Journal Details
Format
Journal
eISSN
1407-6179
First Published
20 Mar 2000
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

# Identifying Vehicle and Collision Impact by Applying the Principle of Conservation of Mechanical Energy

###### Page range:191 - 204
Journal Details
Format
Journal
eISSN
1407-6179
First Published
20 Mar 2000
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English

Various methodologies and tools applied to identification of vehicle and collision impact seek to present more and more accurate solutions to reproduce, restore, recreate and investigate the casualty. Modern computer technology and software provide the tools to solve specific problems developing mathematical modelling of complex mechanical systems involving vehicles and other objects in a road accident. Scientists generally utilize the Standard Test Method for Impact Testing calculating the energy of deformation of both vehicles, however, one of its limitations is the evaluation of the kinetic energy of the vehicles in post-collision taking into consideration vehicle rotation and linear displacement. To improve the analysis, dynamic traffic simulation is used, taking into account the variations in the coefficient of friction, suspension elasticity and damping. The proposed method is based on a system of two equations derived from two principles: the Principle of Conservation of Mechanical Energy and the Principle of Conservation of Momentum in the impact phase. The new approach is conducted on mathematical modelling and computer simulation of vehicle motion after the impact, wherefrom the linear and angular velocities are analysed. This is achieved by the numerical solution of the differential equations of motion of the cars after the impact, and the given initial conditions that satisfy the solution are used to solve the system of equations. The main findings of the study can be grouped as follows: 1) The positions of the vehicles prior to the moment of first impact and the post-impact orientation of velocity vectors are more precise. 2) The variability of the tire-road friction coefficient is taken into consideration. 3) The value of coefficient of restitution according to Newton’s theory of impact is unnecessarily determined.

#### Keywords

1. Campbell, K. (1974) Energy basis for collision severity, SAE Technical Paper Series, no. 740565.Search in Google Scholar

2. Campbell, L. (1974) Energy Basis for Collision Severity. SAE Paper 740565.10.4271/740565Search in Google Scholar

3. Daily, J., Shigemura, N., Daily, J. (2006) Fundamentals of Traffic Crash Reconstruction. Jacksonville, Florida: Institute of Police Technology and Management, University of North Florida.Search in Google Scholar

4. Hibbeler, R. (2004) Engineering Mechanics: Dynamics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 10th ed.Search in Google Scholar

5. Hight, P., Kent-Koop, D., Hight, R. (1985) Barrier equivalent velocity, delta v and CRASH3 stiffness in automobile collisions, SAE Technical Paper Series, no. 850437.Search in Google Scholar

6. James, A., Neptune and James E. Flynn (1994) A Method for Determining Accident Specific Crush Stiffness Coefficients. SAE Transactions.10.4271/940913Search in Google Scholar

7. Jiang, T., Grzebieta, R. H., Rechnitzer, G., Richardson, S.; Zhao, X. L. (2003) Review of Car Frontal Stiffness Equations for Estimating Vehicle Impact Velocities. The 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference (ESV), Nagoya.Search in Google Scholar

8. Karapetkov, S. (2005) Auto Technical Expertise, Technical University - Sofia, Bulgaria.Search in Google Scholar

9. Karapetkov, S. (2010) Investigation of road traffic accident, technical commentary on the lawyer. Technical University of Sofia, Bulgaria.Search in Google Scholar

10. Karapetkov, S., Uzunov, H. (2016) Dynamics of transverse resistance of a car. Didada Consult – Sofia, Bulgaria.Search in Google Scholar

11. Mchenry, R., Mchenry, G. (1986) A Revised Damage Analysis Procedure for the CRASH Computer Program. SAE Paper 861894.10.4271/861894Search in Google Scholar

12. Neptune, J., Blair, G., Flynn, J. (1992) A method for quantifying vehicle crush stiffness coefficients, SAE Technical Paper Series, no. 920607.Search in Google Scholar

13. Niehoff, P., Gabler, C. (2006) The Accuracy of WinSMASH Delta-V Estimates: The Influence of Vehicle Type, Stiffness, and Impact Mode.” In: the 50th Annual Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2006; 50: 73-89, Chicago, ILSearch in Google Scholar

14. Nolan, M., Preuss, A., Jones, L., O’Neill, B. (1998) An Update on Relationships between Computed Delta-Vs and Impact Speeds for Offset Crashes.” In: the Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (Windsor, Canada, June 1998), Paper No. 98-S6-O-07.Search in Google Scholar

15. Owsiański, R. (2007) Szacowanie energii deformacji nadwozi kompaktowych samochodów osobowych (Estimation of the bodywork deformation energy of compact passenger cars). Paragraf na Drodze No.4.Search in Google Scholar

16. Prasad, K. (1990) CRASH3 Damage Algorithm Reformulation for Front and Rear Collisions. SAE 900098.10.4271/900098Search in Google Scholar

17. Schmidt, B., Haight, W., Szabo, T., Welcher, J. (1998) System-based energy and momentum analysis of collisions, In: Accident Reconstruction: Technology and Animation VIII SP-1319, no. 980026, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, February.10.4271/980026Search in Google Scholar

18. Sharma, D., Stern, S., Brophy, J. (2007) An Overview of NHTSA’s Crash Reconstruction Software WinSMASH. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Paper No. 07-0211, Lyon, France.Search in Google Scholar

19. Stronge, W. (2000) Impact Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511626432Search in Google Scholar

20. Stucki, L., (1998) Fessahaie Comparison of Measured Velocity Change in Frontal Crash Tests to NASS Computed Velocity Change. SAE 980649, Society of Automotive Engineers.10.4271/980649Search in Google Scholar

21. Vangi, D. (2009) Simplified Method for Evaluating Energy Loss in Vehicle Collisions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41.10.1016/j.aap.2009.02.01219393816Search in Google Scholar

22. Wach, W. (2003) Analiza deformacji samochodu według standardu CRASH3. Część 2: Pomiar głębokości odkształcenia (Analysis of motor vehicle deformation according to the CRASH3 standard. Part 2: Measurement of deformation depth). Paragraf na Drodze No. 12.Search in Google Scholar

23. Wicher, J. (2006) Energetyczne metody analizy, Scientific and Educational Conference “Development of automotive engineering versus motor insurance”, Radom.Search in Google Scholar

• #### Feature Selection Method for Ml/Dl Classification of Network Attacks in Digital Forensics

Recommended articles from Trend MD