[
1. Lang J. Clinical anatomy of the masticatory apparatus and peripharyngeal spaces. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme Publishing Group; 1995. 3-8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Barteczko K, Jacob M. A re-evaluation of the premaxillary bone in humans. Anatomy and Embryology. 2004;207(6):417-437.10.1007/s00429-003-0366-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Sperber GH, Sperber SS, Guttmann GD. Craniofacial embryogenetics and development. 2nd. Shelton: People's Medical; 2010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Trevizan M, Consolaro A. Premaxilla: an independent bone that can base therapeutics for middle third growth! Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2017;22(2):21-26.10.1590/2177-6709.22.2.021-026.oin
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Starczewska M, Motyl S, Lipski M, Loster B. Premaxilla - development and significance in humans - systematic review of literature. Czas Stomatol. 2014;67(3):381-95.10.5604/00114553.1111280
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Sarver, D.M. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am. J. Orthod. 2001, 120, 98-111. 39810.1067/mod.2001.11430111500650
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Zachrisson, B.U. Esthetic factors involved in anterior tooth display and the smile; vertical dimension. J. Clin. Orthod. 1998, 32, 399 432-445. 400
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Riedel, R.A. Esthetics and its relation to orthodontic therapy. Angle Orthod, 1950, 20, 168-178.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Ackerman JL, Proffit WR, Sarver DM. The emerging soft tissue paradigm in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Clin Orthod Res. 1999;2:49-52.10.1111/ocr.1999.2.2.49
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Graber LW, Vanarsdall Jr RL, Vig KW. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2011. p. 15-7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Tian YL, Liu F, Sun HJ, Lv P, Cao YM, Yu M, et al. Alveolar bone thickness around maxillary central incisors of different inclination assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod. 2015;45:245-52.10.4041/kjod.2015.45.5.245
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Handelman CS. The anterior alveolus: its importance in limiting orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:95-109.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Proffit W, Fields H, Sarver D. Contemporary orthodontics. 5th ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Ma J, Huang J, Jiang J. Morphological analysis of the alveolar bone of the anterior teeth in severe high-angle skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(3):e0210461.10.1371/journal.pone.0210461
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Castro Rodríguez Y, Grados Pomarino S. Orthodontic dental movement and its association with the presence of gingival recession. Revista Odontológica Mexicana. 2017;21(1):e8-e11.10.1016/j.rodmex.2017.02.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Parker RJ, Harris EF. Directions of orthodontic tooth movements associated with external apical root resorption of the maxillary central incisor. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Dec;114(6):677-83. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70200-8. PMID: 9844208.10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70200-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Sarver DM. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2001;120:98-111.10.1067/mod.2001.114301
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Turley PK. Evolution of esthetic considerations in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2015;148: 374-9.10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.01026321334
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Sarver DM. Interactions of hard tissues, soft tissues, and growth over time, and their impact on orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2015;148:380-6.10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.030
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Shuying Y, Yunfei G, Xianrui Y, Feng Z, Jian W, Jingyi Q, et al. Effect of mesiodistal angulation of the maxillary central incisors on esthetic Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2015;148:396-404.10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.03.021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Spear FM, Kokich VG, Mathews DP. Interdisciplinary management of anterior dental esthetics. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137:160-9.10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0140
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Gull M, Maqbool S, Mushtaq M, Ahmad A. Evaluation of Morphologic Features and Proximity of Incisive Canal to the Maxillary Central Incisors Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS). 2018;17(01):46-50.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Chung CJ, Choi YJ, Kim KH. Approximation and contact of the maxillary central incisor roots with the incisive canal after maximum retraction with temporary anchorage devices: Report of 2 patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Sep;148(3):493-502. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.033. PMID: 26321347.10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.033
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Milanovic, P.; Selakovic, D.; Vasiljevic, M.; Jovicic, N.U.; Milovanovi´c, D.; Vasovic, M.; Rosic, G. Morphological Characteristics of the Nasopalatine Canal and the Relationship with the Anterior Maxillary Bone—A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 915. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics1105091510.3390/diagnostics11050915
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Liang, X.; Jacobs, R.; Martens, W.; Hu, Y.; Adriaensens, P.; Quirynen, M.; Lambrichts, I. Macro- and micro-anatomical, histological and computed tomography scan characterization of the nasopalatine canal. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2009, 36, 598-603. [CrossRef]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Uesugi, S.; Imamura, T.; Kokai, S.; Ono, T. Cone-beam computed tomography-based diagnosis and treatment simulation for a patient with a protrusive profile and a gummy smile. Korean J. Orthod. 2018, 48, 189-199.10.4041/kjod.2018.48.3.189
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Vasiljevic, M.; Milanovic, P.; Jovicic, N.; Vasovic, M.; Milovanovic, D.; Vojinovic, R.; Selakovic, D.; Rosic, G. Morphological and Morphometric Characteristics of Anterior Maxilla Accessory Canals and Relationship with Nasopalatine Canal Type—A CBCT Study. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1510. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics1108151010.3390/diagnostics11081510
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Ahn H, Moon S, Baek S. Morphometric evaluation of changes in the alveolar bone and roots of the maxillary anterior teeth before and after en masse retraction using cone-beam computed tomography. The Angle Orthodontist. 2012;83(2):212-221.10.2319/041812-325.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Wehrbein H, Bauer W, Diedrich P. Mandibular incisors alveolar bone, and symphysis after orthodontic treatment. A retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1996;110(3):239-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-54 06(96)80006-0.10.1016/S0889-5406(96)80006-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Wehrbein H, Fuhrmann RA, Diedrich PR. Periodontal conditions after facial root tipping and palatal root torque of incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1994;106(5):455-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70067-2.10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70067-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Wainwright WM. Faciolingual tooth movement - its influence on root and cortical plate. Am J Orthod. 1973;64(3):278-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(73)90021-3.10.1016/0002-9416(73)90021-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Joss-Vassalli I, Grebenstein C, Topouzelis N, Sculean A, Katsaros C. Orthodontic therapy and gingival recession: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2010;13(3):127-41.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01491.x.10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01491.x20618715
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Enhos S, Uysal T, Yagci A, Veli İ, Ucar FI, Ozer T. Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with different vertical growth patterns assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2012;82:868-7410.2319/111211-702.1882311922356702
