaction (Vol. 16, pp. 39-86): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schoelles, M. J., Neth, H., Myers, C. W., & Gray, W. D. (2006). Steps toward integrated models of cognitive systems: A level-of-analysis approach to comparing human performance to model predictions in a complex task environment. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, BC, CA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schreiber, B. T., Lyon, D. R., Martin, E., & Confer, H. A. (2002). Impact of prior flight experience on learning Predator UAV operator skills Mesa, AZ: Air Force Research Laboratory, Warfighter Training Research Divisiono. Document Number)10.1037/e592542010-001]Search in Google Scholar
[Schunn, C. D., & Wallach, D. (2005). Evaluating goodness-of-fit in comparison of models to data. In W. Tack (Ed.), Psychologie der Kognition: Reden and Vortrage anlasslich der Emeritierung von Werner Tack (pp. 115-154). Saarbrueken, Germany: University of Saaarland Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Simon, H. A. (1999). The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sun, R. (2004). Desiderata for cognitive architectures. Philosophical Psychology, 17(3), 341-373.10.1080/0951508042000286721]Search in Google Scholar
[Taatgen, N. A., & Lee, F. J. (2003). Production compilation: A simple mechanism to model complex skill acquisition. Human Factors, 45(61-76).10.1518/hfes.45.1.61.2722412916582]Search in Google Scholar
[USAF. (2000). Air Force Manual on Instrument Flight. Retrieved. from.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, P. (2009). Editorial: What makes JAGI special. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 1-2.10.2478/v10229-011-0001-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress with a model of visual search. In W. Gray (Ed.), Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems (pp. 99-119). New York: Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wray, R. E., & Jones, R. M. (2005). An introduction to Soar as an agent architecture. In R. Sun (Ed.), Cognition and Multi-agent Interaction: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation (pp. 53-78): Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar