[Ayres, Ian and John Braithwithe. 1992. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the DeregulationDebate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Box, Richard C. 2004. “Alternatives to Representative Primacy and Administrative Efficiency” Administrative Theory & Praxis 26(4), 588 - 608.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferlie, Ewan, Louise Fitzgerald, Gerry McGivern, Sue Dopson and Chris Bennett. 2011. “Public Policy Networks and ‘Wicked Problems’: A Nascent Solution ?” Public Administration 89(2), 307 - 324.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fukuyama, Francis. 2004. “Why There Is No Science of Public Administration.” Journal of International Affairs 58(1), 189 - 201.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gajduschek, Gyorgy. 2008. Rendnek lenni kellene: Tények es elemzések a közigazgatásellenőrzési es bírságolási tevékenységéről. Budapest: KSZK.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haerpfer, Christian W. 2006. “Hungary: Structure and Dynamics of Democratic Consolidation.” In Hans-Dieter Klingelman, Dieter Fuchs and Jan Zielonka (eds). Democracy and Political Culture and Eastern Europe. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 148 - 171.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hajnal, Gyorgy. 2011. “Studying Dynamics of Government Agencies: Conceptual and Methodological Results of a Hungarian Organizational Mapping Exercise.” 6th ECPR General Conference, 25 - 27 August 2011, Reykjavik, Iceland. Available at http://www.ecprnet.eu/MyECPR/proposals/reykjavik/uploads/papers/1003.pdf (last accessed 21.11.2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hajnal, Gyorgy. 2008. “Public Management Reforms: Hungary.” In Geert Bouckaert, Juraj Nemec, Vitalis Nakrošis, Gyorgy Hajnal and Kristiina Tonnisson (eds). Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava, Slovakia: NISPAcee Press, 121 - 150.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hajnal, Gyorgy and Gyorgy Jenei. 2008. “Kozigazgatasi rendszerek valamint kozmenedzsment-tudomany es kepzes Europaban es Magyarorszagon.” Köz-Gazdaság (4), 21 - 42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hazafi, Zoltan. 2011 “Uj kozszolgalati eletpalya.” In Marton Gellen (ed.). Új feladatok- átalakuló közszolgálat. Tanulmányok a II: Magyary Zoltán emlékkonferenciakapcsán. Budapest: NKI, conference paper, 33 - 48.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kornai, Janos. 2006. “The Great Transformation of Central Eastern Europe.” Economicsof Transition 14(2), 207 - 244.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuti, Eva 2011. “Government-Nonprofit Sector Relations in Hungary: Aspirations, Efforts and Impacts.” In Susan D. Philips and Steven Rathgeb Smith (eds). Government and Regulation of the Third Sector: International Perspectives. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 142 - 163.]Search in Google Scholar
[Neshkova, Milena I. and Tatiana Konstandinova. 2012. “The Effectiveness of Administrative Reform is New Democracies.” Public Administration Review 72(3), 324 - 333.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2008. Reforms for Stability and Sustainable Growth. An OECD Perspective onHungary. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters, B. Guy. 2009. “The Two Futures of Governing: Decentering and Recentering Processes in Governing.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration andPolicy 2(1), 7 - 22.]Search in Google Scholar
[Solyom, Laszlo. 2003. “The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Transition to Democracy.” International Sociology 18(1), 133 - 161.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2003. Roaring Ninties. A New History of the World’s Most ProsperousDecade. New York, USA: W.W. Norton & Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vigvari, Andras. 2011. Önkormányzati pénzügyek: Hazai kihívások és nemzetközipéldák. Budapest: State Audit Office of Hungary. ]Search in Google Scholar