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Segal GR, Schiffman PH, Tuncay OC. Meta analysis of the treatment-related factors of external apical root resorption. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2004;7:71-8.10.1111/j.1601-6343.2004.00286.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Nakada T, Motoyoshi M, Horinuki E, Shimizu N. Conebeam computed tomography evaluation of the association of cortical plate proximity and apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment. J Oral Sci. 2016;58:231-6.10.2334/josnusd.15-0566
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Hong, S.Y.; Shin, J.W.; Hong, C.; Chan, V.; Baik, U.B.; Kim, Y.H.; Chae, H.S. Alveolar bone remodeling during maxillary incisor intrusion and retraction. Prog. Orthod. 2019, 20, 47.10.1186/s40510-019-0300-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Rudolph CE. An evaluation of root resorption during orthodontic treatment. J Dent Res 1940;19:367-71.10.1177/00220345400190040301
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. DeShields RW. A study of root resorption in treated Class II Division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 1969;39:231-45.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Sjølien T, Zachrisson BU. Periodontal bone support and tooth length in orthodontically treated and untreated persons. Am J Orthod 1973;64:28-37.10.1016/0002-9416(73)90278-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Linge BO, Linge L. Apical root resorption in upper anterior teeth. Eur J Orthod 1983;5:173-83.10.1093/ejo/5.3.1736578039
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Ono, T. Should the "envelope of discrepancy" be revised in the era of three-dimensional imaging? J. World. Fed. Orthod. 2020, 9, 419 59-66.10.1016/j.ejwf.2020.08.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Sheerah H, Othman B, Jaafar A, Alsharif A. Alveolar bone plate measurements of maxillary anterior teeth: A retrospective Cone Beam Computed Tomography study, AlMadianh, Saudi Arabia. The Saudi Dental Journal. 2019;31(4):437-444.10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.04.007682381131700220
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Fuentes R, Flores T, Navarro P, Salamanca C, Beltrán V, Borie E. Assessment of buccal bone thickness of aesthetic maxillary region: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science. 2015;45(5):162.10.5051/jpis.2015.45.5.162463543726550524
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Zhang W, Skrypczak A, Weltman R. Anterior maxilla alveolar ridge dimension and morphology measurement by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) for immediate implant treatment planning. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15(1).10.1186/s12903-015-0055-1446066226059796
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Papadopoulou AK, Papageorgiou SN, Hatzopoulos SA, Tsirlis A, Athanasiou AE. Alveolar ridge alterations in the maxillary anterior region after tooth extraction through orthodontic forced eruption for implant site development: a clinical CBCT study. Eur J Orthod. 2020 Jun 23;42(3):295-304. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz028. PMID: 31081905.10.1093/ejo/cjz02831081905
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Soumya P, Koppolu P, Pathakota K, Chappidi V. Maxillary Incisive Canal Characteristics: A Radiographic Study Using Cone Beam Computerized Tomography. Radiology Research and Practice. 2019;2019:1-5.10.1155/2019/6151253645730631032120
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Peñarrocha M, Carrillo C, Uribe R, García B. The nasopalatinecanal as an anatomic buttress for implant placement in theseverely atrophic maxilla: a pilot study. Int J Oral MaxillofacImplants. 2009; 24(5): 936-942.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Costa EDD, Nejaim Y, Martins LAC, Peyneau PD, Ambrosano GMB, Oliveira ML. Morphological Evaluation of the Nasopalatine Canal in Patients With Different Facial Profiles and Ages. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; (4): 721-729.10.1016/j.joms.2018.11.02530597135
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Mardinger O, Namani SN, Chaushu G, Schwartz AD. Morphologic Changes of the Nasopalatine Canal Related to Dental Implantation: A Radiologic Study in Different Degrees of Absorbed Maxillae. J Periodontol. 2008; 79 (9): 1659-1662.10.1902/jop.2008.08004318771366
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Güncü GN, Yıldırım YD, Yılmaz HG, Galindo-Moreno P, Velasco-Torres M, Al-Hezaimi, K, Al-Shawaf R, Karabulut E, Wang, H.L, Tözüm TF. Is there a gender difference in anatomic features of incisive canal and maxillary environmental bone? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24 (9): 1023-102610.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02493.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Milanovic P, Vasiljevic M. Gender Differences in the Morphological Characteristics of the Nasopalatine Canal and the Anterior Maxillary Bone - CBCT Study. Serbian Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research. 2021;0(0).10.2478/sjecr-2021-0029
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Weltman B, Vig KW, Fields HW, Shanker S, Kaizar EE. Root resorption associated with orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010; 137:462-76.10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.02120362905
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. Von Arx, T.; Lozanoff, S.; Sendi, P.; Bornstein, M.M. Assessment of bone channels other than the nasopalatine canal in the anterior maxilla using limited cone beam computed tomography. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2013, 35, 783-790. [CrossRef]10.1007/s00276-013-1110-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. De Oliveira-Santos, C.; Rubira-Bullen, I.R.; Monteiro, S.A.; León, J.E.; Jacobs, R. Neurovascular anatomical variations in the anterior palate observed on CBCT images. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2013, 24, 1044-1048. [CrossRef]10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02497.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. Shah, P.N.; Arora, A.V.; Kapoor, S.V. Accessory branch of canalis sinuosus mimicking external root resorption: A diagnostic dilemma. J. Conserv. Dent. 2017, 20, 479-481. [CrossRef] [PubMed]10.4103/JCD.JCD_375_16
]Search in Google Scholar
[
56. Lopes Dos Santos, G.; Ikuta, C.R.S.; Salzedas, L.M.P.; Miyahara, G.I.; Tjioe, K.C. Canalis sinuosus: An Anatomic Repair that May Prevent Success of Dental Implants in Anterior Maxilla. J. Prosthodont. 2020, 29, 751-755. [CrossRef] [PubMed]10.1111/jopr.13256
]Search in Google Scholar
[
57. Lombardo G, Vena F, Negri P, Pagano S, Barilotti C, Paglia L, Colombo S, Orso M, Cianetti S. Worldwide prevalence of malocclusion in the different stages of dentition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2020 Jun;21(2):115-122. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2020.21.02.05. PMID: 32567942.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
58. Chappuis, V., Engel, O., Reyes, M., Shahim, K., Nolte, L.P. & Buser, D. (2013) Ridge alterations postextraction in the esthetic zone: A 3D analysis with CBCT. Journal of Dental Research 92 (Suppl 12): 195S201S.10.1177/0022034513506713386006824158340
]Search in Google Scholar
[
59. Chhatwani S, Rose-Zierau V, Haddad B, Almuzian M, Kirschneck C, Danesh G. Three-dimensional quantitative assessment of palatal bone height for insertion of orthodontic implants - a retrospective CBCT study. Head & Face Medicine. 2019;15(1).10.1186/s13005-019-0193-9644243430935392
]Search in Google Scholar
[
60. Sun Q, Lu W, Zhang Y, Peng L, Chen S, Han B. Morphological changes of the anterior alveolar bone due to retraction of anterior teeth: a retrospective study. Head & Face Medicine. 2021;17(1).10.1186/s13005-021-00277-z828400934271939
]Search in Google Scholar
[
61. Lund H, Grondahl K, Grondahl HG. Cone beam computed tomography evaluations of marginal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic treatment combined with premolar extractions. Eur J Oral Sci. 2012;120(3): 201 - 11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2012.00964.x.10.1111/j.1600-0722.2012.00964.x22607336
]Search in Google Scholar
[
62. Maspero C, Gaffuri F, Castro IO, Lanteri V, Ugolini A, Farronato M. Correlation between dental vestibular-palatal inclination and alveolar bone remodeling after orthodontic treatment: a CBCT analysis. Materials (Basel). 2019;12:4225.10.3390/ma12244225694722331888251
]Search in Google Scholar
[
63. Castro LO, Castro IO, de Alencar AHG, Valladares- Neto J, Estrela C. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of distance from cementoenamel junction to alveolar crest before and after nonextraction orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2016;86:543-54.10.2319/040815-235.1860149626379114
]Search in Google Scholar
[
64. Chaimongkol P, Thongudomporn U, Lindauer SJ. Alveolar bone response to light-force tipping and bodily movement in maxillary incisor advancement: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2018 Jan;88(1):58-66. doi: 10.2319/070717-449.1. Epub 2017 Oct 30. PMID: 29083225; PMCID: PMC8315714.10.2319/070717-449.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
65. Cassetta M, Sofan AA, Altieri F, Barbato E. Evaluation of alveolar cortical bone thickness and density for orthodontic mini-implant placement. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013 Dec 1;5(5):e245-52. doi: 10.4317/jced.51228. PMID: 24455090; PMCID: PMC3892271.10.4317/jced.51228
]Search in Google Scholar
[
66. Lee KJ, Joo E, Kim KD, Lee JS, Park YC, Yu HS. Computed tomographic analysis of tooth-bearing alveolar bone for orthodontic miniscrew placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:486-94.10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
67. Lim JE, Lee SJ, Kim YJ, Lim WH, Chun YS. Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2009 Nov;12(4):299-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01465.x. PMID: 19840282.10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01465.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
68. Maong N, Charoemratrote C, Leethanakul C. Factors related to alveolar bone thickness during upper incisor retraction. The Angle Orthodontist. 2012;83(3):394-401.10.2319/062912-534.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
69. Thongudomporn U, Charoemratrote C, Jearapongpakorn S. Changes of anterior maxillary alveolar bone thickness following incisor proclination and extrusion. Angle Orthod. 2015 Jul;85(4):549-54. doi: 10.23 19/051614-352.1. Epub 2014 Sep 10. PMID: 25208232.10.2319/051614-352.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
70. AlTarawneh S, AlHadidi A, Hamdan A, Shaqman M, Habib E. Assessment of Bone Dimensions in the Anterior Maxilla: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2017;27(4):321-328.10.1111/jopr.12675
]Search in Google Scholar
[
71. Nayak Krishna US, Shetty A, Girija MP, Nayak R. Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth during orthodontic treatment: a cephalometric and computed tomography comparative study. Indian J Dent Res. 2013 Nov-Dec;24(6):736-41. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.127623. PMID: 24552936.10.4103/0970-9290.127623
]Search in Google Scholar
[
72. Sarikaya S, Haydar B, Ciger S, Ariyurek M. Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:15-26.10.1067/mod.2002.119804
]Search in Google Scholar
[
73. Vardimon AD, Basset B. Cortical bone remodeling/tooth movement ratio during maxillary incisor retraction with tip versus torque movements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:520-529.10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70172-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
74. Lake, S.; Iwanaga, J.; Kikuta, S.; Oskouian, R.J.; Loukasm, M.; Tubbs, R.S. The inicisve canal: A comprehensive review. Cureus 2018, 10, e3069.10.7759/cureus.3069616691130280065
]Search in Google Scholar
[
75. Fukuda, M.; Matsunaga, S.; Odaka, K.; Oomine, Y.; Kasahara, M.; Yamamoto, M.; Abe, S. Three-dimensional analysis of incisive canals in human dentulous and edentulous maxillary bones. Int. J. Implant Dent. 2015, 1, 1210.1186/s40729-015-0012-4500566627747634
]Search in Google Scholar
[
76. Gil-Marques, B.; Sanchis-Gimeno, J.A.; Brizuela-Velasco, A.; Perez-Bermejo M.; Larrazábal-Morón, C. Differences in the shape and direction-course of the nasopalatine canal among dentate, partially edentulous and completely edentulous subjects. Anat. Sci. Int. 2020, 95, 76-84.10.1007/s12565-019-00496-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
77. Thakur, A.R.; Burde, K.; Guttal, K.; Naikmasur, V.G. Anatomy and morphology of the nasopalatine canal using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci. Dent. 2013, 43, 273-281.10.5624/isd.2013.43.4.273
]Search in Google Scholar
[
78. Bornstein, M.M.; Balsiger, R.; Sendi, P.; von Arx, T. Morphology of the nasopalatine canal and dental implant surgery: a radio-graphic analysis of 100 consecutive patients using limited cone-beam computed tomography. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2011, 22, 295-301.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02010.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
79. Mraiwa, N.; Jacobs, R.; Van Cleynenbreugel, J.; Sanderink, G.; Schutyser, F.; Suetens, P.; Van Steenberghe, D.; Quirynen, M. The nasopalatine canal revisited using 2D and 3D CT imaging. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2004, 33, 396-402. 48010.1259/dmfr/53801969
]Search in Google Scholar
[
80. Al-Amery, S.M.; Nambiar, P.; Jamaludin, M.; John, J.; Ngeow, W.C. Cone beam computed tomography assessment of the maxillary incisive canal and foramen: considerations of anatomical variations when placing immediate implants. PLoS One 2015, 10, e0117251.10.1371/journal.pone.0117251433250225679505
]Search in Google Scholar
[
81. Kim, Y.T.; Lee, J.H.; Jeong, S.N. Three-dimensional observations of the incisive foramen on cone-beam computed tomography image analysis. J. Periodontal Implant Sci. 2020, 50, 48-55.10.5051/jpis.2020.50.1.48
]Search in Google Scholar
[
82. Khojastepour, L.; Haghnegahdar, A.; Keshtkar, M. Morphology and Dimensions of Nasopalatine Canal: a Radiographic Analysis Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. J. Dent. (Shiraz), 2017, 18, 244-250.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
83. Zhou, Z.; Chen, W.; Shen, M.; Sun, C.; Li, J.; Chen, N. Cone beam computed tomographic analyses of alveolar bone anatomy at the maxillary anterior region in Chinese adults. J. Biomed. Res. 2014, 28, 498-505.10.7555/JBR.27.20130002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
84. Kajan, Z.D.; Kia, J.; Motevasseli, S.; Rezaian, S.R. Evaluation of the nasopalatine canal with cone-beam computed tomography in an Iranian population. Dent. Res. J. (Isfahan). 2015, 12, 14-1910.4103/1735-3327.150289
]Search in Google Scholar
[
85. Khurana, S.; Parasher, P.; Mukherjee, P.; Mupparapu, M.; Lotlikar, P.P.; Creanga, A.G. Cone beam computed tomographic-based retrospective study on newark population for the assessment of distance between incisive canal and maxillary central incisors: Clinical implications. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2020, 31, 175-179.10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_88_19
]Search in Google Scholar
[
86. Chung, C.J.; Nguyen, T.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, K.H. Incisive canal remodelling following maximum anterior retraction reduces apical root resorption. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 2021, 24, 59-65.10.1111/ocr.12464
]Search in Google Scholar
[
87. Pan Y, Chen S. Contact of the incisive canal and upper central incisors causing root resorption after retraction with orthodontic mini-implants: A CBCT study. The Angle Orthodontist. 2018;89(2):200-205.10.2319/042318-311.1812087630484326
]Search in Google Scholar
[
88. Matsumura, T.; Ishida, Y.; Kawabe, A.; Ono T. Quantitative analysis of the relationship between maxillary incisors and the incisive canal by cone-beam computed tomography in an adult Japanese population. Prog. Orthod. 2017, 18, 24.10.1186/s40510-017-0181-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
89. Cho, E.A.; Kim, S.J.; Choi, Y.J.; Kim, K.H.; Chung, C.J. Morphologic evaluation of the incisive canal and its proximity to the maxillary central incisors using computed tomography images. Angle Orthod. 2016, 86, 571-576.10.2319/063015-433.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
90. Liang X, Jacobs R, Martens W, Hu Y, Adriaensens P, Quirynen M, et al. Macro- and micro-anatomical, histological and computed tomography scan characterization of the nasopalatine canal. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36: 598-603.10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01429.x19538333
]Search in Google Scholar
[
91. Song WC, Jo DI, Lee JY, Kim JN, Hur MS, Hu KS, et al. Microanatomy of the incisive canal using three-dimensional reconstruction of microCT images: an ex vivo study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 108:583-90.10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.06.03619778745
]Search in Google Scholar
[
92. Orhan K, Gorurgoz C, Akyol M, Ozarslanturk S, Avsever H. An anatomical variant: evaluation of accessory canals of the canalis sinuosus using cone beam computed tomography. Folia Morphol (Warsz), 2018;77:551-557.10.5603/FM.a2018.000329345719
]Search in Google Scholar
[
93. Shelley AM, Rushton VE, Horner K. Canalis sinuosus mimicking a periapical inflammatory lesion. Br Dent J,1999;186:378-379.10.1038/sj.bdj.4800116a
]Search in Google Scholar
[
94. Aoki R, Massuda M, Zenni LTV, Fernandes KS. Canalis sinuosus: anatomical variation or structure? Surg Radiol Anat, 2020;42:69-74.10.1007/s00276-019-02352-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
95. Şalli G, Öztürkmen Z. Evaluation of Location of Canalis Sinuosus in the Maxilla Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine. 2021;25(1):7-12.10.2478/bjdm-2020-0032
]Search in Google Scholar
